Hi man,
Where I can find the 1.3.1 source to download? I tried
http://directory.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Source#Directory_Server_Source_Code,
but it´s not available over there.
Alberto Viana
On Fri, Jul 5, 2013 at 3:24 PM, Alberto Viana alberto...@gmail.com wrote:
No. It's a new server cert
Alberto Viana wrote:
Hi,
I got it. Everything is working fine now, so it was something in the
old branch (1.3.0.4)
Glad to hear that. Thanks so much for the report. And please keep us
updated...
--noriko
Alberto Viana
On Mon, Jul 8, 2013 at 5:17 PM, Noriko Hosoi nho...@redhat.com
Hi Ludwig,
Thanks for responding on this.
After further experimentation and re-applying ACI files from earlier times, I
find that the condition probably has been present the whole time and I just
didn't notice because I was focusing on performance related to our Directory
Manager-based
How do I restrict the number of groups or users that an application/service can
see?
I have an application that authenticates against 389. I want to restrict the
groups that are available to the application.
Regards
Andy
The contents of this email are strictly confidential to the intended
On 08.07.2013 00:55, Martin Jackson wrote:
Please, check this link for more info:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/users/2013-July/436981.html
Mateusz Marzantowicz
Thanks, Mateusz. I'm not certain that what I'm seeing is the same
thing, as it has happened even without VMs running.
On Sun, Jul 7, 2013 at 8:05 PM, Germán A. Racca german.ra...@gmail.comwrote:
On 07/07/2013 02:25 PM, Joachim Backes wrote:
On 07/07/2013 07:15 PM, Germán A. Racca wrote:
About Grub, that is what I did: first I installed grub2-starfield-theme
and then I modified the file /etc/default/grub
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Bonjour,
Once upon a time, install fedora was easy: you had to choose between an
automatic installation and a customised installation.
Now, I get a stupid screen which allows to choose an environment (gnome,
xfce,) bravo! And *I can only choose
I did had the possibility to partition manually !
I choosed my disk, uncheck it and check it again then it proposed me to
partition manullay (personalisé ).
that's for the manual way to install, here we are deploying dozens of
fedora19, in that case the use of kickstart and partition option
Ah, SELinux again... Kinda' defeats the purpose these days, doesn't it?
No it's doing exactly what it should be doing ... in a 'normal' usercase
there's no need for SSH to be on a port other than TCP/22 and this prevents
it ... if you need it on another port it's trivial to add on the new
On 08.07.2013 08:34, Mateusz Marzantowicz wrote:
On 08.07.2013 00:55, Martin Jackson wrote:
Please, check this link for more info:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/users/2013-July/436981.html
Mateusz Marzantowicz
Thanks, Mateusz. I'm not certain that what I'm seeing is the same
On 08.07.2013 09:11, sguazt wrote:
Hello,
Thank you for the feedback.
Just for info, is the grub2 without themed the new F19 default, or
something's gone wrong with my installation?
It is essential for the boot loader to boot the kernel, not to play
disco. :)
poma
--
users mailing
On 06.07.2013 11:31, Jerome Yanga wrote:
Thanks, Poma.
I have compiled and installed the code in the URL you have provided.
However, I am still seeing the same issue.
Don't top-post, s'il vous plaît.
That is a library part - 'libfprint',
follows a service part - 'fprintd'. ;)
poma
--
François Patte wrote:
Once upon a time, install fedora was easy: you had to choose between an
automatic installation and a customised installation.
Now, I get a stupid screen which allows to choose an environment (gnome,
xfce,) bravo! And *I can only choose (so there is no choice!!!) an
I've been running Fedora on both laptops and desktops since Fedora Core 1.
Before that I used Red Hat Linux. I've been used to my six-monthly upgrades
entailing a variable (but non-zero) amount of hassle.
Over the weekend I upgraded both my laptop and my desktop from Fedora 18 to
Fedora 19. For
On Mon, 8 Jul 2013 10:54:47 +0100
Dave Cross dav...@gmail.com wrote:
I've been running Fedora on both laptops and desktops since Fedora Core 1.
