On 05/24/11 22:07, Kevin J. Cummings wrote:
>
> You didn't explicitly list them. Can I assume that they are:
>
> win7 192.168.1.1
> fedora192.168.1.2
> xp1 192.168.1.3
> router192.168.1.254
fedora 192.168.1.108
> ?
>
> Are these all DCHP assigned from the router? or static?
> I
Hi Joachim,
Thank you for the suggestions I tried pressing "Esc" during booting and it
looks like the system is hanging after *"Starting SYSV: Late init script
for live image, Started SYSV: Late init script for live image"* does not go
pass this.
How do I disable the rhbg?
Thank you,
On Wed, M
On 05/25/2011 06:57 AM, Sherwyn wrote:
Hello all,
I am sure today is a busy day with the release and bug reporting and all, I
just had a question about upgrading to the new F15. I tried following the
information over at https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/YumUpgradeFaq however
after several attempts
On 05/24/2011 10:19 PM, JD wrote:
> On 05/24/11 18:45, Kevin J. Cummings wrote:
>> Does "xp1" have an IP address?
>>
>> If yes, does Fedora know about it?
> xp1 and win7 are both listed in /etc/hosts.
> So yes, they have IP addresses :) :)
You didn't explicitly list them. Can I assume that they
Hello all,
I am sure today is a busy day with the release and bug reporting and all, I
just had a question about upgrading to the new F15. I tried following the
information over at https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/YumUpgradeFaq however
after several attempts it finally worked, now after rebooting th
Gregory P. Ennis PoMec.Net> writes:
> The minimum requirement is 512MB of RAM (see http://fedoraproject.org/).
> With 256MB I suspect there isn't enough space even for the root image
> (which lives in a RAM filesystem as the error message implies).
Unfortunately, that documentation is wrong. The
Ed Greshko wrote:
>
>
>So, is there a quick way to tell yum to install all (majority) of 32
>bit libs?
OK Memory kicked in
yum install redhat-lsb
--
Sent from my Android phone with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscr
On Tue, 2011-05-24 at 22:04 -0500, Gregory P. Ennis wrote:
> List,
>
> I have been trying to do a fresh install of F15 i386 on a Dell 8250 with
> 256 mgs of memory.
>
> I am able to boot from the DVD as well as the netiso CD without
> difficulty, but after picking the first option on the "Welcome
I am trying to install F15 on a Lenovo X120E laptop.
When I get to the disk partitioning step, it tells me:
sda must have a GPT disk label
What is a GPT disk label, and how do I get one?
By the way, Ubuntu installed just fine. I am trying to delete the Ubuntu
partition and install Fedora on it
On 05/24/2011 08:04 PM, Gregory P. Ennis wrote:
> I have been trying to do a fresh install of F15 i386 on a Dell 8250 with
> 256 mgs of memory.
If you go to http://fedoraproject.org/ the minimum requirements include
"at least 512 MB of memory." Sorry.
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedorapro
On Tue, 2011-05-24 at 22:04 -0500, Gregory P. Ennis wrote:
> List,
>
> I have been trying to do a fresh install of F15 i386 on a Dell 8250 with
> 256 mgs of memory.
>
> I am able to boot from the DVD as well as the netiso CD without
> difficulty, but after picking the first option on the "Welcome
Hi,
For all these years I've only been using 32bit Linux. Decided to install F15 as
64bit and I've run into a minor issue and looking for a simple solution.
It seems that google earth does use some 32bit libs. Probably will run into
other non-packaged apps that will need 32bit libs.
So, is the
List,
I have been trying to do a fresh install of F15 i386 on a Dell 8250 with
256 mgs of memory.
I am able to boot from the DVD as well as the netiso CD without
difficulty, but after picking the first option on the "Welcome to Fedora
15" screen to install a new system I am not been able to get p
On 25 May 2011 06:18, Digimer wrote:
> Before I go through the hassle of a re-install; Has anyone tried out
> Fedora 15's Gnome 3 on a Thinkpad T400s?
>
> lspci tells me it has an "Intel Corporation Mobile 4 Series Chipset
> Integrated Graphics Controller" for a video card. The card is the Intel
>
Before I go through the hassle of a re-install; Has anyone tried out
Fedora 15's Gnome 3 on a Thinkpad T400s?
lspci tells me it has an "Intel Corporation Mobile 4 Series Chipset
Integrated Graphics Controller" for a video card. The card is the Intel
X4500M Integrated chip, according to the specs.
