On 11/22/2011 07:59 PM, Christopher A. Williams wrote:
> ...Actually, I know Larewnce. He's using the kmod-nvidia and
> akmod-nvidia drivers from the RPM Fusion repository. He's also running
> F16 x86_64 and used the standard methods published to install the
> drivers.
Oh, good. As I said, I was
Thank you, much appreciated
Roger
> You might look at this functionality. Check out your man pages for any
> interpretation you need.
>
> ===8<---
> $IPTABLES -A INPUT -p tcp --syn --dport 22 -m recent --name sshattack --set
> $IPTABLES -A INPUT -p tcp --dport 22 --syn -m recent --name sshattack \
On 11/23/2011 04:02 AM, Fedora User wrote:
<>
> My apologies. I stand corrected.
accepted.
> In any event, I backed up my bookmarks uninstalled, removed the mozilla
> directory and reinstalled.
>
> That seems to have fixed the problem.
"seems" is a magic word here.
so, back to my first post, d
You might look at this functionality. Check out your man pages for any
interpretation you need.
===8<---
$IPTABLES -A INPUT -p tcp --syn --dport 22 -m recent --name sshattack --set
$IPTABLES -A INPUT -p tcp --dport 22 --syn -m recent --name sshattack \
--rcheck --seconds 180 --hitcount 2 -j LOG
Andre Robatino fedoraproject.org> writes:
> The old keys are available at https://fedoraproject.org/en/keys under
> "OBSOLETE
> KEYS" if you want to download and import them.
Should add that by default yum checks RPMs against ANY of your imported keys, so
you should probably uninstall obsolete
Skunk Worx verizon.net> writes:
> foo.rpm : (SHA1) DSA sha1 md5 (GPG) NOT OK (MISSING KEYS: GPG#6df2196f)
> ...
>
> They all say this -- which seems okay -- all things considered. They are
> Fedora 9 update rpms from a couple years ago.
The old keys are available at https://fedoraproject.org/e
On 11/23/2011 12:19 PM, T.C. Hollingsworth wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 9:13 PM, Skunk Worx wrote:
>> ..
>> foo.rpm : (SHA1) DSA sha1 md5 (GPG) NOT OK (MISSING KEYS: GPG#6df2196f)
>> ...
>>
>> They all say this -- which seems okay -- all things considered. They are
>> Fedora 9 update rpms from
On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 9:13 PM, Skunk Worx wrote:
> ..
> foo.rpm : (SHA1) DSA sha1 md5 (GPG) NOT OK (MISSING KEYS: GPG#6df2196f)
> ...
>
> They all say this -- which seems okay -- all things considered. They are
> Fedora 9 update rpms from a couple years ago.
That's just telling you RPM doesn't
On 11/22/2011 08:00 PM, T.C. Hollingsworth wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 8:46 PM, Skunk Worx wrote:
>> I have a set of .rpm files restored from backups.
>>
>> They have nothing to do with my current install except they are in the
>> file system.
>>
>> Is there a command that will sweep these (s
On Wed, 23 Nov 2011 03:07:11 +
g wrote:
> On 11/23/2011 02:44 AM, Fedora User wrote:
> <>
>
> > Shouldn't be sarcastic. The RPM is listed on the first line of
> > the original post (firefox-8.03).
>
> there is nothing sarcastic about my statement. my statement was
> because you where though
On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 8:46 PM, Skunk Worx wrote:
> I have a set of .rpm files restored from backups.
>
> They have nothing to do with my current install except they are in the
> file system.
>
> Is there a command that will sweep these (several hundred) .rpm files
> and test their internal value
On Tue, 2011-11-22 at 19:37 -0800, Joe Zeff wrote:
> On 11/22/2011 06:32 PM, Lawrence Graves wrote:
> > I have a Dell 9400 Inspiron with a FX2500m video card and I can not
> > install nvidia drivers on my laptop.
> > I get this error results: iwl4965 :0c:00.0: Aggregation not enabled
> > for ti
I have a set of .rpm files restored from backups.
They have nothing to do with my current install except they are in the
file system.