Before that I used Red Hat Linux. I've been used to my six-monthly upgrades
entailing a variable (but non-zero) amount of hassle.
Over the weekend
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
- Message original
Sujet: Re: rant of the day: installing fedora
Date : Mon, 08 Jul 2013 10:54:28 +0200
De : François Patte francois.pa...@mi.parisdescartes.fr
Organisation : Université Paris Descartes
Pour :
On 8 July 2013 11:05, Maurizio Marini mau...@datalogica.com wrote:
On Mon, 8 Jul 2013 10:54:47 +0100
Dave Cross dav...@gmail.com wrote:
I've been running Fedora on both laptops and desktops since Fedora Core
1.
Before that I used Red Hat Linux. I've been used to my six-monthly
upgrades
I've used fedup on 4 very different machines,
and it has worked faultlessly.
My only gripe is the complete silence
during hours of processing.
Is there any reason why something -
if even just a dot every minute or so -
should not appear on the screen?
Of course an estimate of the expected
On 07/08/2013 07:03 AM, Timothy Murphy wrote:
I've used fedup on 4 very different machines,
and it has worked faultlessly.
My only gripe is the complete silence
during hours of processing.
Is there any reason why something -
if even just a dot every minute or so -
should not appear on the
My only gripe is the complete silence
during hours of processing.
Hours? Jeez. It doesn't take anything like hours for me to
install from scratch and copy my old config by hand.
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
On 07/08/2013 05:32 AM, poma wrote:
On 08.07.2013 09:11, sguazt wrote:
Hello,
Thank you for the feedback.
Just for info, is the grub2 without themed the new F19 default, or
something's gone wrong with my installation?
It is essential for the boot loader to boot the kernel, not to play
Excuse the top posting to my original email...
Just updated the laptop to Fedora 19, same degraded networking performance. If
I switch back to the hard drive with Fedora 17 everything goes back to normal,
fast networking. I don't have another network card to test with, but I know
the
On Mon, Jul 08, 2013 at 12:12:12PM +0200, François Patte wrote:
Le 08/07/2013 10:02, jehan procaccia a écrit :
I did had the possibility to partition manually ! I choosed my disk,
uncheck it and check it again then it proposed me to partition
manullay (personalisé ). that's for the manual
On Monday 08 July 2013 12:37:13 Tom Horsley wrote:
My only gripe is the complete silence
during hours of processing.
Hours? Jeez. It doesn't take anything like hours for me to
install from scratch and copy my old config by hand.
But does that include the download time for the DVD? Not
On 07/08/2013 07:57 AM, Gary Stainburn wrote:
On Monday 08 July 2013 12:37:13 Tom Horsley wrote:
My only gripe is the complete silence
during hours of processing.
Hours? Jeez. It doesn't take anything like hours for me to
install from scratch and copy my old config by hand.
But does that
Thanks Tim for your response!
No, it's not the kernel.
I have three kernels: 3.6.5, 3.6.8. and 3.9.9
With the two firsts, the mouse worked very well.
I've made an update on 3.6.8 to 3.9.9 and then, booted to Windows on the
reboot part, installed the chipset update, then boot fedora.
Since that
On Mon, 8 Jul 2013 12:57:00 +0100
Gary Stainburn wrote:
But does that include the download time for the DVD?
Nope, but my system stays up and is usable in a
normal state while I'm downloading the DVD prior
to an install from scratch :-).
In fact with my latest preferred install technique
my
Timothy Murphy writes:
I've used fedup on 4 very different machines,
and it has worked faultlessly.
My only gripe is the complete silence
during hours of processing.
Is there any reason why something -
if even just a dot every minute or so -
should not appear on the screen?
There is a
Am 07.07.2013 07:02, schrieb Bruno Wolff III:
On Sat, Jul 06, 2013 at 15:45:53 +0200,
Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote:
Am 06.07.2013 15:40, schrieb Tim Evans:
# yum -y update
do *not* use -y
what are you doing if due a packaging-error half of the system
would be removed?
Am 07.07.2013 17:53, schrieb lee:
Heinz Diehl h...@fritha.org writes:
On 07.07.2013, lee wrote:
What kind of crap is that?
