On 08/09/2017 06:14 PM, Rick Stevens wrote:
You have to have at least two "part raid.somenumber" lines to create a
RAID1, and a "raid" line to define the type of RAID, filesystem type
and mountpoint.
I did. I used a kickstart that was as close to D's snippet as possible.
Have a look at:
On 08/10/2017 10:07 AM, bruce wrote:
> the test was to (1) replicate the results I get from the cmdline.
> and to then (2) be able to pass a input/var to then generate the pgrep
> count results
>
> the initial cmdline pgrep -- pgrep -f 'bash' | wc -l
> -- on the test box, this returns a "50"
hey guys...
appears to be user error... looks like i was on the wrong/older box..
on the updated centos/fed.. looks as i expected... at least for now!
thanks..
On Wed, Aug 9, 2017 at 10:07 PM, bruce wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 9, 2017 at 9:52 PM, kevin martin
On Wed, Aug 9, 2017 at 9:52 PM, kevin martin wrote:
> is the end result meant to be able to pass some string ($1) to pgrep that
> get's counted? knowing what you're trying to accomplish would make it
> easier to help.
>
> ---
>
-
hey kevin. sorry.
the test was to
On 08/09/2017 05:47 PM, bruce wrote:
aa='bash'
xx="pgrep -f '"${aa}"' | wc -l"
echo $xx <<< this dsplays the test pgrep
echo `$xx` << err msg
echo `${xx}` << err msg...
eval "$xx"
or:
echo $(eval "$xx")
In the invocation you're trying to use, "|" is being passed as an
argument to
is the end result meant to be able to pass some string ($1) to pgrep that
get's counted? knowing what you're trying to accomplish would make it
easier to help.
---
Regards,
Kevin Martin
On Wed, Aug 9, 2017 at 8:24 PM, bruce wrote:
> h update..
>
> this works...
>
h update..
this works...
aa='bash'
echo $aa " pp"
xx= pgrep -f $aa | wc -l
echo $xx
however, I can't seem to figure out how to enclose the aa var in
single quotes within the pgrep.
thoughts/comments..
thanks
On Wed, Aug 9, 2017 at 8:47 PM, bruce wrote:
> trying
On 08/09/2017 04:02 PM, Gordon Messmer wrote:
> On 08/09/2017 02:27 PM, Rick Stevens wrote:
>> Right below those "part" definitions, you see "raid" definitions where
>> those labels are normally used. In your case,
>>
>> raid / --device=root --fstype=ext4 --level=raid1 --useexisting
>>
>>
On 08/09/2017 05:47 PM, bruce wrote:
> trying to get the following to output
> pgrep -f 'bash' | wc -l
>
> the var $xx has the cmd...
> something's missing to allow the backtics to run the cmd..
> if the cmd is hadcoded.run, it works..
>
> can't see what the homer simpson "doh" moment
unclear what you are trying to accomplish here. If, for example, you are
trying to pgrep for all processes that have 'bash' in the process name:
#!/bin/bash
aa='bash'
xx="pgrep -f ${aa} | wc -l"
echo $xx <<< shows the command in $xx
eval ${xx} <<< runs the command in $xx
---
Regards,
Kevin
trying to get the following to output
pgrep -f 'bash' | wc -l
the var $xx has the cmd...
something's missing to allow the backtics to run the cmd..
if the cmd is hadcoded.run, it works..
can't see what the homer simpson "doh" moment is!
thanks
#!/bin/bash
#
# ptest.sh
#
# use
On Wed, 2017-08-09 at 19:48 +, Lucas Diedrich wrote:
> Willian, i can make that, is there any manual on how to get the data trough
> gstack?
On the affected master run:
ps aux | grep slapd
Note the pid of the ns-slapd process
sudo gstack &> /tmp/gstack.out
Then send me the gstack.out
On 08/09/2017 02:27 PM, Rick Stevens wrote:
Right below those "part" definitions, you see "raid" definitions where
those labels are normally used. In your case,
raid / --device=root --fstype=ext4 --level=raid1 --useexisting
tells the system to use the first two devices in the "part"
On Wed, Aug 09, 2017 at 02:06:20PM -0400, bruce wrote:
> Hey peeps.
>
> From a fed/centos cmdline...
>
> pgrep -f "foo" | wc -l
>
> will return 0 -- if "foo" doesn't exist in the procTBL, and something
> else if "foo" is running.
>
> The curiousity... When I have a simple php
>
>
>
On 08/09/2017 12:08 PM, D wrote:
> On Wed, 9 Aug 2017 12:00:00 -0700
> Rick Stevens wrote:
>
>> On 08/09/2017 11:52 AM, D wrote:
>>> When I boot into the install there is an error in the destination section.
>>>
>>> I looked at the debug info in the storage.log and there
On 08/09/2017 11:52 AM, D wrote:
I looked at the debug info in the storage.log and there was an
error about sdb1 did not exist. But...
Switch to VT2 (where I assume you examined storage.log) and run "ls -l
/dev/sd* /dev/md" or "lsblk" to see what block devices *do* exist.
