Re: radeon to nvidia to radeon produces pain

On Thu, Jun 03, 2010 at 01:30:10 -0500, Michael Hennebry wrote: > > I might have screamed too soon. > After using Xorg -configure, > I replaced the old xorg.conf with the generated version. > Does this mean I have hardware acceleration at last? > > [r...@localhost ~]# glxinfo | grep -e ender -e

Re: fnfx trouble on Toshiba

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Le 03/06/2010 03:05, Yogesh a écrit : > Hello, > > I have very recently migrated to Fedora from Windows. I have installed > it on my Toshiba L505-S5971 laptop. > I installed fnfx after reading about it in some forum. That went fine. > > Now with ever

Moving a virtual machine

I set up a virtual machine in virt-manager on one machine, and now I'd like to port it to another machine. I copied /var/lib/libvirt to the other machine, but the VM doesn't show up in the list of VMs in virt-manager. I must be missing something, but I'm not sure what. Does anyone know? Is there

Printer selector in F13

Up through F12, under Preferences, there was a selector for the default printer. After a preupgrade to F13, that no longer seems to be available. Is it gone? Did it move to another package? Thanks. -- Matthew Saltzman Clemson University Math Sciences mjs AT clemson DOT edu htt

Re: fnfx trouble on Toshiba

On 3 June 2010 02:05, Yogesh wrote: > I installed fnfx after reading about it in some forum. FnFx is obsolete now. All the events should come up using INPUT from the kernel. This means they either just work, or you can assign them actions in the keybinding caplet. Richard. -- users mailing list

Fwd: Fedora Weekly News 228

Hope nobody Minds. Frank --- Begin Message --- 1 Fedora Weekly News Issue 228 o 1.1 Announcements + 1.1.1 Fedora Announcement News # 1.1.1.1 Fedora Board and FESCo Election results # 1.1.1.2 Thank-you message from the Board

Re: Fwd: Fedora Weekly News 228

Frank Murphy wrote: > Hope nobody Minds. > > Frank hi frank, not at all. i get fwn, too. i was going to forward it also. but i thought about snipping it down to what might be pertinent to recent events. :D such as; > Subject: Fedora Weekly News 228 > o 1.5 Artwork + 1.5.1 Design Team Rel

Re: Printer selector in F13

On Thu, 2010-06-03 at 04:03 -0400, Matthew Saltzman wrote: > Up through F12, under Preferences, there was a selector for the default > printer. After a preupgrade to F13, that no longer seems to be > available. Is it gone? Did it move to another package? The stand-alone default printer selectio

Re: Fwd: Fedora Weekly News 228

On 03/06/10 09:44, g wrote: > Frank Murphy wrote: >> Hope nobody Minds. >> >> Frank > > hi frank, > > not at all. > > i get fwn, too. > > i was going to forward it also. > > but i thought about snipping it down to what might be pertinent to recent > events. :D > I'll let you do it then?, as

Re: Fwd: Fedora Weekly News 228

On Thursday 03 June 2010, Frank Murphy wrote: >Hope nobody Minds. > >Frank > Thank you Frank. -- Cheers, Gene "There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order." -Ed Howdershelt (Author) BOFH excuse #183: filesystem not big enough for

Re: can't set Okular as helper pdf app in Firefox

On Wed, 2010-06-02 at 08:42 -0400, Claude Jones wrote: > When I click on a pdf link in Firefox, I get a message saying the > helper application doesn't exist and to change that in preferences. The usual problem is that the source isn't telling you that it's a PDF file, but uses the generic binary

Re: Fwd: Fedora Weekly News 228

Frank Murphy wrote: > I'll let you do it then?, > as your shears may be better than mine. lol. more satirical? more cynical? -- peace out. tc,hago. g . in a free world without fences, who needs gates. ** help microsoft stamp out piracy - give linux to a friend today. ** to mess up a

[389-users] two guys who bit some more than we could chew...(?)

Dear Sirs, we need your help. We are two guys, Olof Nord and Thobias Nylander, studying the secondary year on upper high school at kattegattgymnasiet, Halland, sweden. google maps link We have a Local Networking class where we are supposed to set up and maintain an LDAP based directory ser

Re: Ugly little hand [Solved]

On Wed, Jun 02, 2010 at 06:01:58PM -0700, Jonathan Ryshpan wrote: > On Tue, 2010-06-01 at 19:55 -0700, Jonathan Ryshpan wrote: > > The cursor that displays over desktop icons and links in Firefox, among > > other places -- a little black hand pointing up -- is really ugly. (At > > least I think so

Evolution new mail notification gone in F13?