On 05/24/11 18:45, Kevin J. Cummings wrote:
> On 05/24/2011 06:57 PM, JD wrote:
>> I have been trying to mount on fedora a shared C drive
>> from a windows machine running winxp.
>>
>> Well, I used the mount command:
>>
>> # mount -t cifs //xp1/c -o
>> user=jd,password=mypassword,uid=myuid,gid=mygi
All packages downloaded, but preupgrade reported an error on the console
I ran it from regarding the fact that /boot was on a software RAID
device. The GUI, on the other hand, appeared to finish normally and
reported that the installation would start on reboot. It didn't.
So is there a reason pr
On 05/24/2011 06:57 PM, JD wrote:
> I have been trying to mount on fedora a shared C drive
> from a windows machine running winxp.
>
> Well, I used the mount command:
>
> # mount -t cifs //xp1/c -o
> user=jd,password=mypassword,uid=myuid,gid=mygid,rw /mnt/xp1/c
>
> Unable to find suitable addre
Dear All,
When I start a XFCE session on F15, I get a Gnome terminal window and
I hear a voice from the computer. Can I avoid this?
Thanks in advance,
Paul
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/
On 05/24/2011 05:31 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:
> On 05/25/2011 08:23 AM, Konstantin Svist wrote:
>> Does btrfs finally have a fully functional fsck? Or is btrfs install not
>> recommended for the faint of heart?
>>
>> Last time I tried btrfs (~year ago), FS got corrupted after a kernel
>> oops. Luckily
On 05/25/2011 08:23 AM, Konstantin Svist wrote:
> Does btrfs finally have a fully functional fsck? Or is btrfs install not
> recommended for the faint of heart?
>
> Last time I tried btrfs (~year ago), FS got corrupted after a kernel
> oops. Luckily it was only a test machine.
>
>
From the relea
Does btrfs finally have a fully functional fsck? Or is btrfs install not
recommended for the faint of heart?
Last time I tried btrfs (~year ago), FS got corrupted after a kernel
oops. Luckily it was only a test machine.
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or cha
On Tue, 24 May 2011 19:52:32 -0400
Tom Horsley wrote:
> if I
> right click the network icon and look at connections,
> it shows a wireless connection, and even knows the
> MAC address but it says it is Disconnected
OK, I tried some stuff and found an answer: Apparently
NM in fedora won't talk to
Issue 1:
My wired network does indeed work OK in fedora 15. The
Options... button is no longer always disabled, so that problem
seems to be fixed since the beta, but when I was editing
the connection to turn on the always connected flag,
I get this tool tip when I hover over the "Save..."
button t
Hi Rahul,
On Sat, May 21, 2011 at 10:18 AM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> On 04/19/2011 03:21 PM, suvayu ali wrote:
>> Hi Rahul,
>> I am definitely interested in a beta release. Currently I am on F13 on
>> my desktop but I will upgrade to F15 once it is out. I would be happy
>> to try out this transmis
On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 12:03 AM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> On 05/25/2011 04:32 AM, Paul Smith wrote:
>>
>> Thanks, Kevin. I have adwaita-gtk*-theme installed, but how can I
>> change Gnome theme to adwaita?
>
> Try using gnome-tweak-tool
Thanks, Kevin and Rahul. Adwaita is the Gnome theme that I h
On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 20:16, Fernando Cassia wrote:
> My take is that multiple 32-bit JVMs each in its own 4GB address space
on top of a 64-bit OS.
^^
(sorry, I missed that line :)
> probably would run faster than the equivalent 64-bit JVMs on 64-bit
> OS.
FC
--
users ma
On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 20:14, Nat Gross wrote:
> 32 bit jvm inside 64 bit os works fine. The question is which
> combination of os & jvm is best.
My take is that multiple 32-bit JVMs each in its own 4GB address space
probably would run faster than the equivalent 64-bit JVMs on 64-bit
OS.
But th
On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 5:51 PM, Fernando Cassia wrote:
> On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 18:07, Jerry Feldman wrote:
>> My statement is:
>> 64-bit operating systems on X86-64 are faster than the same OS in 32-bits.
