Re: Solution to RAID /boot issue in fc17?

Alex writes: Hi, I believe the ability to have /boot on RAID was removed in fc15 so in fc16, That's news to me. Both F15 and F16 were perfectly happy with /boot on RAID-1, for me. I must admit that they were quite reluctant to do so, and I did have to beat the crap out of both of them; an

Re: Solution to RAID /boot issue in fc17?

> Is the 2MB BIOS BOOT partition necessary? Yes, as GPT is now the default over MBR iirc. -- Sincerely, William Brown pgp.mit.edu http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=vindex&search=0x3C0AC6DAB2F928A2 signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature -- users mailing list users@lists.

Solution to RAID /boot issue in fc17?

Hi, I believe the ability to have /boot on RAID was removed in fc15 so in fc16, /boot was a single partition, like /dev/sda1. I recently had my primary disk fail on one of my systems, and recovering with a failed sda was very difficult. Has this issue been fixed in fc17? Is it now possible instal

Booting from AHCI controller on f17

Hi, I have an older Xeon x86_64 box that I'm trying to install fc17 on. I've set up the BIOS to "Enable" the "SATA AHCI" controller. However, when I finish the install, and install the bootloader on /dev/sda, the system reports "Operating System not found" when booting. Changing it back to "Disab

Re: yum remove selinux*

On 30/05/12 5:10 AM, Tom Horsley wrote: > On Tue, 29 May 2012 14:32:13 -0400 > Neal Becker wrote: > >> I don't want/use selinux. Any reason I shouldn't just do: >> >> yum remove selinux* ? > > Selinux libs are dependencies of virtually everything. > > The only actual way to do the equivalent of

Re: OT: Very slow download of Fedora-17 via BitTorrent

On 29/05/12 20:40, Jonathan Ryshpan wrote: Downloading Fedora-17 via bittorrent is going very slowly, averaging about 150 Kbytes/sec on a connection that usually achieves about 300 Kbytes/sec. More interesting is that the connection is useless for every other purpose: very slow access to the Web;

Re: OT: Very slow download of Fedora-17 via BitTorrent

On 05/29/2012 02:40 PM, Jonathan Ryshpan wrote: > Downloading Fedora-17 via bittorrent is going very slowly, averaging > about 150 Kbytes/sec on a connection that usually achieves about 300 > Kbytes/sec. More interesting is that the connection is useless for > every other purpose: very slow access

Re: OT: Very slow download of Fedora-17 via BitTorrent

On 05/30/2012 03:53 AM, JD wrote: > On 05/29/2012 12:40 PM, Jonathan Ryshpan wrote: >> Downloading Fedora-17 via bittorrent is going very slowly, averaging about >> 150 >> Kbytes/sec on a connection that usually achieves about 300 Kbytes/sec. More >> interesting is that the connection is useless

Re: yum remove selinux*

On 05/29/2012 04:23 PM, Neal Becker wrote: Daniel J Walsh wrote: If you had a problem with SELinux that caused you to want to remove it, I hope you reported this as a bug. I'd like to remove it because I always disable it, but every time I update it takes a long time. It's the policy updates

Re: ssh-agent no longer started with 3.3 kernels (F16/17)?

On Tue, 29 May 2012 16:04:06 -0600 Phil Meyer wrote: > On 05/29/2012 03:00 PM, Ranjan Maitra wrote: > ... > >> > >> $ ssh-add > >> > >> Could not open a connection to your authentication agent. > >> > ... > > Just a note to say that as far as I can tell, it works fine on a fresh > F17, kernel 3

Re: F17 - no network

On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 03:24:26PM -0400, David A. De Graaf wrote: > Upon first boot after a fresh installation, there's no network; > no way to continue the installation, to say nothing of useability. NEVERMIND!:-) It's fixed. Don't ask me why or how. But grub.cfg was screwed up worse tha

Re: ssh-agent no longer started with 3.3 kernels (F16/17)?

