Re: Anyone upgraded from F19 to F20 with yum?

On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 06:23:35PM -0600, Ian Pilcher wrote: > On 01/14/2014 04:56 PM, Timothy Murphy wrote: > > As a matter of interest, what is the advantage of doing this > > rather than using fedup? > > In my case, I still use GRUB legacy as my bootloader. AFAIK, fedup > doesn't work with thi

Re: Anyone upgraded from F19 to F20 with yum?

On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 11:56:13PM +0100, Timothy Murphy wrote: > Suvayu Ali wrote: > > > On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 04:41:44PM -0600, Ian Pilcher wrote: > >> Any gotchas that I should be aware of? > > > > I did it the week of the release and didn't hit anything. > > As a matter of interest, what i

Re: Anyone upgraded from F19 to F20 with yum?

On Tue, 14 Jan 2014 23:56:13 +0100 Timothy Murphy wrote: > Suvayu Ali wrote: > > > On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 04:41:44PM -0600, Ian Pilcher wrote: > >> Any gotchas that I should be aware of? > > > > I did it the week of the release and didn't hit anything. > > As a matter of interest, what is the

Re: What is Gnome Screensaver?

Re: What is Gnome Screensaver? Ans: Neutered... Even as far back as, at least, Fedora 17, Gnome's screensaver will only blank the screen. I miss the picture slide show screensaver, and installing the old X screensaver was a seriously broken attempt at getting that feature back again. It's as b

Re: What is Gnome Screensaver?

Around 10:29am on Wednesday, January 15, 2014 (UK time), Tim wrote: > Even as far back as, at least, Fedora 17, Gnome's screensaver will only > blank the screen. I miss the picture slide show screensaver, and > installing the old X screensaver was a seriously broken attempt at > getting that feat

Re: Audio problems

This could be related to a regression I am seeing on Fedora 20. Pretty much every time a user logs in (or switch user) on Fedora 20 with KDE the audio output defaults to "headphones" and I have to manually change it to "line out", even though there is nothing connected to the headphones socke

qcad

Hello, qcad-2.0.5.0-17.fc18.i686 fails on a fedora 20 distribution. Is there a plan to have is working. the srpm does not seem to be available! Thank === Patrick DUPRÉ                                 | | email: pdu...@gmx

Re: qcad

On Wed, 15 Jan 2014 13:01:42 +0100 "Patrick Dupre" wrote: > Hello, > > qcad-2.0.5.0-17.fc18.i686 > fails on a fedora 20 distribution. > > Is there a plan to have is working. > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/qcad Orphaned ___ Regards, Frank www.frankly3d.com -- users maili

Re: qcad

On 01/15/2014 06:01 AM, Patrick Dupre wrote: Hello, qcad-2.0.5.0-17.fc18.i686 fails on a fedora 20 distribution. Is there a plan to have is working. the srpm does not seem to be available! Thank To solve this, I downloaded the community edition of qcad from http://www.ribbonsoft.com/en/qcad

Re: Anyone upgraded from F19 to F20 with yum?

On Tue, 14 Jan 2014, Ian Pilcher wrote: Any gotchas that I should be aware of? When I returned to my laptop after running yum (via fedora-upgrade) I found a black screen, unresponsive to the keyboard and over the network. I rebooted with Alt-SysRq-b and it came back up fine, with yum appare

Re: qcad

I downloaded qcad-2.0.5.0-21.fc19.src.rpm Then: rpmbuild --rebuild Downloads/qcad-2.0.5.0-21.fc19.src.rpm and finally installed it. But I have the same issue: It should crash the graphic environment and the gnome session! > > On 01/15/2014 06:01 AM, Patrick Dupre wrote: > > Hello, > > > > qcad

Re: qcad

The version from this site: http://www.qcad.org/en/blog/137-qcad-3-3-2 Is at version 3.3.2 and was updated recently (Sep 2013) Perhaps it can get un-retired? Richard -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.o

Re: qcad

On Wed, 15 Jan 2014 08:05:18 -0600 Richard Shaw wrote: > Perhaps it can get un-retired? > > Richard Blocked: http://bugzilla.redhat.com/907111 ___ Regards, Frank www.frankly3d.com -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admi