Is there a command that will sweep these (several hundred) .rpm files
and test their internal values against the file itself, in place, to
check for any problem
On 11/22/2011 06:32 PM, Lawrence Graves wrote:
> I have a Dell 9400 Inspiron with a FX2500m video card and I can not
> install nvidia drivers on my laptop.
> I get this error results: iwl4965 :0c:00.0: Aggregation not enabled
> for tid 0 because load = 1
> How do I go about fixing this firmware
Quoting Patrick Lists :
> On 23-11-11 03:44, Fedora User wrote:
>> 100%. Furthermore, the following site opens instantly in Opera while it
>> takes about five minutes in Firefox: http://www.nysif.com . I find that
>> very odd.
>
> Did a quick test and there is a delay but that is because the DNS
>
On 23-11-11 03:44, Fedora User wrote:
> 100%. Furthermore, the following site opens instantly in Opera while it
> takes about five minutes in Firefox: http://www.nysif.com . I find that
> very odd.
Did a quick test and there is a delay but that is because the DNS
queries for that site get very sl
On 11/23/2011 03:12 AM, Ed Greshko wrote:
> On 11/23/2011 10:44 AM, Fedora User wrote:
>> Shouldn't be sarcastic.
>
> I am sure "g" wasn't being sarcastic. If you go back in the archives it
> is a common occurrence that not enough details are give an the next post
> after the OP's is "what vers
On 11/23/2011 10:44 AM, Fedora User wrote:
> Shouldn't be sarcastic.
I am sure "g" wasn't being sarcastic. If you go back in the archives it
is a common occurrence that not enough details are give an the next post
after the OP's is "what version of X are you using". So, he was just
noting you
On 11/23/2011 02:44 AM, Fedora User wrote:
<>
> Shouldn't be sarcastic. The RPM is listed on the first line of
> the original post (firefox-8.03).
there is nothing sarcastic about my statement. my statement was because
you where thoughtful enough to mention which firefox v/r you are using.
becau
Is it possible to get/compile/build static qemu-[arch] similar to the
qemu-user-static in Debian?
I am making use of binfmt_misc and need to execute statically built
qemu-[arch]. Using the "standard" qemu-[arch] won't work because I am executing
this in a chrooted environment where all the lib
On Wed, 23 Nov 2011 02:07:18 +
g wrote:
> On 11/23/2011 12:42 AM, Fedora User wrote:
> > firefox-8.0-3
> >
> > I am seeing some spectacularly sluggish performance and temporary
> > freezes. I hate the idea of moving all my stuff to opera but I am
> > very close.
>
> nice to see you state whi
I have a Dell 9400 Inspiron with a FX2500m video card and I can not
install nvidia drivers on my laptop.
I get this error results: iwl4965 :0c:00.0: Aggregation not enabled
for tid 0 because load = 1
How do I go about fixing this firmware problem? Thanking you in advance.
--
Lawrence Graves
On 11/23/2011 12:42 AM, Fedora User wrote:
> firefox-8.0-3
>
> I am seeing some spectacularly sluggish performance and temporary
> freezes. I hate the idea of moving all my stuff to opera but I am very
> close.
nice to see you state which firefox v/r.
now, next question, is it virgin, or have you
firefox-8.0-3
I am seeing some spectacularly sluggish performance and temporary
freezes. I hate the idea of moving all my stuff to opera but I am very
close.
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/
Hello
I have been Googling all day and seem to get conflicting reports that this
Intel graphics will work with gnome shell or not. I have read a lot about
nomodeset either it needs to be there or doesn't. And even some posts about
creating a xorg.conf with Intel set as the driver. So what I want t
# uname -r
2.6.35.14-103.fc14.i686.PAE
I haven't paid much attention to avc warnings.
did /.autorelabel, reboot, to see if that could stop avc.
Still see
'avc: denied' in auditlog, involving firefox, plugin-config,...
last 6 of # grep -n avc audit.log:
279:type=AVC msg=audit(1321983
On 20 November 2011 00:09, Ian Malone wrote:
> On 19 November 2011 18:38, Deron Meranda wrote:
>> On Sat, Nov 19, 2011 at 9:42 AM, Ian Malone wrote:
>>> I've got quite a few of these during boot, anyone know what might be the
>>> cause?
