Re[2]: %P in sms-service

2008-03-17 Thread Thomas Göttgens
Hello Iain, please keep in mind that in case you expect traffic peaks or a sustained high level of service requests, the overhead disk i/o and processor time from doing grep/sed in every webserver process may grind your server to a halt. If you really need to parse the logfile, pipe it through a s

Re: %P in sms-service

2008-03-16 Thread Iain Dooley
my-number = "12345" to smsc configuration. it must be change your number to 12345 ah, that's unfortunate!! because i'm going to be using the same installation for multiple inbound numbers, and because i don't have a 'service based' inbound sms but rather using a catchall (and also cos i ha

Re: %P in sms-service

2008-03-16 Thread Tulga . G
add my-number = "12345" to smsc configuration. it must be change your number to 12345 On Mon, Mar 17, 2008 at 5:37 AM, Iain Dooley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > hi tulga, > > > > I think it is not destination number. it is my-number in your smsc > > group. could you send your configuration file

Re: %P in sms-service

2008-03-16 Thread Iain Dooley
hi tulga, I think it is not destination number. it is my-number in your smsc group. could you send your configuration file? so, file below. whether i use %P or %Q it still produces the send sms port number. i have gotten around this problem by ading the %I placeholder to the log file, then d

Re: %P in sms-service

2008-03-15 Thread Tulga . G
I think it is not destination number. it is my-number in your smsc group. could you send your configuration file? On Sat, Mar 15, 2008 at 11:02 PM, Iain Dooley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > has anyone else seen the problem where %P in your get-url of an > sms-service configuration sends the port n

%P in sms-service

2008-03-15 Thread Iain Dooley
has anyone else seen the problem where %P in your get-url of an sms-service configuration sends the port number rather than the destination number? cheers iain