Re: Most efficient way to upgrade a bunch of workstations

On 10.12.2014 04:09, Robert Moskowitz wrote: ... > Well yeah, what with multiple versions, sources, debug, etc. I just > pull down the part of the tree I need. I currently do things like: > > screen rsync -auv --delete > rsync://fedora.mirrors.pair.com/linux/releases/21/Server/x86_64/os/ > /m

Re: Questions about Fedora 14 Workstation

On 10.12.2014 04:37, Jeffrey Needle wrote: > On Wed, 2014-12-10 at 00:58 +0100, poma wrote: > >> On 09.12.2014 23:49, Jeffrey Needle wrote: >>> On Tue, 2014-12-09 at 15:25 -0500, Rahul Sundaram wrote: Hi On Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 3:05 PM, Jeffrey Needle wrote:

Re: suspend broken by f21 update! (hp dv9000)

On 10.12.2014 02:18, Neal Becker wrote: > poma wrote: > >> On 10.12.2014 01:33, Neal Becker wrote: >>> poma wrote: >>> On 10.12.2014 01:06, Neal Becker wrote: > hp dv9000 laptop. > > suspend/resume has worked for many years on each version of fedora. Not > anymore. >

Re: I made potato salad during Fedora installation

On 10.12.2014 03:30, Tim wrote: > Allegedly, on or about 10 December 2014, poma sent: >> When I closed the lid, nothing happened. >> However it seems that Fedora works. > > You forgot to feed the giraffe > Giraffe waving, everything is all right! :) http://status.fedoraproject.org -- users m

Re: Well that went really well!

On 12/10/14 13:57, jarmo wrote: > Tue, 09 Dec 2014 13:45:24 -0600 > Steven Stern kirjoitti: > >> Fedup from 20 to 21 workstation. Everything seems to be working. >> > Has anyone, who uses XFCE4 as desktop, fedupped succesfully? It seems, > that GNOME is going to be MUST? I have some GNOME and KDE

Re: Well that went really well!

Tue, 09 Dec 2014 13:45:24 -0600 Steven Stern kirjoitti: > Fedup from 20 to 21 workstation. Everything seems to be working. > Has anyone, who uses XFCE4 as desktop, fedupped succesfully? It seems, that GNOME is going to be MUST? I have some GNOME and KDE stuff installed with XFCE4, but, I'm qui

Re: pdftk

On Tue, 9 Dec 2014 21:01:46 -0500 Matthew Miller wrote: > On Tue, Dec 09, 2014 at 07:37:08PM -0600, Ranjan Maitra wrote: > > What is the story with pdftk? > > $ sudo yum list pdftk > > . > > Installed Packages > > pdftk.x86_641.44-11.fc19 > >

Re: Questions about Fedora 14 Workstation

Hi On Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 11:08 PM, Joe Zeff wrote: > On 12/09/2014 07:36 PM, Jeffrey Needle wrote: > >> >> Not the way I took it. I installed it, thinking it was a graphical >> interface for yum. >> > > It is a graphical interface for yum, but I gather that when dnf is ready, > yumex will use

Re: Questions about Fedora 14 Workstation

On 12/09/2014 07:36 PM, Jeffrey Needle wrote: Not the way I took it. I installed it, thinking it was a graphical interface for yum. It is a graphical interface for yum, but I gather that when dnf is ready, yumex will use it instead. I don't think that it can do everything that yum does, su

Re: Questions about Fedora 14 Workstation

On Wed, 2014-12-10 at 00:58 +0100, poma wrote: > On 09.12.2014 23:49, Jeffrey Needle wrote: > > On Tue, 2014-12-09 at 15:25 -0500, Rahul Sundaram wrote: > >> > >> > >> Hi > >> > >> > >> On Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 3:05 PM, Jeffrey Needle wrote: > >> > >> My vote: some ability to install whatev

Re: Questions about Fedora 14 Workstation

On Tue, 2014-12-09 at 22:57 +, Ian Malone wrote: > On 9 December 2014 at 22:46, Rahul Sundaram wrote: > > Hi > > > > On Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 3:36 PM, Joe Zeff wrote: > >> > >> On 12/09/2014 12:25 PM, Rahul Sundaram wrote: > >>> > >>> On Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 3:05 PM, Jeffrey Needle wrote: > >>>

