On 29.07.2013 07:32, Ed Greshko wrote:
> On 07/29/13 12:37, Isaac Cortés González wrote:
>> Well, I'm having a problem trying to enable the new UI of LibreOffice
>> 4.1, all this in F19+KDE; but for some reason I can't see it in any
>> menuItem or any other menu or option; is this because of KDE or
On Sunday 28 July 2013 23.03.23 Isaac Cortés González wrote:
> > I have not experienced this.
> >
> > Install libreoffice-kde to see if this helps. I am
> > using that.
>
> I have it installed, that's not the problem.
What is it supposed to look like?
/Martin S
--
users mailing list
users@list
On 07/29/13 12:37, Isaac Cortés González wrote:
> Well, I'm having a problem trying to enable the new UI of LibreOffice
> 4.1, all this in F19+KDE; but for some reason I can't see it in any
> menuItem or any other menu or option; is this because of KDE or is
> there a dependency I haven't resolve?
On 7/28/2013 8:50 PM, Richard Shaw wrote:
Now to see if I can get cdrtools to play nice (or replace cdrkit) or
give up and put it in /usr/local and hope brasero can find it there.
Have you taken a look at this Howto; It is a bit old, but it may
still apply.
http://www.stephencuppett.c
> I have not experienced this.
>
> Install libreoffice-kde to see if this helps. I am
> using that.
I have it installed, that's not the problem.
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/user
On Sunday 28 July 2013 23.45.40 lee wrote:
> Sam Varshavchik writes:
> > lee writes:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> how does one get a clean installation of Fedora? "Clean" means that
> >> only those packages are installed that are actually needed and only
> >> those services are running that are actually n
Isaac Cortés González wrote:
> is this because of KDE or is
> there a dependency I haven't resolve?
I have not experienced this.
Install libreoffice-kde to see if this helps. I am
using that.
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
ht
Well, I'm having a problem trying to enable the new UI of LibreOffice
4.1, all this in F19+KDE; but for some reason I can't see it in any
menuItem or any other menu or option; is this because of KDE or is
there a dependency I haven't resolve?
-Isaac C.
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fe
On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 1:21 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:
> On 07/29/13 11:09, David Beveridge wrote:
>> The mask keyword is not used in any sysctl commands from what I can see.
I should have looked more before typing. Oops.
>
> Are you confusing sysctl and systemctl?
>
yes
> From the systemctl man pag
Ok, ran into a couple of problems:
1. You don't actually get all 25GB after formatting, you get 24.8GB so I
needed to modify the dd line to:
$ dd if=/dev/zero of=./picback.udf bs=2048 count=12088320
2. Brasero now doesn't tell me that my image is too big for my disc, but
still refuses to write.
On Sun, 28 Jul 2013 21:51:10 +0200 poma
wrote:
> On 28.07.2013 21:42, Ranjan Maitra wrote:
> > On Sun, 28 Jul 2013 21:37:14 +0200 poma
> > wrote:
> >
> >> On 28.07.2013 21:24, Ranjan Maitra wrote:
> >>> Does anyone know if the following is available for Fedora 19?
> >>>
> >>> I don't think it
On 07/28/2013 08:09 PM, David Beveridge wrote:
The mask keyword is not used in any sysctl commands from what I can see.
In fact the service-start-up script is linked to /dev/null, which
effectively hides (masks) it from the system, so that it cannot be
found or started.
Then you haven't looked
On 07/29/13 11:09, David Beveridge wrote:
> The mask keyword is not used in any sysctl commands from what I can see.
Are you confusing sysctl and systemctl?
From the systemctl man page
mask NAME...
Mask one or more unit files, as specified on the command line. This
On Mon, 29 Jul 2013 10:46:57 +0800
Ed Greshko wrote:
> On 07/29/13 10:30, Marko Vojinovic wrote:
> > If you feel adventurous, go ahead and remove avahi without the
> > dependent packages (rpm -e --nodeps avahi), and then keep using the
> > broken system. If you are lucky, you won't run into troubl
On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 12:47 PM, David Beveridge wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 11:19 AM, Robert Arkiletian wrote:
>> It's not that bad. This page explains it clearly.
