Hi Nauman,
May the most important question is what are your scalability and
performance goals? and including hardware goals (=> running costs).
After all, once a system meets those, anything else is unnecessary.
Different workloads have different characteristics. (A general database
comment
Hi Andy,
thank you for the explanation. That is new information for us since you told us
that Virtuoso is an old one. We were always researching about triple stores
which are promising a high performance and high scalability. Several
benchmarktests were always praising Virtuoso on single server
On 31/05/15 15:52, John A. Fereira wrote:
I've used that driver with another semantic web application that has a
configurable triple store but not with fuseki directly. Be aware that you may
encounter some sparql syntax difference for inserts/deletes.
-Original Message-
From: Nauman R
I've used that driver with another semantic web application that has a
configurable triple store but not with fuseki directly. Be aware that you may
encounter some sparql syntax difference for inserts/deletes.
-Original Message-
From: Nauman Ramzan [mailto:nauman.emalla...@gmail.com]
