Re: Extending Sparql with New Keywords

This is actually a part of my master thesis, I will also extend the processor and add my own functions according to the keywords. Basically my aim is to form a new language by extending sparql 1.1. 2018-02-05 23:55 GMT+02:00 Martynas Jusevičius : > Berkin, > > unless

Re: Extending Sparql with New Keywords

Berkin, unless this is some kind of exercise, is this really a good idea? What would be the adoption rate of your new language? All SPARQL 1.1 processors will report errors in your extended syntax. On Mon, Feb 5, 2018 at 9:42 PM, Berkin Özdemir Bengisu < berkinozdemirbeng...@gmail.com> wrote: >

Extending Sparql with New Keywords

Hello, I am using jena 3.6.0 and I would like to extend the sparql 1.1 grammar with some new keywords. Could you please help me what would be the best way to start with? - As I understood, the grammar is generated by javaCC but I was unable to find any documentation or any main classes that

Re: Limit memory usage of Fuseki server?

Can you tell us more about your configuration, data, workload, and the timing of the problem? ajs6f > On Feb 5, 2018, at 7:08 AM, Laura Morales wrote: > > You can tell the Kernel to limit memory usage per process or per user. If you > set the limit too low your process

Re: Limit memory usage of Fuseki server?

You can tell the Kernel to limit memory usage per process or per user. If you set the limit too low your process will be killed because it can't allocate more memory, but you can tell the Kernel to only limit resident memory while using up all the virtual memory it wants. You can do this with

Limit memory usage of Fuseki server?

We have a cloud server with 4gb of memory and after a while system is killing Fuseki server java process for using up all memory. Is it possible to limit memory usage, and what would be the performance penalty for doing that? Thanks. -- Lingsoft - 30 years of Leading Language Management