Joe Tseng hotmail.com> writes:
> ...
Google search: slapd slow start
JB
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guideline
I recently set up an Amahi-based file server using F12 and I configured it
to run as a PDC with Samba and OpenLDAP. It had been running very smoothly
until just tonight when I discovered when I tried to restart the slapd
service it would just sit there for a few minutes. After it did start I
look
On Sun, 2011-02-27 at 19:56 -0700, stan wrote:
> On Sun, 27 Feb 2011 20:04:59 -0600
> "Robert G. (Doc) Savage" wrote:
> > Each of these loops takes a noticeable amount of time -- especially on
> > this old 32-bit system. Thirty-two iterations of this loop add
> > substantially to the total update
Many useful configurations are missing from GNOME 3, I deeply hope them be
back in later GNOME revise builds.
GNOME3 is largely alike KDE 4.0.0 on the aspect of matureness seen now.
On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 02:17, Tom H wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 26, 2011 at 6:35 PM, Bill Davidsen wrote:
> > Tom H wro
On Sun, 27 Feb 2011 20:04:59 -0600
"Robert G. (Doc) Savage" wrote:
> Lately every time I update my system I see umpteen cycles of messages
> complaining about a group of files that are "not a symbolic link":
>
> /sbin/ldconfig: /usr/lib/libbigloosrfi27_es-3.4a.so is not a symbolic
> link /sbin/l
Lately every time I update my system I see umpteen cycles of messages
complaining about a group of files that are "not a symbolic link":
/sbin/ldconfig: /usr/lib/libbigloosrfi27_es-3.4a.so is not a symbolic link
/sbin/ldconfig: /usr/lib/libbigloocrypto_es-3.4a.so is not a symbolic link
/sbin/ldcon
On 2/27/11 5:54 PM, Fernando Cassia wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 27, 2011 at 9:37 PM, James McKenzie
> wrote:
>
>>> Thanks to everyone!. Btw. this box had Fedora 10... not 12... :) I now
>>> realize
>> Time for an upgrade to the lastest version of Fedora?
>>
>> Definitely time to clean up the drive and
On 02/27/2011 12:55 PM, Tim wrote:
> On Sun, 2011-02-27 at 14:39 -0500, John Mellor wrote:
>> Here here! FWN used to be something worth reading, but has now been
>> bastardized into what looks more like an employee rule-book for a
>> totally mindless organization.
>
> Thirded... I used to find so
On Sun, Feb 27, 2011 at 9:37 PM, James McKenzie wrote:
>> Thanks to everyone!. Btw. this box had Fedora 10... not 12... :) I now
>> realize
> Time for an upgrade to the lastest version of Fedora?
>
> Definitely time to clean up the drive and rid it of all unnecessary baggage.
>
> James McKenzie
On 2/27/11 4:01 PM, Fernando Cassia wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 27, 2011 at 7:43 PM, JB wrote:
>> So it would be:
>> selinux=0 enforcing=0 1
>>
>> Try it and report back.
> Worked like a charm. The combination of first booting to runlevel 1,
> erasing some stuff to bring disk usage down from 100% to 98%
Fernando Cassia gmail.com> writes:
> ...
> Ok, runlevel 1 I went and erased some VirtualBox VM vdis taking a
> couple gigs. Now space free is 98% according to "df". I hope SELinux
> stops panicking now.
>
> BTW: Is it "working as designed" to have an OS become comatose and
> unable to boot when
On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 10:50 AM, Geoffrey Leach wrote:
>
> Like I said, FWIW.
>
Sure, just making it clearer for him, in case.
-c
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines
On 02/27/2011 03:45:20 PM, Chris Smart wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 10:39 AM, Geoffrey Leach
> wrote:
> >> What does the xrandr command show when you have it plugged in?
> >
> > I have a (possibly) similar Sony Bravia. I'm running
> > 2.6.27.12-170.2.5.fc10 on an ASUS P5N7A-VM with an nVidia M
On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 10:39 AM, Geoffrey Leach wrote:
>> What does the xrandr command show when you have it plugged in?
