Do what thou wilt
shall be the whole of the Law
On 3/23/10, Craig White wrote:
Even a broken clock is right twice each
> day.
except for a certain day in spring, (on which it might be right only once)
and a certain day in fall, (on which it might be right three times)
> Craig
charles zeitl
On Tue, 23 Mar 2010 13:56:08 -0600, Mike McCarty wrote:
>> I guess what I am saying is there needs to be a way for the new user to
>> keep their machine updated without all the headaches. This is why some
>> will stick with Windows. Only needs to be re-installed every year.
>> And you have to
Do what thou wilt
shall be the whole of the Law.
On 3/23/10, BeartoothHOS wrote:
> On Mon, 22 Mar 2010 17:38:03 -0400, Marcel Rieux wrote:
>
>>> Are you saying that if you run Linux, and then re-boot, and enter the
>>> BIOS, it is changed in some way?
>
>> I would think this is exactly what I s
On Wednesday 24 March 2010, Michael Schwendt wrote:
>On Tue, 23 Mar 2010 13:13:57 -0400, Gene wrote:
>> [...] how then do I install grub in /dev/sdb1? Easier to
>> reinstall, I want /root and /usr both on their own partitions anyway.
>
>You can tell the Fedora installer where to store GRUB.
>
Well,
On Tue, 23 Mar 2010 13:13:57 -0400, Gene wrote:
> [...] how then do I install grub in /dev/sdb1? Easier to
> reinstall, I want /root and /usr both on their own partitions anyway.
You can tell the Fedora installer where to store GRUB.
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubs
"On 10:17:38 pm Michael Miles said"
> Here is how I got the latest update in with 190.53 nvidia driver
>
> Install the driver from add remove software not yum
If the system boots to a black screen, how do you run the add / remove
software??
I have been following this because I too have a system
On Wed, 24 Mar 2010 11:04:44 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote:
> Ed Greshko wrote:
>> Vitorio Okio wrote:
>>
>>> On Tue, 23 Mar 2010 03:48:05 +, Vitorio Okio wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
I have 3 PCs running Hardy, Karmic, and Fedora 12, with Firefox on
each of them: v. 3.0.18 on Hardy and v. 3.5
Ed Greshko wrote:
> Vitorio Okio wrote:
>
>> On Tue, 23 Mar 2010 03:48:05 +, Vitorio Okio wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>> I have 3 PCs running Hardy, Karmic, and Fedora 12, with Firefox on each
>>> of them: v. 3.0.18 on Hardy and v. 3.5.8 on both Karmic and Fedora.
>>>
>>> I created "shared" pro
Vitorio Okio wrote:
> On Tue, 23 Mar 2010 03:48:05 +, Vitorio Okio wrote:
>
>
>> I have 3 PCs running Hardy, Karmic, and Fedora 12, with Firefox on each
>> of them: v. 3.0.18 on Hardy and v. 3.5.8 on both Karmic and Fedora.
>>
>> I created "shared" profile on each system and synchronize them
On 23 March 2010 19:17, Michael Miles wrote:
> Here is how I got the latest update in with 190.53 nvidia driver
>
> Install the driver from add remove software not yum
This doesn't make sense. Yum is the backend for all gui package
management tools in Fedora.
>
> Michael Miles
> mmamiga6
>
--
Here is how I got the latest update in with 190.53 nvidia driver
Install the driver from add remove software not yum
It will find the extention for kernel mod and install kernel
Do not reboot
edit the grub.conf like below and make sure nouveau is blacklisted on
all kernel lines after quiet
lower
On Tue, 23 Mar 2010 03:48:05 +, Vitorio Okio wrote:
> I have 3 PCs running Hardy, Karmic, and Fedora 12, with Firefox on each
> of them: v. 3.0.18 on Hardy and v. 3.5.8 on both Karmic and Fedora.
>
> I created "shared" profile on each system and synchronize them using
> Unison. Ubuntu 8.04 is
On Tuesday 23 March 2010, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
>On 03/24/2010 02:57 AM, Rick Stevens wrote:
>> Provided the /boot partition was big enough, yes. The default disk
>> partitioning left the /boot partition just a tad too small for many
>> people to use yum to upgrade.