I preupgraded from F12 to F13, and now Evolution doesn't pop up the notification icon for new mail in the notification area. It does pop up the appointment notification. Any suggestion for where to look to fix welcome. Thanks. -- Matthew Saltzman Clemson University Math Science

Re: [389-users] two guys who bit some more than we could chew...(?)

2010/6/1 olof nord : [snip] > we can start, but not logon to the 389-console, and we cant get luma to > connect to our server. > > we have succeded with starting service dirsrv. Are you getting any errors when you try to connect? Are you running the console locally or from a second workstation?

Re: [389-users] 389-console not working on Windows XP

> I’m able to start 389-console on WinXP but cannot login; always fails > with the error below. any ideas? > C:\Program Files\389 Management Console>"C:\Program > Files\Java\jre6\bin\java" "-Djava.library.path=." -cp > "./jss4.jar;./ldapjdk.jar;./idm-console-base.jar;./idm-console-mcc.jar;./idm

Re: [389-users] two guys who bit some more than we could chew...(?)

I am in the same position, but I am running RHEL5.3 I am able to get the admin Gui working, but not the management GUI working But I am unable to log into the Admin Gui. Which user is this, is this a unix user/password? Which one? Is this an application user/password?? How do I set this. Tha

Re: [389-users] two guys who bit some more than we could chew...(?)

olof nord wrote: > Dear Sirs, > we need your help. > > We are two guys, Olof Nord and Thobias Nylander, studying the > secondary year on upper high school at kattegattgymnasiet > , Halland, sweden. google > maps link >

Re: [389-users] two guys who bit some more than we could chew...(?)

Hyatt, Dan wrote: > > I am in the same position, but I am running RHEL5.3 > > I am able to get the admin Gui working, but not the management GUI working > > > > But I am unable to log into the Admin Gui. Which user is this, is this > a unix user/password? Which one? Is this an application > use

Re: twin display f12

Hi siddhesh.poyare...@gmail.com Thanks for your reply. I did in same way but the monitor is not detecting. It is displaying no signal. Yes I would like to mention that its 64 bit system. I have been trying it since one month and I have search the net almost everyday for the solution but no luck yet

Re: radeon to nvidia to radeon produces pain

On Thu, 3 Jun 2010, Bruno Wolff III wrote: > On Thu, Jun 03, 2010 at 01:30:10 -0500, > Michael Hennebry wrote: >> >> I might have screamed too soon. >> After using Xorg -configure, >> I replaced the old xorg.conf with the generated version. >> Does this mean I have hardware acceleration at last?

Re: Fwd: Fedora Weekly News 228

On Thu, 2010-06-03 at 09:14 +0100, Frank Murphy wrote: > Hope nobody Minds. Since you don't explain why you're doing this, we can only speculate. Or are we to expect reposts of every issue of FWN from the announce list? I for one would certainly mind that. poc -- users mailing list users@lists.

Re: Moving a virtual machine

On 06/03/2010 01:59 AM, Matthew Saltzman wrote: > I set up a virtual machine in virt-manager on one machine, and now I'd > like to port it to another machine. I copied /var/lib/libvirt to the > other machine, but the VM doesn't show up in the list of VMs in > virt-manager. > > I must be missing so

Re: Fwd: Fedora Weekly News 228

On 03/06/10 16:12, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > On Thu, 2010-06-03 at 09:14 +0100, Frank Murphy wrote: >> Hope nobody Minds. > > Since you don't explain why you're doing this, we can only speculate. All the past week or so about "we didn't know" Or > are we to expect reposts of every issue of F

Re: [389-users] 389-console not working on Windows XP

Benjamin, Devon wrote: > Microsoft Windows XP [Version 5.1.2600] > 32-bit or 64-bit? > (C) Copyright 1985-2001 Microsoft Corp. > > C:\>cd "Program Files\389 Management Console" > > C:\Program Files\389 Management Console>dir > Volume in drive C has no label. > Volume Serial Number is D422-1F83

