Re: Screen Resolution in Fedora 13 on Intel i915 Chipset

Samuel Kidman gmail.com> writes: > ... > Also if this is the problem, how do I know what are the right > parameters to write a modeline for 1680x1050 resolution? Google search: linux change max native resolution monitor manufacturer Somebody tried to solve a problem like yours on that other OS

Re: Screen Resolution in Fedora 13 on Intel i915 Chipset

On 09/21/2010 02:00 AM, Samuel Kidman wrote: > This is all making me think that the issue is actually with my > monitor- whatever ROM inside the actual screen that stores the have you read monitor manual or considered logging site of manufacture of monitor to find what actual ability is? if lar

Re: Google Inc. Could Be Compliant to the Chinese Government in Beijing, People's Republic of China (PRC)

On 09/21/2010 02:00 AM, James McKenzie wrote: > He spammed at least two of the mailing lists I subscribe to. I thought > he was banned here. one can only hope. until then, a boycott would be nice. -- peace out. tc,hago. g . in a free world without fences, who needs gates. ** help m

Re: Rhythmbox doesn't quite share

On Mon, 2010-09-20 at 21:07 -0500, Steven Stern wrote: > On 09/20/2010 08:11 PM, Craig White wrote: > > On Sun, 2010-09-19 at 22:30 -0500, Steven Stern wrote: > > > >>> > >> mt-daapd crashes. Here's the end of the logfile with debug level 9. So > >> much for that. (The file in question was ripped

Re: Screen Resolution in Fedora 13 on Intel i915 Chipset

On 9/20/10 7:00 PM, Samuel Kidman wrote: >>> Hi, >>> I am not an expert on this, I just try to help if it is of any value :-) >>> Having said that, >>> $ man xrandr >>> $ xrandr >>> $ xrandr --verbose >>> >>> Some links: >>> search Google: fedora xrandr change resolution > Thanks for the help, bu

Re: Rhythmbox doesn't quite share

On 09/20/2010 08:11 PM, Craig White wrote: > On Sun, 2010-09-19 at 22:30 -0500, Steven Stern wrote: > >>> >> mt-daapd crashes. Here's the end of the logfile with debug level 9. So >> much for that. (The file in question was ripped into ALAC m4a format on >> the mac and copied onto the Fedora mach

Re: Screen Resolution in Fedora 13 on Intel i915 Chipset

>>Hi, >>I am not an expert on this, I just try to help if it is of any value :-) >>Having said that, >>$ man xrandr >>$ xrandr >>$ xrandr --verbose >> >>Some links: >>search Google: fedora xrandr change resolution Thanks for the help, but this doesn't solve the problem- I am able to change screen

Re: Google Inc. Could Be Compliant to the Chinese Government in Beijing, People's Republic of China (PRC)

On 9/20/10 5:35 PM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > > 1) This story is *nine months old*. > 2) Exactly what has this got to do with Fedora? > He spammed at least two of the mailing lists I subscribe to. I thought he was banned here. James McKenzie -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject

Re: Rhythmbox doesn't quite share

On 21 September 2010 02:08, Craig White wrote: > On Mon, 2010-09-20 at 16:29 -0500, Steven Stern wrote: >> On 09/20/2010 03:50 PM, Michael Cronenworth wrote: >> > Steven Stern wrote: >> >> Well, that's useful, Craig. I guess I should hand my Mac to the nearest >> >> homeless person. >> > >> > You

Re: Google Inc. Could Be Compliant to the Chinese Government in Beijing, People's Republic of China (PRC)

On 9/20/2010 8:35 PM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > On Tue, 2010-09-21 at 08:04 +0800, "Mr. Teo En Ming (Zhang Enming) 张恩 > 鸣 of Singapore" wrote: >> Article: Google Warns of China Exit Over Hacking >> Link: http://online.wsj.com/article/SB126333757451026659.html >> >> I don't think it is that easy

Re: Rhythmbox doesn't quite share

On Sun, 2010-09-19 at 22:30 -0500, Steven Stern wrote: > > > mt-daapd crashes. Here's the end of the logfile with debug level 9. So > much for that. (The file in question was ripped into ALAC m4a format on > the mac and copied onto the Fedora machine.) > > Found /home/music/iTunes Music/Lyle Lo

Re: Rhythmbox doesn't quite share

On Mon, 2010-09-20 at 16:29 -0500, Steven Stern wrote: > On 09/20/2010 03:50 PM, Michael Cronenworth wrote: > > Steven Stern wrote: > >> Well, that's useful, Craig. I guess I should hand my Mac to the nearest > >> homeless person. > > > > You should. You overpaid hundreds of dollars for the same h

