Hi there!
We have the following configuration in our lab: multifunctional
(printer+scanner) device canon mf4410 is connected to the usb port of a
router. Router is netgear WNR3500L and is configured to share this printer
to every computer in the lab. What steps should I take to make my fedora17
On Sun, 25 Aug 2013 22:12:34 -0700
Joe Zeff j...@zeff.us wrote:
On 08/25/2013 09:21 PM, Marko Vojinovic wrote:
While I respect Joe Zeff as a reputable member of this list, those
instructions on fedoraforum are a total piece of crap. I don't know
who wrote those instructions, but
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Thanks to all that originally responded.
I bugzilled, and it happens that this was a kernel bug, appearing only in the
3.10.4 kernels. The latest 3.10.7-200 works correctly again.
All the best,
- -Greg
On 08/05/2013 10:28 AM, Gregory Hosler wrote:
On 08/26/2013 12:20 AM, Marko Vojinovic wrote:
* Any of the remaining stuff about PAE kernels, selinux policies, grub
tweaking and manually blacklisting nouveau should be frown upon. Not
only that those things are not necessary for the installation of the
driver, but moreover they can
On Sun, Aug 25, 2013 at 7:00 PM, Les Howell hlhow...@pacbell.net wrote:
What is the key to getting MATE installed and run on a user?
sudo yum groupinstall MATE Desktop
Will the GNOME3 version of Evolution, Firefox, etc all run?
Should do, but it's easier just to try it. If you don't like
On 08/26/2013 09:20 AM, Marko Vojinovic wrote:
On Sun, 25 Aug 2013 22:12:34 -0700
Joe Zeff j...@zeff.us wrote:
On 08/25/2013 09:21 PM, Marko Vojinovic wrote:
While I respect Joe Zeff as a reputable member of this list, those
instructions on fedoraforum are a total piece of crap. I don't know
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 08/26/2013 02:00 AM, Les Howell wrote:
My wife doesn't like the GNOME3 desktop. She did like GNOME2, so I have
found that MATE desktop is a fork of GNOME2. I have looked at the software
menu (on x86_64 F19) and see lots of stuff related to
On 26/08/13 19:01, Harald Hoyer wrote:
On 08/26/2013 09:20 AM, Marko Vojinovic wrote:
On Sun, 25 Aug 2013 22:12:34 -0700
Joe Zeff j...@zeff.us wrote:
On 08/25/2013 09:21 PM, Marko Vojinovic wrote:
While I respect Joe Zeff as a reputable member of this list, those
instructions on fedoraforum
On 26.08.2013 11:01, Harald Hoyer wrote:
/boot/initramfs-$(uname -r).img is the default value of the first argument and
can be omitted.
$(uname -r) is the default value of the second argument and can be omitted.
So, this results in
# dracut
True. :)
$(uname -r) is the default value
Am 24.08.2013 00:19, schrieb Jim:
On 08/23/2013 05:45 PM, Mateusz Marzantowicz wrote:
On 23.08.2013 23:40, Jim wrote:
On 08/23/2013 05:29 PM, Rick Stevens wrote:
Mount point is ;
rwx--. 25 mickey mickey 8192 Dec 31 1969 /run/media/mickey/0A73-237A
I ran mount -o remount,rw
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=319901
looks like Redhat based systems are the only remaining
which does not support EECDHE which is a shame these
days in context of PRISM and more and more Ciphers
are going to be unuseable (BEAST/CRIME weakness)
Am 25.08.2013 19:20, schrieb Tom Horsley:
Given that, I've had to develop my own theory:
The mei module is actually the primary back door
for the NSA to access linux systems. Why else would
they go to so much trouble to generate so much obfuscated
non-documentation for it?
