On 05/21/2012 09:57 AM, Chuck Peters wrote:
>
> I have a friend using Fedora 15 and I have asked her keep the system updated,
> but
> she has fallen behind and now has 300+MB to download (not counting presto if
> it
> helps). I have searched for a method which would allow me to download them
>
2012/5/21 Chuck Peters :
>
> I have a friend using Fedora 15 and I have asked her keep the system
> updated, but she has fallen behind and now has 300+MB to download (not
> counting presto if it helps). I have searched for a method which would
> allow me to download them on a faster net connection
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi all,
I am setting up a Koji server, and following the instructions given on the
Fedora Koji wiki
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Koji/ServerHowTo
Part way down, there are directions on
Generate a PKCS12 user certificate
This is fo
On 5/20/2012 6:27 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:
Yes, at least you've been able to verify for yourself that problem lies on the
cygwin
box. Otherwise, you may have succumbed to the "I made changes so the problem
must be
here" syndrome.
Ed:
My problem was the other way I knew I hadn't changed a
On Sunday, May 20, 2012, Brian Wood wrote:
> I'm starting to use systemd. I've written a simple unit file and
> systemd starts the service during boot. When I manually kill
> the process though, it doesn't get restarted the way I expected
> it would. Is there an option to specify for that? Tha
I have a friend using Fedora 15 and I have asked her keep the system
updated, but she has fallen behind and now has 300+MB to download (not
counting presto if it helps). I have searched for a method which would
allow me to download them on a faster net connection, but I haven't found
something sim
On 05/21/2012 05:47 AM, Paul Allen Newell wrote:
> I did at least one power cycle yesterday on the XP and, as stated above, got
> the
> failure on XP box today.
>
> So, this is solved by reason of POM (phase-of-moon). I apologize for the
> noise even
> though, given at least one power cycle on a
On 05/21/2012 07:08 AM, Brian Wood wrote:
> I'm starting to use systemd. I've written a simple unit file and
> systemd starts the service during boot. When I manually kill
> the process though, it doesn't get restarted the way I expected
> it would. Is there an option to specify for that? Thank
I'm starting to use systemd. I've written a simple unit file and
systemd starts the service during boot. When I manually kill
the process though, it doesn't get restarted the way I expected
it would. Is there an option to specify for that? Thank you.
Brian Wood
Ebenezer Enterprises
http://web
$ iwconfig wlan0
wlan0 IEEE 802.11bgn ESSID:"Private"
Mode:Managed Frequency:2.452 GHz Access Point:
00:AA:BB:CC:DD:EE
Bit Rate=18 Mb/s Tx-Power=27 dBm
Retry long limit:7 RTS thr=2346 B Fragment thr=2346 B
Power Management:off
Link
Smagin Vladimir <2...@blindage.org> writes:
> Hi all. I found that my fedora 16 doesnt clean /tmp at shutdown like any
> other linux distributions. How I can fix this issue? Using tmpfs is a wrong
> way.
Just put this into /sbin/halt.local and make it mode 755.
[wolfgang@arbol sbin]$ cat /sbi
On 5/20/2012 11:39 AM, Paul Allen Newell wrote:
On 5/20/2012 8:00 AM, Ed Greshko wrote:
It also should be a very simple matter to prove to yourself that the
cygwin system is
at fault.
Just go to your cygwin system, open a window on that system, and ssh
to itself. This
eliminates the network
Il 20/05/2012 21:08, Joe Zeff ha scritto:
On 05/20/2012 11:37 AM, antonio montagnani wrote:
in F17 it doesn't install!!!
Report it on the F17 test list.
It doens't install on F16 either
--
Antonio Montagnani
Fedora 17 Beta
Acer 5670
http://www.campingmonterosa.com
On 05/20/2012 11:37 AM, antonio montagnani wrote:
in F17 it doesn't install!!!
Report it on the F17 test list.
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedorap
On 5/20/2012 8:00 AM, Ed Greshko wrote:
It also should be a very simple matter to prove to yourself that the cygwin
system is
at fault.
Just go to your cygwin system, open a window on that system, and ssh to itself.
This
eliminates the network and since you are going from a system to
itself.