Re: Google Inc. Could Be Compliant to the Chinese Government in Beijing, People's Republic of China (PRC)

On Tue, 2010-09-21 at 08:04 +0800, "Mr. Teo En Ming (Zhang Enming) 张恩 鸣 of Singapore" wrote: > Article: Google Warns of China Exit Over Hacking > Link: http://online.wsj.com/article/SB126333757451026659.html > > I don't think it is that easy to hack if you are using SSL connections > and very str

Google Inc. Could Be Compliant to the Chinese Government in Beijing, People's Republic of China (PRC)

Article: Google Warns of China Exit Over Hacking Link: http://online.wsj.com/article/SB126333757451026659.html I don't think it is that easy to hack if you are using SSL connections and very strong passwords. How long would it take supercomputers to perform a brute force attack if you are using

Re: Hole in 64-bit Linux kernel provides root rights

Tom Horsley writes: > On Tue, 21 Sep 2010 09:10:32 +1000 > Chris Smart wrote: > >> If you're running the free service from KSplice, you'd already be >> protected - and without even rebooting your computer :-) >> >> http://blog.ksplice.com/2010/09/cve-2010-3081/ > > Unless, of course, you think th

Re: Hole in 64-bit Linux kernel provides root rights

On Tue, 21 Sep 2010 09:10:32 +1000 Chris Smart wrote: > If you're running the free service from KSplice, you'd already be > protected - and without even rebooting your computer :-) > > http://blog.ksplice.com/2010/09/cve-2010-3081/ Unless, of course, you think that allowing dynamic modification

Re: Hole in 64-bit Linux kernel provides root rights

On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 10:06 PM, wrote: > Story at > http://www.h-online.com/security/news/item/Hole-in-Linux-kernel-provides-root-rights-Update-1081317.html If you're running the free service from KSplice, you'd already be protected - and without even rebooting your computer :-) http://blog.k

Re: Unrecognized option 'vfilters' in ffmpeg

On 20 September 2010 19:33, Adel ESSAFI wrote: > Hi list > Is there any package that includes vfilter option for ffmpeg After a brief google session and ffmpeg docs, No it's not been merged yet and currently lives in this svn tree: svn://svn.ffmpeg.org/soc/libavfilter see README & checkout.sh fil

Re: Rhythmbox doesn't quite share

On 09/20/2010 03:50 PM, Michael Cronenworth wrote: > Steven Stern wrote: >> Well, that's useful, Craig. I guess I should hand my Mac to the nearest >> homeless person. > > You should. You overpaid hundreds of dollars for the same hardware you > could buy separately for less. Those hundreds of dol

Re: Rhythmbox doesn't quite share

On 20 September 2010 21:50, Michael Cronenworth wrote: > I will always be mystified how people are suckered into buying Apple > products. I guess that's why I'm not a Steve Jobs. Because good looks sell things. I may not totally agree with Steve Jobs, Apple as a company, or the "Mac Experience",

Re: ctrl-alt-+ doesn't work for me

On Monday, 20 September, 2010 @16:24 zulu, Aaron Konstam scribed: > (labeled 1 in the screenshot below) and press the Layout Options > button (labeled 2 in the screenshot below) to bring up the Keyboard You might consider putting your screenshots on a sharing service like flickr, photobucket, e

Re: Rhythmbox doesn't quite share

Steven Stern wrote: > Well, that's useful, Craig. I guess I should hand my Mac to the nearest > homeless person. You should. You overpaid hundreds of dollars for the same hardware you could buy separately for less. Those hundreds of dollars you could have saved could have went to a homeless shel

Re: Dog

On 9/20/10, JD wrote: > > > On 09/20/2010 11:39 AM, Marvin Kosmal wrote: >> Hi >> >> Trying to find dog. >> >> These are down.. >> >> Homepage http://www.nl.linux.org/~wsl/dog.html >> Download http://www.nl.linux.org/~wsl/dog-1.2.tar.gz >> >> Still looking >> >> >> TIA >> >> Marvin > > ftp

Re: Wubi installing Fedora ??

On 20 September 2010 12:33, Jim wrote: > 2010/9/20 Stephen Gallagher >> >> On 09/20/2010 11:53 AM, Jim wrote: >> >   The application Wubi can it install Fedora ? >> > >> > I have a lot of new Windows users that want to install Fedora the >> > easiest way possible, without having to change Partiti

Re: Wubi installing Fedora ??