>
>That's not the case anymore.
> As a general rule, I would reccomend removing 'rhgb' and 'quiet' from your
> kernel parameters in grub.conf. This will show more info during boot, and
> possibly aid in diagnostics.
>
> I'm following this thread with interest after giving up on my own battle
> with the same issue. After adjustin
On Tue, 2010-03-23 at 21:43 +, mike cloaked wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 9:36 PM, Patrick O'Callaghan
> wrote:
>
> >> Maybe that last point is the important one - in Thunderbird I have the
> >> option of sending PGP/mime - but I can't see how to do this in
> >> Evolution? Is there a swit
Hello,
sorry for the off-topic.
Tipically when I work with LVM on Linux (RHEL/CentOS 5 and/or Fedora 11/12),
I create the physical volume directly on the whole disk.
Historically one created a partition on the disk, eventually big as the
whole disk and then marked it as 8e type (LVM), and then the
On 03/24/2010 02:57 AM, Rick Stevens wrote:
>
> Provided the /boot partition was big enough, yes. The default disk
> partitioning left the /boot partition just a tad too small for many
> people to use yum to upgrade.
>
That's not the case anymore. The new default for /boot in Fedora 13
will b
On 03/23/2010 03:11 PM, Greg Woods wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-03-23 at 14:27 -0700, Rick Stevens wrote:
>
>> Provided the /boot partition was big enough, yes. The default disk
>> partitioning left the /boot partition just a tad too small for many
>> people to use yum to upgrade.
>
> I didn't use yum, I
As a general rule, I would reccomend removing 'rhgb' and 'quiet' from your
kernel parameters in grub.conf. This will show more info during boot, and
possibly aid in diagnostics.
I'm following this thread with interest after giving up on my own battle with
the same issue. After adjusting grub.co
On Tue, 2010-03-23 at 14:27 -0700, Rick Stevens wrote:
> Provided the /boot partition was big enough, yes. The default disk
> partitioning left the /boot partition just a tad too small for many
> people to use yum to upgrade.
I didn't use yum, I booted off the new DVD and did an upgrade from
the
On 03/23/2010 01:52 PM, Kevin Kempter wrote:
>> You must blacklist nouveau in the edit /etc/grub.conf and add the
>> following to the end of the line(s) starting with 'kernel':
>>
>> rdblacklist=nouveau
>>
>>
>>
>> Before using the driver, you need to lower your system protection so
>> SElinux does
On Tue, 2010-03-23 at 21:05 + Craig White
wrote
> On Tue, 2010-03-23 at 11:55 -0700, Shivkumar Chandrasekaran wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I have 2 laptops that can accept SD cards. The Fedora Core 12 (Gnome
> > 2.28.2) set-up in both are as follows:
> >
> > 1. Thinkpad T61: 2.6.32.9-70.fc12.x86_
On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 9:36 PM, Patrick O'Callaghan
wrote:
>> Maybe that last point is the important one - in Thunderbird I have the
>> option of sending PGP/mime - but I can't see how to do this in
>> Evolution? Is there a switch I am missing because I did not look deep
>> enough or is it that
On 03/24/2010 01:26 AM, Marko Vojinovic wrote:
> On Tuesday 23 March 2010 19:21:59 Robin Laing wrote:
>
>> On 03/13/2010 08:34 AM, Mail Lists wrote:
>> It will be interesting if
>> Mono is pushed into Gnome to the point that RedHad cannot work around
>> it. Could KDE become the default Fedora d
On Tue, 2010-03-23 at 21:05 +, mike cloaked wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 8:55 PM, mike cloaked wrote:
>
> >>> does it make a difference if you are sending inline or PGP/MIME.