On 5/20/2012 2:54 AM, Gordon Messmer wrote:
On 05/19/2012 08:08 PM, Paul Allen Newell wrote:
The iptables on the converted machine is the factory default.
The problem is almost certainly not iptables. Unless you've
intentionally added some kind of egress filtering, none will be present.
I
Il 20/05/2012 19:24, Frank Murphy ha scritto:
On 20/05/12 18:21, Antonio M wrote:
but octave-ode is missing (and in my opinion it might be the most
interesting)
Tnx for help
--
Antonio Montagnani
Skype : amontag52
It was part of octave-forge, last built for Fedora 15.
It may work on Fedora
On 5/20/2012 5:20 AM, Mikkel L. Ellertson wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 05/19/2012 11:51 PM, Paul Allen Newell wrote:
Hello:
Is there a way to flush output to /etc/log/message so a tail -f
catches things when they happen rather than what I think I am
seeing as a buf
Il 20/05/2012 19:24, Frank Murphy ha scritto:
On 20/05/12 18:21, Antonio M wrote:
but octave-ode is missing (and in my opinion it might be the most
interesting)
Tnx for help
--
Antonio Montagnani
Skype : amontag52
It was part of octave-forge, last built for Fedora 15.
It may work on Fedora
On Sun, 20 May 2012 09:38:24 -0400
Armelius Cameron wrote:
> The only "mode" that didn't cause reboot is "emergency" (i.e. changed
> "single" to "emergency" as kernel argument in grub, which as Fedora
> doc stated doesn't load any init."
This is a long shot. But given the above, why then don't
On Sun, 2012-05-20 at 13:00 -0400, Armelius Cameron wrote:
> In my case it finished booting completely. I could even log in if I
> type fast enough. Then within a few seconds, it reboots.
I suppose I should ask the obvious question: Does it actually "reboot,"
or does it crash?
--
[tim@localhos
On Sun, 2012-05-20 at 11:25 -0500, Dave Ihnat wrote:
> nobody should run a Windows box connected to the Internet except
> through some sort of firewall appliance anyway. A good one. (The
> ones built into most cable & DSL modems are marginal at best.)
I came across one ADSL modem/router that goe
On 20/05/12 18:21, Antonio M wrote:
but octave-ode is missing (and in my opinion it might be the most
interesting)
Tnx for help
--
Antonio Montagnani
Skype : amontag52
It was part of octave-forge, last built for Fedora 15.
It may work on Fedora 16?
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildin
2012/5/20 Frank Murphy
> On 19/05/12 22:11, antonio montagnani wrote:
>
>> Where can I find the odepkg rpm for Octave. Any idea??
>>
>> Tnx
>>
>
> yum info octave
>
> --
> Regards,
> Frank
> "Jack of all, fubars"
>
> --
> users mailing list
> users@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe or chan
On 19/05/12 22:11, antonio montagnani wrote:
Where can I find the odepkg rpm for Octave. Any idea??
Tnx
yum info octave
--
Regards,
Frank
"Jack of all, fubars"
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/ma
Il 20/05/2012 07:54, antonio montagnani ha scritto:
Il 19/05/2012 23:11, antonio montagnani ha scritto:
Where can I find the odepkg rpm for Octave. Any idea??
Tnx
Just for clarification:
1) this package is a package for solving ordinary differential equations
and more.
2) can't be installed
On Sunday, May 20, 2012 05:01:35 PM Heinz Diehl wrote:
> On 20.05.2012, Armelius Cameron wrote:
> > When you saw this, did it
> > reboot after finish booting (i.e. get to KDM / GDM ) or was it just at the
> > grub menu ?
>
> It started to boot, but never got into X, it rebooted somewhere in
> betw
On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 01:20:32AM +0930, Tim wrote:
> This is the worst OS in the world to do that to. Dropping Windows pants
> for a second is enough for it to get rogered by marauding bastards on
> the net.
That's true...except it shouldn't really matter. Because nobody should
run a Windows b
Am 20.05.2012 17:52, schrieb Smagin Vladimir:
Fedora handles this with "tmpwatch" and a too large default
you can create your own file with oerrides
>>> tmpwatch and crones also wrong way.
>>
>> says who?
