Just wanted to follow up on this question. What is the impact of moving from coding=0 to coding=1 for all MT messages? Do we risk some handsets not being able to view the message?
Thanks! Jeff Jeff Thorn Principal Software Architect Thorn Technologies, LLC (410) 429-0255 www.thorntech.com @thorntech <http://twitter.com/thorntech> | LinkedIn<http://www.linkedin.com/in/jeffthorn> | Facebook <http://www.facebook.com/thorntechnologies> On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 5:39 PM, Jeff Thorn <j...@thorntechnologies.com>wrote: > We've been using kannel for a very long time, sending messages with the > default coding value of 0. We just received a complaint that underscore > characters are not appearing in messages which I believe is a known issue > with the GSM7 charset. > > I am trying to understand the impact of moving from a coding value of 0 to > 1. The way our platform is configured, this would be a global change for > all messages we send (our application does not know about the coding > parameter, we'd have to hard code it into the URL for all kannel requests). > Is there any risk of using coding=1 for all messages? Are there some > handsets out there that will not be able to view the messages if the coding > =1 ? > > Thanks, > Jeff > > >
