On 02/28/2011 08:49 PM, Tim wrote
> I'm sure it is, but I'm voicing my comments from the viewpoint of a
> reader, rather than a contributor. What happened to it? Did the people
> previously submitting the interesting articles give up? Have they left
> the scene? Has someone deliberately decided
On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 6:51 AM, Jim Philips wrote:
> I had this on a previous distro, so it's not specific to Fedora. I log in
> and after about 60 seconds, mouse clicks no longer work. The only workaround
> is to log out and log back in. Then mouse clicks work for an unlimited time.
> This is an
On Sat, Feb 12, 2011 14:51:25 PM +0100, Marco Fioretti
(mfiore...@nexaima.net) wrote:
> when I upgraded from Fedora 12 to Fedora 14, about twenty days ago,
> the system (which wasn't doing really well even before the upgrade)
> became almost unusable.
Things went better, then worse, now they are
Hi Wey,
Including you and Nathalie of Intel, the Dell wholesaler who integrated my
system, and the WIN 7 developers who implemented the windows driver for the
card have not expressed any concern that the network card in question (with
EEPROM 0x424) be used under WINDOWS 7. To make my life easier,
Tom H wrote:
> AFAIK gconf has been renamed dconf.
It wasn't just renamed, it was rewritten.
GConf was a XML-like configuration storage system.
dconf is a binary (think Windows registry) configuration storage system.
It was designed for speed.
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.or
On Tue, Mar 1, 2011 at 1:12 PM, Armelius Cameron wrote:
> On Monday, February 28, 2011 10:53:34 pm inode0 wrote:
>> On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 4:34 PM, Larry Brower wrote:
>> > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>> > Hash: SHA512
>> >
>> > On 02/28/2011 07:47 AM, Alain Spineux wrote:
>> >>> So I did
On Tue, 2011-03-01 at 11:48 -0500, Tom H wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 1, 2011 at 10:35 AM, Aaron Konstam wrote:
> > On Tue, 2011-03-01 at 08:21 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> >>
> >> It is configurable via dconf.
> >
> > I admit I don't know what dconf is. Running it causes a core dump on my
> > machine;
On Tue, Mar 1, 2011 at 5:09 PM, inode0 wrote:
> Yes, I am giving the parent poster a chance to show us how it is possible.
I initiated this thread and I find it pretty absurd how it´s got into
an entirely different discussion.
Whoever made that claim about * extending to the parent directory was
People,
I would like to set up lxc on Fedora 14 x86_64 for sandboxing and the
closest thing I can find to a simple setup script is this:
http://blog.kagesenshi.org/2010/03/howto-linux-container-lxc-on-fedora-12.html
which had a few bugs in it but after fixing them I still couldn't create
a con
Well, FWIW I offered to _merge_ a patch. :-)
But, if I get some confirmation from a credible source at Intel that
simply honoring the earlier version is sufficient I should have no
particular problem squeezing-out such a patch.
John
On Tue, Mar 01, 2011 at 03:51:34PM -0300, Sebastian wrote:
> Th
On Tue, Mar 1, 2011 at 1:12 PM, Armelius Cameron wrote:
> On Monday, February 28, 2011 10:53:34 pm inode0 wrote:
>> On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 4:34 PM, Larry Brower wrote:
>> > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>> > Hash: SHA512
>> >
>> > On 02/28/2011 07:47 AM, Alain Spineux wrote:
>> >>> So I did
On Mon, 28 Feb 2011 19:53:41 -0800
"Suresh Govindachar" wrote:
> > You could install the development group, and do it all
> > within the live CD environment, but that is a pretty big
> > project also. And unless you put the result somewhere
> > permanent, you will lose it when you shut
On 2/24/2011 5:13 AM, Jorgen Lundman wrote:
> Right, so I download the fc14 ISO and try to do a install over the old OS,
> hoping to keep data. The installer does have an option to keep things, the
> second to last option, before custom.
