Ben Suffolk wrote:
Now, that's reasonable... I'll drop it to the org@ list for a decission
concensus. I'm +1 on it.
Any idea for the "name"? [EMAIL PROTECTED] ?
Why not just [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Ben
yep, I was going to propose the same one, I think it's more intuitive
just that you had a typo
Now, that's reasonable... I'll drop it to the org@ list for a
decission
concensus. I'm +1 on it.
Any idea for the "name"? [EMAIL PROTECTED] ?
Why not just [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Ben
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Alex,
Alex Kinch wrote:
> I figured it's time to expand our SMSC connections, so if anyones got
> an SMPP server available and can fire me across a coverage list and
> prices, let's talk :)
>
> Also, if anyone wants high quality routes at a good
I figured it's time to expand our SMSC connections, so if anyones got
an SMPP server available and can fire me across a coverage list and
prices, let's talk :)
Also, if anyone wants high quality routes at a good price, shout too.
We can only do HTTP/S at the moment, but if there's justification f