>
> I have a (possibly) similar Sony Bravia. I'm running
> 2.6.27.12-170.2.5.fc10 on an ASUS P5N7A-VM with an nVidia MCP79
> (probably significant) HDMI video worked first time
On 02/26/2011 06:29:53 PM, Chris Smart wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 27, 2011 at 1:20 PM, barry yu
> wrote:
> > I have an HP Pavilion dv3 AMD Tution x2 dual core, pre loaded Vista
> H
> > Premium 64bit, the HDMI function works soon as the Vista starts
> booting
> > into desktop, both sound and video works
Please don´t fight, don´t need to. The problem was solved, thanks to you all.
A little manners goes a long way. No need to point fingers and accuse
others of being "wrong". :)
FC
On Sun, Feb 27, 2011 at 8:25 PM, compdoc wrote:
>> Wrong. Runlevel 1 is single-user mode.
>
> Naw, I wasn't wrong -
> Wrong. Runlevel 1 is single-user mode.
Naw, I wasn't wrong - I was just explaining in a way anyone can understand.
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fe
On 02/27/2011 02:43 PM, compdoc wrote:
> As Kevin J. Cummings said, you want to boot to runlevel 1, which is text mode.
> Boot to the command line, in other words.
Wrong. Runlevel 1 is single-user mode. You aren't connected to the net
by default and only the root partition (and, if needed, /boo
On Sun, Feb 27, 2011 at 7:43 PM, JB wrote:
>
> So it would be:
> selinux=0 enforcing=0 1
>
> Try it and report back.
Worked like a charm. The combination of first booting to runlevel 1,
erasing some stuff to bring disk usage down from 100% to 98% and then
disabling SELinux did the trick.
Thanks
On Sun, Feb 27, 2011 at 7:17 PM, Fernando Cassia wrote:
> Thanks, will try that.
>
> Confirms my suspicion: SELinux´ best feature is to disable it. ;) (JOKE, JOKE)
> FC
Ok, runlevel 1 I went and erased some VirtualBox VM vdis taking a
couple gigs. Now space free is 98% according to "df". I hope S
Fernando Cassia gmail.com> writes:
>
> On Sun, Feb 27, 2011 at 7:12 PM, JB gmail.com> wrote:
> > Fernando Cassia gmail.com> writes:
> >
> >> ...
> >> The issue is that I get the normal Fedora boot screen , then the
> >> hourglass, then the log-in screen,then I get
> >>
> >> Oops, sealert hit a
As Kevin J. Cummings said, you want to boot to runlevel 1, which is text mode.
Boot to the command line, in other words.
Google: fedora 12 runlevel 1
And if you are able to log in as root, you need to look at all of your
partitions and see which one is full. If you aren't sure what to delete,
On Sun, Feb 27, 2011 at 7:12 PM, JB wrote:
> Fernando Cassia gmail.com> writes:
>
>> ...
>> The issue is that I get the normal Fedora boot screen , then the
>> hourglass, then the log-in screen,then I get
>>
>> Oops, sealert hit an error!
>>
>> Traceback (most recent call last):
>> ...
>
> Stop b
On Sun, 2011-02-27 at 13:01 -0500, Tom H wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 27, 2011 at 10:02 AM, Patrick O'Callaghan
> wrote:
> >
> > The OP didn't mention NM, so he could hardly have said that it
> wasn't
> > active. And NM isn't "reporting" anything to Firefox. NM is
> registering
> > a service (presumably v
On Sun, Feb 27, 2011 at 7:12 PM, JB wrote:
> Stop boot loader, edit kernel boot line, and disable selinux for now.
> kernel /boot/vmlinuz-... ... selinux=0
>
> This may get you thru ...
>
> JB
Thanks, will try that.