>>
>> http://0pointer.de/blog/projects/three-levels-of-off
>
> That does describe what it does quite clearly, however, if you
On 07/29/13 10:30, Marko Vojinovic wrote:
> If you feel adventurous, go ahead and remove avahi without the
> dependent packages (rpm -e --nodeps avahi), and then keep using the
> broken system. If you are lucky, you won't run into trouble. If that is
> what will make you happy...
That's "good" adv
On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 11:19 AM, Robert Arkiletian wrote:
> It's not that bad. This page explains it clearly.
>
> http://0pointer.de/blog/projects/three-levels-of-off
That does describe what it does quite clearly, however, if you did not
read that and tried to assume which did what, it would be
DISCLAIMER: Yes I'm whining, but hopefully someone who wants to user their
BD writer will find this useful...
Well I thought I would try to make my first blu-ray movie from some home
movies instead of down converting them to DVD like I have been... Only to
find out not only is it currently laborio
On Sun, 28 Jul 2013 23:35:22 +0200
lee wrote:
> Marko Vojinovic writes:
> > On Sun, 28 Jul 2013 17:03:29 +0200
> > lee wrote:
> >> Tim writes:
> >> > They might not *actually* need it. i.e. They *may* make use of
> >> > it for some features, that you *might* use, so they require it
> >> > for
It's not that bad. This page explains it clearly.
http://0pointer.de/blog/projects/three-levels-of-off
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedorapro
On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 7:41 AM, lee wrote:
> Joe Zeff writes:
>
>> On 07/28/2013 08:03 AM, lee wrote:
>>> However, when I look at online dictionaries, they say that "disabled"
>>> refers to people the abilities of which are somehow limited, so that
>>> word won't be applicable here at all. Serv
On 29.07.2013 02:01, Rolf Turner wrote:
…
> (b) Would it be possible to disable/mask the internal WiFi card but
> leave the USB WiFi device
> available, so that I can actually get a WiFi connection?
…
>> I am running Fedora 17; output of "uname -a" is:
>>
>>> Linux localhost.localdomain 3.3
On Sun, 28 Jul 2013 23:41:14 +0200
lee wrote:
> Joe Zeff writes:
> > On 07/28/2013 08:03 AM, lee wrote:
> >> However, when I look at online dictionaries, they say that
> >> "disabled" refers to people the abilities of which are somehow
> >> limited, so that word won't be applicable here at all.
So far I have received no useful responses to my question (given
below). However I have
recently seen in another thread a considerable amount of discussion of
something called
"systemctl". This sounds like it *might* do what I want. However
looking at the man page
for systemctl leaves just
On 29.07.2013 00:46, আনন্দ কুমার সমাদ্দার Ananda Samaddar wrote:
> It looks like you'd be better served using something like Arch if you
> want minimalism.
>
> Ananda
>
Eeny, meeny, miny, moe,
Catch a package by the toe.
If he hollers, let him go,
Eeny, meeny, miny, moe.
Eeny, meeny, tiny, toe
On Sun, 28 Jul 2013 19:00:13 -0400
Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> Hi
>
>
> On Sun, Jul 28, 2013 at 6:45 PM, আনন্দ কুমার সমাদ্দার wrote:
>
> > On Sun, 28 Jul 2013 18:13:24 -0400I've done as you suggested. The
> > full spec is attached to this email.
> > I'm going to use it in conjunction with this:
On 28/07/13 17:49, lee wrote:
Digimer writes:
On 28/07/13 11:07, lee wrote:
Hi,
how does one get a clean installation of Fedora? "Clean" means that
only those packages are installed that are actually needed and only
those services are running that are actually needed.
You can do a "minima
Hi
On Sun, Jul 28, 2013 at 6:45 PM, আনন্দ কুমার সমাদ্দার wrote:
> On Sun, 28 Jul 2013 18:13:24 -0400I've done as you suggested. The full
> spec is attached to this email.
