Re: dnf hold?

On 11/21/17 15:27, Samuel Sieb wrote: > On 11/20/2017 06:31 AM, Ed Greshko wrote: >> Look at the man page for dnf.conf and check out the option "excludepkgs".  >> It can be >> placed either in the dnf.conf or in a specific repo file. > > I'm guessing you have F26.  When I check the dnf.conf man pa

Re: dnf hold?

Samuel Sieb wrote: On 11/20/2017 06:31 AM, Ed Greshko wrote: Look at the man page for dnf.conf and check out the option "excludepkgs".  It can be placed either in the dnf.conf or in a specific repo file. I'm guessing you have F26. When I check the dnf.conf man page in F25, it only lists the

Re: dnf hold?

On 11/20/2017 06:31 AM, Ed Greshko wrote: Look at the man page for dnf.conf and check out the option "excludepkgs".  It can be placed either in the dnf.conf or in a specific repo file. I'm guessing you have F26. When I check the dnf.conf man page in F25, it only lists the "exclude" option, t

Re: dnf hold?

On 11/21/17 13:23, Samuel Sieb wrote: > On 11/20/2017 07:09 PM, Geoffrey Leach wrote: >> Ah. For the record, its -x or --exclude. However,that will, "exclude >> packages by >> name or glob".  I'll give it a try. Thanks. > > That's on the dnf command line, not in the config file. > And, because I

Re: dnf hold?

On 11/20/2017 07:09 PM, Geoffrey Leach wrote: Ah. For the record, its -x or --exclude. However,that will, "exclude packages by name or glob". I'll give it a try. Thanks. That's on the dnf command line, not in the config file. ___ users mailing list

Re: mozilla-adblockplus disabled in FF57

On 11/21/2017 11:01 AM, Andre Robatino wrote: > Are you running Adblock Plus using the mozilla-adblockplus-2.9.1 Fedora > package (not the 3.0.1 upstream version)? > ___ > users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email

Re: mozilla-adblockplus disabled in FF57

Are you running Adblock Plus using the mozilla-adblockplus-2.9.1 Fedora package (not the 3.0.1 upstream version)? ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: mozilla-adblockplus disabled in FF57

On 11/21/2017 10:28 AM, Andre Robatino wrote: > The package mozilla-adblockplus is now disabled in all supported versions of > Fedora, which have FF57 in stable. I filed > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1513731 but no response yet. I > can't find any sign of recent activity by the a

mozilla-adblockplus disabled in FF57

The package mozilla-adblockplus is now disabled in all supported versions of Fedora, which have FF57 in stable. I filed https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1513731 but no response yet. I can't find any sign of recent activity by the assignee, Andreas Thienemann. The last few builds of m

Re: dnf hold?

On 11/20/2017 03:32:27 PM, Samuel Sieb wrote: > On 11/20/2017 03:12 PM, Geoffrey Leach wrote: > > On 11/20/2017 06:31:00 AM, Ed Greshko wrote: > >> On 11/20/17 22:19, Geoffrey Leach wrote: > >>> Now that Mozilla has provided us with its latest and greatest > (sic!) > >> Firefox, I need to prevent u

Re: dnf hold?

On 11/20/2017 05:27:11 PM, Ed Greshko wrote: > On 11/21/17 07:12, Geoffrey Leach wrote: > > On 11/20/2017 06:31:00 AM, Ed Greshko wrote: > >> On 11/20/17 22:19, Geoffrey Leach wrote: > >>> Now that Mozilla has provided us with its latest and greatest > (sic!) > >> Firefox, I need to prevent updates

Re: dnf hold?

On 11/21/17 07:12, Geoffrey Leach wrote: > On 11/20/2017 06:31:00 AM, Ed Greshko wrote: >> On 11/20/17 22:19, Geoffrey Leach wrote: >>> Now that Mozilla has provided us with its latest and greatest (sic!) >> Firefox, I need to prevent updates to firefox. Dnf does not appear to >> provide a "don't u

Re: dnf hold?