> >>
>
> Maybe that last point is the important one - in Thunderbird I have the
> option of sending PGP/mime - bu
On 03/23/2010 01:25 PM, Greg Woods wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-03-23 at 13:56 -0600, Mike McCarty wrote:
>
>> This is perhaps better accomplished by using a separate partition
>> for your data and system. IOW, perhaps you should put /home, and
>> perhaps /usr/local and /opt, on separate partitions. This
On Sat, 20 Mar 2010 18:13:59 +0100, Maurizio Marini wrote:
> I have this very annoying issue:
> whan i use vmware console (many vmware versions:from vmware server to
> ESXi 4) with various kind of rpm based vm's client (fedora 11/fedora 12,
> centos 5, etc..), when using arrow keys kSnapShot is fi
Hi,
Has anyone got Fedora installed on a Sony Z11 laptop (
http://www.sony.co.uk/product/vn-z-series/tab/overview )
Its got a new fangled dual graphics card set up a NVIDIA® GeForce® GT 330M 1GB,
and Intel card for low power
consumption. I've ordered one now I'm getting concerned that perhaps
On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 9:05 PM, mike cloaked wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 8:55 PM, mike cloaked wrote:
>
does it make a difference if you are sending inline or PGP/MIME.
>>>
>
> Maybe that last point is the important one - in Thunderbird I have the
> option of sending PGP/mime - but I c
On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 8:55 PM, mike cloaked wrote:
>>> does it make a difference if you are sending inline or PGP/MIME.
>>
Maybe that last point is the important one - in Thunderbird I have the
option of sending PGP/mime - but I can't see how to do this in
Evolution? Is there a switch I am mi
On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 8:44 PM, mike cloaked wrote:
>>> If anyone else uses signed mail and can confirm this behaviour it
>>> would be useful - I would report this against bugzilla but I need to
>>> know which component is the underlying problem.
>>>
>>>
>> Check to make sure you are sending pla
> You must blacklist nouveau in the edit /etc/grub.conf and add the
> following to the end of the line(s) starting with 'kernel':
>
> rdblacklist=nouveau
>
>
>
> Before using the driver, you need to lower your system protection so
> SElinux doesn't prevent the driver to load.
>
> setsebool -P
On Tue, 2010-03-23 at 13:21 -0600, Robin Laing wrote:
> On 03/13/2010 08:34 AM, Mail Lists wrote:
> >
> > I'm curious how many current KDE users we have - what percent of our
> > install base? And what percent of the desktop install base ?
> >
> > Since the 3.5 -> 4.0 KDE pushathon, everyone
On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 4:47 PM, Jerry Feldman wrote:
> On 03/22/2010 01:20 PM, mike cloaked wrote:
>> This is not an selinux issue - the summary is as follows:
>> Thunderbird sends signed mail to Thunderbird - all is fine
>> Thunderbird sends signed mail to Evolution - all is fine
>> Evolution se
Greg Woods wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-03-23 at 13:56 -0600, Mike McCarty wrote:
>
>> This is perhaps better accomplished by using a separate partition
>> for your data and system. IOW, perhaps you should put /home, and
[...]
> That's not quite as easy as it sounds, because when you log in to a new
>
On Tue, 2010-03-23 at 13:56 -0600, Mike McCarty wrote:
> This is perhaps better accomplished by using a separate partition
> for your data and system. IOW, perhaps you should put /home, and
> perhaps /usr/local and /opt, on separate partitions. This is a good
> idea, anyway, because then if you ha
Robin Laing wrote:
> I would like the option to rolling release or upgrade. I say this
> because of my family. My wife is not with the install and I have to
> think of her. My daughter installed F12 herself on a new laptop.
>
> My wife was running FC7 until I re-installed to F12 but moving to
On Tuesday 23 March 2010 19:21:59 Robin Laing wrote:
> On 03/13/2010 08:34 AM, Mail Lists wrote:
> It will be interesting if
> Mono is pushed into Gnome to the point that RedHad cannot work around
> it. Could KDE become the default Fedora desktop?
Forgive my ignorance, but what is the story about
On 03/23/2010 03:21 PM, Robin Laing wrote:
> On 03/13/2010 08:34 AM, Mail Lists wrote:
>
>>I'm curious how many current KDE users we have - what percent of our
>> install base? And what percent of the desktop install base ?
>>
>>Since the 3.5 -> 4.0 KDE pushathon, everyone I know who
On 03/15/2010 02:33 PM, Antonio Olivares wrote:
> Dear fellow Fedora users,
>
> At distrowatch there is some discussion whether Fedora would become a
> "Rolling Release" like Arch. See:
>
> http://distrowatch.com/weekly.php?issue=20100315
>
> http://www.desktoplinux.com/news/NS8716234495.html
>
>
On Tue, 2010-03-23 at 18:18 +, BeartoothHOS wrote:
> meaning by "we" those few who have not yet killfiled him. (I will in
> a
> minute.)
