Re: Load balancing MT with preferred SMSC

2016-09-23 Thread Денис Давыдов
Its strange but I have a such scheme and it is working for me on my test suite with kannel svn-r5173 :) The only different thig is that I route MT by prefix, not by smsc-id. Nevermind, with smsc-id it will be working too. # fake.conf group = smsc smsc = fake smsc-id = vasgw1 port = 12000 log-file

Re: Load balancing MT with preferred SMSC

2016-09-22 Thread Davor Spasoski
Thanks. Is it also kannel based? Davor Sent from my iPad > On 22.9.2016, at 19:39, vinayak mv wrote: > > Dear Davor, > > There is also an alternative solution for SMPP Server i.e. vsmppbox ,which > has more features compared to other smpp servers.you can find the details of > that in http://w

Re: Load balancing MT with preferred SMSC

2016-09-22 Thread Davor Spasoski
Hi Stipe, Thanks for confirming. Yes, I would like to have more details about the mentioned product. Davor Sent from my iPad > On 22.9.2016, at 16:03, Stipe Tolj wrote: > > Am 21.09.2016 08:25, schrieb Davor Spasoski: >> Hi, >> >> I realized yesterday that the reason the allowed/preferred tri

Re: Load balancing MT with preferred SMSC

2016-09-22 Thread vinayak mv
Dear Davor, There is also an alternative solution for SMPP Server i.e. vsmppbox ,which has more features compared to other smpp servers.you can find the details of that in http://www.evoxtel.com > On 22-Sep-2016, at 7:32 PM, Stipe Tolj wrote: > > Am 21.09.2016 08:25, schrieb Davor Spasoski: >

Re: Load balancing MT with preferred SMSC

2016-09-22 Thread Stipe Tolj
Am 21.09.2016 08:25, schrieb Davor Spasoski: Hi, I realized yesterday that the reason the allowed/preferred trickery doesn’t work is because opensmppbox doesn’t pass smsc-id dynamically. It’s either a static value using the route-to-smsc directive or it’s blank if this is omitted. The whole poin

RE: Load balancing MT with preferred SMSC

2016-09-20 Thread Davor Spasoski
: Davor Spasoski Cc: users@kannel.org Subject: Re: Load balancing MT with preferred SMSC Of course you have removed the # form those lines, right? Other than that, I cannot tell why it's not working for you. On Sat, Sep 17, 2016 at 8:48 AM, Davor Spasoski mailto:davor.spaso...@onevip.mk>

Re: Load balancing MT with preferred SMSC

2016-09-20 Thread DHC Admin
Of course you have removed the # form those lines, right? Other than that, I cannot tell why it's not working for you. On Sat, Sep 17, 2016 at 8:48 AM, Davor Spasoski wrote: > Hi, > > > > I’m trying to use opensmppbox and kannel to act as SMPP proxy. The SMSC > operator doesn’t allow direct con

Load balancing MT with preferred SMSC

2016-09-17 Thread Davor Spasoski
Hi, I’m trying to use opensmppbox and kannel to act as SMPP proxy. The SMSC operator doesn’t allow direct connections and it has two SMSCs, one of which is preferred and the other handles traffic if only the preferred fails. But, both are always active, i.e. bearerbox is normally bound to both