>
> How abonut a 32-bit JVM inside a 64-bit OS? Is that even possible?
> (just thinking a
On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 4:44 PM, Fernando Cassia wrote:
> On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 17:40, Jerry Feldman wrote:
>> The bottom line here is you can't make a blanket statement
>> that 64-bit code is slower. And if you have a decent optimizing
>> compiler, your performance could improve.
>
> I don´t m
On 05/25/2011 04:32 AM, Paul Smith wrote:
>
> Thanks, Kevin. I have adwaita-gtk*-theme installed, but how can I
> change Gnome theme to adwaita?
Try using gnome-tweak-tool
Rahul
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedor
On Wed, 25 May 2011 00:02:16 +0100
Paul Smith wrote:
> Thanks, Kevin. I have adwaita-gtk*-theme installed, but how can I
> change Gnome theme to adwaita?
That I am not sure of...
I would have said 'gnome-control-center' but looking at that here, it
doesn't seem to have that ability.
kevin
On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 11:58 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>> I am using XFCE on F15, but the Gnome programs look horribly "boxy".
>> How can one get the Gnome programs looking better?
>
> Gnome uses gtk3, Xfce uses gtk2.
>
> Currently adwaita is the only theme I know that has both a gtk2 and
> gtk3 ver
On Tue, 24 May 2011 23:00:31 +0100
Paul Smith wrote:
> Dear All,
>
> I am using XFCE on F15, but the Gnome programs look horribly "boxy".
> How can one get the Gnome programs looking better?
Gnome uses gtk3, Xfce uses gtk2.
Currently adwaita is the only theme I know that has both a gtk2 and
g
I have been trying to mount on fedora a shared C drive
from a windows machine running winxp.
Well, I used the mount command:
# mount -t cifs //xp1/c -o
user=jd,password=mypassword,uid=myuid,gid=mygid,rw /mnt/xp1/c
Unable to find suitable address.
I checked the firewall setting on the xp machi
On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 11:51 PM, Antonio Olivares
wrote:
>> I am using XFCE on F15, but the Gnome programs look
>> horribly "boxy".
>> How can one get the Gnome programs looking better?
>
> Maybe using native Gnome?
>
> Have you tried that?
Yes, I have tried that, but unfortunately I was not abl
> I am using XFCE on F15, but the Gnome programs look
> horribly "boxy".
> How can one get the Gnome programs looking better?
Maybe using native Gnome?
Have you tried that?
>
> Thanks in advance,
>
> Paul
> --
Don't have ideas for fixing the look :( sorry for my answer in case it seemed
imp
Dear All,
I am using XFCE on F15, but the Gnome programs look horribly "boxy".
How can one get the Gnome programs looking better?
Thanks in advance,
Paul
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/li
On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 18:07, Jerry Feldman wrote:
> My statement is:
> 64-bit operating systems on X86-64 are faster than the same OS in 32-bits.
How abonut a 32-bit JVM inside a 64-bit OS? Is that even possible?
(just thinking aloud).
FC
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To
On 05/24/2011 04:03 PM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> On 05/25/2011 01:54 AM, Steven Stern wrote:
>> Transmission will not move to another desktop. I have transmission
>> running and clicked on Activities, then tried to drag transmission to a
>> 2nd desktop. It comes right back. Other applications move
On 05/24/2011 04:44 PM, Fernando Cassia wrote:
> On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 17:40, Jerry Feldman wrote:
>> The bottom line here is you can't make a blanket statement
>> that 64-bit code is slower. And if you have a decent optimizing
>> compiler, your performance could improve.
> I don´t make any blan
On 05/25/2011 01:54 AM, Steven Stern wrote:
> Transmission will not move to another desktop. I have transmission
> running and clicked on Activities, then tried to drag transmission to a
> 2nd desktop. It comes right back. Other applications move normally, so I
> think it's something peculiar to t
On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 17:40, Jerry Feldman wrote:
> The bottom line here is you can't make a blanket statement
> that 64-bit code is slower. And if you have a decent optimizing
> compiler, your performance could improve.