I am one of those who enjoys a train wreck and rarely ever killfile
someone but he is actually getting close to giving me sufficient
motivation.
I fin
I am having an issue in regards to handling expiring passwords during the
grace period. I also filed a bug because I find the behavior to not be as
expected (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=576303). But to
summarize my bug report, in my code that checks a user's credentials
(username
On 03/13/2010 08:34 AM, Mail Lists wrote:
>
> I'm curious how many current KDE users we have - what percent of our
> install base? And what percent of the desktop install base ?
>
> Since the 3.5 -> 4.0 KDE pushathon, everyone I know who was a KDE user
> (myself included, and Linus too!) switc
On Tue, 2010-03-23 at 11:55 -0700, Shivkumar Chandrasekaran wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have 2 laptops that can accept SD cards. The Fedora Core 12 (Gnome
> 2.28.2) set-up in both are as follows:
>
> 1. Thinkpad T61: 2.6.32.9-70.fc12.x86_64
> 2. Lenovo S10: 2.6.32.9-70.fc12.i686
>
> On both these machine
Hi,
I have 2 laptops that can accept SD cards. The Fedora Core 12 (Gnome
2.28.2) set-up in both are as follows:
1. Thinkpad T61: 2.6.32.9-70.fc12.x86_64
2. Lenovo S10: 2.6.32.9-70.fc12.i686
On both these machines SD card insertion is not detected. I think there
is no hardware problem, since if I
On Mon, 22 Mar 2010 17:38:03 -0400, Marcel Rieux wrote:
>> Are you saying that if you run Linux, and then re-boot, and enter the
>> BIOS, it is changed in some way?
> I would think this is exactly what I said.
... and, of course, it never occurs to you that all the rest of
us might be
You must blacklist nouveau in the edit /etc/grub.conf and add the
following to the end of the line(s) starting with 'kernel':
rdblacklist=nouveau
Before using the driver, you need to lower your system protection so
SElinux doesn't prevent the driver to load.
setsebool -P allow_execstack on
On Tuesday 23 March 2010, Gregory Hosler wrote:
>On 03/23/2010 06:08 PM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
>> On Mon, 22 Mar 2010 17:10:49 -0400, Gene wrote:
>>> On Monday 22 March 2010, Will Walthall wrote:
So I made the assumption that your part layout was /dev/sdb1 f10
system, /dev/sdb2 f12 syst
On Tuesday 23 March 2010, Michael Schwendt wrote:
>On Mon, 22 Mar 2010 17:10:49 -0400, Gene wrote:
>> On Monday 22 March 2010, Will Walthall wrote:
>> >So I made the assumption that your part layout was /dev/sdb1 f10
>> >system, /dev/sdb2 f12 system.
>> >
>> >Option #1 Install grub to the MBR of /d
Hi all;
I've updated to the latest kernel and it boots to a blank screen, nvidia does
not start.
Here's what I have installed:
[/root]
r...@issac # rpm -qa | grep kernel | sort
abrt-addon-kerneloops-1.0.8-2.fc12.x86_64
kernel-2.6.31.12-174.2.19.fc12.x86_64
kernel-2.6.31.12-174.2.22.fc12.x86_64
On 03/22/2010 01:20 PM, mike cloaked wrote:
> This is not an selinux issue - the summary is as follows:
> Thunderbird sends signed mail to Thunderbird - all is fine
> Thunderbird sends signed mail to Evolution - all is fine
> Evolution sends signed mail to Evolution - all is fine
> Evolution sends
I think I would understand it more if I understood the following sections:
cacertfile = /usr/local/etc/freeradius/certs/CA_certif.crt
(If I am doing testing how to I make this file)
Do I really need this section. I don't have, nor will I have any Wi-Fi and
all users connecting
j...@scusting.com wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I noticed in our directory server logs a number of queries which are not
> using indexes, and this appears to be down to sorting of the query being
> done the server side:
>
> - Server sorted-
> conn=1433 op=1 SRCH base="o=blah.com" scope=2
> fi
On 03/23/2010 01:30 PM, Theodore Papadopoulo wrote:
> On 03/23/2010 01:21 PM, Theodore Papadopoulo wrote:
>
>> My problem is that those two file do not belong to any rpm ?? How can I
>> restore them ??