I don't know.
And does it mean that there again will be problems with updating when I try
to move to F19?
In general, I would always prefer a fresh install over
Am 07.07.2013 15:19, schrieb Steven Stern:
Since F19, the following have appeared in my daily logwatch:
- Cron Begin
**Unmatched Entries**
INFO (RANDOM_DELAY will be scaled with factor 37% if used.)
INFO (RANDOM_DELAY will be scaled with
ipv6disable=1 in F19 is ignored
i get tired every few months research how IPv6 to disable
because it permanently changes, maybe it is F19/systemd
maybe it is the F20 3.10.0-1.fc20.x86_64 because it is
the only 3.10 build currently, however the kernel-line
is clear
on pure ipv4 networks there is
Am 07.07.2013 19:21, schrieb lee:
Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net writes:
Am 07.07.2013 17:53, schrieb lee:
If Fedora cannot be updated without major problems, it's
not useable.
if you follow this guides *strictly* and willing to learn to deal
wtih package-cleanup --leaves |
On Sun, Jul 07, 2013 at 06:30:54PM +, Andre Robatino wrote:
But what if you DO want the screen to blank (and eventually turn the monitor
off, for power saving) but get rid of the screen shield?
Curremtly, the official Gnome answer seemed to be don't use Gnome. There
was a thread a while
Alexander Volovics wrote:
Du calme, Francois. Ce que nous voyons ici c'est:
'Monsieur Hulot et les ordinateurs' ou 'Francois et les ordinateurs'.
First there are 'installation guides' (though one is too terse and the
other long-winded and turgid).
By browsing these you would have known
Joachim, dis you submit this problem to the devel list since it seems to be
a kernel problem ?
Best regards
Eric
2013/7/7 Joachim Backes joachim.bac...@rhrk.uni-kl.de
On 07/07/2013 03:17 PM, Martin Møller Skarbiniks Pedersen wrote:
Are you swap partition large enough ?
Hi Martin,
in
On 07/08/2013 08:58 AM, Timothy Murphy wrote:
Alexander Volovics wrote:
Du calme, Francois. Ce que nous voyons ici c'est:
'Monsieur Hulot et les ordinateurs' ou 'Francois et les ordinateurs'.
First there are 'installation guides' (though one is too terse and the
other long-winded and turgid).
On 07/08/2013 03:14 PM, Eric Tanguy wrote:
Joachim, dis you submit this problem to the devel list since it seems to
be a kernel problem ?
Best regards
Eric
Eric,
I filed a kernel BZ in july 2012
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=842033
which I closed in the meantime because for me
On Sun, 2013-07-07 at 18:18 +0200, Reindl Harald wrote:
ipv6disable=1 in F19 is ignored
i get tired every few months research how IPv6 to disable
because it permanently changes, maybe it is F19/systemd
maybe it is the F20 3.10.0-1.fc20.x86_64 because it is
the only 3.10 build currently,
On Mon, Jul 08, 2013 at 02:58:47PM +0200, Timothy Murphy wrote:
The default should always be to leave things as they are,
as far as possible.
Did you protest against the new anaconda, I can't remember.
I didn't because I believe in flexibility and adaptation,
certainly when the end result is
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Le 08/07/2013 13:49, Alexander Volovics a écrit :
On Mon, Jul 08, 2013 at 12:12:12PM +0200, François Patte wrote:
Le 08/07/2013 10:02, jehan procaccia a écrit :
I did had the possibility to partition manually ! I choosed my
disk, uncheck it and
Matthew Miller mattdm at fedoraproject.org writes:
I've gotten used to double-clicking esc to unlock my screen.
If the screen is blanked, and I hit Esc specifically (as opposed to just any
kind of mouse or keyboard action, as previously), it both unblanks the
screen and avoids the screen
On Mon, 08 Jul 2013 13:29:44 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 07/08/13 13:09, Amadeus W.M. wrote:
I normally have an nfs server running on one of my machines. Now nfs
itself and the portmapper start on fixed ports, but the rpc services
start on random ports so they need to be assigned fixed ports
On Mon, Jul 08, 2013 at 02:09:12PM +, Andre Robatino wrote:
I've gotten used to double-clicking esc to unlock my screen.
