Apache Jena tdbloader performance and limits

2020-05-19 Thread Wolfgang Fahl
Dear Apache Jena users, Some 2 years ago Laura Morlaes and Dick Murray had an exchange on this list on how to influence the performance of tdbloader. The issue is currently of interest for me again in the context of trying to load some 15 billion triples from a copy of wikidata. At http://wiki.bit

Re: SHACL Endpoint questions

2020-05-19 Thread Andy Seaborne
On 19/05/2020 18:44, Chris Tomlinson wrote: Hi Andy, Thanks for the very helpful feedback. 1) I did not understand the proper use of sh:inversePath. I thought it was to verify that the target of the target/value of the sh:path property had a property equal to the value of sh:inversePath. I

Re: SHACL Endpoint questions

2020-05-19 Thread Chris Tomlinson
Hi Andy, Thanks for the very helpful feedback. 1) I did not understand the proper use of sh:inversePath. I thought it was to verify that the target of the target/value of the sh:path property had a property equal to the value of sh:inversePath. I see that is just not correct. 2) I’ve found an

Re: Fuseki 3.15.0 logging problems

2020-05-19 Thread Andy Seaborne
Franco, Thank you very much for the report and investigation. It does indeed impact the shaded jar in the apache-jena-fuseki download. The war file form works. The other one shaded jar - jena-fuseki-server AKA "Fuseki main" also seems to work although I can't see why they are different. (this

Fuseki 3.15.0 logging problems

2020-05-19 Thread Franco Venturi
I just downloaded and started Fuseki 3.15.0, and I am now receiving several error messages related to the logging subsystem when it starts up (timestamps are in UTC): 2020-05-19 15:05:43,040 main ERROR Unrecognized format specifier [d] 2020-05-19 15:05:43,116 main ERROR Unrecognized conversion

Re: SPIN constraint validation differs on 3.0.1 and 3.16.0-SNAPSHOT

2020-05-19 Thread Andy Seaborne
That's a long jump. (and it's a SpinRDF question) >> Are there some obvious suspects here or do I need to create a >> reproducible example? reproducible example (noting that the query has custom functions which have names that suggest they are not proper "functions" (i.e. their return is not

Re: SPIN constraint validation differs on 3.0.1 and 3.16.0-SNAPSHOT

2020-05-19 Thread Martynas Jusevičius
With 3.0.1, no such internal *violations* are produced. On Tue, May 19, 2020 at 2:03 PM Martynas Jusevičius wrote: > > Hi, > > After upgrading our code as well as SPINRDF from 3.0.1 to > 3.16.0-SNAPSHOT, some constraint violation-related tests are failing. > > With 3.16.0-SNAPSHOT, it seems that

SPIN constraint validation differs on 3.0.1 and 3.16.0-SNAPSHOT

2020-05-19 Thread Martynas Jusevičius
Hi, After upgrading our code as well as SPINRDF from 3.0.1 to 3.16.0-SNAPSHOT, some constraint violation-related tests are failing. With 3.16.0-SNAPSHOT, it seems that a bunch of constraint violations are coming from the SPIN vocabulary iself, e.g. "Attribute spin:body : [0,1]" on spin:Construct

[ANN] Apache Jena 3.15.0

2020-05-19 Thread Andy Seaborne
The Apache Jena development community is pleased to announce the release of Apache Jena 3.15.0. This release includes experimental support for RDF* in Fuseki. https://jena.apache.org/documentation/rdfstar/ == Contributions and notable JIRA For a full list of tickets for this release, see: ht