Re: Most efficient way to upgrade a bunch of workstations

On 2014-12-09 20:09, Robert Moskowitz wrote: On 12/09/2014 07:04 PM, Robin Laing wrote: On 2014-12-09 19:52, Robert Moskowitz wrote: On 12/09/2014 06:45 PM, Robin Laing wrote: On 2014-12-09 19:06, Robert Moskowitz wrote: On 12/09/2014 06:01 PM, Sam Varshavchik wrote: So, I read the blurb

fedup - luks encrypted system

Hello, In the past, using fedup was a disaster due to encrypted systems. Is this working in F21? Don't use LVM's and partitions are encrypted using LUKS. This includes /tmp swap. /boot isn't encrypted. Have had issues installing in the past with encrypted partitions. Seen many bug reports

Re: Most efficient way to upgrade a bunch of workstations

On 12/09/2014 07:04 PM, Robin Laing wrote: On 2014-12-09 19:52, Robert Moskowitz wrote: On 12/09/2014 06:45 PM, Robin Laing wrote: On 2014-12-09 19:06, Robert Moskowitz wrote: On 12/09/2014 06:01 PM, Sam Varshavchik wrote: So, I read the blurb that strongly advises against doing an iso-bas

Re: Samba 4 support

On 2014-12-09 19:53, Robert Moskowitz wrote: On 12/09/2014 06:47 PM, Robin Laing wrote: On 2014-12-09 18:43, Robert Moskowitz wrote: I was asking about Samba 4 on the Samba list and got the following response about Fedora and Samba4: "If you look thru previous posts to this forum you will see

Re: Most efficient way to upgrade a bunch of workstations

On 2014-12-09 19:52, Robert Moskowitz wrote: On 12/09/2014 06:45 PM, Robin Laing wrote: On 2014-12-09 19:06, Robert Moskowitz wrote: On 12/09/2014 06:01 PM, Sam Varshavchik wrote: So, I read the blurb that strongly advises against doing an iso-based fedup, and strongly encouraging a network-

Re: Samba 4 support

On 12/09/2014 06:47 PM, Robin Laing wrote: On 2014-12-09 18:43, Robert Moskowitz wrote: I was asking about Samba 4 on the Samba list and got the following response about Fedora and Samba4: "If you look thru previous posts to this forum you will see that Samba 4 uses Heimdal Kerberos libraries

Re: Most efficient way to upgrade a bunch of workstations

On 12/09/2014 06:45 PM, Robin Laing wrote: On 2014-12-09 19:06, Robert Moskowitz wrote: On 12/09/2014 06:01 PM, Sam Varshavchik wrote: So, I read the blurb that strongly advises against doing an iso-based fedup, and strongly encouraging a network-based fedup in order to yank in all the update

Re: Samba 4 support

On 2014-12-09 18:43, Robert Moskowitz wrote: I was asking about Samba 4 on the Samba list and got the following response about Fedora and Samba4: "If you look thru previous posts to this forum you will see that Samba 4 uses Heimdal Kerberos libraries , while Fedora uses MIT kerberos libraries, s

Re: Most efficient way to upgrade a bunch of workstations

On 2014-12-09 19:06, Robert Moskowitz wrote: On 12/09/2014 06:01 PM, Sam Varshavchik wrote: So, I read the blurb that strongly advises against doing an iso-based fedup, and strongly encouraging a network-based fedup in order to yank in all the updates at once. I have a bunch of machines to upg

Re: I made potato salad during Fedora installation

Allegedly, on or about 10 December 2014, poma sent: > When I closed the lid, nothing happened. > However it seems that Fedora works. You forgot to feed the giraffe -- All mail to my mailbox is automatically deleted, there is no point trying to privately email me, I will only read messages pos

Re: anaconda root= weirdness?

Allegedly, on or about 09 December 2014, Tom Horsley sent: > After being confused by this for a bit, I finally noticed that > the root= line on the default entry said /dev/vda1 not UUID= > > I could have sworn it always used UUID for all kernel entries > in previous fedoras. On my Fedora 20 inst

Re: Most efficient way to upgrade a bunch of workstations

On 12/09/2014 06:01 PM, Sam Varshavchik wrote: So, I read the blurb that strongly advises against doing an iso-based fedup, and strongly encouraging a network-based fedup in order to yank in all the updates at once. I have a bunch of machines to upgrade to both the workstation and server pro