Re: qcad

2014-01-15 13:01, Patrick Dupre skrev: > Hello, > > qcad-2.0.5.0-17.fc18.i686 > fails on a fedora 20 distribution. > > Is there a plan to have is working. > > the srpm does not seem to be available! > Look att following URL: http://www.qcad.org/en/qcad-downloads-trial -- Med vänliga hälsning

Re: qcad

On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 8:14 AM, Frank Murphy wrote: > On Wed, 15 Jan 2014 08:05:18 -0600 > Richard Shaw wrote: > > > Perhaps it can get un-retired? > > > > Richard > > Blocked: > http://bugzilla.redhat.com/907111 The main body of the latest version is now GPLv3 licensed but I'm not sure about

Re: qcad

Ok, doing a little preliminary work, I can't find any non-free licenses in the current release per their own LICENSE.txt and gpl-3.0-exceptions.txt files. Now there could be a incompatible mix of FOSS licenses but I could use a an expert here... Looking at the licenses that licensecheck recognizes

Re: qcad

On Wed, 15 Jan 2014 08:54:19 -0600 Richard Shaw wrote: https://github.com/qcad/qcad/blob/master/fonts/hershey.readme ? ___ Regards, Frank www.frankly3d.com -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailm

Is this an RPMFusion problem? librtmp.so conflict

$sudo yum update Loaded plugins: langpacks, refresh-packagekit Resolving Dependencies --> Running transaction check ---> Package gstreamer-plugins-bad.x86_64 0:0.10.23-4.fc20 will be updated ---> Package gstreamer-plugins-bad.x86_64 0:0.10.23-5.fc20 will be an update ---> Package gstreamer1-plugin

Re: Is this an RPMFusion problem? librtmp.so conflict

On 01/15/2014 09:00 AM, Steven Stern wrote: > $sudo yum update > > Loaded plugins: langpacks, refresh-packagekit > Resolving Dependencies > --> Running transaction check > ---> Package gstreamer-plugins-bad.x86_64 0:0.10.23-4.fc20 will be updated > ---> Package gstreamer-plugins-bad.x86_64 0:0.10.

Re: qcad

On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 8:56 AM, Frank Murphy wrote: > On Wed, 15 Jan 2014 08:54:19 -0600 > Richard Shaw wrote: > > https://github.com/qcad/qcad/blob/master/fonts/hershey.readme ? > > I guess this is what I find confusing... This indicates it's in the Public Domain... Looking at the Fedora accep

Re: qcad

On Wed, 15 Jan 2014 10:31:57 -0600 Richard Shaw wrote: > On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 8:56 AM, Frank Murphy > wrote: > > > On Wed, 15 Jan 2014 08:54:19 -0600 > > Richard Shaw wrote: > > > > https://github.com/qcad/qcad/blob/master/fonts/hershey.readme ? > > > > > I guess this is what I find confusi

Re: qcad

On Wed, 15 Jan 2014 10:44:56 -0600 Richard Shaw wrote: estrictions being bad in general, the two listed don't appear to > be particularly onerous. Is that the only problem? I looked through > the bug report and even following the links to the debian bugs but > there seems to be a severe lack of s

Re: qcad

On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 10:34 AM, Frank Murphy wrote: > On Wed, 15 Jan 2014 10:31:57 -0600 > Richard Shaw wrote: > > > On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 8:56 AM, Frank Murphy > > wrote: > > > > > On Wed, 15 Jan 2014 08:54:19 -0600 > > > Richard Shaw wrote: > > > > > > https://github.com/qcad/qcad/blob/m

Re: qcad

On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 10:46 AM, Frank Murphy wrote: > On Wed, 15 Jan 2014 10:44:56 -0600 > Richard Shaw wrote: > estrictions being bad in general, the two listed don't appear to > > be particularly onerous. Is that the only problem? I looked through > > the bug report and even following the l

Re: qcad

On Wed, 15 Jan 2014 10:52:05 -0600 Richard Shaw wrote: > > Without specifics I don't even know if the situation is different > > now with > the 3.X releases. If LibreCAD is a good replacement then there may be > no point. > > Richard That is the way to go, he's usually on the ball. Those that n

Re: qcad

On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 10:54 AM, Frank Murphy wrote: > On Wed, 15 Jan 2014 10:52:05 -0600 > Richard Shaw wrote: > > > > Without specifics I don't even know if the situation is different > > > now with > > the 3.X releases. If LibreCAD is a good replacement then there may be > > no point. > > >

