Re: Kafka Cluster WITHOUT Zookeeper

This is really great information Paul . Thank you . On Tue, Mar 28, 2023 at 4:01 AM Brebner, Paul wrote: > I have a recent 3 part blog series on Kraft (expanded version of ApacheCon > 2022 talk): > > > > > https://www.instaclustr.com/blog/apache-kafka-kraft-abandons-the-zookeeper-part-1-partitio

Re: Kafka Cluster WITHOUT Zookeeper

Paul, thanks for the articles. It's great to see someone digging into KRaft! It would be interesting to see your experiments against a newer version of KRaft, such as 3.4.0. Also, we hope to improve on the maximum number of partitions with the addition of https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display

ISR expansion vs. shrink eligibility

Hello! I was reading through the partition code, and I noticed that the criteria for expanding an ISR differs from the criteria to shrink an ISR

users@kafka.apache.org

Classification: Public Hello, I am IT Project Manager at PG&E and would like to understand support, license, and other requirement to implement Kafka for one of my projects. Can I get a contact at Kafka who would be able to meet with my project team to discuss requirement please? Best, Naray

Re: Kafka Cluster WITHOUT Zookeeper

David, hi, interesting thanks! Paul From: David Arthur Date: Wednesday, 29 March 2023 at 2:37 am To: paul.breb...@netapp.com.invalid Cc: users@kafka.apache.org , d...@kafka.apache.org , mmcfarl...@cavulus.com , Israel Ekpo , ranlupov...@gmail.com , scante...@gmail.com , show...@gmail.com , s

Re: ISR expansion vs. shrink eligibility

Hi. So the question is about the difference between the leader LEO (shrink criteria) and the leader HW (expand criteria), right? 1. Why shrink-criteria uses leader LEO Since HW is defined as "the latest offset that is replicated to all ISRs", it can't be used to kick out a replica from the ISR se