Re: HD 1TB or greater Fedora 15 64bit

On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 3:55 AM, Johan Scheepers wrote: > Good day, > > I have now the option of buying a 500GIG  or  1TB harddisk. > > Could be used on usb sometimes. > > Google..seem some problems for  1TB. > > Kindly some advice please. > > Thanks > Johan S why you asking to buy a 500 gigs di

Re: HD 1TB or greater Fedora 15 64bit

On 06/22/2011 09:08 AM, Itamar Reis Peixoto wrote: > On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 3:55 AM, Johan Scheepers > wrote: >> Good day, >> >> I have now the option of buying a 500GIG or 1TB harddisk. >> >> Could be used on usb sometimes. >> >> Google..seem some problems for 1TB. >> >> Kindly some advice p

Re: HD 1TB or greater Fedora 15 64bit

22.06.2011, 16:14, "Johan Scheepers" : > On 06/22/2011 09:08 AM, Itamar Reis Peixoto wrote: > >>  On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 3:55 AM, Johan Scheepers;   >> wrote: >>>  Good day, >>> >>>  I have now the option of buying a 500GIG  or  1TB harddisk. >>> >>>  Could be used on usb sometimes. >>> >>>  Googl

Re: HD 1TB or greater Fedora 15 64bit

On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 4:14 AM, Johan Scheepers wrote: >> >> why you asking to buy a 500 gigs disk if you can buya a larger ? >> > It would be wasted money if the system can not handle it. > On google I found to be some problems for some users. > Johan S I see alot of people using disks > 1 TB

TurboYUM: EasyUrpmi for Fedora

Hello to Everyone: With this mail I want to share with the Fedora Community the last proyect I worked on: TurboYUM. TurboYUM is an Online Tool for Automatic Repo Setup in Fedora Linux, just as "EasyUrpmi" For Mandriva - http://easyurpmi.zarb.org/?language=en The thing is, Ubuntu has "Ubuntu Twea

Re: HD 1TB or greater Fedora 15 64bit

On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 12:19 AM, Itamar Reis Peixoto wrote: > I see alot of people using disks > 1 TB > I use 2 1TB internal disk and one 1TB external USB drive just fine with Fedora. All are formatted as ext4. In the past I have also tried XFS on one of the internal drives. -- Suvayu Open so

Re: How to get this OUTPUT? perl/awk/sed? How?

On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 2:27 AM, lancebaynes87 wrote: > How can I generate from this INPUT in "general" > > INPUT (/proc/net/ip_conntrack) > >     udp  17 0 src=192.168.1.128 dst=91.120.112.125 sport=29249 > dport=39802 packets=3 bytes=408 [UNREPLIED] src=91.120.112.125 > dst=79.132.235.112 sp

Re: HD 1TB or greater Fedora 15 64bit

On 06/22/2011 09:19 AM, Itamar Reis Peixoto wrote: > On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 4:14 AM, Johan Scheepers > wrote: > >>> why you asking to buy a 500 gigs disk if you can buya a larger ? >>> >> It would be wasted money if the system can not handle it. >> On google I found to be some problems for some

Re: HD 1TB or greater Fedora 15 64bit

On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 4:55 AM, Johan Scheepers wrote: > Were those used as usb drives? I am using with a external sata port e-sata -- Itamar Reis Peixoto msn, google talk: ita...@ispbrasil.com.br +55 11 4063 5033 (FIXO SP) +55 34 9158 9329 (TIM) +55 34 8806 3989 (OI) +55 34 3221

Re: HD 1TB or greater Fedora 15 64bit

On 06/22/2011 09:18 AM, Misha Shnurapet wrote: > 22.06.2011, 16:14, "Johan Scheepers": >> On 06/22/2011 09:08 AM, Itamar Reis Peixoto wrote: >> >>> On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 3:55 AM, Johan Scheepers; >>> wrote: Good day, I have now the option of buying a 500GIG or 1TB harddis

Re: HD 1TB or greater Fedora 15 64bit (SOLVED)

On 06/22/2011 09:33 AM, suvayu ali wrote: > On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 12:19 AM, Itamar Reis Peixoto > wrote: >> I see alot of people using disks> 1 TB >> > I use 2 1TB internal disk and one 1TB external USB drive just fine > with Fedora. All are formatted as ext4. In the past I have also tried > X

Re: Anybody else having wireless connection problems with F15 Gnome?

