Apologies, this was a mistake.
Paolo
On 10 September 2012 23:07, Paolo Castagna wrote:
> Hi Osma
>
> On 28/08/12 14:22, Osma Suominen wrote:
>> Hi Paolo!
>>
>> Thanks a lot for the fix! I have tested the latest snapshot and it now
>> works as expected. At least until I add lots of new data and h
Hi Osma
On 28/08/12 14:22, Osma Suominen wrote:
> Hi Paolo!
>
> Thanks a lot for the fix! I have tested the latest snapshot and it now
> works as expected. At least until I add lots of new data and hit the new
> limit :)
>
>
> You're of course right about the search use case. I think the problem
>
Hi Paolo!
31.08.2012 21:58, Paolo Castagna kirjoitti:
A. Traditional IR, in which the user cares about only the first few
results. Lucene is obviously very good at this, though full advantage
(especially for non-English languages) of it can only be achieved by
using specific Analyzer implementa
Hi Osma
On 28/08/12 14:22, Osma Suominen wrote:
> Hi Paolo!
>
> Thanks a lot for the fix! I have tested the latest snapshot and it now
> works as expected. At least until I add lots of new data and hit the new
> limit :)
>
>
> You're of course right about the search use case. I think the proble
Hi Paolo!
Thanks a lot for the fix! I have tested the latest snapshot and it now
works as expected. At least until I add lots of new data and hit the new
limit :)
You're of course right about the search use case. I think the problem
here is that the LARQ index can be used for two very diffe
Hi Osma
On 20/08/12 11:10, Osma Suominen wrote:
> Hi Paolo!
>
> Thanks for your quick reply.
>
> 17.08.2012 20:16, Paolo Castagna wrote:
>> Does your problem go away without changing the code and using:
>> ?lit pf:textMatch ( 'a*' 10 )
>
> I tested this but it didn't help. If I use a parame
Hi Paolo!
Thanks for your quick reply.
17.08.2012 20:16, Paolo Castagna wrote:
Does your problem go away without changing the code and using:
?lit pf:textMatch ( 'a*' 10 )
I tested this but it didn't help. If I use a parameter less than 1000
then I get even fewer hits, but values above 1
Hi Osma,
thanks for your help and feedback.
Does your problem go away without changing the code and using:
?lit pf:textMatch ( 'a*' 10 )
It's not a problem adding a couple of '0'...
However, I am thinking that this would just shift the problem, isn't it?
Paolo
On 15/08/12 10:31, Osma Suomin
Hi Paolo!
Thanks for your reply and sorry for the delay.
I tested this again with today's svn snapshot and it's still a problem.
However, after digging a bit further I found this in
jena-larq/src/main/java/org/apache/jena/larq/LARQ.java:
--clip--
// The number of results returned by defa
Hi Osma,
first of all, thanks for sharing your experience and clearly describing
your problem.
Further comments inline.
On 13/07/12 14:13, Osma Suominen wrote:
Hello!
I'm trying to use a Fuseki SPARQL endpoint together with LARQ to
create a system for accessing SKOS thesauri. The user interf
Hello!
I'm trying to use a Fuseki SPARQL endpoint together with LARQ to create
a system for accessing SKOS thesauri. The user interface includes an
autocompletion widget. The idea is to use the LARQ index to make fast
prefix queries on the concept labels.
However, I've noticed that in some s
11 matches
Mail list logo