Re: Fwd: Fedora Weekly News 228

On Thu, 2010-06-03 at 16:19 +0100, Frank Murphy wrote: > On 03/06/10 16:12, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > > On Thu, 2010-06-03 at 09:14 +0100, Frank Murphy wrote: > >> Hope nobody Minds. > > > > Since you don't explain why you're doing this, we can only speculate. > > All the past week or so about

Re: Fwd: Fedora Weekly News 228

On Thu, 2010-06-03 at 11:41 -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > On Thu, 2010-06-03 at 16:19 +0100, Frank Murphy wrote: > > On 03/06/10 16:12, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > > > On Thu, 2010-06-03 at 09:14 +0100, Frank Murphy wrote: > > >> Hope nobody Minds. > > > > > > Since you don't explain why yo

Re: Fwd: Fedora Weekly News 228

> How many of you are subscribed to announce-list? > > The web redesign was in FWN multiple times and if FWN was sent to > announce-list I really don't get all the harping about how people didn't > know about it... > > ~m > > I knew of it, but had not subscribed. seeing it has this content, i

FC13, Installing 32 bit Libs on a 64 bit box

FC13/KDE How do I install 32 bit Libs on a 64 bit box ? I have SDL installed. This would be a good addition to Yum. -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedora

Re: Fwd: Fedora Weekly News 228

On Thursday 03 June 2010, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: >On Thu, 2010-06-03 at 09:14 +0100, Frank Murphy wrote: >> Hope nobody Minds. > >Since you don't explain why you're doing this, we can only speculate. Or >are we to expect reposts of every issue of FWN from the announce list? I >for one would cer

Re: FC13, Installing 32 bit Libs on a 64 bit box

Append .i686 to the package name you are installing using yum. yum install packagename.i686 e.g. yum install libtiff.i686 On Thu, Jun 3, 2010 at 19:33, Jim wrote: > FC13/KDE > > How do I install 32 bit Libs on a 64 bit box ? > > I have SDL installed. > > This would be a good addition to Yum. >

F13: kvm guest screen resolution

Hi, I'm running a kvm guest (F13) on a F13 host but didn't managed to get a reasonable screen resolution in the guest OS. I used cirrus and vga but was not able to get a resolution higher then 800x600. I tried also to manually add some resolutions to the xorg.conf but without success. Would be

Re: FC13, Installing 32 bit Libs on a 64 bit box

On 06/03/2010 12:41 PM, Nicolae Ghimbovschi wrote: Append .i686 to the package name you are installing using yum. yum install packagename.i686 e.g. yum install libtiff.i686 On Thu, Jun 3, 2010 at 19:33, Jim > wrote: FC13/KDE How do I install 32 bit Li

Re: FC13, Installing 32 bit Libs on a 64 bit box

On Thu, 2010-06-03 at 12:52 -0400, Jim wrote: > On 06/03/2010 12:41 PM, Nicolae Ghimbovschi wrote: > > Append .i686 to the package name you are installing using yum. > > > > yum install packagename.i686 > > > > e.g. > > yum install libtiff.i686 > > > > On Thu, Jun 3, 2010 at 19:33, Jim wrote:

Re: F13: kvm guest screen resolution

On Thu, 03 Jun 2010 18:51:44 +0200 Christoph A. wrote: > Would be great if I could get at least a resolution of 1280x960. > Is someone using kvm-qemu with decent resolutions? I basically don't use the native KVM console display at all. I create a VNC server and connect to it with a vnc client. Yo

Re: FC13, Installing 32 bit Libs on a 64 bit box

On 06/03/2010 10:10 AM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > On Thu, 2010-06-03 at 12:52 -0400, Jim wrote: >> On 06/03/2010 12:41 PM, Nicolae Ghimbovschi wrote: >>> Append .i686 to the package name you are installing using yum. >>> >>> yum install packagename.i686 >>> >>> e.g. >>> yum install libtiff.i686

GDM slow to accept password

Using Fedora 11 x86_64 and 12 i686 During login, after selecting username it takes too long (up to 10 seconds) for gdm to present the password prompt. However, if I simply type in my password and hit enter before the password prompt appears, the login is successful. I remember the password promp

