On Jul 13, 2014, at 9:09 PM, Chris Murphy wrote:
> Above the Volume Group pop-up is a Size field, that's for the LV, and you can
> change that from 500mb to something sane.
Desired Capacity. Not Size.
So I just did a pvresize to give up 1GB to back myself out of this stuck state
and it does
On Sun, Jul 13, 2014 at 4:47 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:
>
>
> On 07/14/14 06:28, JD wrote:
>
> Running fc20 64 bit.
> Downloaded google earth from:
> http://www.google.com/earth/download/ge/agree.html
> and at bottom of page, you select the 64 bit rpm,
> and save it.
>
> yum -y localinstall google-eart
On Jul 13, 2014, at 7:52 PM, Mike Wright wrote:
>
> The LVM system has this to say:
>
> PV is 148.53GiB consumed 100% by a VG, extents are 32MiB.
> pvdisplay and vgdisplay report free space 1805/56.41GiB.
> The installer reports 1.71GiB available space. Somewhere between the tools
> to which
David Boles writes:
It appears that the entire Linux world hates your guts so perhaps you
might consider buying a Mac and using Mac OS X?
At the very least might I suggest the you STFU? Since you appear to
not be smart enough to deal with this.
Gee. Are there no moderators here?
Mr. Boles,
07/11/2014 01:07 PM, Chris Murphy wrote:
On Jul 11, 2014, at 1:36 PM, Mike Wright wrote:
Hi all,
Is it possible to install a live CD to a logical volume any more?
Yes.
I've tried repeatedly and just when I think I've got it the installer refuses
to proceed.
What's the filename of th
On Sun, 13 Jul 2014 21:38:33 -0400
David Boles wrote:
> So then tell me where the heck have you have been for the past several
> weeks? All the time this user has been whining and crying over this 3
> or so year old change that he can not comprehend.?
I was not a moderator for this list until th
So then tell me where the heck have you have been for the past several
weeks? All the time this user has been whining and crying over this 3
or so year old change that he can not comprehend.?
On Sun, Jul 13, 2014 at 9:06 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Sun, 13 Jul 2014 21:01:35 -0400
> David Boles w
07/13/2014 06:01 PM, David Boles wrote:
It appears that the entire Linux world hates your guts so perhaps you
might consider buying a Mac and using Mac OS X?
At the very least might I suggest the you STFU? Since you appear to
not be smart enough to deal with this.
Gee. Are there no moderators h
On Sun, 13 Jul 2014 21:01:35 -0400
David Boles wrote:
> It appears that the entire Linux world hates your guts so perhaps you
> might consider buying a Mac and using Mac OS X?
>
> At the very least might I suggest the you STFU? Since you appear to
> not be smart enough to deal with this.
>
> Ge
It appears that the entire Linux world hates your guts so perhaps you
might consider buying a Mac and using Mac OS X?
At the very least might I suggest the you STFU? Since you appear to
not be smart enough to deal with this.
Gee. Are there no moderators here?
On Sun, Jul 13, 2014 at 8:50 PM, Sam
On Sun, 13 Jul 2014 20:37:40 -0400
Sam Varshavchik wrote:
> poma writes:
>
> > Besides why would anyone spend valuable time on outdated network
> > scripts on top of something called
> > http://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man8/systemd-networkd.8.html
>
> yum is unable to find this package. As such
Rahul Sundaram writes:
On Sun, Jul 13, 2014 at 1:18 PM, Timothy Murphy wrote:
One of the problems with NM, in my view, is that it tries to do too much.
This is one of the things that NM addresses with plugins so you can pick and
choose which features you want out of it. Also by integra
Tom H writes:
On Sat, Jul 12, 2014 at 12:08 PM, Sam Varshavchik
wrote:
> Tom Horsley writes:
>> On Sat, 12 Jul 2014 10:00:45 -0400
>> Sam Varshavchik wrote:
>>
>>> Now, here's my hack, which is basically a clone of that NetworkManager
>>> subpackage:
>>
>> You're willing to invest a lot more
poma writes:
Besides why would anyone spend valuable time on outdated network scripts on
top of something called
http://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man8/systemd-networkd.8.html
yum is unable to find this package. As such, even if it's the greatest thing
since sliced bread, it means nothing as
On 07/12/2014 09:14 PM, Stephen Morris wrote:
Hi Mickey,
This might be a moot point, but have you tried deleting the
adobereader profile in your home directory, which fixed my 9.5.5 64bit
reader problem when its execution produced errors about being unable
to read a file?
regards,
Steve
On 07/14/14 06:28, JD wrote:
> Running fc20 64 bit.
> Downloaded google earth from:
> http://www.google.com/earth/download/ge/agree.html
> and at bottom of page, you select the 64 bit rpm,
> and save it.
>
> yum -y localinstall google-earth-stable-7.1.2.2041-0.x86_64
>
> Yum downloaded 34 dependenc
Running fc20 64 bit.