>>>
>>> Loading kernel module for a network device with CA
Yesterday, I used preupgrade on my laptop to go from F14 to F16. When
it was done, I logged back in under XFCE and found that I didn't have a
window manager running. I've gotten xfwm4 working on it, now, but I'd
like to get Compiz-fusion back. I've tried creating and using a
different user,
Aaron Konstam wrote:
> buzilla is files.
Please include a link to the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=756144
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http
On Tue, 2011-11-22 at 17:00 +0100, suvayu ali wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 16:46, Aaron Konstam wrote:
> > Who should I send the suggestion to that the section should be
> > changed?
>
> File a bugzilla report against Fedora Documentation.
>
> --
> Suvayu
>
> Open source is the future. It
On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 3:33 PM, Paul Smith wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 9:28 PM, Terry Polzin wrote:
>>> When trying to play MP3 files on F16 with Totem, I get the following error:
>>>
>>> "The playback of this movie requires a ID3 tag demuxer plugin which is
>>> not installed."
>>>
>>> Any
On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 1:33 PM, Paul Smith wrote:
>I do have rpmfusion
> repository installed, but I do not know what plugin to install.
yum search gstreamer
Install all of the packages listed that have good, bad, ugly and
ffmpeg in their names that are correct for your architecture and
barrin
On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 9:28 PM, Terry Polzin wrote:
>> When trying to play MP3 files on F16 with Totem, I get the following error:
>>
>> "The playback of this movie requires a ID3 tag demuxer plugin which is
>> not installed."
>>
>> Any ideas?
>
> MP3 is a proprietary file format codex for it are
On Tue, 2011-11-22 at 21:04 +, Paul Smith wrote:
> Dear All,
>
> When trying to play MP3 files on F16 with Totem, I get the following error:
>
> "The playback of this movie requires a ID3 tag demuxer plugin which is
> not installed."
>
> Any ideas?
>
> Thanks in advance,
>
> Paul
MP3 is a
Dear All,
When trying to play MP3 files on F16 with Totem, I get the following error:
"The playback of this movie requires a ID3 tag demuxer plugin which is
not installed."
Any ideas?
Thanks in advance,
Paul
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscrip
On 11/19/11 8:54 PM, Marko Vojinovic wrote:
> Those custom vendor shortcuts may or may not be supported by Fedora, depending
> on the particular laptop model you have.
>
> But the certain way to see if your second monitor is detected is to look at
> the output of xrandr in the console.
Just updat
Am 22.11.2011 20:01, schrieb Marko Vojinovic:
> After some reading about this, it appears to me that the problem lies in the
> common misconception that bind mounts are somehow different from ordinary
> mounts. And they aren't --- the kernel does not make any difference between
> an
> ordinar
On 11/22/2011 12:53 PM, Timothy Murphy wrote:
> Does anyone agree with me that the mount command
> (when used simply to get information)
> has become absurdly verbose?
as the 'wolf' might say, "the better to serve you with, my dear". ;)
> I only use this command to determine what hard disks are m
On 11/22/2011 11:01 AM, Marko Vojinovic wrote:
> And it seems that everybody decided to go for the
> "mtab is a symlink" behavior for the time being.
That's not at all unreasonable. /etc/mtab has always been (AFAIK) a
snapshot of how the various parts of the filesystem are mounted, not to
be ed
On Tue, 22 Nov 2011 19:01:43 +
Marko Vojinovic wrote:
> After some reading about this, it appears to me that the problem lies in the
> common misconception that bind mounts are somehow different from ordinary
> mounts.
If they aren't different then there is no bind option to the mount
comma
On Tuesday 22 November 2011 16:25:06 Reindl Harald wrote:
> Am 22.11.2011 16:09, schrieb Andras Simon:
> > Hmmm. I wonder why /dev/sdb8 is mounted to 3 different places?
> > I see here something like this too:
> >
> > /dev/sda1 on / type ext2
> > (rw,noatime,nodiratime,seclabel,errors=continue)
>
2011/11/22, Ralf Corsepius :
> On 11/22/2011 04:09 PM, Andras Simon wrote:
[...]