Re: Most efficient way to upgrade a bunch of workstations

On Tue, Dec 09, 2014 at 09:01:22PM -0500, Sam Varshavchik wrote: > Is there a single repository that I can keep rsync-ing regularly, > and use it to upgrade my machines – to both workstation and server > products – over a period of time? Yes. The separate directory trees are really an artifact of

Most efficient way to upgrade a bunch of workstations

So, I read the blurb that strongly advises against doing an iso-based fedup, and strongly encouraging a network-based fedup in order to yank in all the updates at once. I have a bunch of machines to upgrade to both the workstation and server products. Having each one download everything it

Re: pdftk

On Tue, Dec 09, 2014 at 07:37:08PM -0600, Ranjan Maitra wrote: > What is the story with pdftk? > $ sudo yum list pdftk > . > Installed Packages > pdftk.x86_641.44-11.fc19 > @fedora > Is it orphaned? That would be a bummer! I depend on it a lot.

Samba 4 support

I was asking about Samba 4 on the Samba list and got the following response about Fedora and Samba4: "If you look thru previous posts to this forum you will see that Samba 4 uses Heimdal Kerberos libraries , while Fedora uses MIT kerberos libraries, so you need to recompile Samba 4 from scratc

pdftk

What is the story with pdftk? $ sudo yum list pdftk . Installed Packages pdftk.x86_641.44-11.fc19 @fedora Is it orphaned? That would be a bummer! I depend on it a lot. Ranjan -- Important Notice: This mailbox is ignored: e-mails are set to be

Re: suspend broken by f21 update! (hp dv9000)

poma wrote: > On 10.12.2014 01:33, Neal Becker wrote: >> poma wrote: >> >>> On 10.12.2014 01:06, Neal Becker wrote: hp dv9000 laptop. suspend/resume has worked for many years on each version of fedora. Not anymore. On opening lid, all I get is a loud BEEP and a blac

upgrade to f21

fedup --product=nonproduct --network 21 went perfectly smoothly!!! no problems during upgrade, and no problems after reboot so far :) -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fed

Re: suspend broken by f21 update! (hp dv9000)

On 10.12.2014 01:33, Neal Becker wrote: > poma wrote: > >> On 10.12.2014 01:06, Neal Becker wrote: >>> hp dv9000 laptop. >>> >>> suspend/resume has worked for many years on each version of fedora. Not >>> anymore. >>> >>> On opening lid, all I get is a loud BEEP and a black screen. No response t

I made potato salad during Fedora installation

When I closed the lid, nothing happened. However it seems that Fedora works. Hurray! -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-

Re: suspend broken by f21 update! (hp dv9000)

poma wrote: > On 10.12.2014 01:06, Neal Becker wrote: >> hp dv9000 laptop. >> >> suspend/resume has worked for many years on each version of fedora. Not >> anymore. >> >> On opening lid, all I get is a loud BEEP and a black screen. No response to >> attempting to switch VT or anything else I c

Re: Well that went really well!

On 09.12.2014 20:45, Steven Stern wrote: > Fedup from 20 to 21 workstation. Everything seems to be working. > It is very precisely written, can't get to read all- -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/

Re: suspend broken by f21 update! (hp dv9000)

On 10.12.2014 01:06, Neal Becker wrote: > hp dv9000 laptop. > > suspend/resume has worked for many years on each version of fedora. Not > anymore. > > On opening lid, all I get is a loud BEEP and a black screen. No response to > attempting to switch VT or anything else I can think of trying.

Re: Cannot change the brightness on my laptop

On 10.12.2014 00:49, Joe Zeff wrote: > On 12/09/2014 03:13 PM, Paul Smith wrote: >> I have just installed Fedora 21 Spin XFCE on my laptop. >> >> Unfortunately, I cannot adjust the screen brightness in the settings: >> I change the brightness in the Settings, but nothing happens. > > This may well

Re: Questions about Fedora 14 Workstation

On Tue, 2014-12-09 at 14:50 -0800, Jeffrey Needle wrote: > On Tue, 2014-12-09 at 20:46 +, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > > > On Tue, 2014-12-09 at 18:55 +, Bill Oliver wrote: > > > So you really mean Fedora 14? I don't think that's supported, though > > > I may be wrong. > > > > Nothing ea

suspend broken by f21 update! (hp dv9000)

hp dv9000 laptop. suspend/resume has worked for many years on each version of fedora. Not anymore. On opening lid, all I get is a loud BEEP and a black screen. No response to attempting to switch VT or anything else I can think of trying. Any idea how to debug? -- -- Those who don't unders

