On Sat, 28 Nov 2015 10:02:19 -0600, anlarye wrote:
> I was looking at that site just a few moments ago. One of the packages dnf
> (the replacement for yum) states is required at install is Kate4-part which
> isn't listed on the pkgs site for the RPM.
What makes you think that?
Also according to
On Fri, 20 Nov 2015 19:54:25 +0100, Frédéric Bron wrote:
> I get a black screen when I logout from my Plasma session. What's wrong
> with F23 with KDE, nothing works as before?
> Are we obliged to use Gnome?
A whole passel of us have been using xfce for months if not
years. (I still have
On 11/28/2015 10:42 AM, anlarye wrote:
Thank you Gordon.
Glad to help.
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guide
Thank you Gordon.
Your reply has been the most helpful. Some of the others have been outright
insulting. I have installed from source in the past when I couldn't even
find a package in a repository for something I wanted.
And yes it might take more work and more space to build it from source than
On Sat, 2015-11-28 at 09:07 -0600, anlarye wrote:
> Is there a way to install a package with just the bare minimum
> required packages?
>
> I am running a XFCE spin of Fedora 23. I wanted to install kvirc on
> the box. But when I go through dnf install kvirc, the list ends up
> being about 38 addi
On Sat, 28 Nov 2015 10:02:19 -0600
anlarye wrote:
> I was looking at that site just a few moments ago. One of the packages dnf
anlarye
you are missing dependencies of dependencies,
and dependencies of dependencies of dependencies,
and .tons of packages
-m
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryp
On 11/28/2015 08:02 AM, anlarye wrote:
according to kvirc's website, as of version 2.0 KDE is completely optional.
Generally, information that developers provide about what is optional
apply to the application source code, and not to a compiled binary.
Optional features can be selected when r
On Fri, 2015-11-27 at 09:08 +0200, Angelo Moreschini wrote:
> Thank for yours the answers..
>
> What you suggest to do (to work on a my computer and after send the
> work to the web site) would be very good also for me..
>
> The problem is that actually I am able to access to files in my
> rem
I was looking at that site just a few moments ago. One of the packages dnf
(the replacement for yum) states is required at install is Kate4-part which
isn't listed on the pkgs site for the RPM. Also according to kvirc's
website, as of version 2.0 KDE is completely optional. Of course the qt gui
too
On Sat, 28 Nov 2015 09:07:57 -0600
anlarye wrote:
> Is there a way to install a package with just the bare minimum
> required packages?
>
> I am running a XFCE spin of Fedora 23. I wanted to install kvirc on
> the box. But when I go through dnf install kvirc, the list ends up
> being about 38 a
On Sat, 28 Nov 2015 09:07:57 -0600, anlarye wrote:
> Is there a way to install a package with just the bare minimum required
> packages?
You may want to learn about runtime requirements and RPM package dependencies
before starting a topic with such a question.
> I am running a XFCE spin of Fedo
Is there a way to install a package with just the bare minimum required
packages?
I am running a XFCE spin of Fedora 23. I wanted to install kvirc on the
box. But when I go through dnf install kvirc, the list ends up being about
38 additional packages. I doubt that all of them are needed for kvir
thank you all...
my solution was to take filezilla for the movement of of files from the
server to my computer ..
I was not able to understand if it this operation is possible to do in
good and efficient way using BlueFish .
However BlueFish seem useful to work on the files when they were store
On 11/28/15 05:51, Michael Schwendt wrote:
$ rpm -e --test sane-backends-drivers-scanners
$
The simplest way of checking whether there are dependencies on a package.
Yes, F23 GNOME Workstation comes with this package pre-installed (just not
as a dependency). It used to be a bug in at least one o
On Wed, 25 Nov 2015 15:11:32 -0500, Bob Goodwin wrote:
> On 11/25/15 13:51, Rick Stevens wrote:
> > Nope. It's there in F22:
> >
> > [root@prophead ~]# rpm -qa | grep sane-backends-drivers
> > sane-backends-drivers-scanners-1.0.25-1.fc22.x86_64
> > sane-backends-drivers-cameras-1.0.25-
15 matches
Mail list logo