Re: qcad

On Wed, 15 Jan 2014 10:52:05 -0600, Richard Shaw wrote: > Without specifics I don't even know if the situation is different now with > the 3.X releases. Well, you could download the old src.rpm as used by Fedora and try to verify whether what's written in bug 907111 is true. Then compare with the

Re: qcad

> > On Wed, 15 Jan 2014 10:52:05 -0600 > Richard Shaw wrote: > > > > Without specifics I don't even know if the situation is different > > > now with > > the 3.X releases. If LibreCAD is a good replacement then there may be > > no point. Are the librecad and qcad library compatible? Why lib

Re: example kickstart (ks.cfg)

On Jan 14, 2014 1:28 PM, "bruce" wrote: > > Hey pete! > > basically, starting to see exactly what a dual boot process is, how it > works, how the cfg file is setup, etc.. > > and as I understand the drive, once can create different partitions, > which can then be split to have multiple boot proces

Re: [389-users] Only username as bind dn

If you want to be able to map the simple username "myUser" to say, "uid=myUser,cn=Users,dc=mycompany,dc=net", you probably are best off using SSSD to handle that. SSSD can be configured to know where to search and how to apply the supplied username to the search (i.e. to look for anything under cn=

Re: [389-users] The admin server: failed to get a socket for 0.0.0.0

SELinux enabled? On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 4:30 AM, Jan Tomasek wrote: > Hello, > > I'm trying to install new LDAP server and facing strange errors: > > [14/01/15:04:47:03] - [Setup] Info Updating the configuration for the >> httpd engine . . . >> [14/01/15:04:47:03] - [Setup] Warning Error: com

Re: qcad

On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 11:54 AM, Patrick Dupre wrote: > > > > On Wed, 15 Jan 2014 10:52:05 -0600 > > Richard Shaw wrote: > > > > > > Without specifics I don't even know if the situation is different > > > > now with > > > the 3.X releases. If LibreCAD is a good replacement then there may be > >

How can I make systemd stop grabbing NFS mounts?

I go to a lot of trouble to NOT mount NFS at boot because many test systems here are often down and I don't want to timeout when trying to mount things. I can still mount things manually when I need them, but now systemd screws up my life by saying "Ah-HA! Here's an NFS mount! I'll make a unit for

Re: qcad

Thank Richard, Is librecad srpm available somewhere? The bad thing with qcad is that runiing from a remote machine (fedora 18) it even kill the local fedora 20 session!! Why that? I also tried FreeCAD, but my dxf files seem to be barely compatible. I even cannot get the font displyed! > > > > >

Re: qcad

On Wed, 15 Jan 2014, Richard Shaw wrote: On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 8:56 AM, Frank Murphy wrote: On Wed, 15 Jan 2014 08:54:19 -0600 Richard Shaw wrote: https://github.com/qcad/qcad/blob/master/fonts/hershey.readme ? I guess this is what I find confusing... This indicates it's

Re: Audio problems

On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 11:17:20AM +, Christopher Ross wrote: > > This could be related to a regression I am seeing on Fedora 20. > Pretty much every time a user logs in (or switch user) on Fedora 20 > with KDE the audio output defaults to "headphones" and I have to > manually change it to "li

Re: qcad

On 01/15/2014 11:52 AM, Richard Shaw wrote: On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 10:46 AM, Frank Murphy > wrote: On Wed, 15 Jan 2014 10:44:56 -0600 Richard Shaw mailto:hobbes1...@gmail.com>> wrote: estrictions being bad in general, the two listed don't appear to

Re: How can I make systemd stop grabbing NFS mounts?

Tom Horsley wrote: How do I make it stop? How do I get systemd to leave NFS mounts utterly and completely alone? I DO NOT CARE if they are properly unmounted by crossing all I's and dotting all T's. I just want to frigging REBOOT! Add "noauto" to the mount options of the NFS share in your fstab

Re: Is this an RPMFusion problem? librtmp.so conflict

On Jan 15, 2014 8:00 AM, "Steven Stern" wrote: > > $sudo yum update > > Loaded plugins: langpacks, refresh-packagekit > Resolving Dependencies > --> Running transaction check > ---> Package gstreamer-plugins-bad.x86_64 0:0.10.23-4.fc20 will be updated > ---> Package gstreamer-plugins-bad.x86_64 0:

Re: How can I make systemd stop grabbing NFS mounts?