On Wed, 22 Jun 2011 14:14:02 +0700, wrote: > Unfortunately, using F15 Gnome, and NetworkManager, the wireless network > won't connect. Or rather, it connects and the immediately disconnects, > repeatedly. I have updated the box to the latest (using the wired > network), but it's still not

Re: HD 1TB or greater Fedora 15 64bit (SOLVED)

22.06.2011, 16:59, "Johan Scheepers" : > Can not remember the make. Which makes should be avoided? Sure to avoid the WD GREEN series for a number of reasons, just google them. -- Best regards, Misha Shnurapet, Fedora Project Contributor Email: shnurapet AT fedoraproject.org, IRC: misha on freeno

Re: HD 1TB or greater Fedora 15 64bit (SOLVED)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 06/22/2011 04:06 PM, Johan Scheepers wrote: > On 06/22/2011 09:33 AM, suvayu ali wrote: >> On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 12:19 AM, Itamar Reis Peixoto >> wrote: >>> I see alot of people using disks> 1 TB >>> >> I use 2 1TB internal disk and one 1TB ext

Re: [389-users] Req : Multimaster replication query

On 06/22/2011 01:16 PM, s.varadha rajan wrote: > Hi, > > Anyone can help me, regarding my below query ? > > Regards, > Varad > > > > On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 7:26 PM, Rich Megginson > > wrote: > > __ > On 06/20/2011 11:42 PM, s.varadha rajan wrote: >> Hi Rich

f15: disable automatic update

How to disable automatic update on Fedora 15? Thanks -- Dario Lesca -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines

Re: TurboYUM: EasyUrpmi for Fedora

On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 4:22 AM, Manuel Escudero wrote: > Hello to Everyone: > With this mail I want to share with the Fedora Community the last proyect I > worked on: TurboYUM. > > TurboYUM is an Online Tool for Automatic Repo Setup in Fedora Linux, just as > "EasyUrpmi" > For Mandriva - http://e

Re: [389-users] Req : Multimaster replication query

Hi Sigid, Thanks for the reply.fedora-team,finally didn't update anything my query.hopefully, they will reply back soon.Meantime, will try your suggestions. Regards, Varad On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 1:44 PM, sigid@JINLab wrote: > On 06/22/2011 01:16 PM, s.varadha rajan wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Any

Re: TurboYUM: EasyUrpmi for Fedora

On 22/06/11 10:09, Itamar Reis Peixoto wrote: > On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 4:22 AM, Manuel Escudero wrote: > > where are the source code ? > > It's shell script. Open with your editor. -- Regards, Frank Murphy UTF_8 Encoded Friend of fedoraproject.org -- users mailing list users@lists.fedorap

Re: TurboYUM: EasyUrpmi for Fedora

On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 2:09 AM, Itamar Reis Peixoto wrote: > where are the source code ? > Its a shell script! -- Suvayu Open source is the future. It sets us free. -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.

Re: TurboYUM: EasyUrpmi for Fedora

On Wed, 22 Jun 2011 02:22:29 -0500, ME wrote: > http://www.turboyum.org/ So, you even made a logo for "Livina", which is mis-spelled as it is really called "Livna". And you describe its contents as "All available codecs" without having read the rpm.livna.org web page and without having checked th

Re: TurboYUM: EasyUrpmi for Fedora

On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 12:22 AM, Manuel Escudero wrote: > No matter what desktop or arch they're using. TurboYUM it's obviously > opensource > and free for anyone who wants to use it, besides both the scripts and the > web interface > are available in English & Spanish. Check it out at: > http://

Re: Removing NetworkManager results in very slow boot

On Wednesday 22 June 2011 06:37:30 JD wrote: > On 06/21/2011 10:13 PM, n2xssvv.g02gfr12930 wrote: > Glad to hear you have it working for you. > Does it manage your wifi connection? > I have been trying to make it work for > my wifi connection, and it always invokes > wpa_supplicant with the wrong

Re: HD 1TB or greater Fedora 15 64bit (SOLVED)

On Wednesday 22 June 2011 09:14:36 Gregory Hosler wrote: > The "green" ones will auto-spin > down when not in use. Saves energy, more importantly, runs a heck of a lot > cooler overall. negative is that there can be a delay as it powers up > after being away from the drive for a period of time. The

gnome applets brightness, volume control....