On 09/20/2010 02:41 PM, Zoltan Hoppar wrote: +1 to Stephen 2010/9/20 Stephen Gallagher > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 09/20/2010 11:53 AM, Jim wrote: > The application Wubi can it install Fedora ? > > I have a lot of n

Re: Dog

On 09/20/2010 11:39 AM, Marvin Kosmal wrote: > Hi > > Trying to find dog. > > These are down.. > > Homepage http://www.nl.linux.org/~wsl/dog.html > Download http://www.nl.linux.org/~wsl/dog-1.2.tar.gz > > Still looking > > > TIA > > Marvin ftp://ftp.icm.edu.pl/vol/rzm1/linux-pld-linux/

Re: Wubi installing Fedora ??

+1 to Stephen 2010/9/20 Stephen Gallagher > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > On 09/20/2010 11:53 AM, Jim wrote: > > The application Wubi can it install Fedora ? > > > > I have a lot of new Windows users that want to install Fedora the > > easiest way possible, without having

Dog

Hi Trying to find dog. These are down.. Homepagehttp://www.nl.linux.org/~wsl/dog.html Downloadhttp://www.nl.linux.org/~wsl/dog-1.2.tar.gz Still looking TIA Marvin -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin

Re: rm and old rpms

Todd Zullinger pobox.com> writes: > ... > ... But for this particular usage, if I > wasn't using repomanage (or another rpm specific tool), I'd use > tmpwatch rather than roll my own solution with find. Hi, with regard to tmpwatch. $ man tmpwatch ... By default, tmpwatch dates files

Unrecognized option 'vfilters' in ffmpeg

Hi list Is there any package that includes vfilter option for ffmpeg I have find no documentation on vfilter in fedora 12 and vhook option was deleted from ffmpeg. I am not able add my watermarks in my videos now. Help please -- PhD candidate in Computer Science Address 3 avenue lamine, cité

Re: Wubi installing Fedora ??

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 09/20/2010 11:53 AM, Jim wrote: > The application Wubi can it install Fedora ? > > I have a lot of new Windows users that want to install Fedora the > easiest way possible, without having to change Partitions . The easiest way possible would be

Re: Bugzilla email problem due to SELinux

On 9/20/2010 1:35 PM, Peter J. Stieber wrote: > On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 12:26 PM, PS = Pete Stieber wrote: > PS>>> I just setup bugzilla on a Fedora 13 box. > PS>>> I'm not getting email from the bug reports > PS>>> I enter. I'm seeing the following in the message log... > > On 9/20/2010 10:0

Re: Wubi installing Fedora ??

On Mon, 20 Sep 2010 11:53:23 -0400 Jim wrote: > The application Wubi can it install Fedora ? No, it is the Windows UBuntu Installer after all. > > I have a lot of new Windows users that want to install Fedora the > easiest way possible, without having to change Partitions . > There doesn’t ap

Re: Bugzilla email problem due to SELinux

On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 12:26 PM, PS = Pete Stieber wrote: PS>>> I just setup bugzilla on a Fedora 13 box. PS>>> I'm not getting email from the bug reports PS>>> I enter. I'm seeing the following in the message log... On 9/20/2010 10:00 AM, AP = Arthur Pemberton wrote: AP>> This access was not de

Re: rm and old rpms

On Sun, Sep 19, 2010 at 09:15:32PM -0400, Todd Zullinger wrote: > I don't know what the end goal is, but you may have better luck using > repomanage to prune old packages, yet keep the last N versions. If [...] > new shell process for each file. But for this particular usage, if I > wasn't using

Re: Disable SSE3 routines in glibc

On 09/19/2010 08:20 AM, Thawan Kooburat wrote: > Hi, > > Because of my work, I need to prevent glibc from using SSE3 routine > such as __strncpy_ssse3 even though the machine supports those > features. > > My current solution is to recompile glibc from source rpm. However, I > am not sure if there

Re: Bugzilla email problem due to SELinux

On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 12:26 PM, PS = Pete Stieberwrote: PS>> I just setup bugzilla on a Fedora 13 box. PS>> I'm not getting email from the bug reports PS>> I enter. I'm seeing the following in the message log... On 9/20/2010 10:00 AM, AP = Arthur Pemberton wrote: AP> This access was not denied

