It is clear. Thank you.
Le Jeudi 14 août 2014 15h41, Dave Reynolds a écrit :
On 14/08/14 14:30, Zahir Kali wrote:
> In fact, i have different results using OWL_MICRO and Default configuration.
> Plaese, is this natural?
Yes, MICRO is performing fewer inferences in return for better speed a
On 14/08/14 14:30, Zahir Kali wrote:
In fact, i have different results using OWL_MICRO and Default configuration.
Plaese, is this natural?
Yes, MICRO is performing fewer inferences in return for better speed and
scaling. See https://jena.apache.org/documentation/inference/#OWLcoverage
Dave
In fact, i have different results using OWL_MICRO and Default configuration.
Plaese, is this natural?
To use OWL_MICRO i call this function:
ReasonerRegistry.getOWLMicroReasoner().bindSchema(schema);
To use default OWL i cal this function:
ReasonerRegistry.getOWLReasoner().bindSchema(schema);
Thank you Dave, effectively the materialization of the model make the writing
in file really faster.
Thanks
Le Mercredi 13 août 2014 16h09, Dave Reynolds a
écrit :
On 13/08/14 15:02, Chris Dollin wrote:
> On Wednesday, August 13, 2014 02:47:33 PM Zahir Kali wrote:
>>
>> I am using OWL re
On 13/08/14 15:02, Chris Dollin wrote:
On Wednesday, August 13, 2014 02:47:33 PM Zahir Kali wrote:
I am using OWL reasoner of Jena. But the problem is not the inference ingine.
The inference finished after 2 seconds. The probleme is whene i take resulted
Model to save it in a file.
If the inf
On Wednesday, August 13, 2014 02:47:33 PM Zahir Kali wrote:
>
> I am using OWL reasoner of Jena. But the problem is not the inference ingine.
> The inference finished after 2 seconds. The probleme is whene i take resulted
> Model to save it in a file.
If the inference uses backwards rules, it do
I am using OWL reasoner of Jena. But the problem is not the inference ingine.
The inference finished after 2 seconds. The probleme is whene i take resulted
Model to save it in a file.
I am trying with Jena TDB and i seems that i am in the right direction.
Thank you.
Le Mercredi 13 août 2014
On 13/08/14 12:08, Damian Steer wrote:
On 13/08/14 11:59, Zahir Kali wrote:
Thank you for the help. But i have tried the both RDFDataMgr and RDFWriter but
the result is not better.
You didn't address these questions:
How big is the model, and what format are you writing the file in?
Dami
On Wednesday, August 13, 2014 11:59:47 AM Zahir Kali wrote:
> Thank you for the help. But i have tried the both RDFDataMgr and RDFWriter
> but the result is not better.
Please be specific about what you tried. Include how big your data
is [befor and after inference] and how much memory you gave
On 13/08/14 11:59, Zahir Kali wrote:
> Thank you for the help. But i have tried the both RDFDataMgr and RDFWriter
> but the result is not better.
You didn't address these questions:
> How big is the model, and what format are you writing the file in?
Damian
Thank you for the help. But i have tried the both RDFDataMgr and RDFWriter but
the result is not better.
Sofiane.
Le Mercredi 13 août 2014 11h28, Damian Steer a écrit :
On 13/08/14 09:14, Zahir Kali wrote:
> Hello, I am working about reasoning in Jena. I take RDF model and i
> enrich it.
On 13/08/14 09:14, Zahir Kali wrote:
> Hello, I am working about reasoning in Jena. I take RDF model and i
> enrich it.So the RDF obtained is voluminous and to save it in a file
> i must wait many hours (3 or 4 hours). I thought to use TDB but i am
> not sure that is the best way to resolve the pro
Hello,
I am working about reasoning in Jena. I take RDF model and i enrich it.So the
RDF obtained is voluminous and to save it in a file i must wait many hours (3
or 4 hours). I thought to use TDB but i am not sure that is the best way to
resolve the problem.
Please, do you have idea?
Thanks.
13 matches
Mail list logo
