Re: SHACL & TDB

2021-09-28 Thread Adrian Gschwend
On 27.09.21 18:05, Andy Seaborne wrote: Hi Andy, > Other than the service name - where does it say in-memory only? The> > validation API works on any graphs. The CLI tools do work in-memory. Thanks for the clarification. I then over-interpreted the documentation and draw that wrong conclusion. G

Re: SHACL & TDB

2021-09-27 Thread Andy Seaborne
On 27/09/2021 16:28, Adrian Gschwend wrote: Hi group, I recently started playing with SHACL validation in Jena, worked well with the cli for the few things I tested, thanks for the work! What I don't really get is where SHACL support in Jena is heading. From what I understand in the documenta

Re: SHACL & TDB

2021-09-27 Thread Florian Kleedorfer
Hi, Cannot help with the question as far as jena is concerned. Fwiw, there is (limited) support for SHACL in RDF4J Sails, which is also supported by GraphDB - as you may know. Am 27. September 2021 11:28:50 GMT-04:00 schrieb Adrian Gschwend : >Hi group, > >I recently started playing with S

SHACL & TDB

2021-09-27 Thread Adrian Gschwend
Hi group, I recently started playing with SHACL validation in Jena, worked well with the cli for the few things I tested, thanks for the work! What I don't really get is where SHACL support in Jena is heading. From what I understand in the documentation this is currently only usable in in-memory