Michael Cronenworth wrote: Tom Horsley wrote: How do I make it stop? How do I get systemd to leave NFS mounts utterly and completely alone? I DO NOT CARE if they are properly unmounted by crossing all I's and dotting all T's. I just want to frigging REBOOT! Add "noauto" to the mount options of

Re: Audio problems

On 01/15/2014 01:54 PM, Darryl L. Pierce wrote: On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 11:17:20AM +, Christopher Ross wrote: This could be related to a regression I am seeing on Fedora 20. Pretty much every time a user logs in (or switch user) on Fedora 20 with KDE the audio output defaults to "headphones

Re: How can I make systemd stop grabbing NFS mounts?

On Wed, 15 Jan 2014 13:27:26 -0600 Michael Cronenworth wrote: > Add "noauto" to the mount options of the NFS share in your fstab. They do all have noauto, the problem is that when I manually mount it after the system is up, systemd "helpfully" creates a .mount unit dynamically which then causes i

Re: Is this an RPMFusion problem? librtmp.so conflict

On 01/15/2014 01:35 PM, Pete Travis wrote: > > On Jan 15, 2014 8:00 AM, "Steven Stern" > wrote: >> >> $sudo yum update >> >> Loaded plugins: langpacks, refresh-packagekit >> Resolving Dependencies >> --> Running transaction check >> ---> Package gstreamer-pl

Re: How can I make systemd stop grabbing NFS mounts?

On Jan 15, 2014 12:46 PM, "Tom Horsley" wrote: > > On Wed, 15 Jan 2014 13:27:26 -0600 > Michael Cronenworth wrote: > > > Add "noauto" to the mount options of the NFS share in your fstab. > > They do all have noauto, the problem is that when I manually > mount it after the system is up, systemd "he

Re: Is this an RPMFusion problem? librtmp.so conflict

On Jan 15, 2014 12:52 PM, "Steven Stern" wrote: > > On 01/15/2014 01:35 PM, Pete Travis wrote: > > > > On Jan 15, 2014 8:00 AM, "Steven Stern" > > wrote: > >> > >> $sudo yum update > >> > >> Loaded plugins: langpacks, refresh-packagekit > >> Resolving Depend

Re: Is this an RPMFusion problem? librtmp.so conflict

On Wed, 15 Jan 2014 12:35:10 -0700, Pete Travis wrote: > > Error: Package: mplayer-1.1-16.20131125svn.fc20.x86_64 (installed) > >Requires: librtmp.so.0()(64bit) > >Removing: librtmp-2.4-0.3.20110811gitc58cfb3e.fc19.x86_64 > > (installed) > >librtmp.so.0()(64

Re: How can I make systemd stop grabbing NFS mounts?

On Wed, 15 Jan 2014 12:55:19 -0700 Pete Travis wrote: > I'm not clear on why the creation of a mount unit is the culprit here. > Hasn't of always been the case that filesystems are unmounted during > shutdown? Hasn't unmounting of unavailable NFS mounts always hung until > timeout? Not when it wa

Re: Is this an RPMFusion problem? librtmp.so conflict

On 01/15/2014 12:06 PM, Pete Travis issued this missive: On Jan 15, 2014 12:52 PM, "Steven Stern" mailto:subscribed-li...@sterndata.com>> wrote: > > On 01/15/2014 01:35 PM, Pete Travis wrote: > > > > On Jan 15, 2014 8:00 AM, "Steven Stern" mailto:subscribed-li...@sterndata.com> > >

Re: Is this an RPMFusion problem? librtmp.so conflict

On Jan 15, 2014 1:51 PM, "Rick Stevens" wrote: > > On 01/15/2014 12:06 PM, Pete Travis issued this missive: >> >> >> On Jan 15, 2014 12:52 PM, "Steven Stern" > > wrote: >> > >> > On 01/15/2014 01:35 PM, Pete Travis wrote: >> > > >> > > On Jan 15, 2014 8:0

Re: Is this an RPMFusion problem? librtmp.so conflict

On Wed, 15 Jan 2014 12:50:37 -0800 Rick Stevens wrote: > > OK, that's the same sort of issue. Still just a mixup of package > > versions on *your* system. Probably not a packaging fault. Going ahead > > with the distro-sync should take care of such things in the future. > > > > If packages from up

Re: Is this an RPMFusion problem? librtmp.so conflict

On 01/15/2014 03:42 PM, Susi Lehtola wrote: > On Wed, 15 Jan 2014 12:50:37 -0800 > Rick Stevens wrote: >>> OK, that's the same sort of issue. Still just a mixup of package >>> versions on *your* system. Probably not a packaging fault. Going ahead >>> with the distro-sync should take care of such t

Re: How can I make systemd stop grabbing NFS mounts?