>> Hmmm. I wonder why /dev/sdb8 is mounted to 3 different places?
>
> These are autofs-automounted local homes.
If partitions that are already mounted (because of fstab) should also
be automounted, then I have a lo
How about something like this (fix line wrap) use -se instead of -s if
you prefer:
# cat mydf
#/bin/bash
df ${@} $(findmnt -s| egrep -v
'^TARGET|^swap|^/sys|^/proc|^/dev/pts|^/dev/shm' | awk '{ printf("%s ",
$1)}')
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change
On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 8:46 AM, Aaron Konstam wrote:
> In the last section of the F16 System Administrator's Guide it says that
> sysctl is run by executing the rc.sysinit script against the parameters
> in sysctl.conf.
>
> Now there is no /etc/rc.d/rc.sysinit script in F16 so that leaves me
> wi
On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 16:46, Aaron Konstam wrote:
> Who should I send the suggestion to that the section should be
> changed?
File a bugzilla report against Fedora Documentation.
--
Suvayu
Open source is the future. It sets us free.
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To uns
On 11/22/2011 11:26 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
> Am 22.11.2011 16:21, schrieb Ed Greshko:
>> On 11/22/2011 08:53 PM, Timothy Murphy wrote:
>>> Does anyone agree with me that the mount command
>>> (when used simply to get information)
>>> has become absurdly verbose?
>>>
>>> I only use this command to
In the last section of the F16 System Administrator's Guide it says that
sysctl is run by executing the rc.sysinit script against the parameters
in sysctl.conf.
Now there is no /etc/rc.d/rc.sysinit script in F16 so that leaves me
with two questions:
1: Who should I send the suggestion to that the
On 11/22/2011 04:09 PM, Andras Simon wrote:
> 2011/11/22, Ralf Corsepius:
>> On 11/22/2011 01:57 PM, Andras Simon wrote:
>
> [...]
>
>>> I use df.
>>
>> Not that much better:
>>
>> Real world example:
>>
>> $ df
>> Filesystem 1K-blocks Used Available Use% Mounted on
>> rootfs 5
Am 22.11.2011 16:21, schrieb Ed Greshko:
> On 11/22/2011 08:53 PM, Timothy Murphy wrote:
>> Does anyone agree with me that the mount command
>> (when used simply to get information)
>> has become absurdly verbose?
>>
>> I only use this command to determine
>> what hard disks are mounted.
>> Now I
Am 22.11.2011 16:09, schrieb Andras Simon:
> 2011/11/22, Ralf Corsepius :
>> On 11/22/2011 01:57 PM, Andras Simon wrote:
>
> [...]
>
>>> I use df.
>>
>> Not that much better:
>>
>> Real world example:
>>
>> $ df
>> Filesystem 1K-blocks Used Available Use% Mounted on
>> rootfs
On 11/22/2011 08:53 PM, Timothy Murphy wrote:
> Does anyone agree with me that the mount command
> (when used simply to get information)
> has become absurdly verbose?
>
> I only use this command to determine
> what hard disks are mounted.
> Now I have to wade through large tracts of information
>
On 11/22/2011 04:04 PM, Aaron Konstam wrote:
> I assume people are not having the problems with rhythembox. In neither
> F15 nor F16 does rhythembox play Audio CDs. On both systems it can't
> find the CD. That is not completely true. If I click on devices, the
> tracks are shown bit the program doe
2011/11/22, Ralf Corsepius :
> On 11/22/2011 01:57 PM, Andras Simon wrote:
[...]
>> I use df.
>
> Not that much better:
>
> Real world example:
>
> $ df
> Filesystem 1K-blocks Used Available Use% Mounted on
> rootfs 50395844 32372316 15463528 68% /
> ..
> tmpfs
I assume people are not having the problems with rhythembox. In neither
F15 nor F16 does rhythembox play Audio CDs. On both systems it can't
find the CD. That is not completely true. If I click on devices, the
tracks are shown bit the program does nothing if I click on play. Are
others having the s
On 11/22/2011 01:57 PM, Andras Simon wrote:
> 2011/11/22, Timothy Murphy:
>> Does anyone agree with me that the mount command
>> (when used simply to get information)
>> has become absurdly verbose?
