Re: question on LIMIT

2015-09-22 Thread Zen 98052
2,482 ms vs. 9,119 ms vs. 7,991 ms From: Andy Seaborne Sent: Tuesday, September 22, 2015 3:50 PM To: users@jena.apache.org Subject: Re: question on LIMIT On 22/09/15 19:06, Zen 98052 wrote: > Thanks Andy! All those 3 queries work as expected. Just

Re: question on LIMIT

2015-09-22 Thread Andy Seaborne
On 22/09/15 19:06, Zen 98052 wrote: Thanks Andy! All those 3 queries work as expected. Just an information, the first query (putting OFFSET/LIMIT on the top most query) is the fastest, second one is query that includes ?name in grouping, and the last one is the one using SAMPLE function. How mu

Re: question on LIMIT

2015-09-22 Thread Zen 98052
From: Andy Seaborne Sent: Tuesday, September 22, 2015 12:30 PM To: users@jena.apache.org Subject: Re: question on LIMIT On 22/09/15 17:02, Zen 98052 wrote: > Hi Andy, > I don't see any of my code referencing to QueryIterSlice or OpSlice. > To answer question from Martyna

Re: question on LIMIT

2015-09-22 Thread Andy Seaborne
{ "type": "literal" , "xml:lang": "en" , "value": "C#" } , "no_entities": { "datatype": "http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#integer"; , "type": "typed-literal" , "value": "12

Re: question on LIMIT

2015-09-22 Thread Zen 98052
atatype": "http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#integer"; , "type": "typed-literal" , "value": "75" } } ] } If I modify the query to add OFFSET and also change the number on LIMIT, for example: # What languages are most popular in

Re: question on LIMIT

2015-09-22 Thread Andy Seaborne
On 22/09/15 15:42, Andy Seaborne wrote: On 22/09/15 15:25, Zen 98052 wrote: For example, the query result set (with ORDER clause) is [ a, b, c, d, e, f, g, h, i, j ] When I put OFFSET 4 and LIMIT 3 in the query, I got back [ d, e ] as the result. FWIW that is the result from OFFSET 2 and LIMI

Re: question on LIMIT

2015-09-22 Thread Martynas Jusevičius
Please post your query first. On Tue, Sep 22, 2015 at 4:25 PM, Zen 98052 wrote: > For example, the query result set (with ORDER clause) is [ a, b, c, d, e, f, > g, h, i, j ] > > When I put OFFSET 4 and LIMIT 3 in the query, I got back [ d, e ] as the > result. > > It should return 3 items inste

Re: question on LIMIT

2015-09-22 Thread Andy Seaborne
On 22/09/15 15:25, Zen 98052 wrote: For example, the query result set (with ORDER clause) is [ a, b, c, d, e, f, g, h, i, j ] When I put OFFSET 4 and LIMIT 3 in the query, I got back [ d, e ] as the result. FWIW that is the result from OFFSET 2 and LIMIT 2 It should return 3 items instead

question on LIMIT

2015-09-22 Thread Zen 98052
For example, the query result set (with ORDER clause) is [ a, b, c, d, e, f, g, h, i, j ] When I put OFFSET 4 and LIMIT 3 in the query, I got back [ d, e ] as the result. It should return 3 items instead of 2, where is the Jena code that I can debug to find out the issue (likely bug in my code)