> I'm going to use it in conjunction with this:
>
> http://gaenserich.github.io/hostsblock/
>
> I'll have a look at packagi
On Sun, 28 Jul 2013 23:49:42 +0200
lee wrote:
> Digimer writes:
>
> > On 28/07/13 11:07, lee wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> how does one get a clean installation of Fedora? "Clean" means
> >> that only those packages are installed that are actually needed
> >> and only those services are running th
On Sun, 28 Jul 2013 18:13:24 -0400
Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> Hi
>
>
> > OK I fixed it by adding this:
> >
> > mkdir -p %{buildroot}%{_unitdir}/
> >
> > before copying the service file.
> >
> > It's always the most obvious and daft things!
> >
>
> Glad you found the solution. You might want to u
On 07/28/2013 02:41 PM, lee wrote:
Yes, so why don't they use 'disable' to disable something rather than
"masking" it so it isn't started during booting?
I think that the idea is that a service that's enabled is always started
at boot, one that's disabled doesn't get started until it's needed
lee writes:
Sam Varshavchik writes:
> lee writes:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> how does one get a clean installation of Fedora? "Clean" means that
>> only those packages are installed that are actually needed and only
>> those services are running that are actually needed.
>
> Very easy:
>
> Step 1: figure
On 07/28/2013 02:35 PM, lee wrote:
Package B doesn't need to and shouldn't be installed when the particular
functionality A can provide when B is installed is not needed.
You know that you're not going to need that functionality, but the
package management system doesn't. The only way it coul
On 07/28/2013 10:37 AM, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
Tim Evans writes:
Nearly everything seems to suggest that my fedup upgrade from F18 only
partially F19 succeeded.
$ cat /etc/fedora-release
Fedora release 19 (Schrödinger’s Cat)
$ head /var/log/boot.log
[ OK ] Started Show Plymouth Boot Screen.
Hello Roger,
Same symptoms, booting always fails the first time
while all subsequent attempts are successful.
What puzzles me, however, is that I experienced
for the first time one week ago this kind of problem
with F19 x64 Gnome and never with F15 or F17.
Quicksort
-Message d'origine-
Hi
> OK I fixed it by adding this:
>
> mkdir -p %{buildroot}%{_unitdir}/
>
> before copying the service file.
>
> It's always the most obvious and daft things!
>
Glad you found the solution. You might want to use install instead of cp
however and if you are interested in packaging this official
On 28/07/13 05:41 PM, lee wrote:
Joe Zeff writes:
On 07/28/2013 08:03 AM, lee wrote:
However, when I look at online dictionaries, they say that "disabled"
refers to people the abilities of which are somehow limited, so that
word won't be applicable here at all. Services are not people, and i
Reindl Harald writes:
> Am 28.07.2013 21:13, schrieb Erik P. Olsen:
>> On 28/07/13 17:07, lee wrote:
>>> how does one get a clean installation of Fedora? "Clean" means that
>>> only those packages are installed that are actually needed and only
>>> those services are running that are actually ne
Marko Vojinovic writes:
> On Sun, 28 Jul 2013 17:03:29 +0200
> lee wrote:
>> Tim writes:
>> > They might not *actually* need it. i.e. They *may* make use of it
>> > for some features, that you *might* use, so they require it for
>> > those purposes. But if you don't use those features, it doe
Sam Varshavchik writes:
> lee writes:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> how does one get a clean installation of Fedora? "Clean" means that
>> only those packages are installed that are actually needed and only
>> those services are running that are actually needed.
>
> Very easy:
>
> Step 1: figure out what packa
Joe Zeff writes:
> On 07/28/2013 08:03 AM, lee wrote:
>> However, when I look at online dictionaries, they say that "disabled"
>> refers to people the abilities of which are somehow limited, so that
>> word won't be applicable here at all. Services are not people, and it
>> is a bad idea to use
Digimer writes:
> On 28/07/13 11:07, lee wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> how does one get a clean installation of Fedora? "Clean" means that
>> only those packages are installed that are actually needed and only
>> those services are running that are actually needed.
>
> You can do a "minimal" install and t
"Erik P. Olsen" writes:
> On 28/07/13 17:07, lee wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> how does one get a clean installation of Fedora? "Clean" means that
>> only those packages are installed that are actually needed and only
>> those services are running that are actually needed.