Re: Bugzilla email problem due to SELinux

On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 12:26 PM, Peter J. Stieber wrote: > I just setup bugzilla on a Fedora 13 box.  I'm not getting email from > the bug reports I enter.  I'm seeing the following in the message log... This access was not denied -- Fedora 13 (www.pembo13.com) -- users mailing list users@l

Re: Rhythmbox doesn't quite share

On 09/20/2010 11:35 AM, Craig White wrote: > On Mon, 2010-09-20 at 08:08 -0500, Steven Stern wrote: >> On 09/19/2010 10:10 PM, Craig White wrote: >>> On Sun, 2010-09-19 at 22:05 -0500, Steven Stern wrote: On 09/19/2010 09:41 PM, Craig White wrote: > On Sun, 2010-09-19 at 19:04 -0700, Craig

Re: Rhythmbox doesn't quite share

On Mon, 2010-09-20 at 08:08 -0500, Steven Stern wrote: > On 09/19/2010 10:10 PM, Craig White wrote: > > On Sun, 2010-09-19 at 22:05 -0500, Steven Stern wrote: > >> On 09/19/2010 09:41 PM, Craig White wrote: > >>> On Sun, 2010-09-19 at 19:04 -0700, Craig White wrote: > On Sun, 2010-09-19 at 10:

Re: Screen Resolution in Fedora 13 on Intel i915 Chipset

JB wrote: >Sent: Sep 19, 2010 11:49 PM >To: users@lists.fedoraproject.org >Subject: Re: Screen Resolution in Fedora 13 on Intel i915 Chipset > >Samuel Kidman gmail.com> writes: > >> ... >Hi, >I am not an expert on this, I just try to help if it is of any value :-) >Having said that, >$ man xrandr

Bugzilla email problem due to SELinux

I just setup bugzilla on a Fedora 13 box. I'm not getting email from the bug reports I enter. I'm seeing the following in the message log... Sep 20 09:06:56 marge setroubleshoot: SELinux is preventing /usr/sbin/sendmail.sendmail access to a leaked fifo_file file descriptor. For complete SELin

Re: ctrl-alt-+ doesn't work for me

On Tue, 2010-09-07 at 10:37 -0500, Robert Nichols wrote: > On 09/07/2010 01:46 AM, D. Hugh Redelmeier wrote: > > I want to be able to use ctrl-alt-+ or ctrl-alt-- to cycle between X > > modes (resolutions etc). This should allow me to fix the display from > > the keyboard of the afflicted machine

Firefox at 3.6.7 that has known security bugs, all the while 3 newer versions where released in 54 days.

On 09/20/2010 03:53 PM, Christoph A. wrote: > On 09/20/2010 02:36 PM, Bram_Gro wrote: > >>> you need to signup at bugzilla.redhat.com and submit a bug there. >>> >> >> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=635659 (priority should have >> been urgent). > > Thank you for filing this bugreport.

Wubi installing Fedora ??

The application Wubi can it install Fedora ? I have a lot of new Windows users that want to install Fedora the easiest way possible, without having to change Partitions . -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproj

Re: Hole in 64-bit Linux kernel provides root rights

On 9/20/10 11:24 AM, Takehiko Abe wrote: >> Explain how you could have possibly compiled it let >> alone run it. >> > Please don't. > +1 with a big smile -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/ma

Re: Hole in 64-bit Linux kernel provides root rights

fiedo...@math.ohio-state.edu wrote: > I compiled this, ran it and got a root shell. I am running: > kernel-2.6.34.6-54.fc13.x86_64 The fix is already in the "updates-testing" repository and awaiting karma from the QA folks. # yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update kernel This will give you a

Re: [389-users] Manual and automatic catch up of replication

Gerrard Geldenhuis wrote: >> Replication uses an exponential backoff strategy if the consumer is >> down. That is, it will wait 1 second, try again, then wait 2 seconds, >> try again, then wait 4 seconds, try again, etc. until it hits 5 >> minutes. >> >>> > > hmmm, I probably did not w

Re: Hole in 64-bit Linux kernel provides root rights

> Explain how you could have possibly compiled it let > alone run it. Please don't. -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guid

Re: Hole in 64-bit Linux kernel provides root rights

On 09/20/2010 04:06 PM, JD wrote: > What is ORIG_RAX in the code? > It is undefined! Explain how you could have possibly compiled it let > alone run it. It's an index into an array of 8-byte register values returned by the ptrace API. It's defined in sys/reg.h: $ grep ORIG_RAX /usr/include/sys