Re: FC13, Installing 32 bit Libs on a 64 bit box

On 06/03/2010 01:19 PM, Rick Stevens wrote: > On 06/03/2010 10:10 AM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > >> On Thu, 2010-06-03 at 12:52 -0400, Jim wrote: >> >>> On 06/03/2010 12:41 PM, Nicolae Ghimbovschi wrote: >>> Append .i686 to the package name you are installing using yum. >>>

Re: FC13, Installing 32 bit Libs on a 64 bit box

On 06/03/2010 01:10 PM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > On Thu, 2010-06-03 at 12:52 -0400, Jim wrote: > >> On 06/03/2010 12:41 PM, Nicolae Ghimbovschi wrote: >> >>> Append .i686 to the package name you are installing using yum. >>> >>> yum install packagename.i686 >>> >>> e.g. >>> yum instal

Re: FC13, Installing 32 bit Libs on a 64 bit box

On 03/06/10 18:38, Jim wrote: > On 06/03/2010 01:19 PM, Rick Stevens wrote: > >> >> yum install lib*.i686 >> >> Use at your own risk. Thou hast been warned. > > Cheap and dirty (and will likely install stuff you don't want): > > Yea Your right about that Rick , It wants to also install all

Re: FC13, Installing 32 bit Libs on a 64 bit box

On 06/03/2010 01:44 PM, Jim wrote: > On 06/03/2010 01:10 PM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: >> On Thu, 2010-06-03 at 12:52 -0400, Jim wrote: >> >>> On 06/03/2010 12:41 PM, Nicolae Ghimbovschi wrote: >>> Append .i686 to the package name you are installing using yum. yum install packagenam

Fedora as Xen/CentOS guest?

Is there a trick to getting Fedora to install as a Xen guest? I've got a CentOS 5.5 box and I have tried to create a Fedora VM (starting with F11, then F12, then F13) and I run into the same problem every time: it starts booting from the install DVD (or ISO image, same thing), gets partway through

Re: Network Manager, WPA, "available to all users"

On 06/01/2010 05:11 PM, Wolfgang S. Rupprecht wrote: > > Steven Stern writes: >> I have a desktop with wireless, due to some cabling difficulties. I'm >> trying to switch from "Network" to "NetworkManager" because we're moving >> our wireless from WEP to WPA-PSK. >> >> Using Network Manager, I ca

Re: Fwd: Fedora Weekly News 228

Máirín Duffy wrote: > The web redesign was in FWN multiple times and if FWN was sent to > announce-list exactly which fwn where announcements in? -- peace out. tc,hago. g . in a free world without fences, who needs gates. ** help microsoft stamp out piracy - give linux to a friend to

Re: [389-users] 389-console not working on Windows XP

Benjamin, Devon wrote: > C:\Program Files\389 Management Console>389-console.bat > > C:\Program Files\389 Management Console>"C:\Program > Files\Java\jdk1.6.0_20\bin\java" "-Djava.library > .path=C:\Program Files\389 Management Console" -cp "C:\Program Files\389 > Management Console/jss4.jar > ;C

Re: Fwd: Fedora Weekly News 228

On Thu, 2010-06-03 at 19:32 +, g wrote: > Máirín Duffy wrote: > > > > The web redesign was in FWN multiple times and if FWN was sent to > > announce-list > > exactly which fwn where announcements in? Frank already posted one of the references to the FWN/announce-list notice of the redesign

Re: Fwd: Fedora Weekly News 228

On 06/03/2010 04:59 PM, Frank Murphy wrote: > On 03/06/10 09:44, g wrote: > >> Frank Murphy wrote: >> >>> Hope nobody Minds. >>> >>> Frank >>> >> hi frank, >> >> not at all. >> >> i get fwn, too. >> >> i was going to forward it also. >> >> but i thought about snipping it down to what

Re: GDM slow to accept password

On 06/03/2010 10:23 AM, Robert Arkiletian wrote: > Using Fedora 11 x86_64 and 12 i686 > > During login, after selecting username it takes too long (up to 10 > seconds) for gdm to present the password prompt. However, if I simply > type in my password and hit enter before the password prompt appea

Re: Fwd: Fedora Weekly News 228

Máirín Duffy wrote: > On Thu, 2010-06-03 at 19:32 +, g wrote: >> Máirín Duffy wrote: >> >>> The web redesign was in FWN multiple times and if FWN was sent to >>> announce-list >> exactly which fwn where announcements in? > > Frank already posted one of the references to the FWN/announce-l