You want to make
On Wed, 2017-08-09 at 14:06 -0400, bruce wrote:
> Hey peeps.
>
> From a fed/centos cmdline...
>
> pgrep -f "foo" | wc -l
>
> will return 0 -- if "foo" doesn't exist in the procTBL, and something
> else if "foo" is running.
>
> The curiousity... When I have a simple php
>
>
> $f="pgrep -f
On 08/09/2017 01:48 PM, Craig Lanning wrote:
On Wed, 2017-08-09 at 08:52 -0700, Thomas Dineen wrote:
Gentle People:
I hate to interrupt your Fedora 26 party, but well here goes a
dose of reality from the
USER's PROSPECTIVE!
Yours is not *the* user's perspective. Yours is *a* user's
Willian, i can make that, is there any manual on how to get the data trough
gstack?
Another thing, as i needed to resolve the issue, i had ldapmodify my group
adding the members, using the method below it took like 16 sec. peer user
and leading to un-reponsive system after the 30th user:
*dn:
On Wed, 9 Aug 2017 08:52:59 -0700, Thomas Dineen wrote:
> Gentle People:
^^
That doesn't match the tone you've used in some of your rants.
> I want Text Editors, shell Windows, gcc, gdb , and ddd.
> 6) Yum and rpm: Please print to the screen the directories where S/W is
> installed. So
On Wed, 9 Aug 2017 12:00:00 -0700
Rick Stevens wrote:
> On 08/09/2017 11:52 AM, D wrote:
> > When I boot into the install there is an error in the destination section.
> >
> > I looked at the debug info in the storage.log and there was an
> > error about sdb1 did not
On 9 August 2017 at 16:52, Thomas Dineen wrote:
> 8) Are you on drugs? ... Please consider carefully the possibility that you
> are going in the
> wrong direction!
I suggest you go back to where you purchased the software and ask for
a full refund. Seriously, file a
On 08/09/2017 11:52 AM, D wrote:
> When I boot into the install there is an error in the destination section.
>
> I looked at the debug info in the storage.log and there was an
> error about sdb1 did not exist. But...
>
> When I reboot to F24 then ...
>
> cat /proc/mdstat
>
> md126 : active
When I boot into the install there is an error in the destination section.
I looked at the debug info in the storage.log and there was an
error about sdb1 did not exist. But...
When I reboot to F24 then ...
cat /proc/mdstat
md126 : active raid1 sda2[2] sdb2[1]
961261568 blocks super 1.2
Hey peeps.
From a fed/centos cmdline...
pgrep -f "foo" | wc -l
will return 0 -- if "foo" doesn't exist in the procTBL, and something
else if "foo" is running.
The curiousity... When I have a simple php
$t isn't 0!! -- it's actually 1, or something else if foo is running..
Any ideas why??
On 08/09/2017 09:41 AM, ergodic wrote:
> Amen!
> Let me further add that neither Fedora 26 Live or Fedora 26 XFCE work.
> I had to install Fedora 25 and then upgrade with dnf to Fedora 26.
> Nautilus has become so limited that I switched to nemo.
Then you didn't do it correctly. F26 Xfce Live
On Wed, 2017-08-09 at 08:52 -0700, Thomas Dineen wrote:
> Gentle People:
>
>I hate to interrupt your Fedora 26 party, but well here goes a
> dose of reality from the
> USER's PROSPECTIVE!
Yours is not *the* user's perspective. Yours is *a* user's perspective.
Here is *my* user's
I have to get a new 500GB SSD card before installing on my old system,
so it will be a few more weeks.
I am assuming the OP is using GNOME. The Gnome g-ds are independent of
Fedora and Centos. I dropped Nautilus for Nemo back in Fedora 21. I
dropped Gnome for Xfce with F22. What a
On 08/09/2017 07:59 AM, mitchell@member.fsf.org wrote:
> Rick Stevens writes:
>
>>
>>
>> root@prophead ~]# strings /usr/sbin/grubby | grep "^/" | uniq
>> /lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2
>> /boof
>> /dev
>> /boot/grub/menu.lst
>> /etc/grub2-efi.cfg
>> /boot/grub/grub.cfg
>>
Amen!
Let me further add that neither Fedora 26 Live or Fedora 26 XFCE work.
I had to install Fedora 25 and then upgrade with dnf to Fedora 26.
Nautilus has become so limited that I switched to nemo.
It is a shame!
- Original Message -
> Gentle People:
> I hate to interrupt your
Gentle People:
I hate to interrupt your Fedora 26 party, but well here goes a dose
of reality from the
USER's PROSPECTIVE!
1) First of all F26's performance is very poor. its a CPU hog and DRAM !
I installed F26 in a Virtual Box (VBox)
on a two processor machine and it is so slow that it
Rick Stevens writes:
>
>
> root@prophead ~]# strings /usr/sbin/grubby | grep "^/" | uniq
> /lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2
> /boof
> /dev
> /boot/grub/menu.lst
> /etc/grub2-efi.cfg
> /boot/grub/grub.cfg
> /etc/grub.d/
> /boot/grub2/grubenv
> /etc/mtab
> /boot
>
32 matches
Mail list logo