I don´t make any blanket statement. Sun/Oracle´s FAQ does say there´s
a 0-
On 05/24/2011 12:37 PM, Fernando Cassia wrote:
> Well guess what? 64 bit code is bigger (bigger pointers) and thus
> slower, because CPU cache is less effective, with bigger code.
>
In my previous job I've done quite a bit of benchmarking. First, the OS
itself is faster in 64-bit because it can use
On 05/24/2011 12:40 PM, Sebastian Rust wrote:
> you might wanna have a look at cryptfsAuthConfig. It's a new feature in
> Fedora 15 (released today hurray :-) ) and allows you to decrypt and
> mount /home by entering your user password. Haven't looked in it yet and
> and I don't know how well it is
Transmission will not move to another desktop. I have transmission
running and clicked on Activities, then tried to drag transmission to a
2nd desktop. It comes right back. Other applications move normally, so I
think it's something peculiar to transmission.
--
-- Steve
--
users mailing list
u
On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 7:31 PM, Konstantin Svist wrote:
>> When will
>>
>> http://download.virtualbox.org/virtualbox/rpm/fedora/
>>
>> have rpms for F15?
>
> Sometimes it helps checking the official download page:
> http://www.virtualbox.org/wiki/Linux_Downloads
Thanks, but sometimes it helps to
On 05/24/2011 10:40 AM, Paul Smith wrote:
> Dear All,
>
> When will
>
> http://download.virtualbox.org/virtualbox/rpm/fedora/
>
> have rpms for F15?
>
> Thanks in advance,
>
> Paul
Sometimes it helps checking the official download page:
http://www.virtualbox.org/wiki/Linux_Downloads
--
users ma
Hi,
Although not exactly what you have described, isn't Puppet
a good fit for this?
http://www.puppetlabs.com/
---
Will Y.
> The basics.. you have an icon in the
notification area of gnome or in
> the system menu.. click on the
icon then you have a list of your hosts
> or groups or whatever,
On Tue, 2011-05-24 at 19:05 +0100, Paul Smith wrote:
> On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 6:40 PM, Paul Smith wrote:
> > When will
> >
> > http://download.virtualbox.org/virtualbox/rpm/fedora/
> >
> > have rpms for F15?
>
> If you are planning to use this VirtualBox, it is better to wait until
> the rpms fo
On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 6:40 PM, Paul Smith wrote:
> When will
>
> http://download.virtualbox.org/virtualbox/rpm/fedora/
>
> have rpms for F15?
If you are planning to use this VirtualBox, it is better to wait until
the rpms for F15 are made available, as otherwise you will face many,
many update
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 05/24/2011 07:44 PM, Jon Ingason wrote:
> 2011-05-24 19:11, harleq...@googlemail.com skrev:
>>
>>
>> Rahul Sundaram schrieb:
>>
>> On 05/24/2011 08:33 PM, Nat Gross wrote: > 1. Thank you ALL for the
>> quick positive response! > > 2. I am a
This increases security, because it forces sites that has been whitelisted to
use HTTPS only!
Feel free to use it with Privoxy:
http://pastebin.com/raw.php?i=q8mdpSgh
Have a nice day!
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://ad
2011-05-24 19:11, harleq...@googlemail.com skrev:
>
>
> Rahul Sundaram schrieb:
>
> On 05/24/2011 08:33 PM, Nat Gross wrote: > 1. Thank you ALL for the
> quick positive response! > > 2. I am a bit confused as to when to
> use 32 bit components on a 64 bit > os. Besides Flash, Java has
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 04/25/2011 03:46 AM, ssc1478 wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm new to Fedora - been using Ubuntu for years. I just installed
> Fedora 14 to my laptop and selected to encrypt /home.
>
> When I boot, I have to enter the password for the encrypted directory.
>
Dear All,
When will
http://download.virtualbox.org/virtualbox/rpm/fedora/
have rpms for F15?
Thanks in advance,
Paul
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fed
Once upon a time, Fernando Cassia said:
> Well guess what? 64 bit code is bigger (bigger pointers) and thus
> slower, because CPU cache is less effective, with bigger code.
All other things being equal, that might be true. However, all other
things are NOT equal; pointer size is not the only dif
On 05/23/2011 03:08 PM, Matthew Byrd wrote:
> Hey guys... I've got a project idea I proposed to Red Hat directly and
> Brendan Conoboy told me that they don't deal with this sort of thing..