Re: [389-users] Segfault

Excerpts from Rich Megginson's message of Mon Sep 20 09:19:50 -0400 2010: > > ns-slapd[2725]: segfault at 10a310af ip 003d58c95785 sp > > 7ff2abf04040 error 4 in libcrypto.so.0.9.8n[3d58c0+15b000] > > ns-slapd[2727]: segfault at 10a310af ip 003d58c95785 sp > > 7ff2aab0

Re: Hole in 64-bit Linux kernel provides root rights

On 09/20/2010 05:06 AM, fiedo...@math.ohio-state.edu wrote: > Story at > http://www.h-online.com/security/news/item/Hole-in-Linux-kernel-provides-root-rights-Update-1081317.html > > There is a link to exploit code at: > http://sota.gen.nz/compat2/robert_you_suck.c > > I compiled this, ran it and

[389-users] Recovery Strategy

Hi As far as I can see the documentation does not make mention of backups other than the userdb, netscapedb and dse.ldif. With regards to the certificate databases and admin server configuration is there any specific strategies, recommendations or readmade scripts? I am looking at scenarios whe

Re: Hole in 64-bit Linux kernel provides root rights

On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 10:13 AM, Zbigniew Fiedorowicz wrote: > Further story: > http://www.theregister.co.uk/2010/09/15/linux_kernel_regression_bug/ > > This is a very serious problem which puts multiuser 64-bit Linux systems > absolutely at the mercy of their least responsible users. > > I have

Re: Hole in 64-bit Linux kernel provides root rights

Further story: http://www.theregister.co.uk/2010/09/15/linux_kernel_regression_bug/ This is a very serious problem which puts multiuser 64-bit Linux systems absolutely at the mercy of their least responsible users. I have filed a bug report: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=635675 Prio

Re: Problem controlling display/screen with xorg.conf

On 20 September 2010 06:37, Dick Roark wrote: > Along with (apparently) other OPs, I am having problems with my F13 screen. > Fedora works well but I am not able to configure a 1280x1024 display. I have > generated xorg.conf using system-config-display.  When I put it in the X11 > folder and reboo

Re: Firefox at 3.6.7 that has known security bugs, all the while 3 newer versions where released in 54 days.

On 09/20/2010 02:36 PM, Bram_Gro wrote: >> you need to signup at bugzilla.redhat.com and submit a bug there. >> > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=635659 (priority should have > been urgent). Thank you for filing this bugreport. I was also asking for an update a week ago: http://l

Re: Problem controlling display/screen with xorg.conf

On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 3:37 PM, Dick Roark wrote: > Along with (apparently) other OPs, I am having problems with my F13 screen. > Fedora works well but I am not able to configure a 1280x1024 display. I have > generated xorg.conf using system-config-display.  When I put it in the X11 > folder and

Re: [389-users] Manual and automatic catch up of replication

> > > Replication uses an exponential backoff strategy if the consumer is > down. That is, it will wait 1 second, try again, then wait 2 seconds, > try again, then wait 4 seconds, try again, etc. until it hits 5 > minutes. > > > > hmmm, I probably did not wait long enough... I have enabled repli

Re: Firefox at 3.6.7 that has known security bugs, all the while 3 newer versions where released in 54 days.

On 09/20/2010 02:47 PM, Ankur Sinha wrote: > On Mon, 2010-09-20 at 14:30 +0200, Bram_Gro wrote: >> On 09/20/2010 01:34 PM, Ankur Sinha wrote: >>> On Mon, 2010-09-20 at 13:19 +0200, Bram_Gro wrote: We are stuck with Firefox at 3.6.7 that has known security bugs, all the while 3 newer ve

Problem controlling display/screen with xorg.conf

Along with (apparently) other OPs, I am having problems with my F13 screen. Fedora works well but I am not able to configure a 1280x1024 display. I have generated xorg.conf using system-config-display. When I put it in the X11 folder and reboot, the system stops short of booting a kernel and stops

Re: Firefox at 3.6.7 that has known security bugs, all the while 3 newer versions where released in 54 days.