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Bonjour, I used to use some applet like brightness control or volume control in the gnome panel... I seems that they have disappeared from the package gnome-applets in f14. Did they migrate to another package? and which one? Thanks. - -- François

Re: Removing NetworkManager results in very slow boot

john wendel wrote: > I removed the NetworkManager stuff from systemd, since I don't want to > run it. Now there's a long boot delay while DBUS tries repeatedly to > talk to NetworkManager. Couldn't you just have said (as root) "service NetworkManager stop" and added "chkconfig NetworkManager off"

Re: How to get this OUTPUT? perl/awk/sed? How?

On 06/22/2011 07:27 AM, lancebaynes87 wrote: > How can I generate from this INPUT in "general" > > INPUT (/proc/net/ip_conntrack) [...] > OUTPUT > > udp 192.168.1.128 3 > tcp 192.168.1.129 2 > udp 192.168.1.1 1 > tcp 192.168.1.201 1 Mike's perl version is probably more extensible, more readable,

Re: HD 1TB or greater Fedora 15 64bit (SOLVED)

Misha Shnurapet kirjoitti viestissään (lähetysaika keskiviikko, 22. kesäkuuta 2011): > Sure to avoid the WD GREEN series for a number of reasons, > just google them. I've been using 1 terabyte WD Green drives (WD10EACS) for over two years in my Fedora/Windows dual-boot system without any proble

Re: HD 1TB or greater Fedora 15 64bit

Am 22.06.2011 09:14, schrieb Johan Scheepers: > On 06/22/2011 09:08 AM, Itamar Reis Peixoto wrote: >> why you asking to buy a 500 gigs disk if you can buya a larger ? >> > It would be wasted money if the system can not handle it. > On google I found to be some problems for some users so why you n

Re: HD 1TB or greater Fedora 15 64bit

On 06/22/2011 01:01 PM, Reindl Harald wrote: > Am 22.06.2011 09:14, schrieb Johan Scheepers: >> On 06/22/2011 09:08 AM, Itamar Reis Peixoto wrote: >>> why you asking to buy a 500 gigs disk if you can buya a larger ? >>> >> It would be wasted money if the system can not handle it. >> On google I fou

Re: gnome applets brightness, volume control....

you may find out in https://live.gnome.org/GnomeShell/ suomi On 2011-06-22 12:03, François Patte wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Bonjour, > > I used to use some applet like brightness control or volume control in > the gnome panel... > > I seems that they have disappe

Re: f15: disable automatic update

On 06/22/2011 09:02 AM, Dario Lesca wrote: > How to disable automatic update on Fedora 15? easy. man yum-updatesd.conf -- peace out. tc.hago, g . signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscriptio

Re: Paradigm shift going from Gnome2 to Gnome3

On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 11:56:35AM +0900, 夜神 岩男 wrote: > > Corporate and home users are already being expected (by that company in > > Redmond) to upgrade to higher end hardware for their latest offerings as > > well. The difference is that Fedora has fallback functionality that > > works without t

Re: Paradigm shift going from Gnome2 to Gnome3

On 06/22/2011 01:09 PM, Darryl L. Pierce wrote: > But does Fedora 15 "require high end hardware"? No, it doesn't. You can > run other desktops, such as XFCE (which you mention as well), and still > run all of the same apps. > > So while Gnome 3 may require better video hardware than was available

Re: Paradigm shift going from Gnome2 to Gnome3

Am 22.06.2011 14:09, schrieb Darryl L. Pierce: > But does Fedora 15 "require high end hardware"? No, it doesn't. You can > run other desktops, such as XFCE (which you mention as well), and still > run all of the same apps. to believe you can force users permanently switch their Desktop Environme

Re: HD 1TB or greater Fedora 15 64bit (SOLVED)

22.06.2011, 19:45, "Markku Kolkka" : > Misha Shnurapet kirjoitti viestissään (lähetysaika keskiviikko, > 22. kesäkuuta 2011): > >>  Sure to avoid the WD GREEN series for a number of reasons, >>  just google them. > > I've been using 1 terabyte WD Green drives (WD10EACS) for over > two years in my F

Slow graphics speed - kmod vs. nvidia?

I have a run-of-the mill geforce 210 512MB PCI-X. I just noticed in x-chat that there's really slow graphics. Would the proprietary nvidia driver outperform the kmod install? GW -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscripti

Re: Slow graphics speed - kmod vs. nvidia?