> what I need is a nice little program I'm willing to pay for or give to
> open source or both.
>
> The basic
Rahul Sundaram schrieb:
On 05/24/2011 08:33 PM, Nat Gross wrote: > 1. Thank you ALL for the quick
positive response! > > 2. I am a bit confused as to when to use 32 bit
components on a 64 bit > os. Besides Flash, Java has the same option, and many
more. On the 64 > bit architecture, would I
On 05/24/2011 05:57 PM, Fernando Cassia wrote:
> On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 13:47, Andrew Haley wrote:
>> Ever since
>> Compressed OOPs became the default there's no big advantage to running
>> 32-bit Java, at least on HotSpot.
>
>
> What are the performance characteristics of 64-bit versus 32-
On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 13:47, Andrew Haley wrote:
> Ever since
> Compressed OOPs became the default there's no big advantage to running
> 32-bit Java, at least on HotSpot.
What are the performance characteristics of 64-bit versus 32-bit VMs?
Generally, the benefits of being able to address
On 05/24/2011 05:37 PM, Fernando Cassia wrote:
> On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 11:49, Nat Gross wrote:
>> So, the question is. Is it still advisable to go 32 bit due to
>> stability (say Flash), or can I gain performance and have 99%
>> stability with 64 bit F 15?
>
> Well guess what? 64 bit code is bi
On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 11:49, Nat Gross wrote:
> So, the question is. Is it still advisable to go 32 bit due to
> stability (say Flash), or can I gain performance and have 99%
> stability with 64 bit F 15?
>
Well guess what? 64 bit code is bigger (bigger pointers) and thus
slower, because CPU ca
On Tue, 2011-05-24 at 11:27 -0400, Bill Davidsen wrote:
> Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> > On 05/24/2011 08:19 PM, Nat Gross wrote:
> >> Planning to install Fedora 15 on a new partition dual boot win 7.
> >> Hardware AMD 1090 (6 core) with 8 gig ram.
> >> Doing Java programming and plan to use KVM machine
On Tue, 24 May 2011 08:16:07 -0700
JD wrote:
...snip...
(please do trim what you quote in replies. Thanks)
> What an incredibly rapid release cycle.
> We just installed F14 official release last November!
Yep. Just like clockwork, every 6 months. ;)
> I will have to wait until all the packag
2011/5/24 Rahul Sundaram
> On 05/24/2011 08:57 PM, Bill Davidsen wrote:
> > What? Are you saying that KVM support is out of the PAE 32bit kernel?
> Because
> > libvirt, virt-manager, etc, are definitely shown as available packages.
> As far
> > as limitations and performance go, unless you have a
On 05/24/2011 08:57 PM, Bill Davidsen wrote:
> What? Are you saying that KVM support is out of the PAE 32bit kernel? Because
> libvirt, virt-manager, etc, are definitely shown as available packages. As
> far
> as limitations and performance go, unless you have applications which push
> the
> 4
Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> On 05/24/2011 08:19 PM, Nat Gross wrote:
>> Planning to install Fedora 15 on a new partition dual boot win 7.
>> Hardware AMD 1090 (6 core) with 8 gig ram.
>> Doing Java programming and plan to use KVM machines with Fedora as the host
>> os.
>> Of course regular stuff on th
On 05/24/2011 08:33 PM, Nat Gross wrote:
> 1. Thank you ALL for the quick positive response!
>
> 2. I am a bit confused as to when to use 32 bit components on a 64 bit
> os. Besides Flash, Java has the same option, and many more. On the 64
> bit architecture, would I use 64 bit Java as well?
Yes.
On 05/24/11 07:38, Mike Chambers wrote:
> Case anyone hadn't heard yet. So yes am top posting this one.
>
> Mike Chambers
>
> Forwarded Message
> From: Jared K. Smith
> Reply-to: users@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To: annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Subject: Announcing the releas
On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 10:59 AM, Patrick O'Callaghan
wrote:
> On Tue, 2011-05-24 at 10:49 -0400, Nat Gross wrote:
>> Planning to install Fedora 15 on a new partition dual boot win 7.
>> Hardware AMD 1090 (6 core) with 8 gig ram.