If the screen is blanked, and I hit Esc specifically (as opposed to just any
kind of mouse or keyboard action, as previously), it both unblanks the
screen and avoids
Allegedly, on or about 08 July 2013, James Hogarth sent:
If you want SSH on a different port the better options are to pick a
port below 1024 (and add that port to the sshd_t context via semanage)
or to bind SSH to 22 and to use iptables to do a redirection
internally from the high level port
Am 08.07.2013 15:56, schrieb Cristian Sava:
On Sun, 2013-07-07 at 18:18 +0200, Reindl Harald wrote:
ipv6disable=1 in F19 is ignored
i get tired every few months research how IPv6 to disable
because it permanently changes, maybe it is F19/systemd
maybe it is the F20 3.10.0-1.fc20.x86_64
On 07/08/13 22:24, Amadeus W.M. wrote:
Thank you, that's life saver.
Behind I am, but then so is system-config-nfs because that's what I used
to configure nfs, including the ports.
I don't use that tool. If it lead you down the garden path, you probably
should write a bugzilla.
While
Allegedly, on or about 08 July 2013, Timothy Murphy sent:
Of course an estimate of the expected duration would be even more
helpful, or just a statement of how many packages have been processed,
out of how many in total.
It's often been said that it's hard to estimate how long to completion
On 07/08/2013 10:01 AM, Tim wrote:
And I'd certainly avoid putting anything exploitable, ever, on port
23456. Maybe that was just a made up example by the original poster,
but consecutive numbers like that, and other common number sequences,
are just the sort of thing that wannabes hackers
On Monday 08 July 2013 13:06:12 Tom Horsley wrote:
On Mon, 8 Jul 2013 12:57:00 +0100
Gary Stainburn wrote:
But does that include the download time for the DVD?
Nope, but my system stays up and is usable in a
normal state while I'm downloading the DVD prior
to an install from scratch :-).
Allegedly, on or about 08 July 2013, François Patte sent:
But this requires to have two computers: while you install one, you
follow the instructions on the other.
I've, long since, come to realise that it's nearly impossible to manage
with just one computer. Your instructions are
Allegedly, on or about 08 July 2013, Matthew Miller sent:
Yeah it seems like a good RFE would be for shift, alt, and ctl to also
clear the screen shield.
They're certainly the keys that I hit, now, to unblank the screen.
Since, by themselves, they're not supposed to be able to do anything.
On 07/08/2013 09:47 AM, Matthew Miller wrote:
Yeah it seems like a good RFE would be for shift, alt, and ctl to also clear
the screen shield.
Press the Enter key.
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
Allegedly, on or about 08 July 2013, Diego Vargas sent:
No, it's not the kernel.
I have three kernels: 3.6.5, 3.6.8. and 3.9.9
With the two firsts, the mouse worked very well.
I've made an update on 3.6.8 to 3.9.9 and then, booted to Windows on
the reboot part, installed the chipset update,
Allegedly, on or about 08 July 2013, Michael Cronenworth sent:
Since there are only 65,535 ports to scan, anyone at any time can
easily scan for an open port in seconds. Arguing about semantics of a
port number is more Security Through Obscurity(tm).
I think there's some difference between
I've been using Fedora and before that Red Hat Linux for over 15 years.
I've never trusted any update process. I've always done a
re-installation.
This time, I thought I'd give fedup a chance. I've done it on three
systems. Each mostly worked. The problems were minor and could
essentially
| From: Tanguy Eric eric.tan...@gmail.com
| The problem was in f18 and now also in f19. The pc seems to go fine in
| hibernate but when i try to resume it seems to try to resume and after few
| seconds reboot normally. I tried to activate the pm_trace functionality with
| |echo 1
Sorry for top posting this. My bb won't allow bottom posting.
My $0.02 on this topic.
My nfs server is running fc5. Very outdated but I see no reason to upgrade it
as there are 3 firewalls between it and the Net. It is doing what I want it to
do. Serve files.
