On 5 Aug 2013 03:28, "Gregory Hosler" wrote:
>
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Hi all,
>
> I have a Samsong phone. I used to mount it as Mass Storage (selected on
the
> phone) over the micro usb connection, to copy files to/from.
>
> Starting with kernel 3.10.3-300.fc19.x86_6
Hi folks! :-)
Before I go complain to my ISP, I'd like to hear if anyone can give me
an idea what is going on with my networks... :-)
I have two machines, with following link properties:
local --- 20Mbps/2Mbps (GSM wireless)
remote --- 100Mbps/100Mbps (100Mbit LAN connected to optical uplink)
On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 01:09:09PM +0100, Marko Vojinovic wrote:
>
> Hi folks! :-)
>
> Before I go complain to my ISP, I'd like to hear if anyone can give me
> an idea what is going on with my networks... :-)
>
> I have two machines, with following link properties:
>
> local --- 20Mbps/2Mbps (
On Tue, 13 Aug 2013 08:55:44 -0400
Fred Smith wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 01:09:09PM +0100, Marko Vojinovic wrote:
> >
> > Another test of the local link --- I went to
> >
> > http://fedoraproject.org/get-fedora
> >
> > and clicked the big blue "download now" button, to download the Live
On 08/13/2013 07:09 AM, Marko Vojinovic wrote:
>
> Hi folks! :-)
>
> Before I go complain to my ISP, I'd like to hear if anyone can give me
> an idea what is going on with my networks... :-)
>
> I have two machines, with following link properties:
>
> local --- 20Mbps/2Mbps (GSM wireless)
> r
On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 3:17 PM, William Mattison wrote:
> Problem: That progress bar shows no progress. I checked task usage of
> CPU, and CPU usage of Brasero is negligible. Even after many minutes,
> nothing seems to happen. What am I not doing that I should do, and/or
> doing that I should
On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 7:09 AM, Marko Vojinovic wrote:
>
> Hi folks! :-)
>
> Before I go complain to my ISP, I'd like to hear if anyone can give me
> an idea what is going on with my networks... :-)
>
> I have two machines, with following link properties:
>
> local --- 20Mbps/2Mbps (GSM wireles
On 13.08.2013 14:09, Marko Vojinovic wrote:
…
> Any ideas how to troubleshoot this?
>
Tell to ISP.
> Also, any ideas what to tell to my ISP?
>
You've already said here. :)
> I could ask them to look into it, but they just might open a bunch of
> youtube links, verify that the link works, and bl
If I run WindowsXP in a VM am I looking at Windows security risks? I
have whatever protection Fedora 19 delivers out of the box and my DD-WRT
router. I am still uneasy booting Windows ... There are no Windows boxes
on my LAN, only Apple stuff in addition to mine.
Comments?
Bob
--
http://w
On 13/08/13 12:06, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 13.08.2013 18:00, schrieb Bob Goodwin ~ Zuni:
If I run WindowsXP in a VM am I looking at Windows security risks? I have
whatever protection Fedora 19 delivers
out of the box and my DD-WRT router. I am still uneasy booting Windows ...
There are no Win
On Tue, 13 Aug 2013 10:00:59 -0500
Dale Dellutri wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 7:09 AM, Marko Vojinovic
> wrote:
> >
> > Before I go complain to my ISP, I'd like to hear if anyone can give
> > me an idea what is going on with my networks... :-)
> >
> > I have two machines, with following link
On 8/13/2013 12:11 PM, Bob Goodwin ~ Zuni, Virginia, USA wrote:
> On 13/08/13 12:06, Reindl Harald wrote:
>>
>> Am 13.08.2013 18:00, schrieb Bob Goodwin ~ Zuni:
>>> If I run WindowsXP in a VM am I looking at Windows security risks? I
>>> have whatever protection Fedora 19 delivers
>>> out of the bo
Since I made the switch to a 64 bit machine (still using 32 bit Fedora
19) there is a long delay just before lightdm comes up with the login
screen.
Can someone take a look at this output and perhaps point out why and
where it's occurring ? By the way I don't use LVM or raid...can I disable
thes
On 08/13/2013 11:00 AM, Bob Goodwin ~ Zuni, Virginia, USA wrote:
>
> If I run WindowsXP in a VM am I looking at Windows security risks? I
> have whatever protection Fedora 19 delivers out of the box and my DD-WRT
> router. I am still uneasy booting Windows ... There are no Windows boxes
> on my LA
On 13/08/13 12:58, Steven Stern wrote:
If XP has access to resources on the host machine (e.g., shared
directories) or assets on your network, you need to treat it like any
Windows machine. Use decent anti-malware software and keep it up to date.