On 05/29/2012 03:00 PM, Ranjan Maitra wrote: ... $ ssh-add Could not open a connection to your authentication agent. ... Just a note to say that as far as I can tell, it works fine on a fresh F17, kernel 3.3.7-1.fc17.x86_64. Good Luck! -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org T

Re: yum remove selinux*

Neal Becker wrote: > I'd like to remove it because I always disable it, but every time I update it > takes a long time. @ Daniel, Wasn't there a Fedora Feature that SELinux was going to generate the policy at RPM build time as opposed to RPM install time? Did this feature never make it into a re

Re: Built in SD card reader problem

On 05/29/2012 12:50 PM, Arthur Dent wrote: ... On Tue, 2012-05-29 at 17:15 +0100, Bryn M. Reeves wrote: Moreover the Gnome notifier popped up asking me if I wanted to open the files in shotwell or in the file browser. All excited, I disentangled the SD card from the Pi and plugged that in inste

Re: yum remove selinux*

On 5/29/2012 5:23 PM, Neal Becker wrote: > Daniel J Walsh wrote: > >> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- >> Hash: SHA1 >> >> On 05/29/2012 03:30 PM, Wolfgang S. Rupprecht wrote: >>> >>> Neal Becker writes: I don't want/use selinux. Any reason I shouldn't just do: yum remove selinu

Re: yum remove selinux*

Boris Epstein wrote: > On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 3:07 PM, Neal Becker wrote: > >> Tommy Pham wrote: >> >> > On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 11:32 AM, Neal Becker >> wrote: >> >> I don't want/use selinux. Any reason I shouldn't just do: >> >> >> >> yum remove selinux* ? >> >> >> >> >> > >> > IIRC, selinu

Re: yum remove selinux*

Daniel J Walsh wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > On 05/29/2012 03:30 PM, Wolfgang S. Rupprecht wrote: >> >> Neal Becker writes: >>> I don't want/use selinux. Any reason I shouldn't just do: >>> >>> yum remove selinux* ? >> >> Because it protects you from remote exp

Making sound from Perl - How?

Hi Guys, Are there any perl bindings in Fedora to play sound samples from perl? e.g. The ability to use PortAudio or Libao or something else from perl? Thanks in advance. Albert -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fed

Re: ssh-agent no longer started with 3.3 kernels (F16/17)?

On Tue, 29 May 2012 13:59:30 -0500 Ranjan Maitra wrote: > Hi, > > Up to before the 3.3 kernels showed up in F16, I was able to do the > following: > > ssh-add > > without a problem. > > From the 3.3 kernel updates on, I get the following: > > $ ssh-add > Could not open a connection to your

Re: remote access via VNC

On 05/29/2012 01:26 PM, Rick Stevens wrote: On 05/29/2012 12:00 PM, Tommy Pham wrote: On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 11:18 AM, Rick Stevens wrote: On 05/29/2012 10:26 AM, Tommy Pham wrote: Hi, Is it possible to have remote access via VNC without having the user to be logged in (automatically, espec

Re: remote access via VNC

On 05/29/2012 12:00 PM, Tommy Pham wrote: On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 11:18 AM, Rick Stevens wrote: On 05/29/2012 10:26 AM, Tommy Pham wrote: Hi, Is it possible to have remote access via VNC without having the user to be logged in (automatically, especially on a system reboot)? You could shar

Re: remote access via VNC

On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 1:01 PM, Andrew Haley wrote: > On 05/29/2012 06:26 PM, Tommy Pham wrote: >> Is it possible to have remote access via VNC without having the user >> to be logged in (automatically, especially on a system reboot)? > > I don't get the problem.  You don't have to be logged in o

Re: how to capture flash, etc

On 05/27/2012 09:20 PM, JD wrote: On 05/27/2012 08:31 PM, Ed Greshko wrote: FWIW, when it comes to downloading and saving youtube videos I've found the plugins/extensions for firefox and chrome to work consistently well. The nice thing too is that they convert the flash videos to MP4 so you don

Re: remote access via VNC

On 05/29/2012 06:26 PM, Tommy Pham wrote: > Is it possible to have remote access via VNC without having the user > to be logged in (automatically, especially on a system reboot)? I don't get the problem. You don't have to be logged in on the console, or anything like that. You just have to be ab

Re: [slightly OT] What happened to /media ??

