Hi list,
me again... Does Jena Fuseki 5.0.0 support Java 21?
On https://jena.apache.org/download/ all I can see is "Jena5 requires Java
17".
Best,
Balduin
Java versions are generally forwards compatible, so Fuseki should run fine on
Java 21, unless any of our dependencies have some previously unreported issues
with Java 21
If you do find any bugs then please file bugs as appropriate
Thanks,
Rob
From: Balduin Landolt
Date: Wednesday, 24 April 2
On 24/04/2024 10:41, Rob @ DNR wrote:
Java versions are generally forwards compatible, so Fuseki should run fine on
Java 21, unless any of our dependencies have some previously unreported issues
with Java 21
If you do find any bugs then please file bugs as appropriate
Thanks,
Rob
The pr
Hi Balduin,
Thanks for the detailed report. It's useful to hear of the use case that
occur and also the behaviour of specific deployments.
On 22/04/2024 16:22, Balduin Landolt wrote:
Hello,
we're running Fuseki 5.0.0 (but previously the last 4.x versions behaved
essentially the same) with ro
Andy,
Not directly related, but would different storage backend address
issues like this?
It might sound a bit like the legacy SDB, but AFAIK oxigraph, Stardog
and another commercial triplestore use RocksDB for storage.
https://github.com/oxigraph/oxigraph
https://docs.stardog.com/operating-stard
The wording has been changed to
"Jena5 requires Java 17, or a later version of Java."
Thanks
Andy
On 24/04/2024 09:45, Balduin Landolt wrote:
Hi list,
me again... Does Jena Fuseki 5.0.0 support Java 21?
On https://jena.apache.org/download/ all I can see is "Jena5 requires Java
17".
Be
Hello Andy
Le lun. 22 avr. 2024 à 21:03, Andy Seaborne a écrit :
>
> On 22/04/2024 08:02, Thomas Francart wrote:
> > Hello
> >
> > This is 3.17.0. Pretty old, due to other dependency with TopQuadrant
> SHACL
> > API.
>
> It's not perfect in 5.0.0 either.
>
> TopQuadrant SHACL is now 4.10.0. It w