On Thursday 21 October 2010 06:57 PM, Silent-Hunter wrote:
>> > Another option would be to disable the repo by setting the line below
>> > in that repo file. This way you can enable the repo when required.
>> >
>> > enabled=
> Are you sure I don't need it? There are packages listed in it that I
JD wrote:
> you can save yourself a lot of trouble
> by downloading the firefox add-on
I could, but I like Suvayu's function better. I already put it into my .bashrc
and its a keeper.
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://adm
On 10/21/2010 10:24 PM, Petrus de Calguarium wrote:
> Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
>
>> I meant link to it before it's deleted. Wasn't that obvious?
>
> No.
>
> http://www.reddit.com/r/linux/comments/dky73/flashplugin_not_caching_to_tmp_any
> more/c10ylu5
>
> It gets deleted right away, so there ne
Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> I meant link to it before it's deleted. Wasn't that obvious?
No.
http://www.reddit.com/r/linux/comments/dky73/flashplugin_not_caching_to_tmp_any
more/c10ylu5
It gets deleted right away, so there never is any file in /tmp, so there is
nothing to link to (except usi
On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 3:15 PM, JD wrote:
> It would be even more helpful if you entered
> into a new topic on fedoraforum.org
Done.
http://forums.fedoraforum.org/showthread.php?p=1408465
The wiki next? ;-)
-c
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscr
On Thu, 2010-10-21 at 21:33 -0600, Petrus de Calguarium wrote:
> Takehiko Abe wrote:
>
> > The new flash player (preview 2) unlinks a temp file right after
> > opening it as discussed in this reddit thread:
> >
> >
> http://www.reddit.com/r/linux/comments/dky73/flashplugin_not_caching_to_tmp_any
On Wed, 2010-10-20 at 22:30 -0600, Petrus de Calguarium wrote:
> Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
>
> > Actually what I do is hard-link to the flash file in /tmp, thus keeping
> > a handle to the file so it won't disappear
>
> OK, I tried this, as described in my previous post, using Suvayu's commands.
On 10/21/2010 09:11 PM, Hoang Le wrote:
> Dear friends,
>
> I'm using Fedora 13, 64bit on HP Elitebook 6930p with Authentec
> Fingerprint reader. I already installed GDM fingerprint plugin, but
> there's no fingerprint option from GDM.
> I'm not sure if the driver doesn't work or it's not enabl
On 10/20/2010 9:03 AM, Claude Jones wrote:
> I had a little time and tried to install OpenShot on my F14TC1 box. I
> had the same result - it has a dependency on Python 2.6 and the version
> of Python installed by F14 is 2.7 - seems like an error - usually newer
> versions satisfy older dependency
On 10/21/2010 08:55 PM, Chris Smart wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 12:31 PM, Terry
It would be even more helpful if you entered
into a new topic on fedoraforum.org
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org
On 10/22/2010 07:47 AM, Mike Dwiggins wrote:
> Anyone know of a good source (mail list, forum or blog) about dealing
> with installation problems with PuTTy?
>
> I am trying to install in Fedora 13 and having no luck and don't want to
> use bandwidth here.
>
> Thanks
>
> Mike
>
>
Hey my friend
Dear friends,
I'm using Fedora 13, 64bit on HP Elitebook 6930p with Authentec Fingerprint
reader. I already installed GDM fingerprint plugin, but there's no
fingerprint option from GDM.
I'm not sure if the driver doesn't work or it's not enabled yet. Has anyone
experienced this?
My friend's HP pa
On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 12:31 PM, Terry Polzin wrote:
>
> On my home wireless now. Thanks for the help mates.
I've blogged it
(http://blog.christophersmart.com/2010/10/22/realtek-usb-wireless-on-linux-fedora/)
for future reference, and will add anything new that I find there.
-c
--
users maili
Takehiko Abe wrote:
> The new flash player (preview 2) unlinks a temp file right after
> opening it as discussed in this reddit thread:
>
>
http://www.reddit.com/r/linux/comments/dky73/flashplugin_not_caching_to_tmp_any
more/c10ylu5
>
Finally, someone who gets it :-)
That is what I was saying
On 10/21/10 7:17 PM, Mike Dwiggins wrote:
> Anyone know of a good source (mail list, forum or blog) about dealing
> with installation problems with PuTTy?
