Thanks Andy
On 2020/07/09 08:33:36, Andy Seaborne wrote:
> There is a problem with the Apache Jena Fuseki v3.15.0 combined jar
> (fuseki-server.jar, not the war file packaging, nor the non-UI
> jena-fuseki-server form).
>
> It is a bug in v 3.15.0 only, not in 3.14.0, and will be fixed in 3.1
My bad. "a0" is legal, right?
Updated the test once again.
On Thu, Jul 9, 2020 at 6:58 PM Andy Seaborne wrote:
>
>
>
> On 09/07/2020 13:32, Martynas Jusevičius wrote:
> > Now also replaced URIs with bnodes.
> >
> > On Thu, Jul 9, 2020 at 1:40 PM Martynas Jusevičius
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> I've sim
On 09/07/2020 13:32, Martynas Jusevičius wrote:
Now also replaced URIs with bnodes.
On Thu, Jul 9, 2020 at 1:40 PM Martynas Jusevičius
wrote:
I've simplified the test case:
https://github.com/namedgraph/jena-test/blob/master/src/test/java/WebIDCertTest.java
Indeed it looks like the hexBin
Barry - thanks. I'll take a look at that when I can.
About \, could be. Internally, Jena has a bias towards "/" because
that's the URI way.
Due to a lack of Windows machine, I may be back.
Andy
On 07/07/2020 12:56, Nouwt, B. (Barry) wrote:
Hey Andy, thanks for helping out!
I've tried
Now also replaced URIs with bnodes.
On Thu, Jul 9, 2020 at 1:40 PM Martynas Jusevičius
wrote:
>
> I've simplified the test case:
> https://github.com/namedgraph/jena-test/blob/master/src/test/java/WebIDCertTest.java
>
> Indeed it looks like the hexBinary length makes a difference - the
> long lit
I've simplified the test case:
https://github.com/namedgraph/jena-test/blob/master/src/test/java/WebIDCertTest.java
Indeed it looks like the hexBinary length makes a difference - the
long literal leads to a failed test, the short one does not.
On Thu, Jul 9, 2020 at 1:21 PM Andy Seaborne wrote:
Would it be possible to reduce the complexity?
For example -
Is it essential to use ParameterizedSparqlString?
Use a short lexical form, not one that is 512 characters long.
Or is it significant it is 512 characters long?
Ditto subject and predicate. Do they need to be as shown?
Andy
On
I managed to create a test case that returns a result on 3.0.1 but not
on 3.16.0-SNAPSHOT:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-1936
On Thu, Jul 9, 2020 at 12:36 AM Martynas Jusevičius
wrote:
>
> I managed to reproduce something, I think - the BGP with an explicit
> ^^xsd:hexBinary fails to
There is a problem with the Apache Jena Fuseki v3.15.0 combined jar
(fuseki-server.jar, not the war file packaging, nor the non-UI
jena-fuseki-server form).
It is a bug in v 3.15.0 only, not in 3.14.0, and will be fixed in 3.16.0.
The link I sent you:
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/625068
These are some logging errors. Not sure why though.
On Thu, Jul 9, 2020 at 10:13 AM XiangLei wrote:
>
> Hi there, I was using 3.12 on my PC. Now I want to use 3.15 fuskei on my LP,
> and I did install Java 1.8 xx . The errors are listed below:
>
> 2020-07-09 16:01:44,865 main ERROR Unrecognized
Hi there, I was using 3.12 on my PC. Now I want to use 3.15 fuskei on my LP,
and I did install Java 1.8 xx . The errors are listed below:
2020-07-09 16:01:44,865 main ERROR Unrecognized format specifier [d]
2020-07-09 16:01:44,907 main ERROR Unrecognized conversion specifier [d]
starting at posi
11 matches
Mail list logo