>> Doing Java programming and plan to use KVM machines with Fedora a
1. Thank you ALL for the quick positive response!
2. I am a bit confused as to when to use 32 bit components on a 64 bit
os. Besides Flash, Java has the same option, and many more. On the 64
bit architecture, would I use 64 bit Java as well?
Thanks again.
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedor
James McKenzie wrote:
> On 5/7/11 12:54 PM, Bill Davidsen wrote:
>> James McKenzie wrote:
>>> On 5/1/11 5:18 PM, Bill Davidsen wrote:
Gregory Hosler wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 04/25/2011 09:48 AM, Digimer wrote:
>> On 04/24/2011 09:46 PM
On Tue, 2011-05-24 at 10:49 -0400, Nat Gross wrote:
> Planning to install Fedora 15 on a new partition dual boot win 7.
> Hardware AMD 1090 (6 core) with 8 gig ram.
> Doing Java programming and plan to use KVM machines with Fedora as the host
> os.
> Of course regular stuff on the web including vi
On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 9:49 AM, Nat Gross wrote:
> Planning to install Fedora 15 on a new partition dual boot win 7.
> Hardware AMD 1090 (6 core) with 8 gig ram.
> Doing Java programming and plan to use KVM machines with Fedora as the host
> os.
> Of course regular stuff on the web including vid
Hi there,
I have been using Fedora on 64-bit machines for more than two years and have no
complains. And yes, I do use a lot of flash content, inclunding EaD classes and
webconference using the 32-bits version of the plugin with 64-bits Firefox.
[]s, Fernando Lozano
> Original Message -
On 05/24/2011 03:51 PM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> On 05/24/2011 08:19 PM, Nat Gross wrote:
>> Planning to install Fedora 15 on a new partition dual boot win 7.
>> Hardware AMD 1090 (6 core) with 8 gig ram.
>> Doing Java programming and plan to use KVM machines with Fedora as the host
>> os.
>> Of co
On Tue, 24 May 2011 10:49:40 -0400
Nat Gross wrote:
> Planning to install Fedora 15 on a new partition dual boot win 7.
> Hardware AMD 1090 (6 core) with 8 gig ram.
> Doing Java programming and plan to use KVM machines with Fedora as the host
> os.
> Of course regular stuff on the web including
On 05/24/2011 08:19 PM, Nat Gross wrote:
> Planning to install Fedora 15 on a new partition dual boot win 7.
> Hardware AMD 1090 (6 core) with 8 gig ram.
> Doing Java programming and plan to use KVM machines with Fedora as the host
> os.
> Of course regular stuff on the web including videos, etc.
Planning to install Fedora 15 on a new partition dual boot win 7.
Hardware AMD 1090 (6 core) with 8 gig ram.
Doing Java programming and plan to use KVM machines with Fedora as the host os.
Of course regular stuff on the web including videos, etc.
So, the question is. Is it still advisable to go 32
Case anyone hadn't heard yet. So yes am top posting this one.
Mike Chambers
Forwarded Message
From: Jared K. Smith
Reply-to: users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To: annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Subject: Announcing the release of Fedora 15 (Lovelock)
Date: Tue, 24 May 2011 10:04:
On Tue, 2011-05-24 at 06:28 -0700, Joe Zeff wrote:
> My personal suggestion is to install preupgrade and let it take you to F
> 13, or even F 14 now. (It's generally safe to skip one version when
> doing this.) Then, when F 15 comes out, do the same thing one more time
> and all should be wel
On 24/05/2011 10:07 AM, Joe Zeff wrote:
>
> How old is that monitor? I ask because F 14 fails to detect my monitor
> correctly although earlier versions found it. If yours is a few years
> old it might have "fallen off the radar" like mine.
It's quite recent--last year.
--
users mailing list
us
On 05/24/2011 06:45 AM, Marcus D. Leech wrote:
> When I do a "Detect Monitors", it doesn't update to the Flatron, but
> continues to show "Unknown Monitor". I'm using the VGA
> port.
How old is that monitor? I ask because F 14 fails to detect my monitor
correctly although earlier versions f
I have a system with a LG Flatron W2243T monitor, and a Gigabyte
GA-880GM-UD2H motherboard.
Under F14, this monitor refuses to come up in anything other than
fairly-low resolution (1024 x 768), although the monitor is
clearly capable of 1920 x 1080. The automatic probe that Xorg does
shows
I do that.