On 06/22/2011 08:27 PM, Gary Waters wrote: > I have a run-of-the mill geforce 210 512MB PCI-X. I just noticed in > x-chat that there's really slow graphics. Would the proprietary nvidia > driver outperform the kmod install? You mean the drivers installed from rpmfusion such as kmod-nvidia? Those

Re: HD 1TB or greater Fedora 15 64bit (SOLVED)

On Wed, 2011-06-22 at 10:06 +0200, Johan Scheepers wrote: > On 06/22/2011 09:33 AM, suvayu ali wrote: > > On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 12:19 AM, Itamar Reis Peixoto > > wrote: > >> I see alot of people using disks> 1 TB > >> > > I use 2 1TB internal disk and one 1TB external USB drive just fine > > w

OT: Fedora and (ddos deflate)

How could I modify the script, netstat -ntu | awk '{print $5}' | cut -d: -f1 | sort | uniq -c | sort -n so I can see the banned ip addresses. I nstead of just: "Banned the following ip addresses on Wed Jun 22 10:15:01 IST 2011 234 with 234 connections" ddos deflate: http://deflate.medialayer.c

Re: Slow graphics speed - kmod vs. nvidia?

On 06/22/2011 08:34 AM, Ed Greshko wrote: > On 06/22/2011 08:27 PM, Gary Waters wrote: >> I have a run-of-the mill geforce 210 512MB PCI-X. I just noticed in >> x-chat that there's really slow graphics. Would the proprietary nvidia >> driver outperform the kmod install? > > You mean the drivers ins

Re: Paradigm shift going from Gnome2 to Gnome3

On Wed, 2011-06-22 at 08:09 -0400, Darryl L. Pierce wrote: > On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 11:56:35AM +0900, 夜神 岩男 wrote: > > > Corporate and home users are already being expected (by that company in > > > Redmond) to upgrade to higher end hardware for their latest offerings as > > > well. The difference

Re: Paradigm shift going from Gnome2 to Gnome3

On 20 June 2011 17:59, Stephen Gallagher wrote: > On Tue, 2011-06-21 at 02:23 +0930, Tim wrote: >> Is a corporation going to want to spend $100 per graphics card per PC, >> so that the default Gnome 3 actually works, or are they going to >> continue to only want to put in the $20 graphics card?  (

dependancy problem with selinux

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Bonjour, I tried to run the selinux system manager from the menu administration and it failed So I tried to run it from a terminal: /usr/share/system-config-selinux/system-config-selinux.py answer: Traceback (most recent call last): File "/u

Re: Paradigm shift going from Gnome2 to Gnome3

On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 7:09 AM, Darryl L. Pierce wrote: [SNIP] > But does Fedora 15 "require high end hardware"? No, it doesn't. You can > run other desktops, such as XFCE (which you mention as well), and still > run all of the same apps. > > So while Gnome 3 may require better video hardware tha

Re: HD 1TB or greater Fedora 15 64bit (SOLVED)

Misha Shnurapet kirjoitti viestissään (lähetysaika keskiviikko, 22. kesäkuuta 2011): > $ sudo smartctl -a /dev/sda | grep Load_Cycle_Count > 193 Load_Cycle_Count 0x0032 158 158 000 Old_age Always - > 127583 > > That's 127 000 out of 300 000 to 600 000 in 2200 hours on > Linux. # smartctl -a /dev

Re: Paradigm shift going from Gnome2 to Gnome3

Am 22.06.2011 15:06, schrieb Richard Shaw: > Unless something has changed I remember reading a thread where Fedora > 15 is the first release where 512MB of memory is not enough for an > install, which means unless I upgrade, my netbook is stuck at F14 this installer is quite dumb because he can

Re: HD 1TB or greater Fedora 15 64bit (SOLVED)

22.06.2011, 22:11, "Markku Kolkka" : > Misha Shnurapet kirjoitti viestissään (lähetysaika keskiviikko, 22. kesäkuuta > 2011): > >>  $ sudo smartctl -a /dev/sda | grep Load_Cycle_Count >>  193 Load_Cycle_Count 0x0032 158 158 000 Old_age Always - >>  127583 >> >>  That's 127 000 out of 300 000 to 60

Re: Paradigm shift going from Gnome2 to Gnome3

On 06/22/2011 02:12 PM, Bryn M. Reeves wrote: > On 06/22/2011 01:09 PM, Darryl L. Pierce wrote: >> But does Fedora 15 "require high end hardware"? No, it doesn't. You can >> run other desktops, such as XFCE (which you mention as well), and still >> run all of the same apps. >> >> So while Gnome 3 m

Re: Paradigm shift going from Gnome2 to Gnome3

> But does Fedora 15 "require high end hardware"? No, it doesn't. It won't even install on a machine with 512Mb, so yes it requires high end hardware by many people's measurements. -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fed

Re: Slow graphics speed - kmod vs. nvidia?