PuTTY should just install with yum. If you are trying to install from
the tarball you will have to compile it (./configure, make, make install
Hi, Mike. I didn't know that putty was available for linux, but I just typed:
yum install putty
and had no problems with that. I then issued the "putty" command and saw the
old, familiar interface.
What problems have you had?
-- Mike
- Original Message
> From: Mike Dwiggins
On 10/21/2010 07:17 PM, Mike Dwiggins wrote:
> Anyone know of a good source (mail list, forum or blog) about dealing
> with installation problems with PuTTy?
>
> I am trying to install in Fedora 13 and having no luck and don't want to
> use bandwidth here.
>
> Thanks
>
> Mike
>
Even though Fedora
On 10/21/2010 7:19 PM, david...@gmail.com wrote:
> Why do you need putty in fedora? Doesn't work with wine?
Installing from the tar.gz for UNIX / Linux. I do not run wine!
> Regards
> Mensaje enviado desde mi BlackBerry® de +Móvil!
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Mike Dwiggins
> Sender: us
Why do you need putty in fedora? Doesn't work with wine?
Regards
Mensaje enviado desde mi BlackBerry® de +Móvil!
-Original Message-
From: Mike Dwiggins
Sender: users-boun...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2010 19:17:16
To: fedora list
Reply-To: Community support for Fedora us
Anyone know of a good source (mail list, forum or blog) about dealing
with installation problems with PuTTy?
I am trying to install in Fedora 13 and having no luck and don't want to
use bandwidth here.
Thanks
Mike
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change s
On 10/21/2010 06:31 PM, Terry Polzin wrote:
> On Fri, 2010-10-22 at 12:28 +1100, Chris Smart wrote:
>> On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 10:58 AM, Terry Polzin wrote:
>>> rtl819xU:request firmware fail!
>>>
>>> rtl819xU:Firmware Download Fail!!a
>>>
>>> rtl819xU: --->FirmwareDownload92S()
>>>
>>> usb 1-1:
On 01/-10/-28163 11:59 AM, suvayu ali wrote:
> On 21 October 2010 15:22, Silent-Hunter wrote:
>> On 01/-10/-28163 11:59 AM, Suvayu Ali wrote:
>>> This is
>>> good, this shows the old mandriva rpm is not cached locally. And isolates
>>> your problem to your repository settings.
>>>
>> Attached
On 21 October 2010 15:22, Silent-Hunter wrote:
> On 01/-10/-28163 11:59 AM, Suvayu Ali wrote:
>> This is
>> good, this shows the old mandriva rpm is not cached locally. And isolates
>> your problem to your repository settings.
>>
> Attached the .repo file.
>
That repo file has been generated by
On Thu, 2010-10-21 at 21:31 -0400, Terry Polzin wrote:
> On my home wireless now. Thanks for the help mates.
>
BTW my wireless network is wpa authenticated I made no changes to the
wpa config I also let NetworkManager run the show to make the
connections.
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedo
On Thu, 2010-10-21 at 21:31 -0400, Terry Polzin wrote:
> On Fri, 2010-10-22 at 12:28 +1100, Chris Smart wrote:
> > On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 10:58 AM, Terry Polzin wrote:
> > > rtl819xU:request firmware fail!
> > >
> > > rtl819xU:Firmware Download Fail!!a
> > >
> > > rtl819xU: --->FirmwareDownload92
On Fri, 2010-10-22 at 12:28 +1100, Chris Smart wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 10:58 AM, Terry Polzin wrote:
> > rtl819xU:request firmware fail!
> >
> > rtl819xU:Firmware Download Fail!!a
> >
> > rtl819xU: --->FirmwareDownload92S()
> >
> > usb 1-1: firmware: requesting RTL8192SU/rtl8192sfw.bin
>
On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 12:21 PM, JD wrote:
> Well, if it is a laptop, see if you can
> take it to a nearby starbucks where the wifi is free,
> and try to associate. The real test is to see how well
> it can handle continuous traffic, like a download
> and an upload.
>
It's a USB dongle unfortuna
On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 10:58 AM, Terry Polzin wrote:
> rtl819xU:request firmware fail!
>
> rtl819xU:Firmware Download Fail!!a
>
> rtl819xU: --->FirmwareDownload92S()
>
> usb 1-1: firmware: requesting RTL8192SU/rtl8192sfw.bin
> rtl819xU:request firmware fail!