> I am. In Ubuntu, Gentoo, Suse and others no crons, tmpwatch, tmpfs and other
Am 20.05.2012 17:52, schrieb Smagin Vladimir:
Fedora handles this with "tmpwatch" and a too large default
you can create your own file with oerrides
>>> tmpwatch and crones also wrong way.
>>
>> says who?
> I am. In Ubuntu, Gentoo, Suse and others no crons, tmpwatch, tmpfs and other
>>> Fedora handles this with "tmpwatch" and a too large default
>>> you can create your own file with oerrides
>> tmpwatch and crones also wrong way.
>
> says who?
I am. In Ubuntu, Gentoo, Suse and others no crons, tmpwatch, tmpfs and other
bycicles. All clean.
>>> no reason to remove ALL fro
On Sun, 2012-05-20 at 02:54 -0700, Gordon Messmer wrote:
> Disable your Windows firewall temporarily
Ye gads!
This is the worst OS in the world to do that to. Dropping Windows pants
for a second is enough for it to get rogered by marauding bastards on
the net.
I've seen a friend's PC get rooted
Am 20.05.2012 17:45, schrieb Smagin Vladimir:
>> Fedora handles this with "tmpwatch" and a too large default
>> you can create your own file with oerrides
>
> tmpwatch and crones also wrong way.
says who?
>> no reason to remove ALL from /tmp while shutdown
>> why do you bother about?
>
> beca
> Fedora handles this with "tmpwatch" and a too large default
> you can create your own file with oerrides
tmpwatch and crones also wrong way.
> no reason to remove ALL from /tmp while shutdown
> why do you bother about?
because cleaning /tmp is a normal system function.
--
users mailing list
On Sat, 2012-05-19 at 13:35 -0700, Gordon Messmer wrote:
> It probably already has:
> http://people.gnome.org/~michael/blog/2012-04-26-ooo-comparison.html
"Sadly, most end-users care remarkably little about licenses - clicking
through them without even reading; that is something we should try to
f
Am 20.05.2012 17:37, schrieb Smagin Vladimir:
> Hi all. I found that my fedora 16 doesnt clean /tmp at shutdown like any
> other linux distributions. How I can fix this issue? Using tmpfs is a wrong
> way.
Fedora handles this with "tmpwatch" and a too large default
you can create your own file
Hi all. I found that my fedora 16 doesnt clean /tmp at shutdown like any other
linux distributions. How I can fix this issue? Using tmpfs is a wrong way.
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/list
On 20.05.2012, Armelius Cameron wrote:
> When you saw this, did it
> reboot after finish booting (i.e. get to KDM / GDM ) or was it just at the
> grub
> menu ?
It started to boot, but never got into X, it rebooted somewhere in
between. Nothing worked, and after a few days, just before trying
On 05/20/2012 12:38 PM, Paul Allen Newell wrote:
> Thanks for the reply.
>
> First section yes.
>
> On the telnet cygwin 22, I am getting Connection refused. And I just verified
> again
> that a ping works.
>
> As I mentioned to Joe, I need to get far enough along on my F16 install to
> get some
On 05/19/2012 11:13 AM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
On Sat, 19 May 2012 11:04:41 -0400, RH (Richard) wrote:
Try to install tasque I get:
/home/rgheck/> sudo yum install tasque
[snip]
--> Running transaction check
---> Package mono-extras.x86_64 0:2.10.5-1.fc16 will be installed
---> Package m
On Sunday, May 20, 2012 11:13:39 AM Heinz Diehl wrote:
> On 20.05.2012, Armelius Cameron wrote:
> > This is about the strangest thing I've seen since I've used linux (started
> > in Redhat 5... )
>
> Did you try to load the BIOS defaults? As mentioned above, I saw the
> same thing before, and this
On Sunday, May 20, 2012 12:45:01 PM Alan Cox wrote:
> > Is it not possible that anything in the software somehow is causing this ?