On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 08:27:32AM -0400, Gary Waters wrote: > I have a run-of-the mill geforce 210 512MB PCI-X. I just noticed in x-chat > that > there's really slow graphics. Would the proprietary nvidia driver outperform > the kmod install? Aren't the kmod-nvidia packages just a bundling of th

Re: Directory name completion

On Tue, 2011-06-21 at 16:31 -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > On Tue, 2011-06-21 at 15:27 -0500, Aaron Konstam wrote: > > On Tue, 2011-06-21 at 10:43 -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > > > On Tue, 2011-06-21 at 09:21 -0400, Genes MailLists wrote: > > > > On 06/21/2011 09:07 AM, suvayu ali wrote:

Re: dependancy problem with selinux

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 06/22/2011 09:04 AM, François Patte wrote: > Bonjour, > > I tried to run the selinux system manager from the menu administration > and it failed > > So I tried to run it from a terminal: > > /usr/share/system-config-selinux/system-config-seli

Re: f15: disable automatic update

On Wed, 2011-06-22 at 11:31 +, g wrote: > On 06/22/2011 09:02 AM, Dario Lesca wrote: > > How to disable automatic update on Fedora 15? > > easy. > > man yum-updatesd.conf > I have no yum-updatesd.conf on my machine. Where does one get it? --

Re: Paradigm shift going from Gnome2 to Gnome3

On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 02:16:51PM +0200, Reindl Harald wrote: > Am 22.06.2011 14:09, schrieb Darryl L. Pierce: > > But does Fedora 15 "require high end hardware"? No, it doesn't. You can > > run other desktops, such as XFCE (which you mention as well), and still > > run all of the same apps. > >

Re: Directory name completion

On 06/21/2011 07:14 AM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > There's a specific directory on my system, let's call > it /some/long/path/foobar, that I visit a lot, so it's a bore to have to > type the full pathname so often. The parent directory (/some/long/path) > is a component in CDPATH so I can just ty

Re: Paradigm shift going from Gnome2 to Gnome3

On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 09:56:40PM +0900, 夜神 岩男 wrote: > > But does Fedora 15 "require high end hardware"? No, it doesn't. You can > > run other desktops, such as XFCE (which you mention as well), and still > > run all of the same apps. > > > > So while Gnome 3 may require better video hardware th

Re: Paradigm shift going from Gnome2 to Gnome3

Am 22.06.2011 15:29, schrieb Darryl L. Pierce: > On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 02:16:51PM +0200, Reindl Harald wrote: >> Am 22.06.2011 14:09, schrieb Darryl L. Pierce: >>> But does Fedora 15 "require high end hardware"? No, it doesn't. You can >>> run other desktops, such as XFCE (which you mention as

Re: Paradigm shift going from Gnome2 to Gnome3

On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 02:21:07PM +0100, Alan Cox wrote: > > But does Fedora 15 "require high end hardware"? No, it doesn't. > > It won't even install on a machine with 512Mb, so yes it requires high > end hardware by many people's measurements. I _really_ don't consider having more than 512M on

Re: Not able to download rpmfusion

On Wed, 2011-06-22 at 10:08 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote: > On 06/22/2011 10:05 AM, Lawrence E Graves wrote: > > This is the message I received when trying to download rpmfusion on a > > fresh install of Fedora 15. Is there anywhere else I can go and get a > > download? > > Cannot open: > > http://downl

Re: OT: Fedora and (ddos deflate)

On 06/22/2011 01:38 PM, Frank Murphy wrote: > How could I modify the script, > > netstat -ntu | awk '{print $5}' | cut -d: -f1 | sort | uniq -c | sort -n > > so I can see the banned ip addresses. > I nstead of just: > > "Banned the following ip addresses on Wed Jun 22 10:15:01 IST 2011 > > 234

Re: Paradigm shift going from Gnome2 to Gnome3

Am 22.06.2011 15:37, schrieb Darryl L. Pierce: > On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 02:21:07PM +0100, Alan Cox wrote: >>> But does Fedora 15 "require high end hardware"? No, it doesn't. >> >> It won't even install on a machine with 512Mb, so yes it requires high >> end hardware by many people's measurements