On Tue, 2012-05-29 at 14:04 -0500, Chris Adams wrote: > Once upon a time, Brian Millett said: > > Ok, so I didn't read about the removable media mount point being changed to > > > > /run/media//device > > > > Would have been nice to have that as a gotcha. > > It is in the release notes: > >

Re: OT: Very slow download of Fedora-17 via BitTorrent

On 05/29/2012 12:40 PM, Jonathan Ryshpan wrote: Downloading Fedora-17 via bittorrent is going very slowly, averaging about 150 Kbytes/sec on a connection that usually achieves about 300 Kbytes/sec. More interesting is that the connection is useless for every other purpose: very slow access to

Re: yum remove selinux*

On Tue, 29 May 2012 15:40:56 -0400, Tom Horsley wrote: > On Tue, 29 May 2012 14:32:13 -0400 > Neal Becker wrote: > > > I don't want/use selinux. Any reason I shouldn't just do: > > > > yum remove selinux* ? > > Selinux libs are dependencies of virtually everything. That would be "libselinux",

Re: yum remove selinux*

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 05/29/2012 03:30 PM, Wolfgang S. Rupprecht wrote: > > Neal Becker writes: >> I don't want/use selinux. Any reason I shouldn't just do: >> >> yum remove selinux* ? > > Because it protects you from remote exploits? > > -wolfgang You can disable

Re: yum remove selinux*

On Tue, 29 May 2012 14:32:13 -0400 Neal Becker wrote: > I don't want/use selinux. Any reason I shouldn't just do: > > yum remove selinux* ? Selinux libs are dependencies of virtually everything. The only actual way to do the equivalent of this is to switch to the geentoo linux distro and setup

OT: Very slow download of Fedora-17 via BitTorrent

Downloading Fedora-17 via bittorrent is going very slowly, averaging about 150 Kbytes/sec on a connection that usually achieves about 300 Kbytes/sec. More interesting is that the connection is useless for every other purpose: very slow access to the Web; connections time out; etc. When bittorrent

Re: yum remove selinux*

Neal Becker writes: > I don't want/use selinux. Any reason I shouldn't just do: > > yum remove selinux* ? Because it protects you from remote exploits? -wolfgang -- g+: https://plus.google.com/114566345864337108516/about -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or

Re: uuidd fails to start

On 05/29/2012 11:12 AM, Thibault Nélis wrote: rpm -q --whatrequires uuidd Yes I know that, but in the past, when I wanted to build from source non-fedora distro apps, some of them would require it. For the time being, I will disable it. -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To uns

F17 - no network

Upon first boot after a fresh installation, there's no network; no way to continue the installation, to say nothing of useability. Running lsmod, I see only 4 modules are loaded, in contrast with the 80 or 90 that are customary. Neither the ath9k family, needed for my wireless radio, nor r8169 f

Re: yum remove selinux*

On 05/29/2012 04:07 PM, Neal Becker wrote: Tommy Pham wrote: On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 11:32 AM, Neal Becker wrote: I don't want/use selinux. Any reason I shouldn't just do: yum remove selinux* ? IIRC, selinux is part of the kernel. Hence when you make any changes to/from SELINUX=disable

Re: yum remove selinux*

On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 3:07 PM, Neal Becker wrote: > Tommy Pham wrote: > > > On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 11:32 AM, Neal Becker > wrote: > >> I don't want/use selinux. Any reason I shouldn't just do: > >> > >> yum remove selinux* ? > >> > >> > > > > IIRC, selinux is part of the kernel. Hence when

Re: yum remove selinux*

Tommy Pham wrote: > On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 11:32 AM, Neal Becker wrote: >> I don't want/use selinux. Any reason I shouldn't just do: >> >> yum remove selinux* ? >> >> > > IIRC, selinux is part of the kernel. Hence when you make any changes > to/from SELINUX=disabled in the /etc/selinux/config

Re: F17 upgrade dirty disc dialog

On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 7:58 PM, Mark Haney wrote: > I've hit a snag on upgrading my netbook to F17.  Every time I go into the > upgrade section I get a dialog saying my root volume is dirty and to reboot > into linux, have it clean the FS and restart the upgrade. Maybe it's related to this?

Re: What happened to /media ??

Once upon a time, Brian Millett said: > Ok, so I didn't read about the removable media mount point being changed to > > /run/media//device > > Would have been nice to have that as a gotcha. It is in the release notes: 3.1.4. Removable media changes mount points Removable media mounted in t

Re: remote access via VNC

On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 11:18 AM, Rick Stevens wrote: > On 05/29/2012 10:26 AM, Tommy Pham wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> Is it possible to have remote access via VNC without having the user >> to be logged in (automatically, especially on a system reboot)? > > > You could share the display in the X confi

ssh-agent no longer started with 3.3 kernels (F16/17)?

