On Thursday 02 February 2012 00:55:31 Timothy Murphy wrote:
> I have a small mystery on my home network.
> The machines on the network all run Fedora-16 or CentOS.
> All the machines except one, running CentOS-6.2,
> can ping the ADSL modem at 192.168.1.254 .
>
> The CentOS-6.2 machine does not ge
On Thursday 02 February 2012 06:59:41 fedora wrote:
> firewall? selinux?
I strongly doubt that SELinux has anything to do with pinging. Firewall, OTOH,
is a likely culprit.
Best, :-)
Marko
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https
Hello, I see that my kernel is tainted but I don't know which module
to blame. The taint code is 4096, so it must be a out-of-tree module.
I have listed all modules, and all seem to be in-tree, I have used
this command:
# lsmod | awk {'print $1'} | xargs modinfo | grep intree
and all modules have
In my machine (HP Probook 4515s) completely unbootable - and dies on
boot with kernel panic.
2012/2/1 Ian Malone :
> On 30 January 2012 14:14, Tim Waugh wrote:
>> On Mon, 2012-01-30 at 10:57 +0100, Christian Menzel wrote:
>>> Is anyone else experiencing this problem?
>>
>> Yes, I'm seeing exactly
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 02/02/2012 01:42 PM, Juan Orti Alcaine wrote:
> I have examined the kernel logs, but can't find why the kernel is
> tainted. I haven't compiled any kernel module myself, all are
> bundled in Fedora 16 default kernel.
One option is to issue a sysrq
I recently installed F16. I had the fedora-update.repo repository
enabled when I ran yum. Should fedora-updates.repo be enabled?
Yum installed firefox-10.0-1.fc16.x86_64 and
xulrunner-10.0-1.fc16.x86_64. This combination does not appear to work.
I do not know how to get back to where I was bef
On 02/02/2012 11:49 PM, don fisher wrote:
I recently installed F16. I had the fedora-update.repo repository
enabled when I ran yum. Should fedora-updates.repo be enabled?
Yum installed firefox-10.0-1.fc16.x86_64 and
xulrunner-10.0-1.fc16.x86_64. This combination does not appear to
work. I do
On Thu, Feb 2, 2012 at 2:49 PM, don fisher wrote:
> I recently installed F16. I had the fedora-update.repo repository enabled
> when I ran yum. Should fedora-updates.repo be enabled?
Did you mean fedora-updates-testing.repo? That's where Firefox 10 is
at present. Generally you shouldn't have th
Hello Fedora fans!
Freshly installed Fedora 16 for 32 bit (i686) from DVD on a Pentium 4
with 1 GB RAM. Why does Fedora 16 installs a PAE kernel by default?
Previous versions of Fedora (on that machine) did not install the
PAE kernel but the regular one.
I've seen people on the web asking
Attached is the output from yumex. I didn't want to file a bug report
until I was sure what the problem was. When I type the firefox command,
nothing happens. I do not see anything relevant in /var/log/messages.
Don
On 02/02/12 15:18, T.C. Hollingsworth wrote:
On Thu, Feb 2, 2012 at 2:49 PM,
On 02/02/12 15:13, Rares Aioanei wrote:
On 02/02/2012 11:49 PM, don fisher wrote:
I recently installed F16. I had the fedora-update.repo repository
enabled when I ran yum. Should fedora-updates.repo be enabled?
Yum installed firefox-10.0-1.fc16.x86_64 and
xulrunner-10.0-1.fc16.x86_64. This comb
On Thu, Feb 2, 2012 at 3:49 PM, don fisher wrote:
> Attached is the output from yumex. I didn't want to file a bug report until
> I was sure what the problem was. When I type the firefox command, nothing
> happens. I do not see anything relevant in /var/log/messages.
What YUM did looks fine. Doe
On 02/02/12 16:05, T.C. Hollingsworth wrote:
On Thu, Feb 2, 2012 at 3:49 PM, don fisher wrote:
Attached is the output from yumex. I didn't want to file a bug report until
I was sure what the problem was. When I type the firefox command, nothing
happens. I do not see anything relevant in /var/l
On 02/02/2012 03:05 PM, T.C. Hollingsworth wrote:
If so, you can file a bug from there and it
will automatically include information that will aid developers in
fixing the problem.
One nice thing about abrt, BTW, is that it searches for existing bugs
before creating a new one.
--
users mailin
I wonder if there is a way to make a wifi adapter connect to an access
point but based on its mac address instead of SSID?.
The situation I have is that there´s two APs with the same SSID but
diferent signal strengts, both open, no encryption, and using
different back end providers.
I do not cont
On Thu, Feb 2, 2012 at 5:42 PM, Fernando Cassia wrote:
> I wonder if there is a way to make a wifi adapter connect to an access
> point but based on its mac address instead of SSID?.
Manually create a wireless connection in NetworkManager's
configuration and enter the MAC address in the "BSSID" f
I installed the F16 XFCE spin on this laptop. I copied /etc/gdm/custom.conf
from another Gnome machine that has automatic GDM login working just fine.
On this machine though, the "Automatic Login" gdm banner comes up for a few
seconds, then inexplicably disappears and gets replaced with a reg
On Thu, Feb 2, 2012 at 22:17, T.C. Hollingsworth
wrote:
> Manually create a wireless connection in NetworkManager's
> configuration and enter the MAC address in the "BSSID" field.
Thanks!. Seems that will do the trick.
Wonder if perhaps there should be a clearer indication besides or
below the B
On Thu, Feb 2, 2012 at 8:14 PM, Fernando Cassia wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 2, 2012 at 22:17, T.C. Hollingsworth
> wrote:
>> Manually create a wireless connection in NetworkManager's
>> configuration and enter the MAC address in the "BSSID" field.
>
> Thanks!. Seems that will do the trick.
>
> Wonder if
Andreas M. Kirchwitz wrote:
> Freshly installed Fedora 16 for 32 bit (i686) from DVD on a Pentium 4
> with 1 GB RAM. Why does Fedora 16 installs a PAE kernel by default?
> Previous versions of Fedora (on that machine) did not install the
> PAE kernel but the regular one.
Does your Pentium 4 have N
20 matches
Mail list logo