>
> Absolutely!
>
>> I only use this command to determine
>> what hard disks are mounted.
>> Now I h
On 11/22/2011 02:10 PM, suvayu ali wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 13:53, Timothy Murphy wrote:
>> Is there any way of getting the information one used to get,
>> short of saying something like "mount | grep sd"?
>>
>
> findmnt -s
>
"findmnt -se" additionally shows the disk devices
--
Joachi
22.11.2011 14:10, suvayu ali:
> On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 13:53, Timothy Murphy wrote:
>> Is there any way of getting the information one used to get,
>> short of saying something like "mount | grep sd"?
>>
>
> findmnt -s
Which may or may not be what the OP is looking for, since it only shows
mou
On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 13:53, Timothy Murphy wrote:
> Is there any way of getting the information one used to get,
> short of saying something like "mount | grep sd"?
>
findmnt -s
--
Suvayu
Open source is the future. It sets us free.
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To uns
Am 22.11.2011 13:53, schrieb Timothy Murphy:
> Does anyone agree with me that the mount command
> (when used simply to get information)
> has become absurdly verbose?
>
> I only use this command to determine
> what hard disks are mounted.
> Now I have to wade through large tracts of information
2011/11/22, Timothy Murphy :
> Does anyone agree with me that the mount command
> (when used simply to get information)
> has become absurdly verbose?
Absolutely!
> I only use this command to determine
> what hard disks are mounted.
> Now I have to wade through large tracts of information
> that
Does anyone agree with me that the mount command
(when used simply to get information)
has become absurdly verbose?
I only use this command to determine
what hard disks are mounted.
Now I have to wade through large tracts of information
that make no sense to me, to find the few lines about hard di
On 11/22/2011 03:36 AM, mike cloaked wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 9:59 PM, Jim wrote:
>> Fedora 16
>> Printer has been working fine in Fedora 14, 15.
>> F16 doesn't like it.
>> I'am not getting any Selinux errors.
>>
>>
>> Printer state:
>> Idle - /usr/lib/cups/filter/rastertosamsungsplc faile
2011/11/22 Tim Waugh :
> On Tue, 2011-11-22 at 12:15 +0100, Antonio M wrote:
>> Since latest updates, when I print I get on the bottom right corner a
>> message every time I print a message, and it is present also after
>> print completion.
>
> What does the message say?
>
> Tim.
> */
>
>
> --
> us
On Tue, 2011-11-22 at 12:15 +0100, Antonio M wrote:
> Since latest updates, when I print I get on the bottom right corner a
> message every time I print a message, and it is present also after
> print completion.
What does the message say?
Tim.
*/
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally
Hey all, I'm looking for help testing a project I've been working on
over the last few months. Snap [1] is a cross-platform system snapshot
and restoration utility which uses the underlying package management
system to take snapshots of packages installed as well as files modified
outside of th
Since latest updates, when I print I get on the bottom right corner a
message every time I print a message, and it is present also after
print completion.
Anybody else experiencing this??
--
Antonio Montagnani
Skype : amontag52
Linux Fedora 16 Verne
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproj
On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 9:59 PM, Jim wrote:
> Fedora 16
> Printer has been working fine in Fedora 14, 15.
> F16 doesn't like it.
> I'am not getting any Selinux errors.
>
>
> Printer state:
> Idle - /usr/lib/cups/filter/rastertosamsungsplc failed
>
I can't tell from the messages output you posted
On Tuesday 22 November 2011 14:57:19 Ed Greshko wrote:
> On 11/22/2011 01:00 PM, Marko Vojinovic wrote:
> > On Monday 21 November 2011 20:43:07 linux guy wrote:
> >> No replies to this ? Am I asking the question wrong ? All I want is
> >> everything on the desktop to be larger.
> >
> > Decrease
On Monday 21 November 2011 23:33:46 Jonathan Ryshpan wrote:
> The KDE temperature panel widget on my system reports the temperatures
> in degrees F. I would prefer it to report in degrees C, since all the
> literature about max safe temperature, etc. gives values in degrees C.
> How can the thermo
69 matches
Mail list logo