>
> It is certainly possible, however the only thing that ought to be capable
> of causing an accidental reboot is the kernel (hence the 'try old kernel'
> comment) or
Am 20.05.2012 14:52, schrieb suvayu ali:
> On Sun, May 20, 2012 at 2:20 PM, Mikkel L. Ellertson
> wrote:
>>
>> What you are seeing is the last last 10 lines of the file, and
>> then new additions as it is added to the file. This is the way
>> tail -f works. You may want to read the man or info p
On Sun, May 20, 2012 at 2:20 PM, Mikkel L. Ellertson
wrote:
>
> What you are seeing is the last last 10 lines of the file, and
> then new additions as it is added to the file. This is the way
> tail -f works. You may want to read the man or info page on tail.
Maybe `less +F /path/to/file` would b
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 05/19/2012 11:51 PM, Paul Allen Newell wrote:
> Hello:
>
> Is there a way to flush output to /etc/log/message so a tail -f
> catches things when they happen rather than what I think I am
> seeing as a buffer hold-until-full delay?
>
> Thanks in a
> Is it not possible that anything in the software somehow is causing this ?
It is certainly possible, however the only thing that ought to be capable
of causing an accidental reboot is the kernel (hence the 'try old kernel'
comment) or maybe the X server
[try booting "norhgb 3"]
--
users mailin
On 5/20/2012 6:17 AM, Frank Murphy wrote:
> On 20/05/12 11:06, David wrote:
> _broken=1
>>>
>>> RFE filed:
>>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=823245
>>
>>
>> I see. An interesting idea. Not that it matters :-) but I agree.
>>
>
> Maybe If there more cc's ;)
Had not thought of that
On 20/05/12 11:06, David wrote:
_broken=1
RFE filed:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=823245
I see. An interesting idea. Not that it matters :-) but I agree.
Maybe If there more cc's ;)
--
Regards,
Frank
"Jack of all, fubars"
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.o
On 5/20/2012 5:59 AM, Frank Murphy wrote:
> On 20/05/12 10:54, David wrote:
>
>>
>> I, personally, know of no GUI that does this. The CLI for this would be:
>
> Not a GUI problem, a config option
>
>>
>> yum update --security
>>
>> What is wrong with that?
>
> It's not as tidy as
> cat /some/*r
On 20/05/12 10:54, David wrote:
I, personally, know of no GUI that does this. The CLI for this would be:
Not a GUI problem, a config option
yum update --security
What is wrong with that?
It's not as tidy as
cat /some/*repo
security=1
keepcache=1
skip_broken=1
RFE filed:
https://bugzill
On 05/19/2012 08:08 PM, Paul Allen Newell wrote:
The iptables on the converted machine is the factory default.
The problem is almost certainly not iptables. Unless you've
intentionally added some kind of egress filtering, none will be present.
I looked in /var/log/messages and didn't see an
On 5/20/2012 5:26 AM, Frank Murphy wrote:
> On 20/05/12 10:20, David wrote:
>> On 5/20/2012 4:35 AM, Frank Murphy wrote:
>>> As it's a general question asking here.
>>> Will
>>> security=1 within the repo file,
>>> allow me to update testing with security fixes _only_
>
>> There is a plugin:
>>
>>
On 20/05/12 10:20, David wrote:
On 5/20/2012 4:35 AM, Frank Murphy wrote:
As it's a general question asking here.
Will
security=1 within the repo file,
allow me to update testing with security fixes _only_
There is a plugin:
yum-plugin-security
Yes, but it seems to be on the command line o
On 5/20/2012 4:35 AM, Frank Murphy wrote:
> As it's a general question asking here.
>
> Will
> security=1 within the repo file,
> allow me to update testing with security fixes _only_
>
There is a plugin:
yum-plugin-security
--
David
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
On 20.05.2012, Armelius Cameron wrote:
> This is about the strangest thing I've seen since I've used linux (started in
> Redhat 5... )
Did you try to load the BIOS defaults? As mentioned above, I saw the
same thing before, and this was the solution. Don't ask me why, it's
totally irrational, bu
As it's a general question asking here.
Will
security=1 within the repo file,
allow me to update testing with security fixes _only_
--
Regards,
Frank
"Jack of all, fubars"
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproje
On 05/19/2012 11:51 PM, Paul Allen Newell wrote:
Hello:
Is there a way to flush output to /etc/log/message so a tail -f
catches things when they happen rather than what I think I am seeing
as a buffer hold-until-full delay?
Thanks in advance,
Paul
output of what?
See
logger (1) - a
57 matches
Mail list logo