Confirms my suspicion: SELinux´ best feature is to disable it. ;) (JOKE, JOKE)
Fernando Cassia gmail.com> writes:
> ...
> The issue is that I get the normal Fedora boot screen , then the
> hourglass, then the log-in screen,then I get
>
> Oops, sealert hit an error!
>
> Traceback (most recent call last):
> ...
Stop boot loader, edit kernel boot line, and disable selinux
On 02/27/2011 05:01 PM, Fernando Cassia wrote:
> I have one old machine running Fedora 12, kernel 2.6.27.
> Suddenly one day after doing system updates (and it was downloading
> some torrents in the background) the system would no longer boot
> properly, and the system says the disk is full (probab
I have one old machine running Fedora 12, kernel 2.6.27.
Suddenly one day after doing system updates (and it was downloading
some torrents in the background) the system would no longer boot
properly, and the system says the disk is full (probably is).
The issue is that I get the normal Fedora boot
On 02/27/2011 01:11 PM, Tim wrote:
> On Sat, 2011-02-26 at 16:12 -0700, compdoc wrote:
>> 3) While looking in the case, look for bad capacitors on the
>> motherboard and inside the PSU. Click on the pictures to see close up:
>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Capacitor_plague
>>
>> 4) If you're using
On Sun, 27 Feb 2011 20:08:58 +0100
Andras Simon wrote:
> On 2/27/11, Patrick Bartek wrote:
>
> > TO: OP
> >
> > If you think it's specifically a Fedora problem (I don't), I would
> > install
>
> Me neither. It's just that I still think it's possible that it's not a
> HW problem.
I'm going to
On Sun, 2011-02-27 at 10:07 -0500, Jim Philips wrote:
>
>
> On Sun, Feb 27, 2011 at 10:02 AM, Patrick O'Callaghan
> wrote:
> On Sat, 2011-02-26 at 23:52 -0800, bruce wrote:
> > but the OP had stated that NM wasn't active..
> >
> > and i'm still not convinced that
On Sat, 2011-02-26 at 16:12 -0700, compdoc wrote:
> 3) While looking in the case, look for bad capacitors on the
> motherboard and inside the PSU. Click on the pictures to see close up:
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Capacitor_plague
>
> 4) If you're using two or more sticks of ram and the sticks
Tim:
>> It should drain away when unplugged. But that doesn't happen instantly.
>> And, if the power supply has a fault, it may hold a charge for longer
>> than you might expect.
compdoc:
> You can unplug the power cord and hit the power button on the PC, and it
> will be gone instantly.
As I sa
On Sun, 2011-02-27 at 14:39 -0500, John Mellor wrote:
> Here here! FWN used to be something worth reading, but has now been
> bastardized into what looks more like an employee rule-book for a
> totally mindless organization.
Thirded... I used to find something worth reading in it, but the last
Andras Simon gmail.com> writes:
> ...
> *-firmware
> description: BIOS
> vendor: Award Software International, Inc.
> physical id: 0
> version: F10
> date: 01/12/2007
You should update the BIOS (and run in default settings for a longer peri
> >There are lots of cases where reallocated
> >sectors is not a problem
>
> Please explain a situation in which a hard drive developing bad sectors is
> not a problem.
The drive has lots of spare sectors. Some drives will even indicate they
have reallocated sectors at purchase time. What matters
On 02/27/2011 11:38 AM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Sun, 27 Feb 2011 11:04:50 -0800
> JD wrote:
>
>> Can anyone point me to any docs or info on the
>> process (and frequency) of updating RHEL with
>> the bugfixes and new features added to the Fedora
>> repos?
> When there is a new major RHEL release
On Sun, 27 Feb 2011 12:38:50 -0700
Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> So, RHEL6 just came out not too long ago, and was branched/based off
> Fedora 12/13.