Re: Questions about Fedora 14 Workstation

On 09.12.2014 23:49, Jeffrey Needle wrote: > On Tue, 2014-12-09 at 15:25 -0500, Rahul Sundaram wrote: >> >> >> Hi >> >> >> On Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 3:05 PM, Jeffrey Needle wrote: >> >> My vote: some ability to install whatever is available in the >> repositories, without having to ju

Re: Questions about Fedora 14 Workstation

On 10.12.2014 00:47, Joe Zeff wrote: > On 12/09/2014 02:57 PM, Ian Malone wrote: >> This is just a guess, but looks like Joe thought you were suggesting >> using yumex to search for a graphical interface. > > No, I misread what he wrote and thought he was saying that yumex wasn't > a GUI. > "GU

Re: Cannot change the brightness on my laptop

On 12/09/2014 03:13 PM, Paul Smith wrote: I have just installed Fedora 21 Spin XFCE on my laptop. Unfortunately, I cannot adjust the screen brightness in the settings: I change the brightness in the Settings, but nothing happens. This may well be specific to Xfce, not Fedora. You might want t

Re: Cannot change the brightness on my laptop

On Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 11:13 PM, Paul Smith wrote: > I have just installed Fedora 21 Spin XFCE on my laptop. > > Unfortunately, I cannot adjust the screen brightness in the settings: > I change the brightness in the Settings, but nothing happens. > > Any ideas? After having installed and run xba

Re: Questions about Fedora 14 Workstation

On 12/09/2014 02:57 PM, Ian Malone wrote: This is just a guess, but looks like Joe thought you were suggesting using yumex to search for a graphical interface. No, I misread what he wrote and thought he was saying that yumex wasn't a GUI. -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To

Re: Questions about Fedora 14 Workstation

Hi On Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 5:57 PM, Ian Malone wrote: > > This is just a guess, but looks like Joe thought you were suggesting > using yumex to search for a graphical interface > Ah, I see. I was suggesting that the user either use the command line (ie) dnf or yum directly or use yumex if the us

Cannot change the brightness on my laptop

Dear All, I have just installed Fedora 21 Spin XFCE on my laptop. Unfortunately, I cannot adjust the screen brightness in the settings: I change the brightness in the Settings, but nothing happens. Any ideas? Thanks in advance, Paul -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsub

Re: Questions about Fedora 14 Workstation

On 9 December 2014 at 22:46, Rahul Sundaram wrote: > Hi > > On Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 3:36 PM, Joe Zeff wrote: >> >> On 12/09/2014 12:25 PM, Rahul Sundaram wrote: >>> >>> On Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 3:05 PM, Jeffrey Needle wrote: >>> >>> __ >>> My vote: some ability to install whatever is availab

Re: Questions about Fedora 14 Workstation

On Tue, 2014-12-09 at 15:25 -0500, Rahul Sundaram wrote: > > > Hi > > > On Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 3:05 PM, Jeffrey Needle wrote: > > My vote: some ability to install whatever is available in the > repositories, without having to jump all over the place to > find stuff. >

Re: Questions about Fedora 14 Workstation

On Tue, 2014-12-09 at 20:46 +, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > On Tue, 2014-12-09 at 18:55 +, Bill Oliver wrote: > > So you really mean Fedora 14? I don't think that's supported, though > > I may be wrong. > > Nothing earlier than F19 is supported, and in a month or so F19 won't be > either

Re: Questions about Fedora 14 Workstation

Hi On Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 3:36 PM, Joe Zeff wrote: > On 12/09/2014 12:25 PM, Rahul Sundaram wrote: > >> On Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 3:05 PM, Jeffrey Needle wrote: >> >> __ >> My vote: some ability to install whatever is available in the >> repositories, without having to jump all over the

Re: Well that went really well!

On Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 1:46 PM, Steven Stern wrote: > I just ignored the iced-tea stuff and will wait until it causes some > sort of problem > I didn't want to do that because I actually do use the icedtea plugin. It's how Firefox handles Java applets, such as those launched by the IPMI consoles

Re: anaconda root= weirdness?

On Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 11:32 AM, Tom Horsley wrote: > When I copied my f21 KVM image to a real partition and edited > the UUIDs and msdos partition numbers that were laying around, > I found I could only boot the rescue menu entry, the default > one wouldn't work. > > After being confused by this

Re: Questions about Fedora 14 Workstation

On Tue, Dec 09, 2014 at 08:46:17PM +, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > > So you really mean Fedora 14? I don't think that's supported, though > > I may be wrong. > Nothing earlier than F19 is supported, and in a month or so F19 won't be > either, judging from historical practice. Judging from pol

remove "sharing files via bluetooth" bar in Nautilus

How do I get rid of that bar when I'm in my Downloads directory? see http://imgur.com/obBA0EQ -- -- Steve -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fe

Re: yum update issue

ok i know what is the problem. for an unknown reason, first i had to write: yum clean all and next yum update like that everything works well Best Regards Alain R. The information contained in this e-mail message is privileged and confidential and is for the exclusive use of the addressee. Th

yum update issue

Hi, i've just installed Fedora 21 x64 in a virtualbox (as usual) for test. while running a "yum update" command i get "cannot retrieve metalink for repository: fedora/21/x86_64. Please verify its path and try again" it is a fresh install, so i guess the path is missing in yum.conf file. -- B

Re: Well that went really well!

On 12/09/2014 02:42 PM, Greg Woods wrote: > > > On Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 12:45 PM, Steven Stern > mailto:subscribed-li...@sterndata.com>> > wrote: > > Fedup from 20 to 21 workstation. Everything seems to be working. > > > I ran into problems with the rpm-gpg keys, I ended up having to use >

Re: Questions about Fedora 14 Workstation

On Tue, 2014-12-09 at 18:55 +, Bill Oliver wrote: > So you really mean Fedora 14? I don't think that's supported, though > I may be wrong. Nothing earlier than F19 is supported, and in a month or so F19 won't be either, judging from historical practice. poc -- users mailing list users@list

Re: Well that went really well!

On Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 12:45 PM, Steven Stern < subscribed-li...@sterndata.com> wrote: > Fedup from 20 to 21 workstation. Everything seems to be working. > I ran into problems with the rpm-gpg keys, I ended up having to use --nogpgcheck on fedup to get the upgrade to work. I also had a dependenc

Re: Questions about Fedora 14 Workstation

On 12/09/2014 12:25 PM, Rahul Sundaram wrote: On Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 3:05 PM, Jeffrey Needle wrote: __ My vote: some ability to install whatever is available in the repositories, without having to jump all over the place to find stuff. Either command line or yumex for a graphical

Re: Questions about Fedora 14 Workstation

Hi On Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 3:05 PM, Jeffrey Needle wrote: > My vote: some ability to install whatever is available in the > repositories, without having to jump all over the place to find stuff. > Either command line or yumex for a graphical interface can help with that Rahul -- users mailing

Re: rpmfusion akmod-nvidia and kmodtools

On Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 11:37 PM, Tom Horsley wrote: > Got the f21 rpmfusion repos installed by guessing the > URL from the f20 URLs which are the latest listed on > the rpmfusion web page :-). Under "Command Line Setup using rpm" there is link to install RPMFusion repos for Fedora 14 to the most

Re: Questions about Fedora 14 Workstation

On Tue, 2014-12-09 at 14:58 -0500, Matthew Miller wrote: > On Tue, Dec 09, 2014 at 11:07:11AM -0800, Jeffrey Needle wrote: > > So, how do I discover what's in the standard repositories? Yes, I used > > Software Center, thinking everything would be there. > > There's been some debate around this.

Re: Questions about Fedora 14 Workstation

On Tue, Dec 09, 2014 at 11:07:11AM -0800, Jeffrey Needle wrote: > So, how do I discover what's in the standard repositories? Yes, I used > Software Center, thinking everything would be there. There's been some debate around this. The idea is that the Software Center is focused on showing the most

Well that went really well!

