Re: dnf update vs Software Udpates

On 07/23/2015 08:28 AM, Radek Holy wrote: - Original Message - From: "Ralf Corsepius" To: users@lists.fedoraproject.org Sent: Wednesday, July 22, 2015 6:58:49 PM Subject: Re: dnf update vs Software Udpates On 07/22/2015 05:41 PM, Heinz Diehl wrote: On 22.07.2015, Suvayu Ali wrote:

Re: installing Fedora 21 or 22 on a MacBook Air 7,1

On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 8:15 PM, Frederic Muller wrote: > On 07/30/2015 09:00 AM, Chris Murphy wrote: >> On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 7:46 PM, Frederic Muller wrote: >> >>> On a sidenote livecd-to-disk didn't work as the MBA didn't see the >>> stick. dd however did work and booted. >> >> Those seem co

Re: Dell WMI

On 07/30/15 08:50, jd1008 wrote: > /var/log/messages has many messages like these > > > Jul 27 15:39:47 localhost kernel: [18095.720272] dell_wmi: Received unknown > WMI event (0x11) > Jul 27 15:39:48 localhost kernel: [18097.73] dell_wmi: Received unknown > WMI event (0x11) > Jul 27 15:40:38

Re: installing Fedora 21 or 22 on a MacBook Air 7,1

On 07/30/2015 09:00 AM, Chris Murphy wrote: > On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 7:46 PM, Frederic Muller wrote: > >> On a sidenote livecd-to-disk didn't work as the MBA didn't see the >> stick. dd however did work and booted. > > Those seem contradictory. The stick is a block device. In order for dd > to

Re: installing Fedora 21 or 22 on a MacBook Air 7,1

On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 7:46 PM, Frederic Muller wrote: > On a sidenote livecd-to-disk didn't work as the MBA didn't see the > stick. dd however did work and booted. Those seem contradictory. The stick is a block device. In order for dd to use it, it had to show up the same as for livecd-iso-to-

Re: installing Fedora 21 or 22 on a MacBook Air 7,1

On 07/30/2015 01:16 AM, Chris Murphy wrote: > On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 9:07 AM, Frederic Muller wrote: > >> Sorry if my email wasn't clear enough: there is no disk to install >> Fedora to. The SSD drive is simply invisible. > > It's possible it's being misidentified and "stolen" by multipathd and

Dell WMI

/var/log/messages has many messages like these Jul 27 15:39:47 localhost kernel: [18095.720272] dell_wmi: Received unknown WMI event (0x11) Jul 27 15:39:48 localhost kernel: [18097.73] dell_wmi: Received unknown WMI event (0x11) Jul 27 15:40:38 localhost kernel: dell_wmi: Received unknown

Re: F21: infection reported by "chkrootkit".

On Wed, 29 Jul 2015 14:49:54 -0400, William wrote: > I already realized that "chkrootkit" is not bullet-proof. I understand > that *no* security tool or method is bullet-proof. Malicious people are > always brewing new evil things, and security tools and methods are > almost always stuck tryin

Re: F21: Thunderbird insists on calling Fedora list messages junk!

On 07/29/2015 11:59 AM, William wrote: On 07/28/2015 05:25 PM, William wrote: On 07/28/2015 02:17 PM, William wrote: Good afternoon, On 07/23/2015 03:00 PM, William wrote: Good afternoon, Most messages received from this fedora list are labelled junk by Thunderbird. This is even though

Re: F21: Thunderbird insists on calling Fedora list messages junk!

On 07/29/2015 11:59 AM, William wrote: Thank-you Rick. I tried those things, both in Fedora and in Windows. After doing those things, I completely exited Thunderbird and re-launched. No change! Thunderbird keeps on flagging most messages from this group, and only messages from this group, as

Re: F21: Thunderbird insists on calling Fedora list messages junk!

On 07/28/2015 05:25 PM, William wrote: On 07/28/2015 02:17 PM, William wrote: Good afternoon, On 07/23/2015 03:00 PM, William wrote: Good afternoon, Most messages received from this fedora list are labelled junk by Thunderbird. This is even though I whitelisted "From" = "users-requ...@

Re: F21: infection reported by "chkrootkit".