Curiously though, a default install of RHEL6 gives you postfix as
a mail daemon, but fedora still defaults to sendmail (which I know
because switching off
On Sun, 2011-02-27 at 06:49 -0800, Antonio Olivares wrote:
>
> --- On Sun, 2/27/11, Timothy Murphy wrote:
>
> > From: Timothy Murphy
> > Subject: Re: Fedora Weekly News?
> > To: users@lists.fedoraproject.org
> > Date: Sunday, February 27, 2011, 6:32 AM
> > Antonio Olivares wrote:
> >
> > > htt
On Sun, 27 Feb 2011 11:04:50 -0800
JD wrote:
> Can anyone point me to any docs or info on the
> process (and frequency) of updating RHEL with
> the bugfixes and new features added to the Fedora
> repos?
When there is a new major RHEL release mostly.
So, RHEL6 just came out not too long ago, a
> Even if it has failed you don't want to
>try fixing it unless you are a qualified electrician and
>have appropriate tools for things like earth testing.
You don't repair failed/damaged PSUs and motherboards - you replace them.
>PSU's also fail for another common office reason in some
>configur
On 2/27/11, Patrick Bartek wrote:
> TO: OP
>
> If you think it's specifically a Fedora problem (I don't), I would install
Me neither. It's just that I still think it's possible that it's not a
HW problem.
> (a real dual boot install--not a LiveCD) distro other than Fedora that has
> the same ve
Can anyone point me to any docs or info on the
process (and frequency) of updating RHEL with
the bugfixes and new features added to the Fedora
repos?
Thanx for your help.
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproje
On Sat, 26 Feb 2011 22:58:22 -0800
"Suresh Govindachar" wrote:
>
> I read http://www.broadcom.com/docs/linux_sta/README.txt
> carefully; and in each of the following attempts, I made
> use of the instructions in the README. I tried the rpms:
>
> broadcom-wl-5.60.48.36-1.fc13.noarch
On Sun, Feb 27, 2011 at 10:15 AM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> On Sun, 2011-02-27 at 10:07 -0500, Jim Philips wrote:
> > > I didn't do anything with Network Manager at the beginning, nor was
> > I prompted to. Shouldn't there have been a wizard to lead me through
> > settings?
>
> Is this a fresh
--- On Sat, 2/26/11, Andras Simon wrote:
> On 2/26/11, Bruno Wolff III
> wrote:
> > On Sat, Feb 26, 2011 at 20:02:26 +0100,
> > Andras Simon
> wrote:
> >>
> >> The crashes seem to happen more frequently when
> I'm doing something
> >> interactively (even if it's just browsing, running
> yum).
On Sat, Feb 26, 2011 at 6:35 PM, Bill Davidsen wrote:
> Tom H wrote:
>> On Sat, Feb 26, 2011 at 11:33 AM, Bill Davidsen wrote:
>>>
>>> I read in a non-Fedora list that GNOME3 has dropped the ability to do power
>>> management, and that all laptops will suspend when the cover is closed,
>>> like
On Sun, Feb 27, 2011 at 10:07 AM, Jim Philips wrote:
>
> I didn't do anything with Network Manager at the beginning, nor was I
> prompted to. Shouldn't there have been a wizard to lead me through settings?