>>
>> Is it normal to have such important files (or actually any file at all)
>> not dealt wi
On Tue, 2010-03-23 at 10:21 -0400, Kevin H. Hobbs wrote:
> Since my 8 fedora 11 hosts did their March 20 update of mcelog I have
> been getting hourly e-mails from cron on each host with the text :
>
> /etc/cron.hourly/mcelog.cron:
>
> mcelog: warning: 18446744073709551600 bytes ignored in each r
Vis-a-vis your note of 2010-03-23 07:21:
> Since my 8 fedora 11 hosts did their March 20 update of mcelog I have
> been getting hourly e-mails from cron on each host with the text :
>
> /etc/cron.hourly/mcelog.cron:
>
> mcelog: warning: 18446744073709551600 bytes ignored in each record
> mcelog:
On 03/23/2010 07:21 AM, Kevin H. Hobbs wrote:
> Since my 8 fedora 11 hosts did their March 20 update of mcelog I have
> been getting hourly e-mails from cron on each host with the text :
>
> /etc/cron.hourly/mcelog.cron:
>
> mcelog: warning: 18446744073709551600 bytes ignored in each record
> mcelo
Since my 8 fedora 11 hosts did their March 20 update of mcelog I have
been getting hourly e-mails from cron on each host with the text :
/etc/cron.hourly/mcelog.cron:
mcelog: warning: 18446744073709551600 bytes ignored in each record
mcelog: consider an update
This bug contains the exact test of
Sorry people, I've just found a likely reference in Bugzilla.
Please ignore the stuff below for now...
Terry
> Hi all,
> I'm using the Live version of FC12 to produce a bootable clone of an idle FC12
> system to a USB stick. One step involves using 'dump' to dump the contents of
> the
> idle roo
Hi all,
I'm using the Live version of FC12 to produce a bootable clone of an idle FC12
system to a USB stick. One step involves using 'dump' to dump the contents of
the
idle root fiesystem and piping the result to 'restore', to build the stick
copy of root. This all basically works, except that re
On 03/23/2010 01:21 PM, Theodore Papadopoulo wrote:
> My problem is that those two file do not belong to any rpm ?? How can I
> restore them ??
>
> Is it normal to have such important files (or actually any file at all)
> not dealt with rpm ??
> In my (probably simplistic) view, every non-generated
I have a strange problem with NetworkManager since yesterday.
I was connected through WIFI all the afternoon. At some point I got many:
NetworkManager: nm_call_store_remove(): Trying to remove a
non-existant call id.
Still the network worked. Then I rebooted the computer, and since then
Netwo
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 03/23/2010 06:08 PM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> On Mon, 22 Mar 2010 17:10:49 -0400, Gene wrote:
>
>> On Monday 22 March 2010, Will Walthall wrote:
>>> So I made the assumption that your part layout was /dev/sdb1 f10
>>> system, /dev/sdb2 f12 system.
On Mon, 22 Mar 2010 17:10:49 -0400, Gene wrote:
> On Monday 22 March 2010, Will Walthall wrote:
> >So I made the assumption that your part layout was /dev/sdb1 f10
> >system, /dev/sdb2 f12 system.
> >
> >Option #1 Install grub to the MBR of /dev/sdb
> >Option #2 Install grub to the partition of /d
Around 03:06am on Tuesday, March 23, 2010 (UK time), Marcel Rieux scrawled:
> People usually have opinions to make up for their ignorance of facts.
This is an opinion. As was your initial email.
Steve
--
(o< www.stevesearle.com
//\ Powered by Fedora
V_/_No MS products were used i
> Bruno Wolff III :
>> My problem is all the traffic is caught by "classid 1:10", the
>> default class.
>> Nothing is trapped by "classid 1:301" -> "classid 1:426"
>> At a first glance, would you see something wrong in these?
>I took a quick look and didn't see anything obvious. But I haven't
>pla
66 matches
Mail list logo