Radeon versus Catalyst

Apparently the only way I can get audio out my HDMI port is to use the closed source ATI catalyst drivers for my video card (which I was able to get from rpmfusion). When I tried switching to the catalyst driver, the video quality was just appallingly awful. I found the moronic overscan control an

Re: Not able to download rpmfusion

Am 22.06.2011 15:38, schrieb Aaron Konstam: > On Wed, 2011-06-22 at 10:08 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote: >> On 06/22/2011 10:05 AM, Lawrence E Graves wrote: >>> This is the message I received when trying to download rpmfusion on a >>> fresh install of Fedora 15. Is there anywhere else I can go and get

Re: Paradigm shift going from Gnome2 to Gnome3

On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 03:34:48PM +0200, Reindl Harald wrote: > > For someone that conservative about their desktop I don't image they > > would be taking on an upgrade like this since it _does_ change some > > fundamentals. > > > > It's equally (or even moreso) unreasonable to expect everybody t

Re: Not able to download rpmfusion

Aaron Konstam wrote: > >I don't think ter is anything wrong with changing the URL but I >installed rpmfusion repos by googling for the rpmfusion web site and >follow the instructions. When the op asked, download1 was down. So following the instructions on their site wouldn't work. -- Sent f

Re: Paradigm shift going from Gnome2 to Gnome3

On 06/22/2011 02:37 PM, Darryl L. Pierce wrote: > On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 02:21:07PM +0100, Alan Cox wrote: >>> But does Fedora 15 "require high end hardware"? No, it doesn't. >> >> It won't even install on a machine with 512Mb, so yes it requires high >> end hardware by many people's measurements.

Re: Directory name completion

On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 9:23 AM, Aaron Konstam wrote: > On Tue, 2011-06-21 at 16:31 -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: >> >> AFAIK $PATH has nothing to do with it. The appropriate variable is >> $CDPATH and yes, the directory is in it. > > That is an interesting theory but I have no $CDPATH and the

Re: f15: disable automatic update

On 06/22/2011 06:57 PM, Aaron Konstam wrote: > I have no yum-updatesd.conf on my machine. Where does one get it? Learn to use repoquery. In any case, if you don't have it on your system, your update preferences are controlled via the GUI typically. Rahul -- users mailing list users@lists.fe

Re: Paradigm shift going from Gnome2 to Gnome3

On Wed, 22 Jun 2011 09:37:17 -0400 Darryl L. Pierce wrote: > Quite frankly, I'd question the sanity of someone who actually was > installing a full blown Fedora installation on a system with only 512M. > ;) Which is why I always wonder why the default ram size when installing a virtual machine wi

Re: Paradigm shift going from Gnome2 to Gnome3

On 06/22/2011 07:22 PM, Bryn M. Reeves wrote: > There are still cases where it would be useful to install an up-to-date > general > purpose distribution on hardware that would be deemed "underpowered" by this > definition (some of the cute little atom and other bittyboxes for e.g). > > I understan

Re: Paradigm shift going from Gnome2 to Gnome3

On 06/22/2011 07:25 PM, Tom Horsley wrote: > Which is why I always wonder why the default ram size when > installing a virtual machine with virt-manager is always 512M :-) > (I always change it to 1G). That would indeed be a more reasonable default. Have you filed a RFE? Rahul -- users mail

Re: f15: disable automatic update

On 22 June 2011 10:02, Dario Lesca wrote: > How to disable automatic update on Fedora 15? Type gpk-prefs into a terminal. Richard. -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines

Re: Not able to download rpmfusion

On Wed, 2011-06-22 at 21:49 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote: > Aaron Konstam wrote: > > > > >I don't think ter is anything wrong with changing the URL but I > >installed rpmfusion repos by googling for the rpmfusion web site and > >follow the instructions. > > When the op asked, download1 was down. So f

Re: f15: disable automatic update

On 06/22/2011 01:31 PM, g wrote: > On 06/22/2011 09:02 AM, Dario Lesca wrote: >> How to disable automatic update on Fedora 15? > easy. > > man yum-updatesd.conf > I am not using F15, but on F14 automatic updates could easily be turned off in the Preferences -> Software Updates menu...don't know wha

Re: [389-users] Req : Multimaster replication query

On 06/22/2011 03:10 AM, s.varadha rajan wrote: Hi Sigid, Thanks for the reply.fedora-team,finally didn't update anything my query.hopefully, they will reply back soon.Meantime, will try your suggestions. What information are you waiting for? mmr.pl has no maintainer. Regards, Varad On We