Tom Horsley wrote: Not when it was dead easy to change the init script to stick an '&' on the end of the umount command, it didn't wait then, and even when you forgot to do that, it didn't take hours to timeout like systemd does. But of course, according to the devs, it is a common myth that sys

Re: How can I make systemd stop grabbing NFS mounts?

2014/1/15 Tom Horsley > Not when it was dead easy to change the init script to stick > an '&' on the end of the umount command, it didn't wait then, and > even when you forgot to do that, it didn't take hours to > timeout like systemd does. > > But of course, according to the devs, it is a common

Fedora 20 Desktop hanging

I am using Fedora 20 on a Dell XPS laptop. Since the last software update, whenever I click on the Empathy icon in the Activities menu, or the Settings icon in the status box, the desktop freezes, requiring a reboot. Has any one seen this ? Any help is appreciated Chandana -- users mailing

Re: How can I make systemd stop grabbing NFS mounts?

On Wed, 15 Jan 2014 23:13:34 +0100 Juan Orti Alcaine wrote: > Try to add the mount option "_netdev", it should schedule the mount/umount > after/before the network. That does nothing useful, it is still going to try and unmount it. I want it to ignore it utterly because the umount will take fore

Re: Fedora 20 Desktop hanging

On 01/15/2014 02:22 PM, Chandana De Silva wrote: Any help is appreciated Are you able to ssh in from a second box? If so, try running top and see what happens when things freeze up. -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://adm

Re: How can I make systemd stop grabbing NFS mounts?

On 01/16/14 06:24, Tom Horsley wrote: > On Wed, 15 Jan 2014 23:13:34 +0100 > Juan Orti Alcaine wrote: > >> Try to add the mount option "_netdev", it should schedule the mount/umount >> after/before the network. > That does nothing useful, it is still going to try and unmount it. > I want it to ign

Re: How can I make systemd stop grabbing NFS mounts?

> Well, you could always make a wrapper around a shutdown command and use > "umount -f" as in "force". > Something like that might work if this bugfix has made it into the current kernel (it probably has, we're on 3.12 now): https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=980088 But what I'd reall

Re: How can I make systemd stop grabbing NFS mounts?

On 01/16/14 07:09, Tom Horsley wrote: >> Well, you could always make a wrapper around a shutdown command and use >> "umount -f" as in "force". >> > Something like that might work if this bugfix has made it into > the current kernel (it probably has, we're on 3.12 now): > > https://bugzilla.redhat.

Re: off topic - switching email

On 01/14/2014 09:13 PM, g issued this missive: hello richard, On 01/14/2014 09:47 PM, Richard Vickery wrote: Hi Gang, I want to change the email address to the lists that I am on; I could just add the new email to the list, but conceivably I want to rid the list of this address in favour of m

Xsane only as root -

Xsane can only find the scanner as root. Bus 001 Device 003: ID 04a9:1909 Canon, Inc. CanoScan LiDE 110 This is an F-20 64 bit xfce system. I can probably get by this way but it is inconvenient. What do I need to change? Bob -- http://www.qrz.com/db/w2bod Box10 Fedora-20/64bit Linux -- u

Re: off topic - switching email

On 01/15/2014 05:34 PM, Rick Stevens wrote: <> Note that you SHOULD receive an email from the list on the first of every month reminding you of your username and password to use in the link "G" gave you above (just in case you don't remember it or don't have something like keypassx to track it

Re: Xsane only as root -

On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 06:35:26PM -0500, Bob Goodwin - Zuni, Virginia, USA wrote: > > > Xsane can only find the scanner as root. > > Bus 001 Device 003: ID 04a9:1909 Canon, Inc. CanoScan LiDE 110 > > This is an F-20 64 bit xfce system. I can probably get by this way > but it is inconvenient.

