If you are sending One-To-Many kind of messages than you can also add
multiple mobile number in single HTTP get request.
On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 1:41 PM, Cliff Court cco...@telkomsa.net wrote:
Hi All
I have set up Kannel with bearerbox and smsbox, which is working and I am
writing dlr's to a
Hi All
I have set up Kannel with bearerbox and smsbox, which is working and I
am writing dlr's to a mysql db.
Currently I am submitting messages using a sendsms GET or xml-based
POST, as per the Kannel documentation. However, using individual http
GET or POSTs for each message is relatively
It’s because you have receive-port commented out.
SMPP receives their delivery reports on the receiver channel. So you must
enable that. Otherwise, you won’t receive delivery reports.
For newer Kannel versions, I think you should have two copies of your group =
smsc.
One with port =
Hello,
My SMPP connections are on transceiver mode, i.e. I'm just only configure
port.
I'm getting delivery reports partially. I;m getting some reports.
Thanks
Ammar Ali
1.
I think Kannel does support Keep-Alive connections. Not sure about the server
side, but I think it does. Just make sure your client also supports it.
2.
Yes, probably SQL Box does insert 1,000,000 a lot faster than you can do by
http. Question is if your upstream providers handle such a
I hope that's not your real username password there.
From: users [mailto:users-boun...@kannel.org] On Behalf Of Marius Erasmus
Sent: maandag 20 april 2015 16:06
To: users@kannel.org
Cc: de...@smss.co.za
Subject: Generic Parameters
Good day
I just want to find out if it is possible to
Hello All,
My kannel monitor shows me DLR queue. But In my SMSC log file there is no
delivery_sm or delivery_sm_resp pdu for delivery.
When I'm talking to my SMPP provider then they told me that this issue is
belongs to your configuration. But I'm checked my configuration lots of
time.
*This is
I'd say: with the propper DB and DBI (PostgrSQL + Perl DBI, ie), using
PREPARE and COMMIT, SQLBox is your best bet by far.
Regards,
Alberto Mijares
On Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 12:50 AM, Makhanu Sinja jeysi...@gmail.com wrote:
Well last week The same issue was raised on another thread in this
Also while sqlbox is doing its operations with DB like select from
send_sms,submit to bearerbox and than inserting the same to sent_sms table
and doing delete from send_sms, it will add some time lag and will put load
on server too.
On Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 11:10 AM, Tapan Kumar Thapa
Well last week The same issue was raised on another thread in this
mailing list. Let us consider the amount of time sqlbox has to do
database CRUD for 1M messages compared to using spool or files. Is
there anyone who has worked with both?
On 4/21/15, Rene Kluwen rene.klu...@chimit.nl wrote:
1.
My 2 cents:
Adding messages to send_sms table is not an issue. We can add messages to
send_sms table very quickly however once sqlbox is submitting those
messages to bearerbox, and if beaerebox is unable to submit the same to
upstream smsc at desired speed (because upstream smsc is not taking
Hello,
*This is my kannel monitor log:*
Kannel bearerbox version `1.4.4'. Build `Feb 20 2015 13:58:20', compiler
`4.4.7 20120313 (Red Hat 4.4.7-11)'. System Linux, release
2.6.32-042stab094.7, version #1 SMP Wed Oct 22 12:43:21 MSK 2014, machine
x86_64. Hostname Localhost, IP 192.168.1.101.
12 matches
Mail list logo