*stop* spread
Am 25.08.2013 20:00, schrieb Tom Horsley:
On Sun, 25 Aug 2013 12:37:03 -0500
Steven Stern wrote:
http://lmgtfy.com/?q=mei+kernel+modulel=1
http://lmgtfy.com/?q=Intel+Management+Engine+
And the results of such searches are all those words
which are concatenated together and say
Am 25.08.2013 22:41, schrieb g:
On 08/25/2013 03:04 PM, Mateusz Marzantowicz wrote:
I don't think you understood my comment correctly. OP is writing about
some mysterious kernel module and I just pointed him to module's
source code. I'm not posting any proofs because I'm not claiming
Am 25.08.2013 20:00, schrieb Les Howell:
My wife doesn't like the GNOME3 desktop. She did like GNOME2, so I have
found that MATE desktop is a fork of GNOME2. I have looked at the
software menu (on x86_64 F19) and see lots of stuff related to MATE.
What is the key to getting MATE installed
Am 25.08.2013 22:49, schrieb g:
On 08/25/2013 03:43 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
it was *sarcasm* because the thread-starter did spread FUD
is this really so hard to understand?
really?
so now you are a physic telepathic too?
i do not need to be a physic telepathic
i only need to follow
Am 26.08.2013 13:26, schrieb Jan-Frode Myklebust:
On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 11:07:29AM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
On 08/24/2013 11:38 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=319901
looks like Redhat based systems are the only remaining
which does not support
Am 26.08.2013 11:07, schrieb Florian Weimer:
On 08/24/2013 11:38 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=319901
looks like Redhat based systems are the only remaining
which does not support EECDHE which is a shame these
days in context of PRISM and more and
On Sun, 25 Aug 2013 19:49:47 +0200
Reindl Harald wrote:
*stop* spread such unqualified FUD in the public and RTFM
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intel_Active_Management_Technology
And this wikipedia article is yet another example of a
detailed desciption that says everything AMT does is
behind
On 08/26/2013 01:53 AM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
On Sun, Aug 25, 2013 at 7:00 PM, Les Howell hlhow...@pacbell.net
mailto:hlhow...@pacbell.net wrote:
What is the key to getting MATE installed and run on a user?
sudo yum groupinstall MATE Desktop
Will the GNOME3 version of
2013/8/24 Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=319901
looks like Redhat based systems are the only remaining
which does not support EECDHE which is a shame these
days in context of PRISM and more and more Ciphers
are going to be unuseable
Hi,
Either upgrade release by release or do fresh install from f17 to f18.
Although it might be possible do upgrade from f17 to f19, I don't
recommend it because too much have changed between f17 and f19.
I've done this twice. My laptop went perfectly. My desktop hung at
about 60%,
I've suddenly had to retype a bunch of passwords, including banking
passwords, in firefox and thunderbird. I had selinux disabled on my PC
and notebook and reactivated it. The strange thing is that thunderbird
did not lose all of my email passwords, only one. The same on my PC. I
am being
On 26.08.2013, Alchemist wrote:
Very good discussion. This is an important issue. OpenSSL with Elliptic
Curve was added to the http://rpmfusion.org/Wishlist, but the question
remains open
Is the crypto the real problem (=weakest link), or is it something else? I
guess that would be the
On 08/25/2013 12:49 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 25.08.2013 19:20, schrieb Tom Horsley:
Given that, I've had to develop my own theory:
The mei module is actually the primary back door
for the NSA to access linux systems. Why else would
they go to so much trouble to generate so much obfuscated
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 08/26/2013 10:14 AM, linuxnuts...@videotron.ca wrote:
I've suddenly had to retype a bunch of passwords, including banking
passwords, in firefox and thunderbird. I had selinux disabled on my PC and
notebook and reactivated it. The strange thing
2013/8/26 linuxnuts...@videotron.ca
I've suddenly had to retype a bunch of passwords, including banking
passwords, in firefox and thunderbird. I had selinux disabled on my PC and
notebook and reactivated it. The strange thing is that thunderbird did not
lose all of my email passwords, only
Am 26.08.2013 16:39, schrieb g:
On 08/25/2013 12:49 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 25.08.2013 19:20, schrieb Tom Horsley:
Given that, I've had to develop my own theory:
The mei module is actually the primary back door
for the NSA to access linux systems. Why else would
they go to so much
Am 26.08.2013 16:24, schrieb Chuck Anderson:
On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 11:17:52AM +0200, Reindl Harald wrote:
cause and effect
because Fedora does *not* support Ciphers without large performance impacts
in reality without ECDHE you have no way
go to https://www.ssllabs.com/ssltest/ and look
On 08/26/2013 10:01 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
i referred to wikipedia because *every* article there has references so if
you are so gently and scroll down or click on the anchors on top you find a
ton of links referring to Intel websites and PDF's
a virgin, i am not, to wiki*, having been
Hi
On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 9:59 AM, Ben Greear wrote:
One thing I noticed, 'gdm' appears to use gnome-shell, so if you have a
system w/out
accelerated graphics, your CPU will still be eaten by gnome-shell even if
you log into
MATE.