-- -- Steve
That's sufficient I guess, I've do
On 08/13/2013 12:12 PM, Bob Goodwin ~ Zuni, Virginia, USA wrote:
> On 13/08/13 12:58, Steven Stern wrote:
>> If XP has access to resources on the host machine (e.g., shared
>> directories) or assets on your network, you need to treat it like any
>> Windows machine. Use decent anti-malware software
On 13.08.2013 18:49, Frank wrote:
> Since I made the switch to a 64 bit machine (still using 32 bit Fedora
> 19) there is a long delay just before lightdm comes up with the login
> screen.
> Can someone take a look at this output and perhaps point out why and
> where it's occurring ? By the way I d
On Tue, 13 Aug 2013 12:49:13 -0400
Frank wrote:
> Since I made the switch to a 64 bit machine (still using 32 bit
> Fedora 19) there is a long delay just before lightdm comes up with
> the login screen.
> Can someone take a look at this output and perhaps point out why and
> where it's occurring
On 08/13/2013 01:24 PM, poma wrote:
On 13.08.2013 18:49, Frank wrote:
Since I made the switch to a 64 bit machine (still using 32 bit Fedora
19) there is a long delay just before lightdm comes up with the login
screen.
///snip///
[frank@localhost ~]$ sudo systemd-analyze blame
19.
On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 05:18:32PM +0100, Marko Vojinovic wrote:
> On Tue, 13 Aug 2013 10:00:59 -0500
> Dale Dellutri wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 7:09 AM, Marko Vojinovic
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > Before I go complain to my ISP, I'd like to hear if anyone can give
> > > me an idea what is goi
On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 02:00:33PM -0400, Frank wrote:
> On 08/13/2013 01:24 PM, poma wrote:
> >On 13.08.2013 18:49, Frank wrote:
> >>Since I made the switch to a 64 bit machine (still using 32 bit Fedora
> >>19) there is a long delay just before lightdm comes up with the login
> >>screen.
>
> ///
On 08/13/2013 02:50 PM, Fred Smith wrote:
On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 02:00:33PM -0400, Frank wrote:
On 08/13/2013 01:24 PM, poma wrote:
On 13.08.2013 18:49, Frank wrote:
Since I made the switch to a 64 bit machine (still using 32 bit Fedora
19) there is a long delay just before lightdm comes up w
I've been using scanimage for years with an HP3055 MFP which is network
attached. Suddenly, it stopped working at --resolution=1200. The only
thing I can remember upgrading was/is the kernel, but even going back to
the 3.7.3-101.fc17 kernel and downgrading everything does not help.
Most intrig
Dana 13.08.2013 20:00, Frank je napisao:
> On 08/13/2013 01:24 PM, poma wrote:
>> On 13.08.2013 18:49, Frank wrote:
>>> Since I made the switch to a 64 bit machine (still using 32 bit Fedora
>>> 19) there is a long delay just before lightdm comes up with the login
>>> screen.
>
…
>>> [frank@local
On 08/13/2013 05:28 PM, poma wrote:
Dana 13.08.2013 20:00, Frank je napisao:
On 08/13/2013 01:24 PM, poma wrote:
On 13.08.2013 18:49, Frank wrote:
Since I made the switch to a 64 bit machine (still using 32 bit Fedora
19) there is a long delay just before lightdm comes up with the login
screen
So32-bit software on a 64-bit CPU sometimes may not be all it's
cracked up to be :)
Boy, Poma, if you can't figure it outI doubt anyone here can -
I've been following your various and sundry suggestions to users
closely and you are usually close to, if not on the mark.
Is this wor
On 13/08/13 08:40 PM, Roger wrote:
So32-bit software on a 64-bit CPU sometimes may not be all it's
cracked up to be :)
Boy, Poma, if you can't figure it outI doubt anyone here can -
I've been following your various and sundry suggestions to users
closely and you are usually close to,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 08/14/2013 12:49 AM, Frank wrote:
> Since I made the switch to a 64 bit machine (still using 32 bit Fedora 19)
> there is a long delay just before lightdm comes up with the login screen.
> Can someone take a look at this output and perhaps point ou
On 08/13/2013 10:07 PM, Frank wrote:
On 13/08/13 08:40 PM, Roger wrote:
So32-bit software on a 64-bit CPU sometimes may not be all it's
cracked up to be :)
Boy, Poma, if you can't figure it outI doubt anyone here can -
I've been following your various and sundry suggestions to users
I yum removed nodejs which removed all v8 s as well
then yum installed nodejs which installed Package v8.x86_64
1:3.14.5.10-1.fc19
Rails requires nodejs which requires v8.
v8 is buggy and will not update with sudo yum update
Resolving Dependencies
--> Running transaction check
---> Package v8.x
30 matches
Mail list logo