>
> rtl819xU:Firmware Download Fail!!a
On 01/-10/-28163 11:59 AM, JD wrote:
> On 10/21/2010 03:22 PM, Silent-Hunter wrote:
>> Attached the .repo file.
>
> Good! You found it and deleted the rpm file.
> If I were you I would also delete
> /etc/yum.repos.d/local.repo
> You simply do not need it and as I indicated
> local .rpm files
On 10/21/2010 06:14 PM, Chris Smart wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 12:00 PM, JD wrote:
>> OK, So when you run wpa_supplicant, does it associate with you AP?
> I don't have an AP here that I can associate with to test the
> connection, but with the firmware loaded iwlist does indeed print out
>
On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 12:00 PM, JD wrote:
> OK, So when you run wpa_supplicant, does it associate with you AP?
I don't have an AP here that I can associate with to test the
connection, but with the firmware loaded iwlist does indeed print out
available access points. Without the firmware howeve
On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 11:58 AM, JD wrote:
> Yeah... that's why it is called staging, and there is not support for it
> to boot :)
Indeed. I appreciate that Fedora ships stable drivers - Ubuntu puts
them all in to "make everything work" but..
> Just hope that when Fedora updates the kernel, rpm
On 10/21/2010 05:53 PM, Chris Smart wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 11:49 AM, Chris Smart
> wrote:
>> Using the staging drivers supplied with RPMFusion works for me, except
>> that it can't load the firmware (RTL8192SU/rtl8192sfw.bin)
>>
>
> And finally, if I grab the firmware from the CD that
On 10/21/2010 05:49 PM, Chris Smart wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 11:42 AM, JD wrote:
>> I just posted the how-to.
>>
>> Good luck to you too.
>>
> Thanks JD.
>
> Using the staging drivers supplied with RPMFusion works for me, except
> that it can't load the firmware (RTL8192SU/rtl8192sfw.bin
On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 11:49 AM, Chris Smart wrote:
>
> Using the staging drivers supplied with RPMFusion works for me, except
> that it can't load the firmware (RTL8192SU/rtl8192sfw.bin)
>
And finally, if I grab the firmware from the CD that the device came
with, and put it under /lib/firmware
On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 11:42 AM, JD wrote:
> I just posted the how-to.
>
> Good luck to you too.
>
Thanks JD.
Using the staging drivers supplied with RPMFusion works for me, except
that it can't load the firmware (RTL8192SU/rtl8192sfw.bin)
I still get a wireless device, though.
-c
--
users m
On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 11:37 AM, Chris Smart wrote:
>
> I guess if you can build the staging drivers out of kernel, then you
> might have some luck.
>
I just realised that staging drivers are available in RPMFusion Free
repo. So if you enable that, just run:
yum install kmod-staging
depmod -a
On 10/21/2010 05:37 PM, Chris Smart wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 10:58 AM, Terry Polzin wrote:
>> Broke down and bought a cheap mini usb wireless N device.
> Hi Terry,
>
> I have a similar device:
> Bus 001 Device 008: ID 0bda:8172 Realtek Semiconductor Corp. RTL8191S
> WLAN Adapter
>
> Whic
On 10/21/2010 04:58 PM, Terry Polzin wrote:
> Broke down and bought a cheap mini usb wireless N device.
> lsusb
> Bus 003 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0001 Linux Foundation 1.1 root hub
> Bus 002 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0001 Linux Foundation 1.1 root hub
> Bus 001 Device 003: ID 0bda:8171 Realtek Semiconducto
On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 10:58 AM, Terry Polzin wrote:
> Broke down and bought a cheap mini usb wireless N device.
Hi Terry,
I have a similar device:
Bus 001 Device 008: ID 0bda:8172 Realtek Semiconductor Corp. RTL8191S
WLAN Adapter
Which is a ginormous pain. AFAIK, there is a driver in kernel s
On 10/21/2010 04:57 PM, Jim wrote:
>On 10/21/2010 07:09 PM, JD wrote:
>> Did you reboot after installation?
>>
> Many times.
That is strange.
For a while I was using the Ralink driver for the
Ralinktech 2860 mini pci wireless card.