My other machines are all F17.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Le 08/07/2013 18:03, davidscha...@mobilicity.blackberry.com a écrit :
Sorry for top posting this. My bb won't allow bottom posting.
My $0.02 on this topic.
My nfs server is running fc5. Very outdated but I see no reason to
upgrade it as there
On Mon, 2013-07-08 at 16:15 +0200, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 08.07.2013 15:56, schrieb Cristian Sava:
On Sun, 2013-07-07 at 18:18 +0200, Reindl Harald wrote:
ipv6disable=1 in F19 is ignored
i get tired every few months research how IPv6 to disable
because it permanently changes, maybe
I have built a USB stick with a Live Fedora 19 on it.
I gave it a large overlay to make room for updates.
I booted the stick and did a yum update. (Boy was that slow. I think
that the Kingston DT101 G2 stick, combined with the USB 2.0 interface, was
the cause.)
If I install from this stick,
On Mon, Jul 08, 2013 at 10:34:27AM -0500, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
On 07/08/2013 09:47 AM, Matthew Miller wrote:
Yeah it seems like a good RFE would be for shift, alt, and ctl to also clear
the screen shield.
Press the Enter key.
Right, so, rewinding a second in the conversation
On Mon, Jul 08, 2013 at 12:16:29 -0400,
D. Hugh Redelmeier h...@mimosa.com wrote:
I have built a USB stick with a Live Fedora 19 on it.
I gave it a large overlay to make room for updates.
I booted the stick and did a yum update. (Boy was that slow. I think
that the Kingston DT101 G2 stick,
Hi,
On Sun, Jun 30, 2013 at 12:45 AM, Joe Zeff j...@zeff.us wrote:
On 06/29/2013 08:45 PM, Digimer wrote:
You need to get the MAC address for the new card and replace the old
card's MAC address value in /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-dev.
Specifically, edit the 'HWADDR=...' line.
| From: Bruno Wolff III br...@wolff.to
| On Mon, Jul 08, 2013 at 12:16:29 -0400,
| D. Hugh Redelmeier h...@mimosa.com wrote:
| If I install from this stick, will the installed system be already
| updated?
| The way things currently work the anwser is yes. The file system is
| essentially
On Tue, 09 Jul 2013 01:01:09 +0930
Tim wrote:
I'm
damn sick of some of the stupid things that have happened, in the way of
alleged improvements, over the years.
But at least my new Asus motherboard has an earth-shattering new
improvement that actually makes sense:
You can hit DEL or F2 to
On Mon, 8 Jul 2013, davidscha...@mobilicity.blackberry.com wrote:
Sorry for top posting this. My bb won't allow bottom posting.
My $0.02 on this topic.
My nfs server is running fc5. Very outdated but I see no reason to upgrade it
as there are 3 firewalls between it and the Net. It is doing
On 07/08/2013 11:24 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
have fun
Technologies such as open proxies and bot-nets enable an experienced
cracker to attack your system within a few seconds.
P.S. Please do not snip replies to exclude information that is relevant
to the conversation. It makes you look like a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 07/08/2013 04:02 AM, James Hogarth wrote:
Ah, SELinux again... Kinda' defeats the purpose these days, doesn't it?
No it's doing exactly what it should be doing ... in a 'normal' usercase
there's no need for SSH to be on a port other
Garry T. Williams gtwilli...@gmail.com writes:
On 7-7-13 19:21:33 lee wrote:
So we have three options to upgrade:
1.) the recommended fedup which probably doesn't work
2.) the untested and unsupported way using yum which might work or
not
3.) move away from Fedora and install a different
Heinz Diehl h...@fritha.org writes:
On 07.07.2013, lee wrote:
That is not an option. I can't start from scratch every half year and
waste a week or two to get the system back to how I need it.
Have you considered to switch to some kind of rolling distribution,
then? I for myself like
Frank Murphy frankl...@gmail.com writes:
No. 2.) might not work anymore
sooner or later, if it works at all to begin with --- and it's all
guesswork anyway.
yum is not guesswork.