> By the way, things all work with my wired connection now. Haven't gotten
> wireless workin
On Sun, Feb 27, 2011 at 10:02 AM, Patrick O'Callaghan
wrote:
>
> The OP didn't mention NM, so he could hardly have said that it wasn't
> active. And NM isn't "reporting" anything to Firefox. NM is registering
> a service (presumably via D-bus, though I haven't checked) and FF is
> picking it up. T
On Sun, Feb 27, 2011 at 2:52 AM, bruce wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 26, 2011 at 10:41 PM, Tom H wrote:
>> On Sun, Feb 27, 2011 at 1:20 AM, bruce wrote:
>>> On Sat, Feb 26, 2011 at 8:43 PM, Patrick O'Callaghan
>>> wrote:
On Sat, 2011-02-26 at 20:29 -0500, Jim Philips wrote:
>
> I installed
On Sat, 26 Feb 2011 22:30:20 -0800
"Suresh Govindachar" wrote:
>
> Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> >> On Sat, 26 Feb 2011 07:29:02 -0800
> >> "Suresh Govindachar" wrote:
> >>
> >> Please explain the role played by the material in each
> >> of the following three rpms found on rpmfusion:
>
>
> 5) Inside the PSU, look closely at the mid-sized capacitors where the
> external wires are soldered to the circuit board. (external wires meaning
> those that connect to the mainboard and drives) Also, look at the PSU
> circuit board and its components for indication of high heat. For example,
>
On Sun, 27 Feb 2011 06:49:07 -0800 (PST)
Antonio Olivares wrote:
>
>
> --- On Sun, 2/27/11, Timothy Murphy wrote:
>
> > From: Timothy Murphy
> > Subject: Re: Fedora Weekly News?
> > To: users@lists.fedoraproject.org
> > Date: Sunday, February 27, 2011, 6:32 AM
> > Antonio Olivares wrote:
> >
On 2/26/11 5:30 PM, Bill Davidsen wrote:
> Again, outside political concerns, training time and script rewrites are
> likely
> to be more expensive than writing the tool.
>
It is best that you tell them that nslookup is not maintained, has MAJOR
security concerns and sell them on dig. If they do
On 02/26/2011 07:33 PM, Larry Vaden wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 26, 2011 at 6:18 PM, Larry Vaden wrote:
>>> I'm wondering how long it would take to write nslookup in perl. No, I'm not
>>> joking.
>> It was in
>>
>> BSD/OS home.texoma.net 4.0.1 BSDI BSD/OS 4.0.1 Kernel #5: Thu Dec 30
>> 20:38:22 CST 1999
On 2/27/11 8:15 AM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> On Sun, 2011-02-27 at 10:07 -0500, Jim Philips wrote:
>>> I didn't do anything with Network Manager at the beginning, nor was
>> I prompted to. Shouldn't there have been a wizard to lead me through
>> settings?
> Is this a fresh install or an upgrade
On Sun, 2011-02-27 at 10:07 -0500, Jim Philips wrote:
> > I didn't do anything with Network Manager at the beginning, nor was
> I prompted to. Shouldn't there have been a wizard to lead me through
> settings?
Is this a fresh install or an upgrade? I would expect a fresh install to
give some prompt
On Sun, Feb 27, 2011 at 10:02 AM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> On Sat, 2011-02-26 at 23:52 -0800, bruce wrote:
> > but the OP had stated that NM wasn't active..
> >
> > and i'm still not convinced that NM is "reporting" to Firefox. Which
> > isn't to say that FF isn't accessing something to conne
On Sat, 2011-02-26 at 23:52 -0800, bruce wrote:
> but the OP had stated that NM wasn't active..
>
> and i'm still not convinced that NM is "reporting" to Firefox. Which
> isn't to say that FF isn't accessing something to connect to the the
> port.
[Please don't top-post on this list. See the Guid
On Sat, 2011-02-26 at 21:08 -0800, Joe Zeff wrote:
> On 02/26/2011 08:43 PM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> > Which browser? Firefox and Evolution both use NetworkManager to
> > determine if the machine is connected. Even if the network is working,
> > if NM is not configured to manage the interface,
--- On Sun, 2/27/11, Timothy Murphy wrote:
> From: Timothy Murphy
> Subject: Re: Fedora Weekly News?
> To: users@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Date: Sunday, February 27, 2011, 6:32 AM
> Antonio Olivares wrote:
>
> > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/FWN/Issue264
>
> Thanks for that.