Hi, Up to before the 3.3 kernels showed up in F16, I was able to do the following: ssh-add without a problem. From the 3.3 kernel updates on, I get the following: $ ssh-add Could not open a connection to your authentication agent. This is worked around on window-by-window or tab-by-tab basis

Re: Built in SD card reader problem

On Tue, 2012-05-29 at 17:15 +0100, Bryn M. Reeves wrote: > On 05/29/2012 04:15 PM, Arthur Dent wrote: > > I have never used udevadm before. If I have read the man page > > correctly, all I need to do is to initiate "udevadm monitor" and > > then plug in the card, is that right? > > Yes - just run

Re: yum remove selinux*

On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 11:32 AM, Neal Becker wrote: > I don't want/use selinux.  Any reason I shouldn't just do: > > yum remove selinux* ? > > IIRC, selinux is part of the kernel. Hence when you make any changes to/from SELINUX=disabled in the /etc/selinux/config, you have to reboot. -- users

What happened to /media ??

Ok, so I didn't read about the removable media mount point being changed to /run/media//device Would have been nice to have that as a gotcha. -- Brian Millett "Zathras knew you would not leave him. Zathras trusts The One." -- [ Zathras, "Babylon Squared"] -- users mailing list users@lists.f

yum remove selinux*

I don't want/use selinux. Any reason I shouldn't just do: yum remove selinux* ? -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guide

Re: remote access via VNC

On 05/29/2012 10:26 AM, Tommy Pham wrote: Hi, Is it possible to have remote access via VNC without having the user to be logged in (automatically, especially on a system reboot)? You could share the display in the X configs, e.g.: cat /etc/X11/xorg.conf.d/00-system-setup-vnc.conf # This file

Re: F17 upgrade dirty disc dialog

On Tue, 2012-05-29 at 13:58 -0400, Mark Haney wrote: > I've hit a snag on upgrading my netbook to F17. Every time I go into > the upgrade section I get a dialog saying my root volume is dirty and to > reboot into linux, have it clean the FS and restart the upgrade. > > Unfortunately, no matte

Re: uuidd fails to start

On 05/29/2012 06:21 PM, JD wrote: I am not running anything that I KNOW to require uuidd. I simply wanted to make sure that if there are other daemons or apps that need it, will be able to use it. You could try $ rpm -q --whatrequires uuidd -- t -- users mailing list users@lists.fedora

F17 upgrade dirty disc dialog

I've hit a snag on upgrading my netbook to F17. Every time I go into the upgrade section I get a dialog saying my root volume is dirty and to reboot into linux, have it clean the FS and restart the upgrade. Unfortunately, no matter how many times I've rebooted I keep getting the dialog. I'm

remote access via VNC

Hi, Is it possible to have remote access via VNC without having the user to be logged in (automatically, especially on a system reboot)? Thanks, Tommy -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listin

Re: uuidd fails to start

On 05/29/2012 08:39 AM, Ed Greshko wrote: On 05/29/2012 11:37 PM, JD wrote: after adding the lines to create dir /var/run/uuidd and chowning it; starting the daemon just hangs. # service uuidd start Starting uuidd (via systemctl): And it stays there forever until interrupted. Yes, I know. I me

Re: F17: Processing Conflict: systemd-44-12.fc17.i686 conflicts nfs-utils < 1:1.2.6

On Tue, 29 May 2012 17:13:41 +0100 Pedro Francisco wrote: > Anyone else had this today? > > # yum update -y > (...) > --> Processing Conflict: systemd-44-12.fc17.i686 conflicts nfs-utils > < 1:1.2.6 --> Finished Dependency Resolution > Error: systemd conflicts with 1:nfs-utils-1.2.5-15.fc17.i686

Re: uuidd fails to start

On 05/29/2012 08:37 AM, Ed Greshko wrote: On 05/29/2012 10:51 PM, JD wrote: Will file a bug if one has not been files already. But if it is broken in f16 and f17, seems unlikely the devs do not know about it. I think you meant "likely the devs do not know about it". Let us know the bug ID afte

Re: Built in SD card reader problem

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 05/29/2012 05:15 PM, Bryn M. Reeves wrote: > On 05/29/2012 04:15 PM, Arthur Dent wrote: >> I have never used udevadm before. If I have read the man page >> correctly, all I need to do is to initiate "udevadm monitor" and >> then plug in the card,

