I did not find the bug -- it was reported by Kin Sui
(https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-9244)
If the bug is a blocker is a judgment call thought, because it's
technically not a regression. However, if we don't include the fix in
2.4.0, as Adam pointed out, the new foreign-key join would
Hello there,
I was wondering if anyone here could help me with some insight into a
conundrum that I am facing.
Basically, the story is that I am running three Kafka brokers via docker on
a single vm with log.flush.interval.messages = 1 and min.insync.replicas =
2. Then I create two topics: both
mjsax found an important issue for the foreign-key joiner, which I think
should be a blocker (if it isn't already) since it is functionally
incorrect without the fix:
https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/7758
On Tue, Nov 26, 2019 at 6:26 PM Sean Glover
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I also used Eric's