Re: F14->F15 Laptop Upgrade: Gnome 3 questions/confusions and other issues

On Tue, 2011-06-21 at 14:36 -0400, Max Pyziur wrote: > I move files between my laptop and my Windows desktop at work using a > USB flash drive. When the flashdrive is plugged into the F15 laptop, > the date and time stamp appears correctly. When plugged into the > Windows desktop, the date/time sta

Re: HD 1TB or greater Fedora 15 64bit (SOLVED)

On Wed, 2011-06-22 at 21:19 +0900, Misha Shnurapet wrote: > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/S.M.A.R.T.#Known_ATA_S.M.A.R.T._attributes > The typical lifetime rating for laptop (2.5-in) hard drives is 300,000 > to 600,000 load cycles. Some laptop drives are programmed to unload > the heads whenever the

Re: HD 1TB or greater Fedora 15 64bit

On Wed, 2011-06-22 at 08:55 +0200, Johan Scheepers wrote: > Kindly some advice please. With large drives, I'd suggest you format and check for bad blocks, rather than just quick format and hope for the best. Yes, it will take ages, but you're better to found out about a duff drive at the start, r

Re: Linux util to handle video input from firewire (iLink) port

On Tue, 2011-06-21 at 18:48 -0700, JD wrote: > Tried coriander. > It does not recognize the presence of my old > Sony DCR-TRV330 as being connected. Obvious questions: Is the firewire cable working? Or the firewire port on the camera? Even if the camera's not recognised for what it is, it ought

Re: Slow graphics speed - kmod vs. nvidia?

On Wed, 2011-06-22 at 09:22 -0400, Darryl L. Pierce wrote: > Aren't the kmod-nvidia packages just a bundling of the nVidia binary > drivers? Yes, and they avoid the issue where the nvidia-supplied archive trashed non-nvidia xorg files (which made uninstalling/disabling nvidia a headache, to put it

Re: f15: disable automatic update

On 06/22/2011 01:50 PM, Rahul Sundaram wrote: > On 06/22/2011 06:57 PM, Aaron Konstam wrote: >> I have no yum-updatesd.conf on my machine. Where does one get it? > > Learn to use repoquery. In any case, if you don't have it on your > system, your update preferences are controlled via the GUI ty

RE: sssd and ldap_user_search_base

I have a customer that is attempting to authenticate users from an ldap server with various unix and linux clients.They are having difficulty getting their method to work with their Red Hat V6.0 ldap clients running sssd-1.2.1-28.el6_0.4.x86_64 and sssd-client-1.2.1-28.el6_0.4.x86_64. They

Re: Paradigm shift going from Gnome2 to Gnome3

On 06/22/2011 02:57 PM, Rahul Sundaram wrote: > On 06/22/2011 07:22 PM, Bryn M. Reeves wrote: >> There are still cases where it would be useful to install an up-to-date >> general >> purpose distribution on hardware that would be deemed "underpowered" by this >> definition (some of the cute little

Re: Paradigm shift going from Gnome2 to Gnome3

On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 09:55:45AM -0400, Tom Horsley wrote: > On Wed, 22 Jun 2011 09:37:17 -0400 > Darryl L. Pierce wrote: > > > Quite frankly, I'd question the sanity of someone who actually was > > installing a full blown Fedora installation on a system with only 512M. > > ;) > > Which is why

Re: Removing NetworkManager results in very slow boot

On 06/22/2011 03:34 AM, Timothy Murphy wrote: > john wendel wrote: > >> I removed the NetworkManager stuff from systemd, since I don't want to >> run it. Now there's a long boot delay while DBUS tries repeatedly to >> talk to NetworkManager. > > Couldn't you just have said (as root) "service Networ

Re: Not able to download rpmfusion

"夜神 岩男" wrote: >On Wed, 2011-06-22 at 21:49 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote: >> Aaron Konstam wrote: >> >> > >> >I don't think ter is anything wrong with changing the URL but I >> >installed rpmfusion repos by googling for the rpmfusion web site and >> >follow the instructions. >> >> When the op asked

Re: Removing NetworkManager results in very slow boot

On 06/21/2011 10:13 PM, n2xssvv.g02gfr12930 wrote: > On 06/22/2011 03:43 AM, john wendel wrote: >> >> I removed the NetworkManager stuff from systemd, since I don't want to >> run it. Now there's a long boot delay while DBUS tries repeatedly to >> talk to NetworkManager. >> >> Obviously, I did some

