Re: LARQ prefix search results missing hits

2012-09-11 Thread Paolo Castagna
Apologies, this was a mistake. Paolo On 10 September 2012 23:07, Paolo Castagna wrote: > Hi Osma > > On 28/08/12 14:22, Osma Suominen wrote: >> Hi Paolo! >> >> Thanks a lot for the fix! I have tested the latest snapshot and it now >> works as expected. At least until I add lots of new data and h

Re: LARQ prefix search results missing hits

2012-09-10 Thread Paolo Castagna
Hi Osma On 28/08/12 14:22, Osma Suominen wrote: > Hi Paolo! > > Thanks a lot for the fix! I have tested the latest snapshot and it now > works as expected. At least until I add lots of new data and hit the new > limit :) > > > You're of course right about the search use case. I think the problem >

Re: LARQ prefix search results missing hits

2012-09-03 Thread Osma Suominen
Hi Paolo! 31.08.2012 21:58, Paolo Castagna kirjoitti: A. Traditional IR, in which the user cares about only the first few results. Lucene is obviously very good at this, though full advantage (especially for non-English languages) of it can only be achieved by using specific Analyzer implementa

Re: LARQ prefix search results missing hits

2012-08-31 Thread Paolo Castagna
Hi Osma On 28/08/12 14:22, Osma Suominen wrote: > Hi Paolo! > > Thanks a lot for the fix! I have tested the latest snapshot and it now > works as expected. At least until I add lots of new data and hit the new > limit :) > > > You're of course right about the search use case. I think the proble

Re: LARQ prefix search results missing hits

2012-08-28 Thread Osma Suominen
Hi Paolo! Thanks a lot for the fix! I have tested the latest snapshot and it now works as expected. At least until I add lots of new data and hit the new limit :) You're of course right about the search use case. I think the problem here is that the LARQ index can be used for two very diffe

Re: LARQ prefix search results missing hits

2012-08-26 Thread Paolo Castagna
Hi Osma On 20/08/12 11:10, Osma Suominen wrote: > Hi Paolo! > > Thanks for your quick reply. > > 17.08.2012 20:16, Paolo Castagna wrote: >> Does your problem go away without changing the code and using: >> ?lit pf:textMatch ( 'a*' 10 ) > > I tested this but it didn't help. If I use a parame

Re: LARQ prefix search results missing hits

2012-08-20 Thread Osma Suominen
Hi Paolo! Thanks for your quick reply. 17.08.2012 20:16, Paolo Castagna wrote: Does your problem go away without changing the code and using: ?lit pf:textMatch ( 'a*' 10 ) I tested this but it didn't help. If I use a parameter less than 1000 then I get even fewer hits, but values above 1

Re: LARQ prefix search results missing hits

2012-08-17 Thread Paolo Castagna
Hi Osma, thanks for your help and feedback. Does your problem go away without changing the code and using: ?lit pf:textMatch ( 'a*' 10 ) It's not a problem adding a couple of '0'... However, I am thinking that this would just shift the problem, isn't it? Paolo On 15/08/12 10:31, Osma Suomin

Re: LARQ prefix search results missing hits

2012-08-15 Thread Osma Suominen
Hi Paolo! Thanks for your reply and sorry for the delay. I tested this again with today's svn snapshot and it's still a problem. However, after digging a bit further I found this in jena-larq/src/main/java/org/apache/jena/larq/LARQ.java: --clip-- // The number of results returned by defa

Re: LARQ prefix search results missing hits

2012-07-15 Thread Paolo Castagna
Hi Osma, first of all, thanks for sharing your experience and clearly describing your problem. Further comments inline. On 13/07/12 14:13, Osma Suominen wrote: Hello! I'm trying to use a Fuseki SPARQL endpoint together with LARQ to create a system for accessing SKOS thesauri. The user interf

LARQ prefix search results missing hits

2012-07-13 Thread Osma Suominen
Hello! I'm trying to use a Fuseki SPARQL endpoint together with LARQ to create a system for accessing SKOS thesauri. The user interface includes an autocompletion widget. The idea is to use the LARQ index to make fast prefix queries on the concept labels. However, I've noticed that in some s