>
> It just notifies me that there are no places to install
On Monday, February 28, 2011 10:53:34 pm inode0 wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 4:34 PM, Larry Brower wrote:
> > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> > Hash: SHA512
> >
> > On 02/28/2011 07:47 AM, Alain Spineux wrote:
> >>> So I did SUDO -i, and from root as shell I tried to
> >>> chown -hR * fc
Thanks a million John for offering to write a patch. Today I spoke to Nathalie
from Intel about this issue, ticket number: 8000209173. Nathalie said she
would write to you on behalf of Intel that since Intel are prepared to have
me use this card in Windows 7 (same EEPROM, same hardware), as Wey-wi
Hi,
Yes. Sure. Attached.
Zoltan
2011/3/1 Erik P. Olsen :
> On 22/02/11 14:27, Zoltan Hoppar wrote:
> [snip]
>> I have attached an simple file, what you have to insert as root to
>> /etc/modprobe.d as is.
>
> Could you send the attachment to the list, please?
>
> --
> Erik
> --
> users mailing li
On 22/02/11 14:27, Zoltan Hoppar wrote:
[snip]
> I have attached an simple file, what you have to insert as root to
> /etc/modprobe.d as is.
Could you send the attachment to the list, please?
--
Erik
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription optio
On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 10:27 AM, Zoltan Hoppar wrote:
> I have the same problem basically if I reinstall my F14. The solution
> is quite easy - and possibly you have the very same problem that I
> have. The bug is an kernel bug, what pushing with +1 the IRQ-s and
> that's why you couldn't use yo
On Tue, Mar 1, 2011 at 10:35 AM, Aaron Konstam wrote:
> On Tue, 2011-03-01 at 08:21 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
>>
>> It is configurable via dconf.
>
> I admit I don't know what dconf is. Running it causes a core dump on my
> machine; and there is no : man dconf
AFAIK gconf has been renamed dcon
On Tue, 2011-03-01 at 09:40 -0600, Aaron Konstam wrote:
> Forwarded Message
> From: Aaron Konstam
> To: users@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Subject: Re: FC15 and GNOME3
> Date: Tue, 01 Mar 2011 09:35:46 -0600
>
> On Tue, 2011-03-01 at 08:21 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> > On 02/28/
On Sunday, February 27, 2011 06:50:28 am Roberto Ragusa wrote:
> I see your RH8 in a VM and raise a RH7.2 in a VM. :-)
> For an Internet facing service, nonetheless!
And I'll raise you an RH5.2, still running after nearly thirteen years. On
physical hardware.
It's just about to be decommissione
Forwarded Message
From: Aaron Konstam
To: users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Subject: Re: FC15 and GNOME3
Date: Tue, 01 Mar 2011 09:35:46 -0600
On Tue, 2011-03-01 at 08:21 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> On 02/28/2011 11:34 PM, James McKenzie wrote:
> >
> > Agreed. If I want lid clos
On Tue, 2011-03-01 at 08:21 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> On 02/28/2011 11:34 PM, James McKenzie wrote:
> >
> > Agreed. If I want lid close, suspend, let me select it. If I don't,
> > let me select it.
>
> It is configurable via dconf.
>
> Rahul
I admit I don't know what dconf is. Running it
On Tue, 2011-03-01 at 03:53 -0500, Tom H wrote:
> IMHO totally pedantic...
But completely important.
NetworkManager sets a status that you're on- or off-line, and any
application can check for that. It doesn't individually inform every
network-using application about its status. NetworkManager,
On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 8:15 PM, Patrick O'Callaghan
wrote:
> The Shell will not normally expand * to a name beginning with ".".
Agreed. A tempest in a teapot.
If it did, any command with * will affect the entire filesystem as
everything is linked to levels above it with ".."
FC
--
users mail
On Sun, Feb 27, 2011 at 5:20 PM, Patrick O'Callaghan
wrote:
> On Sun, 2011-02-27 at 13:01 -0500, Tom H wrote:
>> On Sun, Feb 27, 2011 at 10:02 AM, Patrick O'Callaghan
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > The OP didn't mention NM, so he could hardly have said that it
>> wasn't
>> > active. And NM isn't "reporting"
Around about 28/02/11 16:03, mike cloaked typed ...
> Well I have done this on 7 machines and no problems changing it in the
> settings menu under gnome - if you are using KDE that may behave
> differently of course.
I think it may be something to do with my running openbox. If I kill
openbox
27 matches
Mail list logo