Now, I have two questions:
So, what db version do you recommend?
More importantly, is there a migration path or do I have to reload the existing
data? I could see issues migrating replicated environments.
Thanks,
-Reinhard
From: 389-users-boun...@li
On 05/24/2011 05:26 AM, John Nissley wrote:
> I am running fedora 12 on two computers I have. It is time to upgrade
> for obvious reasons and I want to do a clean install of Fedora 15 when
> it becomes available in a few days.
My personal suggestion is to install preupgrade and let it take you to
On Tue, 2011-05-24 at 12:55 +0100, Timothy Murphy wrote:
> Craig White wrote:
>
> >> I have been trying to get an ancient Orinoco Silver PCMCIA card
> >> working under ndiswrapper, but I discovered after some "research"
> >> that ndiswrapper did not create *.conf files
> >> matching the ID 0342:00
On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 7:26 AM, John Nissley wrote:
> I am running fedora 12 on two computers I have. It is time to upgrade
> for obvious reasons and I want to do a clean install of Fedora 15 when
> it becomes available in a few days. Both computers have multiple disks
> with a relativity small
On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 14:26, John Nissley wrote:
> I am running fedora 12 on two computers I have. It is time to upgrade
> for obvious reasons and I want to do a clean install of Fedora 15 when
> it becomes available in a few days. Both computers have multiple disks
> with a relativity small d
On Tue, 2011-05-24 at 07:26 -0500, John Nissley wrote:
> I am running fedora 12 on two computers I have. It is time to upgrade
> for obvious reasons and I want to do a clean install of Fedora 15 when
> it becomes available in a few days. Both computers have multiple disks
> with a relativity s
I am running fedora 12 on two computers I have. It is time to upgrade
for obvious reasons and I want to do a clean install of Fedora 15 when
it becomes available in a few days. Both computers have multiple disks
with a relativity small disk that the operating system is on and then
some fairly
--- On Tue, 5/24/11, Timothy Murphy wrote:
> From: Timothy Murphy
> Subject: Re: Updating to F15
> To: users@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Date: Tuesday, May 24, 2011, 5:02 AM
> Antonio Olivares wrote:
>
> >> From: fred smith
>
> >> I've recently installed the latest pre-release on
> a system
>
On 05/24/2011 05:32 PM, Timothy Murphy wrote:
> Sorry to be dim, but is your answer Yes?
> In other words, if I install F-15-rc3 will "yum upgrade"
> bring me to a kosher version of F-15 when this comes out?
Yes. Fedora 15 RC3 = Fedora 15 final
Rahul
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedorapr
Antonio Olivares wrote:
>> From: fred smith
>> I've recently installed the latest pre-release on a system
>> here and
>> am wondering if, once the "real" release occurs, would "yum
>> update"
>> bring it up to the release level, or not?
> You are right on track :) You are running Fedora 15 :)
Craig White wrote:
>> I have been trying to get an ancient Orinoco Silver PCMCIA card
>> working under ndiswrapper, but I discovered after some "research"
>> that ndiswrapper did not create *.conf files
>> matching the ID 0342:0006 of my card (as listed by lshal).
...
>> If anyone has a suggestion
On 05/24/2011 08:14 AM, fred smith wrote:
> I'm SLIGHTLY premature, I know, I beg your indulgence...
>
> I've recently installed the latest pre-release on a system here and
> am wondering if, once the "real" release occurs, would "yum update"
> bring it up to the release level, or not? If not is th
On Tuesday 24 May 2011 00:00:47 JD wrote:
> On 05/23/11 15:41, Tim Smith wrote:
> > On Monday 23 May 2011 22:26:49 JD wrote:
> >> On 05/23/11 12:22, Tim Smith wrote:
> >>> On Monday 23 May 2011 17:50:50 JD wrote:
> On 05/23/11 09:28, Tim Smith wrote:
> > On Monday 23 May 2011 16:36:00 Tim
On 24/05/2011 01:01, mattias wrote:
> Thanks! I ask because I will use spotifys native client and it only I think
> support fedora 13
I'm using it fine on Fedora 14 (x86_64).
-Phil
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fe
99 matches
Mail list logo