Re: Fwd: Fedora Weekly News 228

On Thu, 2010-06-03 at 20:18 +, g wrote: > Máirín Duffy wrote: > > On Thu, 2010-06-03 at 19:32 +, g wrote: > >> Máirín Duffy wrote: > >> > >>> The web redesign was in FWN multiple times and if FWN was sent to > >>> announce-list > >> exactly which fwn where announcements in? > > > > Fr

Re: F13: kvm guest screen resolution

On Thu, 2010-06-03 at 18:51 +0200, Christoph A. wrote: > Hi, > > I'm running a kvm guest (F13) on a F13 host but didn't managed to get a > reasonable screen resolution in the guest OS. I used cirrus and vga but > was not able to get a resolution higher then 800x600. > I tried also to manually ad

F13: screensaver problem after upgrade from F12

I recently upgraded from F12 to F13 using preupgrade. Everything seemed to go well, except for one problem I think I've traced to the screensaver. When I lock the screen now at the console, I get logged out of my session after a short period of time (a few minutes) . My first thought was that m

Re: Fwd: Fedora Weekly News 228

Máirín Duffy wrote: > Actually that post had plenty to do with what was used on the site for > get.fpo. Did you read it? That's the blog post where the first get.fpo > mockup was presented - the set of mockups links includes the first > mockup we did for the get.fpo that is up right now: again,

Re: [389-users] 389-console not working on Windows XP

I tried it on Windows 2003 and had the same problem. -Original Message- From: Rich Megginson [mailto:rmegg...@redhat.com] Sent: Thursday, June 03, 2010 3:34 PM To: Benjamin, Devon Cc: 389-us...@lists.fedoraproject.org Subject: Re: 389-console not working on Windows XP Benjamin, Devon wro

Re: F13: kvm guest screen resolution

On 06/03/2010 10:51 AM, Christoph A. wrote: > Hi, > > I'm running a kvm guest (F13) on a F13 host but didn't managed to get a > reasonable screen resolution in the guest OS. I used cirrus and vga but > was not able to get a resolution higher then 800x600. > I tried also to manually add some resolut

Re: F13: kvm guest screen resolution / kvm broken setup

On 06/03/2010 10:50 PM, Gilboa Davara wrote: > On Thu, 2010-06-03 at 18:51 +0200, Christoph A. wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I'm running a kvm guest (F13) on a F13 host but didn't managed to get a >> reasonable screen resolution in the guest OS. I used cirrus and vga but >> was not able to get a resolution h

Re: FC13, Installing 32 bit Libs on a 64 bit box

On 06/03/2010 10:33 AM, Jim wrote: > FC13/KDE > > How do I install 32 bit Libs on a 64 bit box ? > > I have SDL installed. > > This would be a good addition to Yum. > It would be much easier to discover why you might need some 32 bit libraries. For instance, you mentioned SDL. Is there an a

Re: FC13, Installing 32 bit Libs on a 64 bit box

On Thu, Jun 3, 2010 at 10:30 PM, Phil Meyer wrote: > On 06/03/2010 10:33 AM, Jim wrote: >> FC13/KDE >> >> How do I install 32 bit Libs on a 64 bit box ? >> >> I have SDL installed. >> >> This would be a good addition to Yum. >> > > It would be much easier to discover why you might need some 32 bit

Re: Fwd: Fedora Weekly News 228

On Thu, 2010-06-03 at 21:10 +, g wrote: > it is now beginning to appear that you are better at evading my question > than you are at designing web pages. We're done here. Have a nice day, ~m -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options:

Desktop doesn't wake up from suspend

Hi, I'm using FC13 x86_64 with all updates on an MSI MS-7025 motherboard with a "AMD Athlon(tm) 64 Processor 3500+". I've configured power management in the BIOS to put the system to sleep in ten minutes, and left it disabled in fedora. It goes to sleep but doesn't wake up. Pressing the power butt

Re: Fwd: Fedora Weekly News 228

Máirín Duffy wrote: > On Thu, 2010-06-03 at 21:10 +, g wrote: >> it is now beginning to appear that you are better at evading my question >> than you are at designing web pages. > > We're done here. may be that you are because; your final evasion is an obvious admission that there was no ann