Is that an actual experience or are you speculating?
Allegedly, on or about 25 August 2013, Joe Zeff sent:
*WE ARE THE VOGONS! RESISTANCE IS USELESS!*
I think the cybermen managed to predate the Vogans and Borg with the
resistance is useless, and you will become like us, threats, in the
1960s. ;-)
--
All mail to my mailbox is automatically
On 08/26/2013 08:28 AM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
Hi
On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 9:59 AM, Ben Greear wrote:
One thing I noticed, 'gdm' appears to use gnome-shell, so if you have a
system w/out
accelerated graphics, your CPU will still be eaten by gnome-shell even if
you log into
MATE.
On 08/26/2013 11:20 AM, Tim wrote:
Allegedly, on or about 25 August 2013, Joe Zeff sent:
*WE ARE THE VOGONS! RESISTANCE IS USELESS!*
I think the cybermen managed to predate the Vogans and Borg with the
resistance is useless, and you will become like us, threats, in the
1960s. ;-)
On Mon, 2013-08-26 at 10:57 +0400, Hiisi wrote:
Hi there!
We have the following configuration in our lab: multifunctional
(printer+scanner) device canon mf4410 is connected to the usb port of
a router. Router is netgear WNR3500L and is configured to share this
printer to every computer in the
On 08/26/2013 09:20 AM, Tim wrote:
Allegedly, on or about 25 August 2013, Joe Zeff sent:
*WE ARE THE VOGONS! RESISTANCE IS USELESS!*
I think the cybermen managed to predate the Vogans and Borg with the
resistance is useless, and you will become like us, threats, in the
1960s. ;-)
Well, I
Am 26.08.2013 19:10, schrieb Joe Zeff:
On 08/26/2013 09:20 AM, Tim wrote:
Allegedly, on or about 25 August 2013, Joe Zeff sent:
*WE ARE THE VOGONS! RESISTANCE IS USELESS!*
I think the cybermen managed to predate the Vogans and Borg with the
resistance is useless, and you will become like
On 08/26/2013 11:22 AM, Alchemist wrote:
2013/8/26 linuxnuts...@videotron.ca mailto:linuxnuts...@videotron.ca
I've suddenly had to retype a bunch of passwords, including banking
passwords, in firefox and thunderbird. I had selinux disabled on my
PC and notebook and reactivated
On Mon, 2013-08-26 at 09:53 +0100, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
sudo yum groupinstall MATE Desktop
Thanks, Pat,
This will help. I did look through the software list, but couldn't
figure out the root of the desktop.
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe
2013/8/26 linuxnuts...@videotron.ca
On 08/26/2013 11:22 AM, Alchemist wrote:
2013/8/26 linuxnuts...@videotron.ca
mailto:linuxnutster@**videotron.calinuxnuts...@videotron.ca
I've suddenly had to retype a bunch of passwords, including banking
passwords, in firefox and
Hello,
Updated from F17 to F19 with a fresh install, and have hit a few
problems. The main one is that my wireless interface does not come up
(it is an Atheros AR9170 device).