> But looking at
On 02/27/2011 09:02 AM, Greg Woods wrote:
> On Sun, 2011-02-27 at 09:57 +0100, François Patte wrote:
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>> Le 27/02/2011 01:17, Mark LaPierre a écrit :
>>> Hey Y'all,
>>>
>>> When I start an xterm I get:
>>>
>>> [mlapier@mushroom ATC]$ xterm
>>> W
Thanks. I got to the command prompt and deleted a few things
under .config and I was able to log in again. Lost some settings, of
course. But that wasn't a big deal, since I started fresh on this distro
yesterday.
On Sun, 2011-02-27 at 13:36 +, JB wrote:
> JB gmail.com> writes:
>
> > ...
>
Antonio Olivares wrote:
> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/FWN/Issue264
Thanks for that.
But looking at the last few numbers does confirm to me
that FWN has changed completely from what it was at the start.
It is now essentially a bureaucratic record of recent Fedora developments.
There is nothing w
>It should drain away when unplugged. But that doesn't happen instantly.
>And, if the power supply has a fault, it may hold a charge for longer
>than you might expect.
You can unplug the power cord and hit the power button on the PC, and it
will be gone instantly. Also, since the PSU circuit boar
On Sun, 2011-02-27 at 09:57 +0100, François Patte wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Le 27/02/2011 01:17, Mark LaPierre a écrit :
> > Hey Y'all,
> >
> > When I start an xterm I get:
> >
> > [mlapier@mushroom ATC]$ xterm
> > Warning: Cannot convert string "nil2" to type
JB gmail.com> writes:
> ...
> Ctrl+Alt+F2 (or F3...F6) - switch to tty
>
> After you have logged in again,
> check System-Preferences-Startup Applications
> and Options
> and clear Automatically remember ...
>
Actually there is a little more to that ...
You should start with GDM configurati
I am running Fedora 14, and now when I open a terminal window and type
any command, as soon as I type a lower-case x character, a new terminal
window opens and control is passed to it.
How do I change this annoying behaviour to what I would expect? If I put
the Caps Lock on and then type Shift-
BTW: Is there a RSS feed of the FWN? I looked for it but I didn't found any.
Regards
--
Laurin Novak
Member Of The Fedora Localization Project - German Translators Team
(https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/L10N_German_Team)
GPG-Key-ID: 0xF4239033
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally sign
Jim Philips gmail.com> writes:
>
> I seemed to get past my network issues by setting up Network Manager. But now,
when I enter my username and password into GDM, it grinds for awhile and then
I'm presented with a white screen with only a mouse pointer. I can move the
pointer, but nothing else wo
I seemed to get past my network issues by setting up Network Manager. But
now, when I enter my username and password into GDM, it grinds for awhile
and then I'm presented with a white screen with only a mouse pointer. I can
move the pointer, but nothing else works. Since GDM doesn't give me any
opt
On 02/26/2011 05:18 PM, Bill Davidsen wrote:
> If you have a toolchain which run in FC8 it's possible that it won't run on a
> newer system. If you hardware supports HVM so you can run KVM virtualization,
> I
> would almost think that the easiest way out is to add a drive with FC14, and
> run
Main question: is it safe, to open a port for an openssl server?
e.g.:
server side - generate a self-signed cert.
time openssl req -x509 -nodes -days 365 -newkey rsa:8192 -keyout mycert.pem
-out mycert.pem
openssl s_server -accept 52310 -cert mycert.pem
Is it secure? - it could be DOSed' [D
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Le 27/02/2011 01:17, Mark LaPierre a écrit :
> Hey Y'all,
>
> When I start an xterm I get:
>
> [mlapier@mushroom ATC]$ xterm
> Warning: Cannot convert string "nil2" to type FontStruct
> xterm: cannot load font
> -misc-fixed-medium-r-semicondensed--1
On Sat, 2011-02-26 at 23:52 -0800, bruce wrote:
> but the OP had stated that NM wasn't active..
But... does that mean they've disabled the service, or they've simply
not configured it for use.
--
[tim@localhost ~]$ uname -r
2.6.27.25-78.2.56.fc9.i686
Don't send private replies to my address, th
75 matches
Mail list logo