Re: Fwd: Fedora Weekly News 228

On 03/06/10 20:56, Ed Greshko wrote: > >> > I could see how some would object and I could see several reasons why it > is a not so good idea. I know what you mean Ed, But, find it a hard one to call as some were calling for info here, in my head (maybe not the lcu) it was those was trying to r

Re: Network Manager, WPA, "available to all users"

> My files seem configured appropriately. Unfortunately, the system does > not come up on the network. > > And, when I check "Available to all users" in nm-applet, the connection > is dropped and disappears from the wireless list. > > FWIW, it works fine on my netbook. On a recent trip, it kep

Re: Network Manager, WPA, "available to all users"

On 06/03/2010 05:36 PM, jack craig wrote: > >> My files seem configured appropriately. Unfortunately, the system does >> not come up on the network. >> >> And, when I check "Available to all users" in nm-applet, the connection >> is dropped and disappears from the wireless list. >> >> > FWIW,

Re: FC13, Installing 32 bit Libs on a 64 bit box

On 06/03/2010 03:51 PM, mike cloaked wrote: > On Thu, Jun 3, 2010 at 10:30 PM, Phil Meyer wrote: > >> On 06/03/2010 10:33 AM, Jim wrote: >> >>> FC13/KDE >>> >>> How do I install 32 bit Libs on a 64 bit box ? >>> >>> I have SDL installed. >>> >>> This would be a good addition to Yum. >>>

System Hangs with online Video

Hello, I run FC13 on my laptop. Every time when I play a video online on either Firefox or Chrome, the system hangs up. The sound plays but the rest goes numb. What may be wrong? Thanks, -Yogesh -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options:

Re: Relabeling all audio files on a server

Phil Meyer wrote: > On 05/30/2010 04:21 PM, Leonard Adjei wrote: >> I have a server which houses thousands of audio tracks and materials. >> Recently I started using a web application which seems to have a ew >> problems with the naming convention used by default. >> For example it has a problem wi

Re: fnfx trouble on Toshiba

Hi, On 3 June 2010 03:22, François Patte wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Le 03/06/2010 03:05, Yogesh a écrit : > > Hello, > > > > I have very recently migrated to Fedora from Windows. I have installed > > it on my Toshiba L505-S5971 laptop. > > I installed fnfx after

Re: Desktop doesn't wake up from suspend

On Thu, Jun 3, 2010 at 3:12 PM, Alex wrote: > Hi, > > I'm using FC13 x86_64 with all updates on an MSI MS-7025 motherboard > with a "AMD Athlon(tm) 64 Processor 3500+". I've configured power > management in the BIOS to put the system to sleep in ten minutes, and > left it disabled in fedora. It go

Re: Fwd: Fedora Weekly News 228

On Thu, 2010-06-03 at 22:18 +, g wrote: > Máirín Duffy wrote: > > On Thu, 2010-06-03 at 21:10 +, g wrote: > >> it is now beginning to appear that you are better at evading my question > >> than you are at designing web pages. > > > > We're done here. > > may be that you are because; > >

Re: Fwd: Fedora Weekly News 228

Craig White wrote: > George - I think that you are very offensive towards people who > volunteer their time. It's easy to understand why Fedora contributors > don't actually want to participate on the user lists and get abused by > unappreciative, sarcastic and combative users. craig, for someo

Re: Fwd: Fedora Weekly News 228

On Fri, 2010-06-04 at 03:56 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote: > I could see how some would object and I could see several reasons why > it is a not so good idea. So can I, and the first thing that sprang to mind was the next thing you said: > 1. Having an informal method of forwarding messages from other

Re: GDM slow to accept password

On Thu, 2010-06-03 at 13:09 -0700, Konstantin Svist wrote: > Maybe not 10 seconds, but it's definitely always laggy Yes, and it's been that way for as long as I can remember. I seem to recall that, back in the dim and distant past, when you could disable the face browser, it was quicker. It baff

Re: Fwd: Fedora Weekly News 228

On 06/04/2010 08:28 AM, Tim wrote: > >> 2. Forwarding edited messages could result in portions being removed >> that some would find useful. (Why does the person forwarding get to >> decide what is "important"?) >> > I don't really agree on the above. Firstly, please don't forward such > me