(replying to two posts) On 07/28/2015 05:37 PM, William wrote: On 07/28/2015 01:55 PM, William wrote: Good afternoon, On 07/23/2015 02:56 PM, William wrote: Hi all, While doing my routine patches and scans, "chkrootkit reported the following: (*** snip ***) Checking `asp'... not infected

Re: installing Fedora 21 or 22 on a MacBook Air 7,1

On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 9:07 AM, Frederic Muller wrote: > Sorry if my email wasn't clear enough: there is no disk to install > Fedora to. The SSD drive is simply invisible. It's possible it's being misidentified and "stolen" by multipathd and will need to be explicitly blacklisted. Doing that is

Re: FAIL: Thunderbird: Replying to thread

On 29/07/15 13:30, Greg Woods wrote: On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 11:19 AM, Rick Stevens > wrote: The reply _is_ in the inbox of the gmail account, but without the "Unread" flag It's more than that. I use the web interface for Gmail, and messages from mysel

Re: FAIL: Thunderbird: Replying to thread

On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 11:19 AM, Rick Stevens wrote: > The reply _is_ in the inbox of > the gmail account, but without the "Unread" flag > It's more than that. I use the web interface for Gmail, and messages from myself are not in the Inbox AT ALL, it just goes into the archive (All Mail). Cur

Re: FAIL: Thunderbird: Replying to thread

On 07/28/2015 11:31 PM, Heinz Diehl wrote: On 29.07.2015, Greg Woods wrote: Stop right there. This unfortunately sounds like a well-known Google-ism. If you send mail to a mailing list that you are on, it does not put the message in your Inbox. Though I'm not a Thunderbird user, I wonder why

[389-users] 389-amdin GUI/console :Performance counters->Connection Status display

Hi List I would like to know how can I confiige my console to see the stats for "Connection Status "windows there 4-5 columns :TIme Opened,Started but can't see any fields entries in my 389-admin GUI for thist particular counters ? Thank you Isabella -- 389 users mailing list 389-us...@lists

Re: installing Fedora 21 or 22 on a MacBook Air 7,1

On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 10:07:26PM +0700, Frederic Muller wrote: > On 07/29/2015 08:07 PM, CS DBA wrote: > > I installed Fedora 20 on a macbook air like this: > > > > 1) burned the KDE live dvd, > > > > 2) plugged the dvd player into the mac usb port > > > > 3) held down the option button while

Suspend asks for authentication

64-bit Fedora 21, up-to-date. In the last few days, suspend is asking for authentication. AFAIK, nothing has changed, other than updates. Any suggestions? Thanks. -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/ma

Re: installing Fedora 21 or 22 on a MacBook Air 7,1

On 07/29/2015 08:07 PM, CS DBA wrote: > I installed Fedora 20 on a macbook air like this: > > 1) burned the KDE live dvd, > > 2) plugged the dvd player into the mac usb port > > 3) held down the option button while I boot the macbook > > 4) when it comes up with the boot options choose the Fedo

Re: Update 20 -> 22, failure

Hello, I wish to thank Michael for his help and patience in understanding the issue. It was a bit stressing, but finally done. It seems to indicate that the upgrade from 20 to 22 may not be without risk. My understanding is that the dependency failures which where more or less acceptable with y

Re: installing Fedora 21 or 22 on a MacBook Air 7,1

I installed Fedora 20 on a macbook air like this: 1) burned the KDE live dvd, 2) plugged the dvd player into the mac usb port 3) held down the option button while I boot the macbook 4) when it comes up with the boot options choose the Fedora DVD (it takes a few min before it shows up) 5) boot

Re: Fedora 22 WS live i686 fails

On 07/29/15 03:34, g wrote: <<>> >>> when buying a new burner, remember you want dvd-r to match dvd-r blanks >> >> What does it mean? > > thru out my years of playing with computers, i have read many articles on > what lead up to the current day optical disk and drives from their first > concept

Re: installing Fedora 21 or 22 on a MacBook Air 7,1

On 07/29/2015 07:01 PM, Suvayu Ali wrote: > On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 04:41:04PM +0700, Frederic Muller wrote: >> Hi! >> >> I have been struggling installing Fedora on a friend's MBA as the local >> SSD doesn't seem to be recognized. I found a few posts online with >> various degrees of luck, unfortu

Re: Update 20 -> 22, failure

OK, I guess that I got it: dnf remove kernel-PAE-modules-extra-3.19.8-100.fc20.i686 dnf remove directfb dnf remove pdftk and now it is installing the updated packages === Patrick DUPRÉ | | em