On 11/20/2017 03:12 PM, Geoffrey Leach wrote: On 11/20/2017 06:31:00 AM, Ed Greshko wrote: On 11/20/17 22:19, Geoffrey Leach wrote: Now that Mozilla has provided us with its latest and greatest (sic!) Firefox, I need to prevent updates to firefox. Dnf does not appear to provide a "don't update

Re: dnf hold?

On 11/20/2017 09:37:34 AM, John Pilkington wrote: > On 20/11/17 16:52, Richard Shaw wrote: > > On Mon, Nov 20, 2017 at 8:31 AM, Ed Greshko > > wrote: > > > > On 11/20/17 22:19, Geoffrey Leach wrote: > > > Now that Mozilla has provided us with its latest and gr

Re: dnf hold?

On 11/20/2017 06:31:00 AM, Ed Greshko wrote: > On 11/20/17 22:19, Geoffrey Leach wrote: > > Now that Mozilla has provided us with its latest and greatest (sic!) > Firefox, I need to prevent updates to firefox. Dnf does not appear to > provide a "don't update this" option. Any suggestions? > > > S

Re: F26->F27 w/ dnf system-upgrade: Failed to synchronize cache for repo 'updates'

Richard Shaw writes: On Mon, Nov 20, 2017 at 6:04 AM, Sam Varshavchik mr...@courier-mta.com> wrote: Bug 1513111 Thanks for the pointer...  I'm not in a hurry to upgrade so I may just wait for a "fix" instead of messing with the workaround. It is relati

Re: dnf hold?

On 20/11/17 16:52, Richard Shaw wrote: On Mon, Nov 20, 2017 at 8:31 AM, Ed Greshko > wrote: On 11/20/17 22:19, Geoffrey Leach wrote: > Now that Mozilla has provided us with its latest and greatest (sic!) Firefox, I need to prevent updates to firefox. Dnf doe

Re: F26->F27 w/ dnf system-upgrade: Failed to synchronize cache for repo 'updates'

On Mon, Nov 20, 2017 at 6:04 AM, Sam Varshavchik wrote: > > Bug 1513111 Thanks for the pointer... I'm not in a hurry to upgrade so I may just wait for a "fix" instead of messing with the workaround. Thanks, Richard ___ users mailing list -- users@li

Re: dnf hold?

On Mon, Nov 20, 2017 at 8:31 AM, Ed Greshko wrote: > On 11/20/17 22:19, Geoffrey Leach wrote: > > Now that Mozilla has provided us with its latest and greatest (sic!) > Firefox, I need to prevent updates to firefox. Dnf does not appear to > provide a "don't update this" option. Any suggestions? >

Re: dnf hold?

On 11/20/17 22:19, Geoffrey Leach wrote: > Now that Mozilla has provided us with its latest and greatest (sic!) Firefox, > I need to prevent updates to firefox. Dnf does not appear to provide a "don't > update this" option. Any suggestions? Sure it does. Look at the man page for dnf.conf and c

dnf hold?

Now that Mozilla has provided us with its latest and greatest (sic!) Firefox, I need to prevent updates to firefox. Dnf does not appear to provide a "don't update this" option. Any suggestions? Thanks. ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraprojec

Re: rsync from F27 box causes higher (30x) cpu on F26 box?

Hello, this might be related to https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/OpenSSH_Server_Crypto_Policy Can you check what ciphers, macs were used in your Fedora 26 and what is used now? We can probably blame the change of the default cipher, from ChaCha20 to AES256, but I don't have the exact numbe

Re: F26->F27 w/ dnf system-upgrade: Failed to synchronize cache for repo 'updates'

Richard Shaw writes: « HTML content follows » I usually have trouble upgrading because I keep a local repository of packages and because they are shared via NFS dnf treats them as local files and doesn't download them. I've worked around that (F25->F26) by disabling it temporarily and dis

Getting permanentiy in F27: failed to synchronize cache for repo 'region51-chrome-gnome-shell', disabling.

Each time if I'm running 'dnf upgrade', I see: failed to synchronize cache for repo 'region51-chrome-gnome-shell', disabling. Anybody sees this too? Kind regards Joachim Backes -- Fedora release 27 (Twenty Seven) Kernel-4.13.13-300.fc27.x86_64 Joachim Backes https://www-user.rhrk.uni-kl.