This seems to be a problem. MirrorMaker waits for all threads to finish
before shutting down. In your case, only one thread died. Are you
configuring the producer in sync mode? One potential solution is to run the
producer in async mode. In this mode, the mirror maker thread won't be
killed when th
You can follow the instructions in http://kafka.apache.org/contact.html
Thanks,
Jun
On Tue, Jul 2, 2013 at 3:01 PM, Nandigam, Sujitha wrote:
>
>
>
> "This message (including any attachments) is intended only for the use of
> the individual or entity to which it is addressed, and may contain
>
One of the issues is that in 0.7, the partitioning key is not stored on the
broker. So, mirror maker won't know what key to use for partitioning.
In 0.8, the partitioning key will be stored on the broker. Once kafka-957
is resolved, mirror maker will be able to partition messages based on the
same
"This message (including any attachments) is intended only for the use of the
individual or entity to which it is addressed, and may contain information that
is non-public, proprietary, privileged, confidential and exempt from disclosure
under applicable law or may be constituted as attorney
Hello,
I've noticed that when a broker in the target cluster restarts (i.e.
immediately comes back online), the MirrorMaker runs into a FATAL exception
but the process hangs indefinitely instead of exiting. This seems to me
like undesirable behavior but I'm not sure that it's a bug. I'd like for
t
HI guys,
We are using kafka0.7.2, in our cluster, we use customized partition
functions in producer.
Say, we compute partition id with user id in our log.
But when we use mirror maker to pull log, we find that mirror maker uses
random partition to push log into destination brokers.
In my mind, w
We currently have a contrib package for consuming and producing messages
from mapreduce (
https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=kafka.git;a=tree;f=contrib;h=e53e1fb34893e733b10ff27e79e6a1dcbb8d7ab0;hb=HEAD
).
We keep running into problems (e.g. KAFKA-946) that are basically due to
the fact tha
Callback handlers are no longer supported in 0.8. Can you go into why
the filtering needs to be done at this stage as opposed to before
actually sending to the producer?
Thanks,
Joel
On Tue, Jul 2, 2013 at 10:41 AM, Nitin Supekar wrote:
> Hello-
>
>Is CallbackHandler supported in Kafka 0.8
You can override the default number of partitions on the source and
target cluster to N. (num.partitions in the broker config). If you
need a higher (or lower) number of partitions for specific topics you
can override that on a per-topic basis (again, the config can be kept
identical between the so
Hi
I asked this question previously and didn't get an answer.
If a topic has N partitions on source cluster, after being mirrored, on the
destination
cluster it has only one partition.
To avoid this issue, before mirroring, I create the same topic with N
partitions on the
Destination cluster. B
This is exactly right. Partitions is configurable so set it to some
reasonable upper bound on the concurrency you desire. To give further
examples, let's say you have 5 threads:
- if you have 2 partitions only two threads will get data
- if you have 100 partitions each thread will get 20 partitions
Erp, actually I don't see a way to get the recording there, nm.
-Jay
On Tue, Jul 2, 2013 at 12:47 PM, Jay Kreps wrote:
> The recording for the user group talks is available here:
> http://www.ustream.tv/linkedin-events
>
> -Jay
>
>
> On Wed, Jun 26, 2013 at 8:22 AM, Jun Rao wrote:
>
>> Hi, Ev
The recording for the user group talks is available here:
http://www.ustream.tv/linkedin-events
-Jay
On Wed, Jun 26, 2013 at 8:22 AM, Jun Rao wrote:
> Hi, Everyone,
>
> We have finalized our agenda of the meetup Thursday evening, with Speakers
> from LinkedIn, RichRelevance, Netflix and Square
Hi, am a also new to Kafka but let me explain my understanding which someone
with more knowledge can confirm. There are actually 2 scenarios:
1. If all 5 of your consumers are in different "consumer groups" then this
will behave like a JMS topic where all 5 of your consumers will each get a co
The current 0.8.0-beta1 release is tagged
so you can git clone and then git checkout 0.8.0-beta1 for the current
release
On Tue, Jul 2, 2013 at 2:56 PM, Yu, Libo wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I want to check out beta version from git repo.
> Which branch should I use? Thank.s
> origin/0.8
> origin/0.8.
Hi,
I want to check out beta version from git repo.
Which branch should I use? Thank.s
origin/0.8
origin/0.8.0-beta1-candidate1
Regards,
Libo
Hi guys, we are starting with kafka in our project. We are using version
0.8. I come from a traditional JMS MoM architecture, and some things are
new to me.
One thing that I'm not getting is the mapping between partitions and number
of threads. On a single consumer I can see the relationship but w
Hello-
Is CallbackHandler supported in Kafka 0.8 for async producers?
If yes, can I use it to alter the batched messages before they are pushed
to broker? For example, I may want to delete some of the messages in the
batch based on some business logic in my application?
If no, is there any al
Was this recorded by any chance?
On Wed, Jun 26, 2013 at 11:22 AM, Jun Rao wrote:
> Hi, Everyone,
>
> We have finalized our agenda of the meetup Thursday evening, with Speakers
> from LinkedIn, RichRelevance, Netflix and Square. Please RSVP to the meetup
> link below. For remote people, we will
Martin,
"other" is not a valid value for auto.offset.reset. This is explained in
the exception itself "kafka.common.InvalidConfigException: Wrong value
other of auto.offset.reset in ConsumerConfig; Valid values are smallest and
largest".
Thanks,
Jun
On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 9:28 PM, Martin Eigen
In 0.8, there are more mbeans than 0.7.
Thanks,
Jun
On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 9:06 PM, Hanish Bansal <
hanish.bansal.agar...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Okay i'll try for same.
>
> Also want to know that in kafka-0.7 there is single MBean -
> SocketServerStats which provides all kafka Metrics. But in Kaf
Thanks for sharing. Could you add this to the wiki?
Jun
On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 9:01 PM, Tejas Patil wrote:
> Hi,
>
> [0] is an old wiki entry for getting Scala setup for development. After all
> huffs and puffs, I gave up getting it loaded in Intellij IDEA. However, I
> could get it setup with
22 matches
Mail list logo