Re: GDM slow to accept password

On Fri, 04 Jun 2010 10:01:52 +0930 Tim wrote: > It baffles me how computers can do millions of things a second, yet > spend so long parsing simple text files (e.g. the GDM config file and > password list, in this case, to make a couple of educated guesses about > what it's doing). Another reason

Re: Fwd: Fedora Weekly News 228

On Fri, 2010-06-04 at 09:58 +0930, Tim wrote: > Separate your responses. Just quote the bit you need to, dump the > rest, in its entirety. Well said Tim (your whole message, not just this bit :-) Slightly OT: users of most modern mailers (Evolution, TBird, Kmail I think, no doubt many others) sh

Re: Fwd: Fedora Weekly News 228

On Thursday 03 June 2010 06:49 PM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > Slightly OT: users of most modern mailers (Evolution, TBird, Kmail I > think, no doubt many others) should know that it's very easy to quote > only the part you want to comment on. Just select the relevant text > before you hit Reply.

Re: Fwd: Fedora Weekly News 228

On Thu, 2010-06-03 at 19:00 -0700, Suvayu Ali wrote: > On Thursday 03 June 2010 06:49 PM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > > Slightly OT: users of most modern mailers (Evolution, TBird, Kmail I > > think, no doubt many others) should know that it's very easy to > quote > > only the part you want to com

Does ccsm work with nouveau?

Is there anyone here who has: 1) Installed the experimental DRI drivers and 2) Who is using nouveau with an Nvidia NV4x chipset (geforce go 6600 is what I got myself) and 3) Who enabled compiz in desktop effects and 4) Who used ccsm, and actually managed to get ccsm to do something? I ca

strange NFS behaviour after upgrade to F13

I have upgraded both a NFS client and NFS server to F13 from F12. Now, on the client, all the files in my NFS home directory appear to be owned by nobody:nobody. It's as though they were being mysteriously root_squashed even though they're not owned by root. Oddly enough, all read/write operation

Network Speed issues on Fedora 12

I have a couple of systems with gigabit ethernet cards. If I copy a large quantity of data to the machine I notice the data throughput start to fall off after about 4-5 gigs. It keeps getting slower and slower the more data that flows through the interface. This happens on x86_64 and i386. A s

Re: System Hangs with online Video

On Thu, 3 Jun 2010 19:07:05 -0400 Yogesh wrote: > Hello, > > I run FC13 on my laptop. Every time when I play a video online on > either Firefox or Chrome, the system hangs up. > The sound plays but the rest goes numb. > > What may be wrong? > Funny, that just happened to me a moment ago while

Re: strange NFS behaviour after upgrade to F13

On 06/03/2010 10:39 PM, Julian C. Dunn wrote: > I have upgraded both a NFS client and NFS server to F13 from F12. > > Now, on the client, all the files in my NFS home directory appear to be > owned by nobody:nobody. It's as though they were being mysteriously > root_squashed even though they're no

Improving the list climate [was Re: Fwd: Fedora Weekly News 228]

On Thu, 2010-06-03 at 16:56 -0700, Craig White wrote: > George - I think that you are very offensive towards people who > volunteer their time. It's easy to understand why Fedora contributors > don't actually want to participate on the user lists and get abused by > unappreciative, sarcastic and co

Re: Does ccsm work with nouveau?

On Thu, 2010-06-03 at 22:37 -0400, Sam Varshavchik wrote: > I can run ccsm without any apparent errors. I can choose to > enable/disable various plugins ccsm offers me, through its interface. It's ages since I've played with that, but does it offer to let you control plugins that aren't actually i

Re: Network Speed issues on Fedora 12

On Thu, 2010-06-03 at 19:42 -0700, alan wrote: > I have a couple of systems with gigabit ethernet cards. If I copy a > large quantity of data to the machine I notice the data throughput > start to fall off after about 4-5 gigs. It keeps getting slower and > slower the more data that flows through t

Re: Fwd: Fedora Weekly News 228

On Fri, 2010-06-04 at 00:27 +, g wrote: > Craig White wrote: > > > > George - I think that you are very offensive towards people who > > volunteer their time. It's easy to understand why Fedora contributors > > don't actually want to participate on the user lists and get abused by > > unappre

Re: Improving the list climate [was Re: Fwd: Fedora Weekly News 228]