>>
>>
> Needed by whome?
by the
On 28.07.2013 21:42, Ranjan Maitra wrote:
> On Sun, 28 Jul 2013 21:37:14 +0200 poma
> wrote:
>
>> On 28.07.2013 21:24, Ranjan Maitra wrote:
>>> Does anyone know if the following is available for Fedora 19?
>>>
>>> I don't think it is in the repos, but perhaps it is in some other
>>> auxiliary re
On Sun, 28 Jul 2013 21:37:14 +0200 poma
wrote:
> On 28.07.2013 21:24, Ranjan Maitra wrote:
> > Does anyone know if the following is available for Fedora 19?
> >
> > I don't think it is in the repos, but perhaps it is in some other
> > auxiliary repo?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Ranjan
> >
>
> Compto
On 28.07.2013 21:24, Ranjan Maitra wrote:
> Does anyone know if the following is available for Fedora 19?
>
> I don't think it is in the repos, but perhaps it is in some other
> auxiliary repo?
>
> Thanks,
> Ranjan
>
Compton, California?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2dyw6LZpSOA :)
poma
-
On 28.07.2013 11:47, François Patte wrote:
> Le 27/07/2013 20:37, poma a écrit :
>> On 27.07.2013 17:38, François Patte wrote:
>>> Le 26/07/2013 18:51, poma a écrit :
On 26.07.2013 18:31, François Patte wrote:
…
> I tried today to install f19 with xfce but it is such a chore that I
>>
Does anyone know if the following is available for Fedora 19?
I don't think it is in the repos, but perhaps it is in some other
auxiliary repo?
Thanks,
Ranjan
--
Important Notice: This mailbox is ignored: e-mails are set to be
deleted on receipt. For those needing to send personal or professio
On 28/07/13 17:07, lee wrote:
Hi,
how does one get a clean installation of Fedora? "Clean" means that
only those packages are installed that are actually needed and only
those services are running that are actually needed.
Needed by whome?
--
Erik
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedorapro
> You should know that top-posting and sending html messages to a mailing
> list are considered bad etiquette.
>
Sorry for that :<
Junayeed Ahnaf Nirjhor
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription optio
On Sun, 28 Jul 2013 19:08:20 +0100
আনন্দ কুমার সমাদ্দার Ananda Samaddar wrote:
> On Sun, 28 Jul 2013 20:01:42 +0200
> Reindl Harald wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > Am 28.07.2013 19:57, schrieb আনন্দ কুমার সমাদ্দার Ananda Samaddar:
> > > I can get kwakd to build and package properly apart from one
> > >
On 07/28/2013 08:03 AM, lee wrote:
However, when I look at online dictionaries, they say that "disabled"
refers to people the abilities of which are somehow limited, so that
word won't be applicable here at all. Services are not people, and it
is a bad idea to use misleading terms like this.
I
On Sun, 28 Jul 2013 20:01:42 +0200
Reindl Harald wrote:
>
>
> Am 28.07.2013 19:57, schrieb আনন্দ কুমার সমাদ্দার Ananda Samaddar:
> > I can get kwakd to build and package properly apart from one thing.
> > The systemd service file needs to be copied to the appropriate
> > directory and it doesn'
Hello all,
I'm attempting to package Kwakd for Fedora. I'm pretty new to rpm
packaging but have already managed to build and package some simple
stuff.
I can get kwakd to build and package properly apart from one thing.
The systemd service file needs to be copied to the appropriate
directory and
On Sun, 28 Jul 2013 23:40:01 +0600
Junayeed Ahnaf wrote:
> I play some games via steam and I need the proprietary driver for
> better gaming. I hope an update fixes the driver - kernel issue :)
>
> Junayeed Ahnaf Nirjhor
> Software Engineer @ Hulu
> Twitter @ Nirjhor
>
You should know that top
I play some games via steam and I need the proprietary driver for better
gaming. I hope an update fixes the driver - kernel issue :)
Junayeed Ahnaf Nirjhor
Software Engineer @ Hulu
Twitter @ Nirjhor
> Date: Sun, 28 Jul 2013 18:34:54 +0100
> From: asamad...@myopera.com
> To: users@lists.fedorapr
On Sun, 28 Jul 2013 23:19:21 +0600
Junayeed Ahnaf wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm using Linux 3.10.x kernel and I have AMD proprietary graphics
> driver running akmod. The 3.9.9 kernel series was working fine until
> the latest update came.