Downloaded google earth from:
http://www.google.com/earth/download/ge/agree.html
and at bottom of page, you select the 64 bit rpm,
and save it.
yum -y localinstall google-earth-stable-7.1.2.2041-0.x86_64
Yum downloaded 34 dependencies, then it burped:
Transaction check erro
07/13/2014 12:22 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
On Sat, 12 Jul 2014 21:00:44 -0700
Mike Wright wrote:
Thanks for the tip Kevin. I deleted the .gnome directories before I
logged back into Gnome3, but I've also logged into Xfce4. So I just
deleted them again and logged into Gnome3. They are not there
On Sat, 12 Jul 2014 21:00:44 -0700
Mike Wright wrote:
> Thanks for the tip Kevin. I deleted the .gnome directories before I
> logged back into Gnome3, but I've also logged into Xfce4. So I just
> deleted them again and logged into Gnome3. They are not there.
> Everything is pointing at Xfce
On Sat, Jul 12, 2014 at 3:16 PM, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
> Tom H writes:
>> "NetworkManager-wait-online.service" has:
>>
>>
>> After=NetworkManager.service
>> Wants=network.target
>> Before=network.target network-online.target
>>
>>
>> Perhaps you should replicate that in "wait-for-network.serv
Hi
On Sun, Jul 13, 2014 at 1:18 PM, Timothy Murphy wrote:
>
> One of the problems with NM, in my view, is that it tries to do too much.
This is one of the things that NM addresses with plugins so you can pick
and choose which features you want out of it. Also by integrating with
existing too
On Sun, 13 Jul 2014 19:18:35 +0200
Timothy Murphy wrote:
> I'm afraid it does not reassure me at all when Dan Williams says
> he will be "granting every wish you dream of".
Yea, and my wish and dream is that NetworkManager goes away,
and network simply gets better support for wi-fi, which should
Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> You haven't looked at the latest release yet I guess
>
> http://blogs.gnome.org/dcbw/2014/06/20/well-build-a-dream-house-of-net/
I'm afraid it does not reassure me at all when Dan Williams says
he will be "granting every wish you dream of".
One of the problems with NM, in
H
On Sun, Jul 13, 2014 at 8:53 AM, Tom Horsley wrote:
>
>
> Probably because NetworkManager still has about 10 years to go
> before it manages to replicate all the functionality of
> network, and then another 10 years before users figure out
> how to use it...
>
You haven't looked at the lates
On 07/13/2014 06:06 PM, Joe Zeff wrote:
On 07/13/2014 08:53 AM, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
Sometimes, thunderbird becomes non-reactive for minutes longer periods
(several minutes), but is back afterwards.
Next time that happens, run top to see if it's working its little ass
off or just taking a nap
On 07/13/2014 08:53 AM, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
Sometimes, thunderbird becomes non-reactive for minutes longer periods
(several minutes), but is back afterwards.
Next time that happens, run top to see if it's working its little ass
off or just taking a nap.
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fed
On 07/13/2014 01:54 AM, Rolf Turner wrote:
On 13/07/14 03:37, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
On Sat, 2014-07-12 at 12:46 +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
You might want to try and find out if those times coincide with your
system operators restoring a backup to their drives. Some SysOps do
a
really
as I know, systemd will start the *.service first! and then the sysvinit
scripts.
I think that can cause the problem. Maybe if you create a foo.service
which point to your sysvinit script and
set the right order in dependency list.
maybe, I'm just guessing.
On Sun, 2014-07-13 at 10:57 +10
On Sat, 2014-07-12 at 11:36 -0400, Tom Horsley wrote:
> On Sat, 12 Jul 2014 10:00:45 -0400
> Sam Varshavchik wrote:
>
> > Now, here's my hack, which is basically a clone of that NetworkManager
> > subpackage:
>
> You're willing to invest a lot more time in systemd than
> I am :-). I just put a
On Sat, Jul 12, 2014 at 12:08 PM, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
> Tom Horsley writes:
>> On Sat, 12 Jul 2014 10:00:45 -0400
>> Sam Varshavchik wrote:
>>
>>> Now, here's my hack, which is basically a clone of that NetworkManager
>>> subpackage:
>>
>> You're willing to invest a lot more time in systemd tha
On Sun, 13 Jul 2014 10:39:00 +0200
poma wrote:
> Besides why would anyone spend valuable time on outdated network scripts
Probably because NetworkManager still has about 10 years to go
before it manages to replicate all the functionality of
network, and then another 10 years before users figure o
poma writes:
> Besides why would anyone spend valuable time on outdated network
> scripts on top of something called
> http://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man8/systemd-networkd.8.html
IMO, if you cannot think of applications, where systemd is
inappropriate, you do not have the maturity to go out an
Actually, I take this opportunity to thanks all systemd associates for their
great effort, commitment and understanding.
Godspeed.
poma
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Fed
On 07/12/2014 10:59 PM, Anders Wegge Keller wrote:
Sam Varshavchik writes:
I think that systemd should not be fixed. I think it should be
dumped, and replaced. It's fundamentally broken, even without this
latest fallout. So, why would I want to report systemd bugs, and
help improve it? I can't
On 07/12/2014 11:38 PM, Joe Zeff wrote:
On 07/12/2014 02:10 PM, Bill Oliver wrote:
Yeah, I know. Thanks for that useful suggestion.
Any time. And, I wasn't even intending to be sarcastic. I wanted to
point out that, unlike Windows, if you don't like the way Linux works,
you're free in ever
35 matches
Mail list logo