Re: Built in SD card reader problem

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 05/29/2012 04:15 PM, Arthur Dent wrote: > I have never used udevadm before. If I have read the man page > correctly, all I need to do is to initiate "udevadm monitor" and > then plug in the card, is that right? Yes - just run the command as root an

F17: Processing Conflict: systemd-44-12.fc17.i686 conflicts nfs-utils < 1:1.2.6

Anyone else had this today? # yum update -y (...) --> Processing Conflict: systemd-44-12.fc17.i686 conflicts nfs-utils < 1:1.2.6 --> Finished Dependency Resolution Error: systemd conflicts with 1:nfs-utils-1.2.5-15.fc17.i686 -- Pedro -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubs

Re: uuidd fails to start

On 05/29/2012 08:37 AM, JD wrote: On 05/29/2012 03:32 AM, Ed Greshko wrote: On 05/29/2012 03:18 PM, Ed Greshko wrote: On 05/29/2012 03:11 PM, Ed Greshko wrote: Third, to work around the problem add the following to the beginning of the init script. mkdir /var/run/uuidd chown uuidd:uuidd /var

Re: uuidd fails to start

On 05/29/2012 11:37 PM, JD wrote: > after adding the lines to create dir /var/run/uuidd > and chowning it; starting the daemon just hangs. > # service uuidd start > Starting uuidd (via systemctl): > And it stays there forever until interrupted. Yes, I know. I mentioned that in another message. Y

Re: uuidd fails to start

On 05/29/2012 10:51 PM, JD wrote: > Will file a bug if one has not been files already. > But if it is broken in f16 and f17, seems > unlikely the devs do not know about it. I think you meant "likely the devs do not know about it". Let us know the bug ID after filing. Also, I am curious, what pi

Re: uuidd fails to start

On 05/29/2012 03:32 AM, Ed Greshko wrote: On 05/29/2012 03:18 PM, Ed Greshko wrote: On 05/29/2012 03:11 PM, Ed Greshko wrote: Third, to work around the problem add the following to the beginning of the init script. mkdir /var/run/uuidd chown uuidd:uuidd /var/run/uuidd Their seems to be some

Re: what name does com1 rs232 get in F16+ ?

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 05/28/2012 05:43 AM, Ed Greshko wrote: > On 05/28/2012 04:17 PM, Fernando Cassia wrote: >> Maybe this explains why I'm unable to access the serial port... once >> again SELinux more a pain in the ass rather than of real use... >> >> http://www.ukra

Re: Built in SD card reader problem

>> Device 002: ID 0644:0200 TEAC Corp. All-In-One Multi-Card Reader >> CA200/B/S Bus 006 Device 002: ID 413c:2003 Dell Computer Corp. >> >> So there it is! >> >> So the next question is why won't it work? (or what do I need to do >> to get it to work?) > > You could use udevadm's monitor feature to

[389-users] password expiration warnings

Is there documentation showing how to get password expiration warnings to work? I have them enabled in the console but for some reason they aren't being sent. I am not sure where the SMTP relay is configured, etc and would like to be sure that everything is configured correctly. Josh -- Joshua

Re: Built in SD card reader problem

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 05/29/2012 03:46 PM, Arthur Dent wrote: > # lsusb Bus 001 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0002 Linux Foundation 2.0 root > hub Bus 002 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0002 Linux Foundation 2.0 root hub > Bus 003 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0001 Linux Foundation 1.1 root hub Bus >

Re: uuidd fails to start

On 05/29/2012 03:32 AM, Ed Greshko wrote: if ! [ -d /var/run/uuidd ] then mkdir /var/run/uuidd chown uuidd:uuidd /var/run/uuidd fi Thanx Ed. Will file a bug if one has not been files already. But if it is broken in f16 and f17, seems unlikely the devs do not know about it. --

Re: Built in SD card reader problem

> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > On 05/29/2012 03:26 PM, Arthur Dent wrote: >> So then I looked at lspci (see below). I may be wrong but I can't >> see anything which might be a card reader listed there. It's as if >> I don't actually have a card reader. > > Most internal card

Announcing Fedora 17. Relish it.