On Thu, 2010-06-03 at 23:11 -0400, Máirín Duffy wrote: > On Thu, 2010-06-03 at 16:56 -0700, Craig White wrote: > > George - I think that you are very offensive towards people who > > volunteer their time. It's easy to understand why Fedora contributors > > don't actually want to participate on the

Re: [mythtv-users] installing MythTV 0.23 as non-root - almost

On 04/06/10 04:38, Nick Rout wrote: > On Fri, Jun 4, 2010 at 3:31 PM, agraham wrote: >> On 04/06/10 03:21, Nick Rout wrote: >>> >>> On Fri, Jun 4, 2010 at 2:08 PM, Jean-Yves Avenard >>> wrote: Hi On 4 June 2010 11:29, agrahamwrote: > > Hi, > > I like to in

Re: Improving the list climate [was Re: Fwd: Fedora Weekly News 228]

--- On Thu, 6/3/10, Máirín Duffy wrote: > From: Máirín Duffy > Subject: Improving the list climate [was Re: Fwd: Fedora Weekly News 228] > To: "Community support for Fedora users" > Date: Thursday, June 3, 2010, 8:11 PM > On Thu, 2010-06-03 at 16:56 -0700, > Craig White wrote: > > George - I

Re: Improving the list climate [was Re: Fwd: Fedora Weekly News 228]

--- On Thu, 6/3/10, Máirín Duffy wrote: > From: Máirín Duffy > Subject: Improving the list climate [was Re: Fwd: Fedora Weekly News 228] > To: "Community support for Fedora users" > Date: Thursday, June 3, 2010, 8:11 PM > On Thu, 2010-06-03 at 16:56 -0700, > Craig White wrote: > > George - I

Re: Improving the list climate [was Re: Fwd: Fedora Weekly News 228]

2010/6/3 Máirín Duffy : > Do we want new users to witness this kind of behavior? They are directed > towards this list right now via a number of different pointers. My team > is planning to redesign the Fedora website for Fedora 14, and I'm not > sure we can in good conscience continue to point new

Re: Improving the list climate [was Re: Fwd: Fedora Weekly News 228]

> Choose a good subject - Do not make your subject say just > "Help slax newbie" nobody wants to hear this. Describe your > problem briefly in your subject, then you can describe your > problem in greater depth in the body of your article. Repeat > the subject in the body if it will make things c

Re: Improving the list climate [was Re: Fwd: Fedora Weekly News 228]

On Thu, 2010-06-03 at 21:01 -0700, Alan Evans wrote: > 2010/6/3 Máirín Duffy : > > Do we want new users to witness this kind of behavior? They are directed > > towards this list right now via a number of different pointers. My team > > is planning to redesign the Fedora website for Fedora 14, and I

Re: Fwd: Fedora Weekly News 228

On Thu, Jun 3, 2010 at 8:55 PM, Craig White wrote: > like Gene you have assumed that Máirín is a woman and I > can't imagine any greater testimony to your arrogance and insensitivity > of others but keep trying. Not that I think that sex has any substantive relevance at all here, but I'm pretty s

Setting default pdf reader Fedora13

Hello Friends. I have a probably little dumb question, before fedora i used debian and ubuntu, now, in fedora i have installed acrobat reader and evince(default) but my default now is adobe reader, i want evince as my default pdf reader, how can i set evince as default in command line? because with

Re: Improving the list climate [was Re: Fwd: Fedora Weekly News 228]

I think the following. 1. Everyone has an opinion. When the opinion is of a "personal", subjective nature and the object of the opinion disagrees then they have choices. Two possible choices are: either take it as a personal attack and fight back or ignore it. 2. This list, and every list

Re: Improving the list climate [was Re: Fwd: Fedora Weekly News 228]

2010/6/4 Máirín Duffy : > On Thu, 2010-06-03 at 16:56 -0700, Craig White wrote: >> George - I think that you are very offensive towards people who >> volunteer their time. It's easy to understand why Fedora contributors >> don't actually want to participate on the user lists and get abused by >> un

Re: FC13, Installing 32 bit Libs on a 64 bit box

On Fri, Jun 4, 2010 at 12:01 AM, Phil Meyer wrote: >> If someone wants to run a nightly version of Thunderbird (say >> 3.1.1pre) in 64 bit F13 where the nightly builds are only for 32 bit - >> then it is not so easy! >> >> If you can give a one line command to pull in all the correct 32 bit >> li

  1   2   >