Re: Update 20 -> 22, failure

On Wed, 29 Jul 2015 13:55:47 +0200, Patrick Dupre wrote: > > Is it the same when you run "dnf distro-sync"? > Error: package directfb-1.6.2-3.fc19.i686 requires libmng.so.1, but none of > the providers can be installed. > package pdftk-1.44-11.fc19.i686 requires itext(x86-32) >= 2.1.7-6, but none

Re: installing Fedora 21 or 22 on a MacBook Air 7,1

On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 04:41:04PM +0700, Frederic Muller wrote: > Hi! > > I have been struggling installing Fedora on a friend's MBA as the local > SSD doesn't seem to be recognized. I found a few posts online with > various degrees of luck, unfortunately they never mentioned with MBA is > used a

Re: Update 20 -> 22, failure

On Wed, 29 Jul 2015 13:48:28 +0200, Patrick Dupre wrote: > I run: > dnf remove xorg-x11-drv-ati > > and then: > dnf install xorg-x11-drv-ati > Last metadata expiration check performed 2:29:58 ago on Wed Jul 29 11:16:10 > 2015. > Error: package xorg-x11-drv-ati-7.5.0-3.fc22.i686 requires > xserv

Re: Update 20 -> 22, failure

=== Patrick DUPRÉ | | email: pdu...@gmx.com Laboratoire de Physico-Chimie de l'Atmosphère | | Université du Littoral-Côte d'Opale | | Tel. (33)-(0)3 28 23 76 12

Re: Update 20 -> 22, failure

On Wed, 29 Jul 2015 13:32:49 +0200, Patrick Dupre wrote: > Dependencies resolved. > Nothing to do. > Complete! This is a major misdesign of dnf. It hides some problems and tries to be helpful, but the confusion that causes can be highly problematic in cases such as yours. It is a known issue. DNF

Re: Update 20 -> 22, failure

I run: dnf remove xorg-x11-drv-ati and then: dnf install xorg-x11-drv-ati Last metadata expiration check performed 2:29:58 ago on Wed Jul 29 11:16:10 2015. Error: package xorg-x11-drv-ati-7.5.0-3.fc22.i686 requires xserver-abi(videodrv-19) >= 0, but none of the providers can be installed =

Re: Update 20 -> 22, failure

There are several issues: kernel-PAE-4.1.2-200.fc22.i686 has not been installed! rpm -qa |grep kernel libreport-plugin-kerneloops-2.6.1-1.fc22.i686 kernel-PAE-modules-extra-4.0.4-301.fc22.i686 kernel-PAE-devel-4.0.4-301.fc22.i686 kernel-PAE-devel-4.1.2-200.fc22.i686 kernel-PAE-core-4.0.4-301.fc22

Re: Update 20 -> 22, failure

On Wed, 29 Jul 2015 13:02:27 +0200, Patrick Dupre wrote: > Extra Packages Irrelevant. As explained, your installation _must_ be up-to-date before this command makes sense. Not all old updates are kept in the repos, so the command would complain about old updates found on your machine when you don

Re: Update 20 -> 22, failure

=== Patrick DUPRÉ | | email: pdu...@gmx.com Laboratoire de Physico-Chimie de l'Atmosphère | | Université du Littoral-Côte d'Opale | | Tel. (33)-(0)3 28 23 76 12

Re: Update 20 -> 22, failure

On Wed, 29 Jul 2015 12:52:57 +0200, Patrick Dupre wrote: > parts of the output (rpm --last) According to that output, you have installed updates over the past two days. Surprise, surprise! > kernel-tools-4.1.2-200.fc22.i686 Wed 29 Jul 2015 12:18:06 PM CEST > kernel-tools-libs-4.1.2-

Re: Update 20 -> 22, failure

Extra Packages AdobeReader_enu.i4869.5.5-1 @System PyOpenGL.noarch 3.1.0b2-1.fc20 @System SOAPpy.noarch 0.11.6-17.fc20 @System adobe-release-i386.noarch 1

Re: Update 20 -> 22, failure

On Wed, 29 Jul 2015 12:48:21 +0200, Patrick Dupre wrote: > hello, > > Sorry, but the file is huge even after compression. > It has been through the moderator! > How can I help? I've mentioned http://fpaste.org multiple times before. From "rpm -qa --last" output, only the top few pages would b

Re: Update 20 -> 22, failure

parts of the output (rpm --last) allegro-4.4.2-13.fc22.i686Wed 29 Jul 2015 12:18:21 PM CEST coolkey-1.1.0-27.fc22.i686Wed 29 Jul 2015 12:18:20 PM CEST goffice-0.10.22-2.fc22.i686 Wed 29 Jul 2015 12:18:19 PM CEST iw-4.1-1.fc22.i686