Fedup from 20 to 21 workstation. Everything seems to be working. -- -- Steve -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

Re: Questions about Fedora 14 Workstation

On Tue, 2014-12-09 at 18:55 +, Bill Oliver wrote: > On Tue, 9 Dec 2014, Jeffrey Needle wrote: > > > Just downloaded the .iso and installed it on my desktop. Really nice! > > > > The repositories seem to be a bit limited, though. No Chrome or Chromium, > > but I've installed it directly fro

Re: Questions about Fedora 14 Workstation

On Tue, 2014-12-09 at 13:50 -0500, Matthew Miller wrote: > On Tue, Dec 09, 2014 at 10:42:48AM -0800, Jeffrey Needle wrote: > > The repositories seem to be a bit limited, though. No Chrome or > > Chromium, but I've installed it directly from Google's download page. > > > Chrome isn't open source

Re: Questions about Fedora 14 Workstation

On Tue, 9 Dec 2014, Jeffrey Needle wrote: Just downloaded the .iso and installed it on my desktop.  Really nice! The repositories seem to be a bit limited, though.  No Chrome or Chromium, but I've installed it directly from Google's download page.  And I need the program gpart in order to atte

Re: Questions about Fedora 14 Workstation

On Tue, Dec 09, 2014 at 10:42:48AM -0800, Jeffrey Needle wrote: > The repositories seem to be a bit limited, though. No Chrome or > Chromium, but I've installed it directly from Google's download page. Chrome isn't open source, and Chromium is a difficult case. See

Questions about Fedora 14 Workstation

Just downloaded the .iso and installed it on my desktop. Really nice! The repositories seem to be a bit limited, though. No Chrome or Chromium, but I've installed it directly from Google's download page. And I need the program gpart in order to attempt a data rescue on an external drive. Not in

anaconda root= weirdness?

When I copied my f21 KVM image to a real partition and edited the UUIDs and msdos partition numbers that were laying around, I found I could only boot the rescue menu entry, the default one wouldn't work. After being confused by this for a bit, I finally noticed that the root= line on the default

rpmfusion akmod-nvidia and kmodtools

Installed f21 workstation (64 bit) from live image. Got the f21 rpmfusion repos installed by guessing the URL from the f20 URLs which are the latest listed on the rpmfusion web page :-). Then tried to yum install akmod-nvidia and it kept puking on installing the kmodtools package because it didn'

Re: nf_conntrack helpers?

Hi On Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 1:02 PM, Tom Horsley wrote: > Should this message mean anything to an ordinary mortal? > > nf_conntrack: automatic helper assignment is deprecated and it will be > removed soon. Use the iptables CT target to attach helpers instead > It is not a message for ordinary mo

nf_conntrack helpers?

Should this message mean anything to an ordinary mortal? nf_conntrack: automatic helper assignment is deprecated and it will be removed soon. Use the iptables CT target to attach helpers instead. It comes out a few seconds after the boot completes on my fresh install of f21 workstation live ima

Re: fedora 20, on my system, actually works only to line command.

On Tue, 9 Dec 2014 18:05:53 +0200 Angelo Moreschini wrote: > So I would pray you to explain: > >- if kmod-nvidia must be downloaded from the Internet or if it is >already on the computer. The kmod-nvidia package must be downloaded from the Internet, from the rpmfusion repository, via y

Re: printing broken by f20->f21 update

Temlakos wrote: > On 12/09/2014 11:24 AM, Neal Becker wrote: >> Neal Becker wrote: >> >>> Neal Becker wrote: >>> I have 2 machines that have both been updated f20->f21. Printing was working before. Now, when I try to print pdf using either okular or evince, all I get are

Re: printing broken by f20->f21 update

On 12/09/2014 11:24 AM, Neal Becker wrote: Neal Becker wrote: Neal Becker wrote: I have 2 machines that have both been updated f20->f21. Printing was working before. Now, when I try to print pdf using either okular or evince, all I get are blank pages. I tried deleting the printer on one m

Re: printing broken by f20->f21 update

Neal Becker wrote: > Neal Becker wrote: > >> I have 2 machines that have both been updated f20->f21. Printing was working >> before. >> >> Now, when I try to print pdf using either okular or evince, all I get are >> blank pages. >> >> I tried deleting the printer on one machine and re-installi

Re: Announcing Fedora 21!

If we could wait a year we can add an extra week. Be patient until all the mirrors are synchronized and updates arrive. Bonjour. -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code

Re: fedora 20, on my system, actually works only to line command.

