8/13/13 9:57 PM, "Philip O'Toole" wrote:
>
>>My experience is solely with 0.72. More inline.
>
> I am currently using 0.8.
>
>>
>>On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 6:47 PM, Eric Sites
>>wrote:
>>> Hello everyone,
>>>
>>> I have
Not sure if there is an easy way to do what you want. One thing I can think
of is to reduce queuedchunks.max and fetch.size to reduce the # of queued
messages.
Thanks,
Jun
On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 6:47 PM, Eric Sites wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
> I have a very low volume topic t
Responses inline
On 8/13/13 9:57 PM, "Philip O'Toole" wrote:
>My experience is solely with 0.72. More inline.
I am currently using 0.8.
>
>On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 6:47 PM, Eric Sites
>wrote:
>> Hello everyone,
>>
>> I have a very low volume topic
My experience is solely with 0.72. More inline.
On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 6:47 PM, Eric Sites wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
> I have a very low volume topic that has 2 consumers in the same group. How do
> I get each consumer to only consume 1 message at a time and if the the first
&
Hello everyone,
I have a very low volume topic that has 2 consumers in the same group. How do I
get each consumer to only consume 1 message at a time and if the the first
consumer is busy get the other consumer to consume the message?
Currently what I am doing is:
First consumer connects to