Fedora - Windows 8/8.1 dual boot

Has anyone successfully installed Fedora 18, 19 or 20 in dual boot with Windows 8/8.1 ? How does the installation process differ from setting up a Fedora/Windows 7 or XP dual boot ? Are there pitfalls one should know about ?-- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or ch

Re: Fedora 20 Desktop hanging

Thank you very much for that suggestion. The culprit seems to be the xorg intel driver, which got updated two days ago, after which noticed this problem. sudo grep -P "xorg|ply|nouv" /var/log/yum.log Jan 14 08:56:56 Updated: abrt-addon-xorg-2.1.11-1.fc20.x86_64 Jan 14 08:57:51 Updated: xorg-x1

F20 USB install broken?

Hi, I was trying to install Fedora 20 on a Dell Latitute e6530 using a USB stick. It doesn't work. Various errors occur. From "USB device will not accept address" during initial boot, to being dropped to a dracut shell with a similar error, to "Cannot find a suitable stage1 device" after the inst

Re: Fedora - Windows 8/8.1 dual boot

- Original Message - From: "Quicksort" To: "Fedora users list support for Fedora users" Sent: Wednesday, 15 January, 2014 16:40:11 Subject: Fedora - Windows 8/8.1 dual boot Has anyone successfully installed Fedora 18, 19 or 20 in dual boot with Windows 8/8.1 ? How does the installa

Re: F20 USB install broken?

- Original Message - From: "Dan Irwin" To: "Community support for Fedora users" Sent: Wednesday, 15 January, 2014 19:16:13 Subject: F20 USB install broken? Hi, I was trying to install Fedora 20 on a Dell Latitute e6530 using a USB stick. It doesn't work. Various errors occur. From "

Re: Xsane only as root

> > > Xsane can only find the scanner as root. > > Bus 001 Device 003: ID 04a9:1909 Canon, Inc. CanoScan LiDE 110 > > This is an F-20 64 bit xfce system. I can probably get by this way but > it is inconvenient. > > What do I need to change? > > Bob > It is a udev problem. I had a similar

Re: Fedora - Windows 8/8.1 dual boot

On Jan 15, 2014, at 8:38 PM, Richard Vickery wrote: > - Original Message - > From: "Quicksort" > To: "Fedora users list support for Fedora users" > > Sent: Wednesday, 15 January, 2014 16:40:11 > Subject: Fedora - Windows 8/8.1 dual boot > > > > > > Has anyone successfully install

Re: F20 USB install broken?

On Jan 15, 2014, at 8:16 PM, Dan Irwin wrote: > > Clearly, USB installs of Fedora 20 have issues on modern Dell hardware. Without more information it seems doubtful as it's common hardware. It's more likely that this is a bad USB transfer. I've had all sorts of funky weird behavior with bad

Re: Fedora - Windows 8/8.1 dual boot

On 16 January 2014 06:39, Chris Murphy wrote: [...] > > 4. Most likely grub2-mkconfig / os-prober will not locate Windows, and will > not create a grub boot menu entry for it. You'll need to figure out how to > use the built-in EFI boot manager to choose between Windows and GRUB(Fedora). I had

Re: F20 USB install broken?

Hi Chris, Yes I did verify the ISO file checksum on download, but I did not do a media verification. Some further info, I could only get the installer UI when doing an EFI boot. Doing a "legacy" boot would not yeild a GUI at all, just a dracut shell, and complaints about USB devices not accepting

Re: Xsane only as root -

On Wed, 15 Jan 2014, Bob Goodwin - Zuni, Virginia, USA wrote: Xsane can only find the scanner as root. Bus 001 Device 003: ID 04a9:1909 Canon, Inc. CanoScan LiDE 110 This is an F-20 64 bit xfce system. I can probably get by this way but it is inconvenient. What do I need to change? I had

Re: Xsane only as root -

On Thu, 16 Jan 2014, Michael Hennebry wrote: On Wed, 15 Jan 2014, Bob Goodwin - Zuni, Virginia, USA wrote: Xsane can only find the scanner as root. Bus 001 Device 003: ID 04a9:1909 Canon, Inc. CanoScan LiDE 110 This is an F-20 64 bit xfce system. I can probably get by this way but it is inc