That driver always downloaded the firmware
automatically and
Broke down and bought a cheap mini usb wireless N device.
lsusb
Bus 003 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0001 Linux Foundation 1.1 root hub
Bus 002 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0001 Linux Foundation 1.1 root hub
Bus 001 Device 003: ID 0bda:8171 Realtek Semiconductor Corp.
Bus 001 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0002 Linux Foundati
On 10/21/2010 07:09 PM, JD wrote:
>On 10/21/2010 12:39 PM, Jim wrote:
>> On 10/21/2010 03:25 PM, Terry Polzin wrote:
>>> On Thu, 2010-10-21 at 15:18 -0400, Terry Polzin wrote:
On Thu, 2010-10-21 at 14:39 -0400, Jim wrote:
> fedora 13
>
> I have a Broadcom wireless install
On 10/21/2010 03:22 PM, Silent-Hunter wrote:
> Attached the .repo file.
Good! You found it and deleted the rpm file.
If I were you I would also delete
/etc/yum.repos.d/local.repo
You simply do not need it and as I indicated
local .rpm files quickly become obsolete
because they are updated on t
On 10/21/2010 12:39 PM, Jim wrote:
>On 10/21/2010 03:25 PM, Terry Polzin wrote:
>> On Thu, 2010-10-21 at 15:18 -0400, Terry Polzin wrote:
>>> On Thu, 2010-10-21 at 14:39 -0400, Jim wrote:
fedora 13
I have a Broadcom wireless installed on a Dell Inspiron Mini 1210 and it
sh
On 10/21/2010 12:26 PM, Jim wrote:
>> Have you loaded the firmware??
>> >
>> >
>> >
>From where ?
I thought that firmware is loaded by the driver module
and not by the user.
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedo
On 01/-10/-28163 11:59 AM, JD wrote:
> On 10/21/2010 04:53 AM, Silent-Hunter wrote:
>> Where are .repo files kept?
> To find the _local repository location,
> look in /etc/yum.repos.d for a file
> that contains the word local
> or it could also be named _local.repo .
>
> A repo file has a lab
On 01/-10/-28163 11:59 AM, JD wrote:
> On 10/21/2010 04:49 AM, Silent-Hunter wrote
>>> You cannot do that, since yum searches the remote repo for what is
>>> available vs. what you already have. You have the 32 bit version,
>>> and it sees that the 64 bit version is available on rpmfusion, and
On 01/-10/-28163 11:59 AM, Suvayu Ali wrote:
On Thursday 21 October 2010 04:53 AM, Silent-Hunter wrote:
[sil...@terminal-bmrf-9 ~]$ yum repolist all
repo id repo namestatus
_local Automatic local repo
enabled:
On Thu, 21 Oct 2010 17:32:45 -0400
Alex wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm not sure what happened, but just this afternoon, perhaps after the
> most recent set of FC13 updates, I have no audio and video plays at
> least at 8x normal speed. This includes videos from mplayer, audio
> from Pandora (the Adobe Air
Claude Jones writes:
« HTML content follows »
On Thursday, October 21, 2010, Tim wrote:
> I wonder what the practical limits are for either cabling? 35
> feet does sound quite long for high bandwidth video.