Re: Update 20 -> 22, failure

hello, Sorry, but the file is huge even after compression. It has been through the moderator! How can I help? === Patrick DUPRÉ | | email: pdu...@gmx.com Laboratoire de Physico-Chimie de l'At

Re: Update 20 -> 22, failure

On Wed, 29 Jul 2015 12:20:13 +0200, Patrick Dupre wrote: > > > xorg-x11-drv-ati-7.2.0-3.20131101git3b38701.fc20.i686 > > > xorg-x11-drv-vmmouse-13.0.0-6.fc20.i686 > > > xorg-x11-drv-synaptics-1.7.7-2.fc20.i686 > > > xorg-x11-drv-fbdev-0.4.3-10.fc20.i686 > > > > > > None of them has been updated!!

Re: Update 20 -> 22, failure

=== Patrick DUPRÉ | | email: pdu...@gmx.com Laboratoire de Physico-Chimie de l'Atmosphère | | Université du Littoral-Côte d'Opale | | Tel. (33)-(0)3 28 23 76 12

Re: Update 20 -> 22, failure

On Wed, 29 Jul 2015 11:33:20 +0200, Patrick Dupre wrote: > Hello, > > Maybe I undertsand. > THis is the list of xorg drivers: > > xorg-x11-drv-wacom-0.23.0-5.fc20.i686 > xorg-x11-drv-openchrome-0.3.3-2.fc20.i686 > xorg-x11-drv-vmware-13.0.2-4.20140613git82c9b0c.fc20.i686 > xorg-x11-drv-vesa-2.3.

Re: Update 20 -> 22, failure

On Wed, 29 Jul 2015 11:08:00 +0200, Patrick Dupre wrote: > > For trouble-shooting Plymouth try booting without "rhgb quiet" boot > > parameters. You can remove them inside the GRUB boot menu. > > I never run with rhgb and quiet option > In level 6, it starts Plymouth and stay stocked for ever Ag

Re: initial-setup-graphical.service

On Tue, 28 Jul 2015 22:39:54 +0200, Patrick Dupre wrote: > Hello, > > In the manual (Installation Guide for fedora 22, 6.1), it says: > You can make it display again (after the next reboot, before a login prompt > is displayed), by > executing the following command as > root > systemctl enable

installing Fedora 21 or 22 on a MacBook Air 7,1

Hi! I have been struggling installing Fedora on a friend's MBA as the local SSD doesn't seem to be recognized. I found a few posts online with various degrees of luck, unfortunately they never mentioned with MBA is used and that didn't work for me. Does anyone has (positive?) experience on the to

Re: Update 20 -> 22, failure

Hello, Maybe I undertsand. THis is the list of xorg drivers: xorg-x11-drv-wacom-0.23.0-5.fc20.i686 xorg-x11-drv-openchrome-0.3.3-2.fc20.i686 xorg-x11-drv-vmware-13.0.2-4.20140613git82c9b0c.fc20.i686 xorg-x11-drv-vesa-2.3.2-10.fc20.i686 xorg-x11-drv-evdev-2.8.4-1.fc20.i686 xorg-x11-drv-nouveau-1.0

Re: Update 20 -> 22, failure

=== Patrick DUPRÉ | | email: pdu...@gmx.com Laboratoire de Physico-Chimie de l'Atmosphère | | Université du Littoral-Côte d'Opale | | Tel. (33)-(0)3 28 23 76 12

Re: Update 20 -> 22, failure

On Tue, 28 Jul 2015 23:48:01 +0200, Patrick Dupre wrote: > Hello, > > crash means, > in running level 3: startx (with a new user) > The graphics mode (if there is not xorg.conf.d > directory) starts asking about language and keyboard and > return to text mode (before, it says, Oh no! etc..) Tha

Re: Fedora 22 WS live i686 fails

On 07/29/15 01:55, Patrick Dupre wrote: > Yes it is an issue between burners. > > I cannot switch from one (burning) and another one (read)!!! . is this problem reversible? ie, neither can read the other? this is may be due to track alignment between to drives. > The reason that I a doing that

Re: FAIL: Thunderbird: Replying to thread

On 07/29/15 07:02, Greg Woods wrote: > > On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 4:28 PM, Rich Emberson > wrote: > > When I reply to a thread using Thunderbird, the response never > shows up, but, if I include the email of the person who wrote > the thread I am respondi