>
> Now I can't log in using the new kernel, tthe screen goes
My portable USB drive that usually automatically remounts after unmounting
with gnome-disks. I am running F19. I have to unmount several times before
it finally stays unmounted (at which point it also powers off). In F18, it
would always stay unmounted, but never power off. Is this a common problem
Hello,
I'm using Linux 3.10.x kernel and I have AMD proprietary graphics driver
running akmod. The 3.9.9 kernel series was working fine until the latest update
came.
Now I can't log in using the new kernel, tthe screen goes black and it logs
itself out. I can't even log back in.
The older ke
On 28/07/13 11:07, lee wrote:
Hi,
how does one get a clean installation of Fedora? "Clean" means that
only those packages are installed that are actually needed and only
those services are running that are actually needed.
You can do a "minimal" install and then install just the applications
On Sun, 28 Jul 2013 17:03:29 +0200
lee wrote:
> Tim writes:
> > They might not *actually* need it. i.e. They *may* make use of it
> > for some features, that you *might* use, so they require it for
> > those purposes. But if you don't use those features, it doesn't
> > need to be running.
>
>
On 07/28/2013 12:23 PM, Marko Vojinovic wrote:
On Sun, 28 Jul 2013 16:21:55 +0200
lee wrote:
Marko Vojinovic writes:
On Sun, 28 Jul 2013 00:58:24 +0200
lee wrote:
Hmm I disabled it now and will see what happens. There are 224
packages depending on the avahi package --- that's insane for
so
On Sun, 28 Jul 2013 16:21:55 +0200
lee wrote:
> Marko Vojinovic writes:
> > On Sun, 28 Jul 2013 00:58:24 +0200
> > lee wrote:
> >> Hmm I disabled it now and will see what happens. There are 224
> >> packages depending on the avahi package --- that's insane for
> >> something that isn't needed.
lee writes:
Hi,
how does one get a clean installation of Fedora? "Clean" means that
only those packages are installed that are actually needed and only
those services are running that are actually needed.
Very easy:
Step 1: figure out what packages and services you need.
Step 2: install jus
poma writes:
> For users prone to outsmart distro by diminishing app prints I recommend
> http://www.damnsmalllinux.org. ;)
When I look at what it has, I find it has lots of things I don't need
and not much I do need. They say that when you extend it, it turns into
a Debian system, and that is
Hi,
how does one get a clean installation of Fedora? "Clean" means that
only those packages are installed that are actually needed and only
those services are running that are actually needed.
--
Fedora release 19 (Schrödinger’s Cat)
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsu
Tim writes:
> Allegedly, on or about 28 July 2013, lee sent:
>> There are 224 packages depending on the avahi package --- that's
>> insane for something that isn't needed.
>>
>> Why are there so many packages depending on it?
>
> They might not *actually* need it. i.e. They *may* make use of i
Marko Vojinovic writes:
> On Sun, 28 Jul 2013 00:58:24 +0200
> lee wrote:
>
>> Timothy Murphy writes:
>>
>> > But my real query is whether avahi (or zeroconf)
>> > could actually offer me anything useful.
>>
>> Hmm I disabled it now and will see what happens. There are 224
>> packages depend
On Sun, Jul 28, 2013 at 9:06 AM, Tim Evans wrote:
> Kernel appears to be F18, though:
>
> $ uname -a
> Linux harrier.xxx.com 3.9.11-200.fc18.i686.PAE #1 SMP Mon Jul 22 21:19:06
> UTC 2013 i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux
>
I think in this case it's because the kernel is at a higher version in F18
than F
Tim Evans writes:
Nearly everything seems to suggest that my fedup upgrade from F18 only
partially F19 succeeded.
$ cat /etc/fedora-release
Fedora release 19 (Schrödinger’s Cat)
$ head /var/log/boot.log
[ OK ] Started Show Plymouth Boot Screen.
[ OK ] Reached target Basic System.