well, for the record, we've run 100' VGA cables to projectors, which is a
fairly com
Hi,
I'm not sure what happened, but just this afternoon, perhaps after the
most recent set of FC13 updates, I have no audio and video plays at
least at 8x normal speed. This includes videos from mplayer, audio
from Pandora (the Adobe Air application) plays at more than double
speed (by time, not b
On 10/21/2010 04:08 PM, Terry Polzin wrote:
> On Thu, 2010-10-21 at 16:00 -0400, Jim wrote:
>> On 10/21/2010 03:49 PM, Terry Polzin wrote:
>>> On Thu, 2010-10-21 at 15:39 -0400, Jim wrote:
On 10/21/2010 03:25 PM, Terry Polzin wrote:
> On Thu, 2010-10-21 at 15:18 -0400, Terry Polzin wrote
On Thu, 2010-10-21 at 16:00 -0400, Jim wrote:
> On 10/21/2010 03:49 PM, Terry Polzin wrote:
> > On Thu, 2010-10-21 at 15:39 -0400, Jim wrote:
> >> On 10/21/2010 03:25 PM, Terry Polzin wrote:
> >>> On Thu, 2010-10-21 at 15:18 -0400, Terry Polzin wrote:
> On Thu, 2010-10-21 at 14:39 -0400, Jim w
On 10/21/2010 03:49 PM, Terry Polzin wrote:
> On Thu, 2010-10-21 at 15:39 -0400, Jim wrote:
>> On 10/21/2010 03:25 PM, Terry Polzin wrote:
>>> On Thu, 2010-10-21 at 15:18 -0400, Terry Polzin wrote:
On Thu, 2010-10-21 at 14:39 -0400, Jim wrote:
> fedora 13
>
> I have a Broadcom wi
On Thu, 2010-10-21 at 15:39 -0400, Jim wrote:
> On 10/21/2010 03:25 PM, Terry Polzin wrote:
> > On Thu, 2010-10-21 at 15:18 -0400, Terry Polzin wrote:
> >> On Thu, 2010-10-21 at 14:39 -0400, Jim wrote:
> >>> fedora 13
> >>>
> >>> I have a Broadcom wireless installed on a Dell Inspiron Mini 1210 and
On 10/21/2010 03:25 PM, Terry Polzin wrote:
> On Thu, 2010-10-21 at 15:18 -0400, Terry Polzin wrote:
>> On Thu, 2010-10-21 at 14:39 -0400, Jim wrote:
>>> fedora 13
>>>
>>> I have a Broadcom wireless installed on a Dell Inspiron Mini 1210 and it
>>> shows the b43 and ssb driver in lsmod,
>>> Wirel
On Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 12:12:52PM +0200, Roberto Polli wrote:
> W: Impossibile trovare il pacchetto mozilla-ldap-sdk
> Trying to download tarball using uscan
> uscan warning: In debian/watch no matching hrefs for version 6.0.6+dfsg in
> watch line
> http://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/direct
On 10/21/2010 03:18 PM, Terry Polzin wrote:
> On Thu, 2010-10-21 at 14:39 -0400, Jim wrote:
>> fedora 13
>>
>> I have a Broadcom wireless installed on a Dell Inspiron Mini 1210 and it
>> shows the b43 and ssb driver in lsmod,
>> Wireless card not working.
>>
>> Shouldn't it be the kmod-wl package
On Thu, 2010-10-21 at 15:18 -0400, Terry Polzin wrote:
> On Thu, 2010-10-21 at 14:39 -0400, Jim wrote:
> > fedora 13
> >
> > I have a Broadcom wireless installed on a Dell Inspiron Mini 1210 and it
> > shows the b43 and ssb driver in lsmod,
> > Wireless card not working.
> >
> > Shouldn't it be
On Thu, 2010-10-21 at 14:39 -0400, Jim wrote:
> fedora 13
>
> I have a Broadcom wireless installed on a Dell Inspiron Mini 1210 and it
> shows the b43 and ssb driver in lsmod,
> Wireless card not working.
>
> Shouldn't it be the kmod-wl package that makes the card work ?
>
>
> 07:00.0 Network
fedora 13
I have a Broadcom wireless installed on a Dell Inspiron Mini 1210 and it
shows the b43 and ssb driver in lsmod,
Wireless card not working.
Shouldn't it be the kmod-wl package that makes the card work ?
07:00.0 Network controller: Broadcom Corporation BCM4312 802.11b/g
LP-PHY (rev
On 10/21/2010 06:35 AM, Germán A. Racca wrote:
> What is that repository called "_repo"? You can see the content of the
> repo with this command:
>
> $ repoquery --repoid=_repo -a
>
> Configuration files for repos are here:
> /etc/yum.repos.d/
>
It is _local (or _Local)
I just posted to the OP h
On 10/21/2010 04:53 AM, Silent-Hunter wrote:
> Where are .repo files kept?
To find the _local repository location,
look in /etc/yum.repos.d for a file
that contains the word local
or it could also be named _local.repo .
A repo file has a label in [ ]
brackets. From your posts which showed that
On Mon, 2010-10-18 at 17:54 +0200, orsch...@googlemail.com wrote:
> It's this module here: http://github.com/tetromino/lenovo-sl-laptop
>
> I own a Lenovo SL500 with which this module worked very well in the past.
>
> Thank you for your help.
