On Wed, Jan 2, 2013 at 7:50 PM, Gary Hodder wrote:
try this
> ppp0=Internet connection
> eth0=local area network connection
> This will forward port 22 on the Internet to machine 192.168.0.2 port 22
> on local network.
>
> iptables -A FORWARD -p tcp -i ppp0 -o eth0 -d 192.168.0.2 --dport 22 -j
> A
On Wed, Jan 2, 2013 at 6:13 PM, Jorge Fábregas wrote:
>
> Please elaborate more.
I'll try.
> Why does 192.168.0.35 perform DNS queries
> against the "external interface" of the firewall? Why not use the
> internal ip?
It doesn't.
I'll try to be more specific:
There are at least four machin
On Wed, 2013-01-02 at 15:54 -0800, Alan Evans wrote:
> This is really related to iptables, not I presume Fedora-specific. But
> I'm really hoping that somebody here will be able to school me on
> iptables, so I don't have to find and subscribe to some other list
> just to ask one question.
>
>
>
On 01/02/2013 07:54 PM, Alan Evans wrote:
> DNS queries (portal is also a DNS server) to the external
> interface stop working.
Hi,
Please elaborate more. Why does 192.168.0.35 perform DNS queries
against the "external interface" of the firewall? Why not use the
internal ip? If you manually pe
This is really related to iptables, not I presume Fedora-specific. But I'm
really hoping that somebody here will be able to school me on iptables, so
I don't have to find and subscribe to some other list just to ask one
question.
I'm faced with the problem of needing to punch a hole in a firewall
On 02/01/13 12:40, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> This is an updated Fedora 17 install.
>
> Can anyone tell me what to do?
Use convenient pages like this one
http://bugz.fedoraproject.org/alacarte
as long as they still exist.;)
I didn't find that with google, and even with your pointe
Am 02.01.2013 19:08, schrieb Doug:
>> That being said, the easiest solution IMHO is to plug its hard drive
>> into a different machine and do the install there.
>>
>> --T.C.
> That would probably *not* be a good idea, unless the other machine is
> identical. The install process customizes the sy
On 01/02/2013 08:49 AM, T.C. Hollingsworth wrote:
On 1/2/13, M de Luis wrote:
When I copied the Net installation iso of Fedora to my USB flash drive using
the Fedora LiveUSB creator, I noticed that the pre-existing FAT32 filesystem
on the thumb drive had been unaltered, and that DOS readable fi
On Wed, 02 Jan 2013 12:27:31 -0500, Bob Goodwin - Zuni, Virginia, USA wrote:
>
> I yum installed "alacarte" in this F-17/64 computer, the install
> apparently worked but it does not run, produces the following errors:
>
> [bobg@Box7 ~]$ alacarte
> Traceback (most recent c
I yum installed "alacarte" in this F-17/64 computer, the install
apparently worked but it does not run, produces the following errors:
[bobg@Box7 ~]$ alacarte
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/usr/bin/alacarte", line 36, in
main()
File
On 01/02/2013 07:59 PM, valent.turko...@gmail.com wrote:
> Shit, frozen again after almost 5 days of uptime. I'm switching to debian if
> Fedora 18 kernel turns out to be shit as F16 & F17 :(
Running F18 since my disk dying recently. Thought it close enough since
release should come on the 8th
On 02/01/13 04:22 AM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
On Tue, 01 Jan 2013 20:03:33 -0500, Frank McCormick wrote:
On 01/01/2013 04:26 PM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
On Tue, 01 Jan 2013 15:37:11 -0500, Frank McCormick wrote:
Having come from Debian unstable, the switch to YUM from Aptitude
is a b
On Wed, 2 Jan 2013 23:24:05 +0900
Joel Rees wrote:
> Do we have problems in the mirrors, or has my database for
> updates/primary_db gone wonky?
I once had big problems with one particular mirror, apparently
due to some router on the path between me and that mirror
(which is when I learned about
Well, Ed. I guess I have to look closer to home for my problems with yum.
yum update, and the fedora/primary_db part goes just fine, maxes my
connection. Then updates/primary_db bogs down to averaging a kilobyte
per second. The mirror for both is riken this time, here in Japan,
FWIW. Should unbloc
On 02.01.2013, valent.turko...@gmail.com wrote:
> Shit, frozen again after almost 5 days of uptime. I'm switching to debian
> if Fedora 18 kernel turns out to be shit as F16 & F17 :(
How about just installing a plain vanilla 3.6.11 or 3.7.1 from
kernel.org?
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fe
On 02/01/13 04:22 AM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
On Tue, 01 Jan 2013 20:03:33 -0500, Frank McCormick wrote:
On 01/01/2013 04:26 PM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
On Tue, 01 Jan 2013 15:37:11 -0500, Frank McCormick wrote:
Having come from Debian unstable, the switch to YUM from Aptitude
is a b
On Wed, Jan 2, 2013 at 10:31 AM, Ed Greshko wrote:
> On 01/02/2013 08:19 AM, Joel Rees wrote:
>> On Tue, Jan 1, 2013 at 8:57 PM, Tim wrote:
>>> Allegedly, on or about 29 December 2012, Joel Rees sent:
I'm beginning to think the ISP has throttled me for yum.
>>> Could just be the time of the
On 1/2/13, M de Luis wrote:
> When I copied the Net installation iso of Fedora to my USB flash drive using
> the Fedora LiveUSB creator, I noticed that the pre-existing FAT32 filesystem
> on the thumb drive had been unaltered, and that DOS readable files for the
> live image and Network installati
Hello Michael. Thanks for your very welcome message and assistance.
Yep, it looks as though the only USB hardware that my bios understands during
setup or boot is the USB floppy drive that came with the laptop. The bios' USB
legacy setting does affect the ability to boot as you have correctly i
Hi
I'm trying to compile the Kernel for Fedora 17 64bit after some little
personalization.
I compiled and installed it , but now when the system start, it gives me
this error:
libsepol.policydb_write: Warning! policy version 19 cannot support
permissive types, but some were defined
libsepol.policy
Shit, frozen again after almost 5 days of uptime. I'm switching to debian
if Fedora 18 kernel turns out to be shit as F16 & F17 :(
On Fri, Dec 28, 2012 at 10:50 AM, valent.turko...@gmail.com <
valent.turko...@gmail.com> wrote:
> After latest updated my system finally has uptime more than 7 days!
On Tue, 01 Jan 2013 20:03:33 -0500, Frank McCormick wrote:
> On 01/01/2013 04:26 PM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> > On Tue, 01 Jan 2013 15:37:11 -0500, Frank McCormick wrote:
> >
> >>
> >> Having come from Debian unstable, the switch to YUM from Aptitude
> >> is a bit disconcerting for me. So f
22 matches
Mail list logo
