What about a pass-thru(forward) configuration between connections? Is it
possible, let's say we want to pass traffics SMPP_CLIENT_A
-SMPPBOX-SMPP_CLIENT_B.
sangprabv
sangpr...@gmail.com
On Jun 19, 2010, at 3:31 AM, Rene Kluwen wrote:
Today, I committted a patch to smppbox svn trunk that
to Bearerbox is (Msg *),
which is a kannel protocol. ESME can be any SMPP client.
BR,
Nikos
- Original Message - From: sangprabv sangpr...@gmail.com
To: Rene Kluwen rene.klu...@chimit.nl
Cc: users@kannel.org
Sent: Saturday, June 19, 2010 2:55 PM
Subject: Re: For the ones using (open
juni 2010 14:15
To: sangprabv
Cc: users@kannel.org
Subject: Re: For the ones using (open) smppbox...
Nope. The way it works is (SMPP_CLIENT = ESME):
ESME - SMPPBOX -Bearerbox-SMSC
The connection from ESME is SMPP. The connection to Bearerbox is (Msg *),
which is a kannel protocol. ESME can be any
: users@kannel.org
Subject: Re: For the ones using (open) smppbox...
Nope. The way it works is (SMPP_CLIENT = ESME):
ESME - SMPPBOX -Bearerbox-SMSC
The connection from ESME is SMPP. The connection to Bearerbox is (Msg *),
which is a kannel protocol. ESME can be any SMPP client.
BR,
Nikos
, June 19, 2010 5:14 PM
Subject: RE: For the ones using (open) smppbox...
I am thinking of a possibility. Does the group = smsbox-route also route
incoming message from a box? Or just incoming messages from the smsc-link?
== Rene
-Original Message-
From: users-boun...@kannel.org
the
client.
Probably this setup is not what you wanted. But it is a possibility.
== Rene
-Original Message-
From: sangprabv [mailto:sangpr...@gmail.com]
Sent: zaterdag 19 juni 2010 13:55
To: Rene Kluwen
Cc: users@kannel.org
Subject: Re: For the ones using (open) smppbox...
What about a pass
is not what you wanted. But it is a possibility.
== Rene
-Original Message-
From: sangprabv [mailto:sangpr...@gmail.com]
Sent: zaterdag 19 juni 2010 13:55
To: Rene Kluwen
Cc: users@kannel.org
Subject: Re: For the ones using (open) smppbox...
What about a pass-thru(forward
.
== Rene
-Original Message-
From: sangprabv [mailto:sangpr...@gmail.com]
Sent: zaterdag 19 juni 2010 13:55
To: Rene Kluwen
Cc: users@kannel.org
Subject: Re: For the ones using (open) smppbox...
What about a pass-thru(forward) configuration between connections
.
== Rene
-Original Message-
From: sangprabv [mailto:sangpr...@gmail.com]
Sent: zaterdag 19 juni 2010 13:55
To: Rene Kluwen
Cc: users@kannel.org
Subject: Re: For the ones using (open) smppbox...
What about a pass-thru(forward) configuration between connections? Is it
possible
: zaterdag 19 juni 2010 13:55
To: Rene Kluwen
Cc: users@kannel.org
Subject: Re: For the ones using (open) smppbox...
What about a pass-thru(forward) configuration between connections? Is it
possible, let's say we want to pass traffics SMPP_CLIENT_A
-SMPPBOX-SMPP_CLIENT_B.
sangprabv
Yes, that is the idea.
From: sangprabv [mailto:sangpr...@gmail.com]
Sent: zaterdag 19 juni 2010 19:12
To: Alejandro Guerrieri
Cc: Rene Kluwen; users@kannel.org
Subject: Re: For the ones using (open) smppbox...
So the configuration would be like this:
ESME_A-SMPPBOX_A-BEARERBOX-SMPPBOX_B
: zaterdag 19 juni 2010 19:12
To: Alejandro Guerrieri
Cc: Rene Kluwen; users@kannel.org
Subject: Re: For the ones using (open) smppbox...
So the configuration would be like this:
ESME_A-SMPPBOX_A-BEARERBOX-SMPPBOX_B-ESME_B is it?
sangprabv
sangpr...@gmail.com
On Jun 19, 2010
...@gmail.com]
Sent: zaterdag 19 juni 2010 19:12
To: Alejandro Guerrieri
Cc: Rene Kluwen; users@kannel.org
Subject: Re: For the ones using (open) smppbox...
So the configuration would be like this:
ESME_A-SMPPBOX_A-BEARERBOX-SMPPBOX_B-ESME_B is it?
sangprabv
sangpr
juni 2010 20:25
To: sangprabv; Rene Kluwen
Cc: users@kannel.org
Subject: Re: For the ones using (open) smppbox...
There is another way to do this using the sendsms interface.
smsbox1-bearerbox1-HTTP smsc-smsbox2-bearerbox2
BR,
Nikos
- Original Message -
From: sangprabv
To: Rene Kluwen
this using the sendsms interface.
smsbox1-bearerbox1-HTTP smsc-smsbox2-bearerbox2
BR,
Nikos
- Original Message -
From: sangprabv
To: Rene Kluwen
Cc: users@kannel.org
Sent: Saturday, June 19, 2010 8:36 PM
Subject: Re: For the ones using (open) smppbox...
This will be very
(that won't
go into svn trunk) that does the trick.
== Rene
From: sangprabv [mailto:sangpr...@gmail.com]
Sent: zondag 20 juni 2010 4:08
To: Nikos Balkanas
Cc: Rene Kluwen; users@kannel.org
Subject: Re: For the ones using (open) smppbox...
This scheme is known as relaying between Kannel
, 2010 5:08 AM
Subject: Re: For the ones using (open) smppbox...
This scheme is known as relaying between Kannel and it is handled by
kannel_*_sms() in the smsc_http.c where by default or we can redefine it by
ourself. Using this scheme there will be too many inside hops. And I'm not
sure
Today, I committted a patch to smppbox svn trunk that allows for long
(catenated) messages to be delivered via the same smsc, in case of load
balancing.
This version obsoletes that patch that is available for download on the
chimit server.
For the latest (stand-alone) version, use svn co
18 matches
Mail list logo