Upgrading Fedora is guesswork, especially when using yum to upgrade.
All I have updated with yum since F16,
Mateusz Marzantowicz mmarzantow...@osdf.com.pl writes:
If you don't want to upgrade to F19 yet, try to regenerate grub boot
menu manually using grub2-mkconfig. You'll gain some time to track
package that is trying to make you happy and then remove or
reconfigure it.
You mean messing up
Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net writes:
Am 07.07.2013 19:21, schrieb lee:
Considering that Fedora does not have a working (and tested and
supported) upgrade method at all, such packaging guidelines seem very
questionable. That means you're simply lucky if you manage to upgrade.
That
Alexander Volovics a.volo...@upcmail.nl writes:
(It's a lot like reading math books/papers skipping the proofs
because you want to try them yourselve first).
Here you browse the guides and then experiment with anaconda.
And François is no newcomer to the list or linux.
That a non-newcomer
On Mon, 08 Jul 2013 18:09:13 +0200
lee l...@yun.yagibdah.de wrote:
So it seems that most ppl use yum to upgrade and that it mostly works.
The sample size of people in this thread isn't really enough to
extrapolate to 'most people', IMHO.
If that is so, then why did they ever come up with
On Mon, Jul 8, 2013 at 1:40 AM, poma pomidorabelis...@gmail.com wrote:
On 06.07.2013 11:31, Jerome Yanga wrote:
Thanks, Poma.
I have compiled and installed the code in the URL you have provided.
However, I am still seeing the same issue.
Don't top-post, s'il vous plaît.
That is a
On 07/08/2013 08:56 AM, lee wrote:
Now consider the possible consequences of running a presumably pretty
harmless yum update: You can be left stranded with a non-working
system and you can lose your data. What kind of reliability is that?
For well over 99% of the people using Fedora this is
On 07/08/2013 09:02 AM, lee wrote:
When you do that, how do you make sure that you don't run into a
situation in which your system becomes unusable? You might end up with
crucial software not running or not working anymore because other
software already has been updated or hasn't been updated
On 07/08/2013 11:40 AM, Heinz Diehl wrote:
And taking into account the simple fact that usually those who
encounter(ed) problems are dominating the list, you have to deal with
publication bias :-)
You make an excellent point. I'm still running F17, but I plan to
upgrade my laptop to 19 RSN,
On 08.07.2013, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
The sample size of people in this thread isn't really enough to
extrapolate to 'most people', IMHO.
And taking into account the simple fact that usually those who
encounter(ed) problems are dominating the list, you have to deal with
publication bias :-)
On Mon, 8 Jul 2013, Joe Zeff wrote:
You make an excellent point. I'm still running F17, but I plan to upgrade my
laptop to 19 RSN, and once that's working properly, I'll do the same to my
desktop. I skipped 18 because of all the upgrade issues I read about here
and other Fedora help
On 08.07.2013, Joe Zeff wrote:
I'm still running F17, but I plan to upgrade
my laptop to 19 RSN, and once that's working properly, I'll do the same to
my desktop. I skipped 18 because of all the upgrade issues I read about
here and other Fedora help groups I infest.
I have two machines
On 7/8/2013 12:38 PM, Tom Horsley wrote:
On Tue, 09 Jul 2013 01:01:09 +0930
Tim wrote:
I'm
damn sick of some of the stupid things that have happened, in the way of
alleged improvements, over the years.
But at least my new Asus motherboard has an earth-shattering new
improvement that actually
No, what I've updated on Windows is the chipset. Which (supposedly) only
makes Windows to recognize parts of the hardware, like the LAN card, the
WiFi card and so forth.
Now, there is a special disable/enable touchpad hotkey. But it just doesn't
work.
I've tried that in my Fedora 19, in anaconda
Alberto Viana wrote:
Hi man,
Where I can find the 1.3.1 source to download? I tried
http://directory.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Source#Directory_Server_Source_Code,
but it´s not available over there.