Re: f15: disable automatic update

On 06/22/2011 02:23 PM, Christopher Svanefalk wrote: > On 06/22/2011 01:31 PM, g wrote: >> On 06/22/2011 09:02 AM, Dario Lesca wrote: >>> How to disable automatic update on Fedora 15? >> easy. >> >> man yum-updatesd.conf >> > I am not using F15, but on F14 automatic updates could easily be turned >

Re: Removing NetworkManager results in very slow boot

On 06/21/2011 09:43 PM, john wendel wrote: > > I removed the NetworkManager stuff from systemd, since I don't want to > run it. Now there's a long boot delay while DBUS tries repeatedly to > talk to NetworkManager. > > Obviously, I did something wrong. How should I have stopped NetworkManager? > >

RE: sssd and ldap_user_search_base

I've discovered through more experimentation and some source code examples that this syntax works: sssd.conf: ldap_user_search_base, ou=ldapusers1,dc=mydomain,dc=net, ou=ldapusers2,dc=mydomain,dc=net, dc=ldapusers3,dc=mydomain,dc=net Same syntax seems to work for ldap_group_search_base. B

Re: Removing NetworkManager results in very slow boot

On 22/06/11 06:37, JD wrote: > On 06/21/2011 10:13 PM, n2xssvv.g02gfr12930 wrote: >> On 06/22/2011 03:43 AM, john wendel wrote: >>> I removed the NetworkManager stuff from systemd, since I don't want to >>> run it. Now there's a long boot delay while DBUS tries repeatedly to >>> talk to NetworkMana

Re: Removing NetworkManager results in very slow boot

On 22/06/11 16:04, john wendel wrote: > On 06/21/2011 10:13 PM, n2xssvv.g02gfr12930 wrote: >> On 06/22/2011 03:43 AM, john wendel wrote: >>> >>> I removed the NetworkManager stuff from systemd, since I don't want to >>> run it. Now there's a long boot delay while DBUS tries repeatedly to >>> talk t

Re: Removing NetworkManager results in very slow boot

On 22/06/11 11:15, Steven Stern wrote: > On 06/21/2011 09:43 PM, john wendel wrote: >> I removed the NetworkManager stuff from systemd, since I don't want to >> run it. Now there's a long boot delay while DBUS tries repeatedly to >> talk to NetworkManager. >> >> Obviously, I did something wrong. Ho

Re: Removing NetworkManager results in very slow boot

On 06/22/2011 11:26 AM, Bob Goodwin wrote: > On 22/06/11 11:15, Steven Stern wrote: >> On 06/21/2011 09:43 PM, john wendel wrote: >>> I removed the NetworkManager stuff from systemd, since I don't want to >>> run it. Now there's a long boot delay while DBUS tries repeatedly to >>> talk to NetworkMa

RE: sssd and ldap_user_search_base

On Wed, 2011-06-22 at 15:17 +, Licause, Al wrote: > I’ve discovered through more experimentation and some source code > examples that this syntax works: > > This shouldn't work at all. Currently, SSSD does not support multiple search bases. There is an open enhancement request for this her

Re: TurboYUM: EasyUrpmi for Fedora

On 06/22/2011 02:38 AM, suvayu ali wrote: > A suggestion, maybe you should get this included in one of the sticky > threads on fedoraforum. At which point a large number of people will point out that fedoraplus not only does everything TruboYUM does it does considerably more, such as installing

RE: sssd and ldap_user_search_base

Thanks very much..I'll check into it and elevate through our channels. Al -Original Message- From: users-boun...@lists.fedoraproject.org [mailto:users-boun...@lists.fedoraproject.org] On Behalf Of Stephen Gallagher Sent: Wednesday, June 22, 2011 12:39 PM To: users@lists.fedoraproject

Re: Paradigm shift going from Gnome2 to Gnome3

On 06/22/2011 05:16 AM, Reindl Harald wrote: > to believe you can force users permanently switch their Desktop Environment > without lose them for the whole platform is very naive! I switched from Gnome to XFCE because I disliked almost everything I heard about Gnome 3 and lost nothing. All of m

Re: Radeon versus Catalyst

On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 09:47:22 -0400, Tom Horsley wrote: > > Does anyone happen to know the magic voo-doo I must have > missed to get decent video from the catalyst drivers, or > am I doomed to using Windows 7 if I want both audio and > video at the same time :-). HDMI support already exists

  1   2   >