Seems this is due to using a model with inference.
Switching from
OntModelSpec modelSpec = OntModelSpec.RDFS_MEM_RDFS_INF;
to
OntModelSpec modelSpec = OntModelSpec.RDFS_MEM;
Prevented the additional classes from being added to the individual in the
resulting graph.
-Original
Greetings and Happy New Year all.
I'm writing some SHACL to validate Linked Art which is based on CiDOC-CRM.
When I consume the following JSON-LD file with Jena, the "Place" object becomes
polymorphic in the sense of Jena automatically assigning another class to it
due to a property
Is it possible for you to make a copy of the database to query offline?
That can be expensive in storage, but it's really the simplest thing to do
in many ways.
Adam
On Mon, Jan 3, 2022, 1:09 PM Andy Seaborne wrote:
>
>
> On 03/01/2022 17:44, robert.ba...@tiscali.it wrote:
> >
> >
> > Hi,
> >
On 03/01/2022 17:44, robert.ba...@tiscali.it wrote:
Hi,
you are right, I was not clear in the request. I try to
explain myself better.
I have a knowledge base of over a billion
triples.
I am testing a query that returns about 2 million results (in
the future I will have many queries
Hi,
you are right, I was not clear in the request. I try to
explain myself better.
I have a knowledge base of over a billion
triples.
I am testing a query that returns about 2 million results (in
the future I will have many queries that will return a lot of data)
On
the client side I have to
I think if you describe your use case in more detail, it would be easier to get
help.
For example, can you clarify
- a query? What kind of query
- "many results", any number?
- What do you consider slow and inefficient and what are would you consider
ideal?
Also, why do you think that the
Hi,
i am using a fuseki server and need to run a query which returns
a lot of results. The use of the HTTP call (http: // localhost: 3030 /
ds / query = myQuery) is very slow and inefficient. I thought about
using the tdbquery command. But I don't want to stop fuseki. Is there
any way to do
On 03/01/2022 11:30, Lorenz Buehmann wrote:
That has already been addressed and will be provided with Jena 4.4.0:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-2233?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels%3Aall-tabpanel
I doubt there will be another minor version 4.3.3, Andy?
That has already been addressed and will be provided with Jena 4.4.0:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-2233?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels%3Aall-tabpanel
I doubt there will be another minor version 4.3.3, Andy?
You could built the Docker image from sources, just
See
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-2233
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-2224
https://github.com/apache/jena/blob/main/pom.xml
for the releases currently in the main branch which will be in the next
version 4.4.0
log4j2: 2.17.1
jackson: 2.13.1
Note: Jena does not use
Hi there,
I ran a docker scan on a Fuseki Jena 4.3.2 image which I built with the
latest version:
https://repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/apache/jena/jena-fuseki-server/4.3.2/
This image still contains log4j vulnerabilities fom version 2.16.0.
These are supposed to be fixed in version 2.17.1
I also
11 matches
Mail list logo
