Re: SPARQL does not match xsd:hexBinary literals?

I managed to reproduce something, I think - the BGP with an explicit ^^xsd:hexBinary fails to match: https://github.com/namedgraph/jena-test/blob/master/src/test/java/SPARQLTest.java However it fails on both 3.0.1 and 3.16.0-SNAPSHOT. In the actual code I'm observing a query with xsd:hexBinary whi

Re: SPARQL does not match xsd:hexBinary literals?

After double checking, this does not return results with 3.0.1 either... On Wed, Jul 8, 2020 at 11:53 AM Martynas Jusevičius wrote: > > Hi, > > after the upgrade to 3.16.0-SNAPSHOT some queries that worked with > 3.0.1 do not return results anymore. > > I tried to narrow it down to a test case: >

SPARQL does not match xsd:hexBinary literals?

Hi, after the upgrade to 3.16.0-SNAPSHOT some queries that worked with 3.0.1 do not return results anymore. I tried to narrow it down to a test case: private final String data = "

Re: Blank node URI scheme

The restriction on BOUND(?var) is done as a syntax restriction. Internally, BOUND(constant) is possible and is true (it's a variable replaced so it is true) and will execute. See JENA-1044. On 06/07/2020 15:39, Martynas Jusevičius wrote: As I'm reading the spec, bound() is used with variables