Welcom
On 07/28/2013 09:00 AM, Tim wrote:
> Allegedly, on or about 28 July 2013, lee sent:
>> There are 224 packages depending on the avahi package --- that's
>> insane for something that isn't needed.
>>
>> Why are there so many packages depending on it?
>
> They might not *actually* need it. i.e. The
Nearly everything seems to suggest that my fedup upgrade from F18 only
partially F19 succeeded.
$ cat /etc/fedora-release
Fedora release 19 (Schrödinger’s Cat)
$ head /var/log/boot.log
[ OK ] Started Show Plymouth Boot Screen.
[ OK ] Reached target Basic System.
Welcome to Fedora 19 (Schrö
On 28.07.2013, Alexander Volovics wrote:
> Are you not being a little harsh on the Intel GPU support.
> There might be 'TONS' of reports but I myself have experience
> with 6 Dell/Lenovo desktops/laptops (3 in house with daily use),
> Sandybridge and Ivybridge, and have never experienced 'Hangche
On Sun, Jul 28, 2013 at 01:26:47PM +0200, Heinz Diehl wrote:
> On 27.07.2013, valent.turko...@gmail.com wrote:
> > I'm considering buying a laptop with Nvidia Optimus, and this looks really
> > bad!
> Do yourself a favour and don't buy a laptop with optimus. I have one,
> and to spare you the
I am currently running many web sites that utilize HTML 5 and validate
each page with the HTML validator at http://validator.w3.org/ You can
validate via file upload or by address. While this is experimental, I
have found it to be an invaluable source.
I would also validate your Cascading Style Sh
On 27.07.2013, valent.turko...@gmail.com wrote:
> I'm considering buying a laptop with Nvidia Optimus, and this looks really
> bad!
Do yourself a favour and don't buy a laptop with optimus. I have one,
and to spare you the details: the nvidia gpu is not useable without a
lot of trouble. I finall
On Sun, 28 Jul 2013 10:23:52 +0100
Frank Murphy wrote:
Apologies for noise, was confusing udev with polkit :(
--
Regards,
Frank "When in doubt PANIC!"
I check for new mail app. 20min
www.frankly3d.com
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription o
On 07/28/2013 07:55 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 07/28/13 17:51, Roger wrote:
On 07/28/2013 07:29 PM, Frank Murphy wrote:
On Sun, 28 Jul 2013 19:23:44 +1000
Roger wrote:
Thanks, yum search Warning: No matches found for: lib32-libjpeg6
Warning: No matches found for: lib32-zlib
Warning: No matches
On 07/28/13 17:51, Roger wrote:
> On 07/28/2013 07:29 PM, Frank Murphy wrote:
>> On Sun, 28 Jul 2013 19:23:44 +1000
>> Roger wrote:
>>
>>> Thanks, yum search Warning: No matches found for: lib32-libjpeg6
>>> Warning: No matches found for: lib32-zlib
>>> Warning: No matches found for: lib32-libtiff
On 07/28/2013 07:29 PM, Frank Murphy wrote:
On Sun, 28 Jul 2013 19:23:44 +1000
Roger wrote:
Thanks, yum search Warning: No matches found for: lib32-libjpeg6
Warning: No matches found for: lib32-zlib
Warning: No matches found for: lib32-libtiff4
Warning: No matches found for: lib32-libv4l
No ma
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Le 27/07/2013 20:37, poma a écrit :
> On 27.07.2013 17:38, François Patte wrote:
>> Le 26/07/2013 18:51, poma a écrit :
>>> On 26.07.2013 18:31, François Patte wrote:
>>> …
I tried today to install f19 with xfce but it is such a chore that I
On Sun, 28 Jul 2013 19:23:44 +1000
Roger wrote:
> Thanks, yum search Warning: No matches found for: lib32-libjpeg6
> Warning: No matches found for: lib32-zlib
> Warning: No matches found for: lib32-libtiff4
> Warning: No matches found for: lib32-libv4l
> No matches found
> Probably zip files, I'l
Though F20, general Fedora js problem.