OK. Before I begin, I have no lenovo laptop to test t
On 10/21/2010 04:49 AM, Silent-Hunter wrote
>> You cannot do that, since yum searches the remote repo for what is
>> available vs. what you already have. You have the 32 bit version,
>> and it sees that the 64 bit version is available on rpmfusion, and
>> since you do not have the 64 bit version,
Gerrard Geldenhuis wrote:
>>
>> From: 389-users-boun...@lists.fedoraproject.org
>> [389-users-boun...@lists.fedoraproject.org] on behalf of Rich Megginson
>> [rmegg...@redhat.com]
>> Sent: 21 October 2010 15:22
>> To: General discussion list for the 389 Di
On Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 7:21 AM, Richard Shaw wrote:
> When I was trying to get WINE to behave I would sometime rename my
> .wine to back it up and start over. That let me know if it was
> something I screwed up in the configuration. Sometime copying to files
> from one to the other worked, other
>
>From: 389-users-boun...@lists.fedoraproject.org
>[389-users-boun...@lists.fedoraproject.org] on behalf of Rich Megginson
>[rmegg...@redhat.com]
>Sent: 21 October 2010 15:22
>To: General discussion list for the 389 Directory server project.
>Subject: Re:
On Thursday 21 October 2010 04:53 AM, Silent-Hunter wrote:
> [sil...@terminal-bmrf-9 ~]$ yum repolist all
> repo id repo namestatus
> _local Automatic local repo
> enabled:776
>
I think this is the problem. As
On Thu, 2010-10-21 at 04:53 -0700, Silent-Hunter wrote:
> On 01/-10/-28163 11:59 AM, Suvayu Ali wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Wednesday 20 October 2010 09:49 PM, Silent-Hunter wrote:
> >>
> >> [sil...@terminal-bmrf-9 ~]$ yum list zsnes\*
> >> Installed Packages
> >> zsnes.i5861.51-6
On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 7:52 PM, Reid Rivenburgh wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 3:29 PM, stan wrote:
>> On Tue, 19 Oct 2010 21:27:22 -0600
>> Reid Rivenburgh wrote:
>>
>>> To follow up, I did manage to get wine to use alsa (it's important to
>>> install the i686 packages as well as x86_64), bu
On Thu, 21 Oct 2010 10:18:44 +0200 (CEST), Walter wrote:
> well, I don't know if it is a repo out of synch or my local db broken
> but my problem still persist even if it is limited to the i686 version
> of postgresql-libs and I can live with it.
There wasn't anything wrong with the i686 version
On 01/-10/-28163 11:59 AM, Suvayu Ali wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wednesday 20 October 2010 09:49 PM, Silent-Hunter wrote:
>>
>> [sil...@terminal-bmrf-9 ~]$ yum list zsnes\*
>> Installed Packages
>> zsnes.i5861.51-6.fc11 @rpmfusion-free
>> Available Packages
>> zsnes.x86_64
On Thursday, October 21, 2010, Tim wrote:
> I wonder what the practical limits are for either cabling? 35
> feet does sound quite long for high bandwidth video.
well, for the record, we've run 100' VGA cables to projectors,
which is a fairly common occurence in event video work
--
Claude Jones
On 01/-10/-28163 11:59 AM, JD wrote:
> On 10/20/2010 09:49 PM, Silent-Hunter wrote:
>>On 01/-10/-28163 11:59 AM, suvayu ali wrote:
>>> Hi "Silent-Hunter",
>>>
>>> On 20 October 2010 15:58, Silent-Hunter wrote:
Not quite. The one I want to remove is the x86_64 one. It doesn't show
>>>
On 01/-10/-28163 11:59 AM, JD wrote:
> On 10/20/2010 09:42 PM, Silent-Hunter wrote:
>>On 01/-10/-28163 11:59 AM, Frank Cox wrote:
>>> rpm -qa | grep zsnes
>> [sil...@terminal-bmrf-9 ~]$ rpm -qa | grep zsnes
>> zsnes-1.51-6.fc11.i586
>>
>> The one listed there is the one I want to keep. The
Ian Malone :
>> I was just curious about how Patrick manages to link to a deleted file.
>>
>
> I assumed this meant hardlink to it before it is deleted, then when
> the entry in firefox's tmp is deleted you still have a link to it.