For those not on the announce lists. Here what ya been waiting for. Mike Chambers Forwarded Message From: Robyn Bergeron Reply-to: users@lists.fedoraproject.org To: annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org, test-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org, devel-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Built in SD card reader problem

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 05/29/2012 03:26 PM, Arthur Dent wrote: > So then I looked at lspci (see below). I may be wrong but I can't > see anything which might be a card reader listed there. It's as if > I don't actually have a card reader. Most internal card readers are U

Built in SD card reader problem

Hello all, I have had my Dell Dimension 5200 DM061 PC for about 3 years now. It has a built in multiple card reader that takes SD cards and others. In the entire time I have had the PC I have never even tried to use the card reader. Yesterday I got my Raspberry Pi (yipee!) and the first thing I n

Re: Gnome-rpd

On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 01:33:18PM -0600, Lawrence Graves wrote: > Is anyone having trouble using gnome-rdp. I get an error message > that says: getaddressinfo can't find name or something to that > affect. Anyway it is not working. Is there a fix out there or will I > have to wait until final rele

Re: Evolution consuming 50% cpu on FC 16

On Tue, 2012-05-29 at 14:22 +0800, hostmaster wrote: > Hi, > > Tried your script. It seems to have worked. Evolution is 0% cpu. > > Thanks a lot. Glad it worked out. It's not really my script. Someone posted it on the Evo list years ago and I kept it. [And for the record: please avoid top-posti

Re: what name does com1 rs232 get in F16+ ?

On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 8:59 AM, Tim wrote: > There probably was some option for me to set in the network > configuration whether any user could bring the interface up and down, > rather than requiring root to do it. I don't really know, but it sounds > familiar, and makes sense. > Of course it

Re: what name does com1 rs232 get in F16+ ?

On Tue, 2012-05-29 at 04:31 -0300, Fernando Cassia wrote: > Or perhaps the dialer program was pre-setup with the right permissions > or handled things pretty much seamlessly for the end user?. Back when I did dial-up on Fedora Core 4, I didn't have to mess around with devices, nor their permission

Re: uuidd fails to start

On 05/29/2012 03:18 PM, Ed Greshko wrote: > On 05/29/2012 03:11 PM, Ed Greshko wrote: >> Third, to work around the problem add the following to the beginning of the >> init script. >> >> mkdir /var/run/uuidd >> chown uuidd:uuidd /var/run/uuidd > Their seems to be some other minor problems surround

Re: 3G Key

On 05/28/2012 02:31 PM, Patrick Dupre wrote: When I plug it on another computer, it is also recognize (I can tell from lsusb) and I never have the option to give the Pin number. How can I load the interface to give the PIN number? Do you have usb-modeswitch installed? It's supposed to switch th

Re: what name does com1 rs232 get in F16+ ?

2012-05-29 09:31 keltezéssel, Fernando Cassia írta: On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 4:28 AM, Zoltan Boszormenyi > wrote: SuSE might have been different with the serial device permissions. But world-writable by default? Or perhaps the dialer program was pre-setup

Re: uuidd fails to start

On 05/29/2012 03:11 PM, Ed Greshko wrote: > First, file a bugzilla. I've decided not to spend any more time on this as uuidd appears to be broken in more than one way. It is also broken in more than one way +1 in F17. First, if you install uuidd the /var/run/uuidd directory is created and you c

Re: what name does com1 rs232 get in F16+ ?

On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 4:28 AM, Zoltan Boszormenyi wrote: > SuSE might have been different with the serial device permissions. > But world-writable by default? > Or perhaps the dialer program was pre-setup with the right permissions or handled things pretty much seamlessly for the end user?. Do

Re: what name does com1 rs232 get in F16+ ?

2012-05-28 19:48 keltezéssel, Fernando Cassia írta: On Mon, May 28, 2012 at 6:05 AM, Zoltan Boszormenyi > wrote: In the old(ish) times, you had to be in the "uucp" group to accomplish the same. I used a modem in SUSE and also Linspire 4.0, and I don't rememb

Re: uuidd fails to start

On 05/29/2012 03:11 PM, Ed Greshko wrote: > Third, to work around the problem add the following to the beginning of the > init script. > > mkdir /var/run/uuidd > chown uuidd:uuidd /var/run/uuidd Their seems to be some other minor problems surrounding this suggestion. Need to read the script and

Re: uuidd fails to start

On 05/29/2012 02:04 PM, JD wrote: > Booting with every fc16 kernel, I always get this failure. > Boot.log shows > Failed to start LSB: UUID daemon FAILED > See 'systemctl status uuidd.service' for details. > # systemctl status uuidd.service > uuidd.service - LSB: UUID daemon >