rrect would be not redistribute the remaining messages to
the
others?
For short: is not possible NOT LOOSE the messages queued when
stop/restart
a
gateway or bearerbox/smsbox ??? Does anyone know a patch to this?
Thanks in advance,
Dino
--
Donald Jackson
http://www.ddj.co.za/
donaldjster(
Hi Stuart,
Basically you won't be able to retrieve those DLRs. ie. you'll lose the
ability to report on any messages who's DLRs were still inn the queue when
you restarted Kannel.
Cheers,
Iain
On Fri, 21 Aug 2009, Stuart Beck wrote:
Hi Ian,
I'm happy with the internal / external DLR stora
Hi Ian,
I'm happy with the internal / external DLR storage differences. As it
stands we currently have 201810 DLRs stored in the postgres database and
most of these references are out of date and so will not be cleaned up
so I'm trying to work out if there is a compelling reason for me to
con
Hi Stuart,
There is always some form of DLR storage in Kannel. The choice is whether
you use internal or external storage. The only difference here is that,
when you restart the Kannel process, you lose all internal DLR storage
whereas if you use external storage it persists across separate pr
I'd like to know what is the operational benefit of using DLR storage
within Kannel?
We are currently using an external postgresql store for DLRs and once
the data is stored we are not doing anything with it.
We use a single kannel instance most of the time so there is no
requirement to have D
ot;iso-8859-1"
> >>
> >> What kind of SMSCs are you using?
> >> I noticed that there is some inconsistency with regards to this
> behaviour
> >> between different SMSC types.
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >>
ow and every week I check for a
>>> patch
>>> or
>>> new version fixing this absolutely basic issue:
>>>
>>> If you stop a gateway all messages queued are lost!
>>>
>>> So I ask you: if the connection with operator is lost during the
o you have? I mean, you check out the box and see
>>> that you have 498 messages to send yet. The connection with that
>>> specifically operator is gone... And so what? What can be done?
>>>
>>> Of course this does not happens often, otherwise would be impossible to
&
is?
Thanks in advance,
Dino
--
Donald Jackson
http://www.ddj.co.za/
donaldjster(a)gmail.com
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://www.kannel.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20090820/279e6667/attachm
ent-0002.html>
-
t;
>> Of course this does not happens often, otherwise would be impossible to
> use
>> Kannel. But for those who use modems, I think the problem could be far
>> bigger. A pool of 10 modems receive 5,000 messages to send. If one of
>> them
>> freeze, the correct would be not redistrib
u stop a gateway all messages queued are lost!
>>>
>>> So I ask you: if the connection with operator is lost during the sending
>>> process, what options do you have? I mean, you check out the box and see
>>> that you have 498 messages to send yet
Hi,
You mean you missed the whole section:
Appendix C: Using the fake SMS center???
Nikos
- Original Message -
From: Alex Dehaini
To: Users mailing list
Sent: Thursday, August 20, 2009 7:55 PM
Subject: Re: testing fake sms
Alejandro,
I am reading the doc - all I see c
naldjster(a)gmail.com
-- next part ------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://www.kannel.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20090820/279e6667/attachm
ent-0002.html>
--
Message: 3
Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2009 13:44:16 +0200
From: Donald Jackson
ued when stop/restart
> a
> gateway or bearerbox/smsbox ??? Does anyone know a patch to this?
>
> Thanks in advance,
>
> Dino
>
>
>
--
Donald Jackson
http://www.ddj.co.za/
donaldjster(a)gmail.com
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
&l
Alejandro,
I am reading the doc - all I see concerning fakesms is this section
group = smsc
smsc = fake
port = 1
connect-allow-ip = 127.0.0.1
I have added that to my kannel.conf file and restart it.
What next? How do I test it?
Regards,
Alex
On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 4:21 PM, Alejandro Gue
Start by reading the userguide
http://www.kannel.org/userguide.shtml
Regards,
Alejandro
On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 6:02 PM, Alex Dehaini wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> Finally installed kannel via rpm this after noon - look like it's
> installed. I want to test the fake sms feature. Can anyone point me in
Hi guys,
Finally installed kannel via rpm this after noon - look like it's installed.
I want to test the fake sms feature. Can anyone point me in the right
direction.
Regards,
Alex
Hi,
If store-location is misstyped, kannel will panic. How would you guys feel
if this was also the case for store-* not specified?
BR,
Nikos
- Original Message -
From: "Alvaro Cornejo"
To: "Users mailing list"
Cc:
Sent: Thursday, August 20, 2009 4:20 PM
Subject: Re: Basic queue m
Hi
You need to configure the store-xxx parameters on core group. If you
do not define it, kannel will store on ram and messages will be lost
in case kannel or the smsc restarts...
Regards
Alvaro
|--
What kind of SMSCs are you using?
I noticed that there is some inconsistency with regards to this behaviour
between different SMSC types.
Thanks,
Donald
2009/8/20 Dino Sane Moreira
> Hi All,
>
> I'm using Kannel for 3 or 4 mounts now and every week I check for a patch
> or
> new version fixing
Hi All,
I'm using Kannel for 3 or 4 mounts now and every week I check for a patch or
new version fixing this absolutely basic issue:
If you stop a gateway all messages queued are lost!
So I ask you: if the connection with operator is lost during the sending
process, what options do you have? I m
21 matches
Mail list logo