I configured it in F17 without NetworkManager by modifying
the /etc/wpa_supplicant/wpa_supplicant.conf
and
When I attempt to login to receive my email from yahoo.com the password is not
recognized. If I login from the yahoo web page with the same password i am able
to retreve my incoming messages. I am using Server (pop.mail.yahoo.com) Port
110. I have encryption turned off. The Authentication is
Have you got Access Yahoo! Mail via POP turned on in your mail settings on
the yahoo site?
PK
Sent from my iPhone
On 2013-08-26, at 2:04 PM, Ron rcher...@excite.com wrote:
When I attempt to login to receive my email from yahoo.com the password is
not recognized. If I login from the yahoo
hello john,
On 08/26/2013 01:39 PM, John Horne wrote:
Hello,
Updated from F17 to F19 with a fresh install, and have hit a few
problems. The main one is that my wireless interface does not come up
(it is an Atheros AR9170 device).
i do not recall exactly when something similar was
On Mon, 2013-08-26 at 15:46 -0500, g wrote:
hello john,
On 08/26/2013 01:39 PM, John Horne wrote:
Hello,
Updated from F17 to F19 with a fresh install, and have hit a few
problems. The main one is that my wireless interface does not come up
(it is an Atheros AR9170 device).
i do
Is it possible to do a re installation of Fedora 19 where the file
system is LVM on a 2nd partition on my hard drive without losing files
in the /home directory structure?
There was a discussion about this some time ago but I didn't take much
notice then.
TIA
Roger
--
users mailing list
And the winner is
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=100
Should we cry or laugh!?
poma
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Fedora Code of Conduct:
Allegedly, on or about 26 August 2013, g sent:
showing our age, are we not. ;=)
No point acquiring it if you can't show it off... ;-)
Though, in my defence, I'll say that I didn't get to see them the first
time around.
--
All mail to my mailbox is automatically deleted, there is no point
On 08/27/2013 08:04 AM, Roger wrote:
Is it possible to do a re installation of Fedora 19 where the file
system is LVM on a 2nd partition on my hard drive without losing files
in the /home directory structure?
There was a discussion about this some time ago but I didn't take much
notice then.
On 08/27/2013 08:16 AM, poma wrote:
And the winner is
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=100
Should we cry or laugh!?
poma
A smile and tears of pride from me, for Bugzilla having faithfully and
tirelessly served millions over the years... :-)
--
Regards,
Rejy M
On 27/08/13 14:04, Rejy M Cyriac wrote:
On 08/27/2013 08:04 AM, Roger wrote:
Is it possible to do a re installation of Fedora 19 where the file
system is LVM on a 2nd partition on my hard drive without losing files
in the /home directory structure?
There was a discussion about this some time
On 08/26/2013 09:04 PM, Rejy M Cyriac wrote:
You can re-install, as long as you maintain the same LVM structure in
partitioning, and you can retain files if do not choose to reformat the
logical volume for '/home'
Just be sure to back /home up before you start. It may take a little
time, but
On 08/27/2013 10:17 AM, Roger wrote:
On 27/08/13 14:04, Rejy M Cyriac wrote:
On 08/27/2013 08:04 AM, Roger wrote:
Is it possible to do a re installation of Fedora 19 where the file
system is LVM on a 2nd partition on my hard drive without losing files
in the /home directory structure?
There
On Tuesday, August 27, 2013 12:32:50 PM Tim wrote:
Allegedly, on or about 26 August 2013, g sent:
showing our age, are we not. ;=)
No point acquiring it if you can't show it off... ;-)
Though, in my defence, I'll say that I didn't get to see them the first
time around.
Dr Who is
54 matches
Mail list logo