The new flash player (preview 2) unlinks a temp file right after
On Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 9:56 AM, Henrik Frisk wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 8:06 PM, TortuXm++ wrote:
>>
>> > Hmm, I'm still getting the same results. I followed the instructions above
>> > but when I reboot, after the three blue bars have finished loading and
>> > turned white, the bar st
On Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 9:39 AM, Chris Smart wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 6:21 PM, Henrik Frisk wrote:
> > Thanks. I'll look into this once I've gotten my nvidia drivers to work.
>
> This might help:
> http://oliver.net.au/?p=70
> http://oliver.net.au/?p=160
>
> I install the NVIDIA drivers u
On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 3:42 PM, Patrick O'Callaghan
wrote:
> On 10/19/10 4:02 PM, Manuel Escudero wrote:
>> Oh! and I forgot: Skype and Firefox :)
> Skype is proprietary. Isn't FF already there?
Skype will be installed and Firefox 4.0 beta will be installed but
Chromium will be default browser.
Hi
On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 3:23 PM, Viji V Nair wrote:
> H
>
> I am working on "kmod-reiser4" package, to pack the module only - will
> help to avoid the full recompilation of the kernel. There are couple
> of issues.
>
> 1. I have downloaded the kernel source package of fedora 13 and
> patched f
Sam Varshavchik:
>> After I relocated the monitor, and attached a 35' long VGA cable...
Richard Hughes:
> As an electrical engineer, this statement has alarm bells ringing :-)
Losses from long cables was the first thing that sprang to my mind, then
perhaps hum and noise if it's getting an earth l
Hi
Perhaps I should have known this
Perhaps I should be better at googling
but this took me a while to discover
Fully updated F13 client(milos) with users home directories NFS4
mounted on a fully updated Centos 5.5 NFS4 server (maui)
Evolution (in particular) falls over if the NFS4 call back por
On 21 October 2010 05:43, Petrus de Calguarium wrote:
> Suvayu Ali wrote:
>
>> How do you hard link a deleted file?
>
> Have no fear. I like your function. :-)
>
> I was just curious about how Patrick manages to link to a deleted file.
>
I assumed this meant hardlink to it before it is deleted, t
On 19 October 2010 23:35, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
> After I relocated the monitor, and attached a 35' long VGA cable...
As an electrical engineer, this statement has alarm bells ringing :-)
I think you're better off with a DVI cable in this instance.
Richard.
--
users mailing list
users@lists.f
On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 8:06 PM, TortuXm++ wrote:
> > Hmm, I'm still getting the same results. I followed the instructions
> above
> > but when I reboot, after the three blue bars have finished loading and
> > turned white, the bar starts flickering and eventually comes to a halt.
> > After that
On Thu, 21 Oct 2010, Michael Schwendt wrote:
On Wed, 20 Oct 2010 19:41:15 -0430, Patrick wrote:
On Wed, 2010-10-20 at 23:02 +0200, Walter Cazzola wrote:
today I got a machine fail (a blackout) during a yum update and after
Have you tried running "yum-complete-transaction" yet?
yes I did
On Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 6:21 PM, Henrik Frisk wrote:
> Thanks. I'll look into this once I've gotten my nvidia drivers to work.
This might help:
http://oliver.net.au/?p=70
http://oliver.net.au/?p=160
I install the NVIDIA drivers using RPMFusion's repo, using the akmod
(so that it's built automati
On Wed, 20 Oct 2010 19:41:15 -0430, Patrick wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-10-20 at 23:02 +0200, Walter Cazzola wrote:
> > today I got a machine fail (a blackout) during a yum update and after
Have you tried running "yum-complete-transaction" yet?
> > that all my attempt to update my machine end with the
On Wed, 20 Oct 2010, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
On Wed, 2010-10-20 at 23:02 +0200, Walter Cazzola wrote:
today I got a machine fail (a blackout) during a yum update and after
that all my attempt to update my machine end with the following error:
[...]
What you're seeing is a yum error (actu
On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 11:33 PM, Chris Smart wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 6:28 PM, Henrik Frisk wrote:
> > Any ideas?
> >
>
> Tom's link is good, but in case it helps, you can check your current
> resolution and DPI with:
>
> xdpyinfo |grep -A1 dim
>
> If you want to manually set the DPI to
92 matches
Mail list logo
