On 12/05/16 23:50, Martynas Jusevičius wrote:
Thanks Andy. So my options are limited, I had anticipated that :)
Being able to do it in one SPARQL operation would be a huge advantage
when it comes to configuration.
It's suppose to be generic so it cannot really depend on data, except
for some in
Thanks Andy. So my options are limited, I had anticipated that :)
Being able to do it in one SPARQL operation would be a huge advantage
when it comes to configuration.
It's suppose to be generic so it cannot really depend on data, except
for some internal convention, so the OPTIONAL pattern is no
On 10/05/16 23:27, Martynas Jusevičius wrote:
Hey,
I know this is a SPARQL question not specific to Jena, but I couldn't
get an answer on public-sparql-dev, so I'll try my luck here:
https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-sparql-dev/2016AprJun/0010.html
This is a real problem we have, trip
Hey,
I know this is a SPARQL question not specific to Jena, but I couldn't
get an answer on public-sparql-dev, so I'll try my luck here:
https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-sparql-dev/2016AprJun/0010.html
This is a real problem we have, triples end up in wrong graphs when we
split one lar