You can get it here:
A source tarball is available for download at
Hi,
I got it. Everything is working fine now, so it was something in the old
branch (1.3.0.4)
Alberto Viana
On Mon, Jul 8, 2013 at 5:17 PM, Noriko Hosoi nho...@redhat.com wrote:
Alberto Viana wrote:
Hi man,
Where I can find the 1.3.1 source to download? I tried
Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net writes:
Am 08.07.2013 20:19, schrieb lee:
i do not buy you're simply lucky after around 400 dist-upgrades
with yum on workstations and production servers with all sort
of services - i *never* rely on luck, i simply *test* and *prepare*
upgrades after test
On 07/08/2013 01:10 PM, lee wrote:
Your conclusion would have to be that Fedora can only reasonably be used
in a professional environment like you have at your disposal and that it
is totally unsuited for what they say that their user base is.
No, that's *your* conclusion. I run Fedora on my
On Mon, Jul 08, 2013 at 12:12:12PM +0200, François Patte wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
- Message original
Sujet: Re: rant of the day: installing fedora
Date : Mon, 08 Jul 2013 10:54:28 +0200
De : François Patte
Am 08.07.2013 17:47, schrieb D. Hugh Redelmeier:
| if you follow this guides *strictly* and willing to learn to deal
| wtih package-cleanup --leaves | --problems | --orphans and
| to understand how your OS basically works you are fine
|
Am 08.07.2013 18:16, schrieb Cristian Sava:
On Mon, 2013-07-08 at 16:15 +0200, Reindl Harald wrote:
syslog message at boot:
ipv6: Loaded, but administratively disabled, reboot required to enable
this does currently no longer work and every release
the magic how to achive this is randomly
Am 08.07.2013 22:10, schrieb lee:
Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net writes:
Am 08.07.2013 20:19, schrieb lee:
i do not buy you're simply lucky after around 400 dist-upgrades
with yum on workstations and production servers with all sort
of services - i *never* rely on luck, i simply
Am 08.07.2013 17:13, schrieb Michael Cronenworth:
On 07/08/2013 10:01 AM, Tim wrote:
And I'd certainly avoid putting anything exploitable, ever, on port
23456. Maybe that was just a made up example by the original poster,
but consecutive numbers like that, and other common number sequences,
Am 08.07.2013 20:19, schrieb lee:
i do not buy you're simply lucky after around 400 dist-upgrades
with yum on workstations and production servers with all sort
of services - i *never* rely on luck, i simply *test* and *prepare*
upgrades after test them carefully on clones with note all needed
Am 08.07.2013 18:49, schrieb Michael Cronenworth:
On 07/08/2013 11:24 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
have fun
Technologies such as open proxies and bot-nets enable an experienced
cracker to attack your system within a few seconds.
there is a *large* difference between a botnet and the typical
Am 08.07.2013 22:26, schrieb Robert Holtzman:
Also, no time for installation is displayed, I'm stcked there waiting
for an end!
Many thanks to all those crapy packagers who think that common people
are to stupid to manage their own computer!
Wrong!
Everyone else seems to be able to
On 07/08/2013 03:25 PM, Jerome Yanga wrote:
On Mon, Jul 8, 2013 at 1:40 AM, poma pomidorabelis...@gmail.com
mailto:pomidorabelis...@gmail.com wrote:
On 06.07.2013 11:31, Jerome Yanga wrote:
Thanks, Poma.
I have compiled and installed the code in the URL you have
On Sun, Jul 7, 2013 at 3:30 PM, Diego Vargas degva...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello All!
I've been playing with fedora a little bit and I just love it! I've have
the gnome GDM and the Cinnamon Desktop.
My Toshiba U945-S4140 is running Fedora 19 and Windows 7. Didn't like the
pre-installed Windows
On Mon, Jul 8, 2013 at 1:40 PM, Germán A. Racca german.ra...@gmail.comwrote:
On 07/08/2013 03:25 PM, Jerome Yanga wrote:
On Mon, Jul 8, 2013 at 1:40 AM, poma pomidorabelis...@gmail.com
mailto:pomidorabelisima@**gmail.com pomidorabelis...@gmail.com
wrote:
On 06.07.2013 11:31, Jerome
1 - 100 of 144 matches
Mail list logo