Following the link below:
http://raftaman.net/?p=300
4. Udev Auto-Magic
5. Mounting script
I know udev has changed to js,
Also due to the fact that USB stick can die,
I want to clone\copy(?) this on 4xusb sticks
So rather than manufacturer,
thinking of Lab
On 07/28/2013 06:29 PM, Frank Murphy wrote:
On Sun, 28 Jul 2013 18:11:20 +1000
Roger wrote:
depends=(lib32-libjpeg6 lib32-zlib lib32-libtiff4 lib32-libv4l
Look at the script you need these 32bit libs installed.
Doesn't matter if the 64bit libs are already installed.
so yum search those 32 bi
On Sat, Jul 27, 2013 at 03:47:03PM +0200, valent.turko...@gmail.com wrote:
> I'm considering buying a laptop with Nvidia Optimus, and this looks really
> bad! Have you managed to fix this issue? Did you get Fedora 19 to install?
> Do Ubuntu and Linux Mint work better with Nvidia Optimus graphics?
2013/7/28 Dave Johansen
> On Sat, Jul 27, 2013 at 2:01 PM, Alchemist wrote:
>
>>
>>
>>
>> 2013/7/27 Dave Johansen
>>
>>> I have a system that I upgraded from Fedora 18 to 19 recently and I
>>> just installed eclipse, but it says that there's no JVM when I try and
>>> run it. I noticed that /usr
On Sun, 28 Jul 2013 18:11:20 +1000
Roger wrote:
> depends=(lib32-libjpeg6 lib32-zlib lib32-libtiff4 lib32-libv4l
Look at the script you need these 32bit libs installed.
Doesn't matter if the 64bit libs are already installed.
so yum search those 32 bit libs, and install them
--
Regards,
Frank
On 07/28/13 16:20, Ed Greshko wrote:
> On 07/28/13 16:11, Roger wrote:
>> What does this do and where should it be placed?
>> http://pastebin.com/fFkt6pri
>> Seems it's for x86x64 but not very helpful.
> It should not be placed anywhere
>
> This is part of the packaging of brosix in archlinux.
On 07/28/13 16:11, Roger wrote:
> What does this do and where should it be placed?
> http://pastebin.com/fFkt6pri
> Seems it's for x86x64 but not very helpful.
It should not be placed anywhere
This is part of the packaging of brosix in archlinux.
--
Getting tired of non-Fedora discussions a
Hello,
I'm fighting with my sound card, which is X-Fi Xtreme Audio (Creative
Labs [SB X-Fi Xtreme Audio] CA0110-IBG). Everything but headphones works
perfectly. When jack is plugged correctly, headphones are identified and
shown in GNOME sound applet, but there is no sound. When jack is plugged
pa
On 07/28/2013 03:36 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 07/28/13 13:04, Roger wrote:
Trying to run Brosix.
rpm installed it ok - it's in /usr/bin/brosix but will not start from the menu
or terminal.
In terminal $ brosix
/usr/share/brosix/Brosix.bin: error while loading shared libraries:
libv4l2.so.0: ca
On 07/28/13 15:13, Roger wrote:
> On 07/28/2013 03:36 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:
>> On 07/28/13 13:04, Roger wrote:
>>> Trying to run Brosix.
>>> rpm installed it ok - it's in /usr/bin/brosix but will not start from the
>>> menu or terminal.
>>> In terminal $ brosix
>>> /usr/share/brosix/Brosix.bin: e
On 07/28/2013 03:36 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 07/28/13 13:04, Roger wrote:
Trying to run Brosix.
rpm installed it ok - it's in /usr/bin/brosix but will not start from the menu
or terminal.
In terminal $ brosix
/usr/share/brosix/Brosix.bin: error while loading shared libraries:
libv4l2.so.0: ca
Allegedly, on or about 26 July 2013, Richard Vickery sent:
> I suppose I am answering my own question when I suggest the
> supposition that I can open files in a web-browser.
A web browser has never been a suitable test for HTML (or other similar
languages). It doesn't point out errors, it makes
Allegedly, on or about 28 July 2013, lee sent:
> There are 224 packages depending on the avahi package --- that's
> insane for something that isn't needed.
>
> Why are there so many packages depending on it?
They might not *actually* need it. i.e. They *may* make use of it for
some features, th
95 matches
Mail list logo
