Hmmm...
I found it... It is the %B parameter.
Rene Kluwen
Chimit
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Behalf Of Rene Kluwen
Sent: donderdag 9 maart 2006 21:24
To: users@kannel.org
Subject: binfo
Is there a field in the dlr-url string that is set to the b
huh?
what are you talking about? you're sending the wrong e-mail
sorry if i use another e-mail address.. it seems my other e-mail address
doesn't work well with thunderbird outside of my office
-Clarence
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sorry, but we're no longer accepting applications. We will sho
This is what happens when people subscribe to mailing lists and then enable
autoresponders...
On Fri, Apr 25, 2008 at 10:12 AM, Clarence Carino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> huh?
>
> what are you talking about? you're sending the wrong e-mail
> sorry if i use another e-mail address.. it seems my o
ok enough with that. back to the topic.
can anyone help me?
thanks
-clarence
oh! heaven must have answered my prayers!
can you teach me to apply in the patch? im using the latest version
1.4.1 i'm really new to linux, kannel and SMS+Push Programing.
will this patch work with the one i'm using to send pushes? (see attached)
i need to know all that's needed so that i can
Clarence,
The file you've attached is a php function I wrote a couple of years ago.
What it does is to encode a wap-push into a binary message and then send it
using the sendsms interface.
It should work no matter the value of binfo, of course you'll have to add
whatever value you want into the $
Hello list,
Does any one have an answer?
Thanks,
Oren
-הודעה מקורית-
מאת: Oren Ein-gal
נשלח: ד 30/04/2008 16:15
אל: users@kannel.org
נושא: binfo and NACK Status
Hello list,
I have a Kannel version 1.4.1 with EMI2 configuration working perfectly.
The operator wants me to send a
transaction id - should this number be of specific format or any unique
number.
If it can be any unique number, kannel by itself gives a message id - %I.
--Jyothi
On Sat, May 3, 2008 at 9:31 PM, Oren Ein-gal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello list,
>
> Does any one have an answer?
>
> Thanks,