OK. I understood what the problem is. Since I can not make full use of the computer (now I'm using it with Windows OS) I have difficulty understanding how to apply some of your instructions. So I would pray you to explain: - if kmod-nvidia must be downloaded from the Internet or if it is alr

Re: printing broken by f20->f21 update

Neal Becker wrote: > I have 2 machines that have both been updated f20->f21. Printing was working > before. > > Now, when I try to print pdf using either okular or evince, all I get are > blank pages. > > I tried deleting the printer on one machine and re-installing. This time with > a cover p

printing broken by f20->f21 update

I have 2 machines that have both been updated f20->f21. Printing was working before. Now, when I try to print pdf using either okular or evince, all I get are blank pages. I tried deleting the printer on one machine and re-installing. This time with a cover page. The cover page prints. Th

Re: f21 runs dnf check on every shell startup

Thanks for the hint! bash -x ... complete -D -F _completion_loader [[ -d /etc/bash_completion.d ]] [[ -r /etc/bash_completion.d ]] [[ -x /etc/bash_completion.d ]] + LC_ALL=C + command ls /etc/bash_completion.d + ls /etc/bash_completion.d for i in '$(LC_ALL=C c

Re: f21 runs dnf check on every shell startup

On 9. 12. 2014 at 18:52:29, Igor Gnatenko wrote: > On Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 5:34 PM, Neal Becker wrote: > > I'm sorry, I'm confused. > > The problem is that it seems with every shell startup, some dnf command is > > run (perhaps check-update?). I did not run the command. I don't want it > > to run

Announcing Fedora 21!

Fedora 21 Release Announcement == The Fedora Project is pleased to announce the release of Fedora 21, ready to run on your desktops, servers, and in the cloud. Fedora 21 is a game-changer for the Fedora Project, and we

Re: f21 runs dnf check on every shell startup

I'm sorry, I'm confused. The problem is that it seems with every shell startup, some dnf command is run (perhaps check-update?). I did not run the command. I don't want it to run - sometimes it slows shell startup. What command did you want me to run to diagnose this? On Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 9:3

Re: f21 runs dnf check on every shell startup

which log should I be looking at? What log entries would be relevant? On Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 9:14 AM, Igor Gnatenko < ignatenkobr...@fedoraproject.org> wrote: > On Dec 9, 2014 3:47 PM, "Jan Zelený" wrote: > > > > On 9. 12. 2014 at 07:06:52, Neal Becker wrote: > > > After fedup f20->f21, on ever

Re: fedora 20, on my system, actually works only to line command.

On Tue, 9 Dec 2014 11:46:08 +0200 Angelo Moreschini wrote: > this is the file Xorg.0. > > I asked more assistance, because I didn't understand: > I thougth you suggested to me to create an "environment chroot jail" I never suggested anything like that, you probably confused different e-mails.

Re: f21 runs dnf check on every shell startup

On 9. 12. 2014 at 07:06:52, Neal Becker wrote: > After fedup f20->f21, on every shell startup I see: > > Repository google-chrome is listed more than once in the configuration > > I don't want this check run on each shell start. For one thing, I believe > it is causing sometimes long delays. Ho

Re: f21 runs dnf check on every shell startup

Matthew Miller wrote: > On Tue, Dec 09, 2014 at 07:06:52AM -0500, Neal Becker wrote: >> After fedup f20->f21, on every shell startup I see: >> Repository google-chrome is listed more than once in the configuration >> I don't want this check run on each shell start. For one thing, I >> believe it

Re: f21 runs dnf check on every shell startup

On Tue, Dec 09, 2014 at 07:06:52AM -0500, Neal Becker wrote: > After fedup f20->f21, on every shell startup I see: > Repository google-chrome is listed more than once in the configuration > I don't want this check run on each shell start. For one thing, I believe it > is > causing sometimes long

f21 runs dnf check on every shell startup

After fedup f20->f21, on every shell startup I see: Repository google-chrome is listed more than once in the configuration I don't want this check run on each shell start. For one thing, I believe it is causing sometimes long delays. How do I turn it off? -- -- Those who don't understand re

Re: No video in News or Youtube ?

On 06.12.2014 01:26, Rex Dieter wrote: > Mickey wrote: > >> F20 >> Firefox-firefox-34.0-1 >> Flash-plugin-11.2.202.424 >> >> In Addons/plugins Flasplayer is Always Activated. >> >> No videos in News or Youtube. > > For me, I found that the "Flashblock" addon needed to be disabled before > flash

Re: fedora 20, on my system, actually works only to line command.

this is the file Xorg.0. I asked more assistance, because I didn't understand: I thougth you suggested to me to create an "environment chroot jail" thank you On Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 8:43 AM, Angelo Moreschini wrote: > thank you Marko for your advice, > > I wanted to do (myself) something si