On Mon, 2010-09-20 at 15:28 +0200, Bram_Gro wrote: > On 09/20/2010 02:47 PM, Ankur Sinha wrote: > > On Mon, 2010-09-20 at 14:30 +0200, Bram_Gro wrote: > >> On 09/20/2010 01:34 PM, Ankur Sinha wrote: > >>> On Mon, 2010-09-20 at 13:19 +0200, Bram_Gro wrote: > We are stuck with Firefox at 3.6.7 t

dracut documentation

Hi Fedora users, I started to write a dracut user and developer manual, and follow the "release early and often" mantra. Here is what I have for now: http://people.redhat.com/harald/dracut.html source is here: http://dracut.git.sourceforge.net/git/gitweb.cgi?p=dracut/dracut;a=blob;f=dracut.xml

Re: [389-users] Manual and automatic catch up of replication

Gerrard Geldenhuis wrote: > > Hi > > I have been doing some testing to see how a database(netscapedb) will > catch up with replicated changes when the server has been shutdown > and/or broken. > > > > My test is very basic: > > Shutdown master2 > > Add an entry to netscapedb on master1 > > Brin

Re: Rhythmbox doesn't quite share

On 09/19/2010 10:10 PM, Craig White wrote: > On Sun, 2010-09-19 at 22:05 -0500, Steven Stern wrote: >> On 09/19/2010 09:41 PM, Craig White wrote: >>> On Sun, 2010-09-19 at 19:04 -0700, Craig White wrote: On Sun, 2010-09-19 at 10:38 -0500, Steven Stern wrote: > I've enabled sharing over DAA

Re: Firefox at 3.6.7 that has known security bugs, all the while 3 newer versions where released in 54 days.

On Mon, 2010-09-20 at 14:30 +0200, Bram_Gro wrote: > On 09/20/2010 01:34 PM, Ankur Sinha wrote: > > On Mon, 2010-09-20 at 13:19 +0200, Bram_Gro wrote: > >> We are stuck with Firefox at 3.6.7 that has known security bugs, all > >> the while 3 newer versions where released in 54 days. > >> > >> > >>

Re: Firefox at 3.6.7 that has known security bugs, all the while 3 newer versions where released in 54 days.

On 09/20/2010 01:34 PM, Ankur Sinha wrote: > On Mon, 2010-09-20 at 13:19 +0200, Bram_Gro wrote: >> We are stuck with Firefox at 3.6.7 that has known security bugs, all >> the while 3 newer versions where released in 54 days. >> >> >> v.3.6.10, released September 15th: >> >> Fixed a single stabilit

Hole in 64-bit Linux kernel provides root rights

Story at http://www.h-online.com/security/news/item/Hole-in-Linux-kernel-provides-root-rights-Update-1081317.html There is a link to exploit code at: http://sota.gen.nz/compat2/robert_you_suck.c I compiled this, ran it and got a root shell. I am running: kernel-2.6.34.6-54.fc13.x86_64 -- user

Re: Firefox at 3.6.7 that has known security bugs, all the while 3 newer versions where released in 54 days.

On Mon, 2010-09-20 at 13:19 +0200, Bram_Gro wrote: > We are stuck with Firefox at 3.6.7 that has known security bugs, all > the while 3 newer versions where released in 54 days. > > > v.3.6.10, released September 15th: > > Fixed a single stability issue affecting a limited number of users > >

Firefox at 3.6.7 that has known security bugs, all the while 3 newer versions where released in 54 days.

We are stuck with Firefox at 3.6.7 that has known security bugs, all the while 3 newer versions where released in 54 days. v.3.6.10, released September 15th: Fixed a single stability issue affecting a limited number of users v.3.6.9, released September 7th, 2010 MFSA 2010-63 Information leak

Problem with Hauppauge WinTV-HVR-4000 - gnomeradio

I am having some problem with my Hauppauge WinTV-HVR-4000 card. One of these problems is starting radio. When I start gnomeradio I get error: Can't open "/dev/mixer" Which is not surprising since "/dev/mixer" does not exist. The question is why does it not exist? After little search I found PD

Re: Screen Resolution in Fedora 13 on Intel i915 Chipset

JB gmail.com> writes: > ... more detailed ... http://www.thinkwiki.org/wiki/Xorg_RandR_1.2 JB -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/M

Re: SOLVED Re: rm and old rpms

On 09/20/2010 09:29 AM, Frank Murphy wrote: > On 20/09/10 02:15, Todd Zullinger wrote: >> >> I don't know what the end goal is, but you may have better luck using >> repomanage to prune old packages, yet keep the last N versions. If >> you have a local repository you want to keep from growing, tha

SOLVED Re: rm and old rpms

On 20/09/10 02:15, Todd Zullinger wrote: > > I don't know what the end goal is, but you may have better luck using > repomanage to prune old packages, yet keep the last N versions. If > you have a local repository you want to keep from growing, that's > often preferable to just removing old packag