Re: Failed to start Load Kernel Modules.

On Mon, Jun 18, 2018 at 5:58 PM Ed Greshko wrote: > On 06/18/18 19:19, Sudhir Khanger wrote: > > I get *Failed to start Load Kernel Modules* during the boot. > > > > Everytime Kernel is updated VirtualBox modules fail I have to reboot > into the new > > Kernel, run the following commands and then

Re: Redshift has an issue with geoclue2

On 06/22/2018 05:00 PM, Ed Greshko wrote: On 06/23/18 05:24, ToddAndMargo wrote: Hi All, Fedora 28, x64 redshift-gtk-1.11-8.fc28.x86_64 redshift-1.11-8.fc28.x86_64 geoclue2-libs-2.4.10-2.fc28.x86_64 geoclue2-2.4.10-2.fc28.x86_64 When starting Redshift, I get the following error $ redshift  

Re: Redshift has an issue with geoclue2

On 06/23/18 05:24, ToddAndMargo wrote: > Hi All, > > Fedora 28, x64 > > redshift-gtk-1.11-8.fc28.x86_64 > redshift-1.11-8.fc28.x86_64 > geoclue2-libs-2.4.10-2.fc28.x86_64 > geoclue2-2.4.10-2.fc28.x86_64 > > When starting Redshift, I get the following error > > $ redshift >     Trying location provi

Redshift has an issue with geoclue2

Hi All, Fedora 28, x64 redshift-gtk-1.11-8.fc28.x86_64 redshift-1.11-8.fc28.x86_64 geoclue2-libs-2.4.10-2.fc28.x86_64 geoclue2-2.4.10-2.fc28.x86_64 When starting Redshift, I get the following error $ redshift Trying location provider `geoclue2'... Using provider `geoclue2'. Unable

Re: Could LightDM be bad?? (LONG)

On 06/22/2018 01:57 PM, Beartooth wrote: > On Mon, 21 May 2018 05:48:24 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote: > >> In actuality you just need one command. >> >> systemctl -f enable sddm   (or whatever new dm you want) >> >> -f = force   which means "When used with enable, overwrite any existing >> conflicting

Re: SSH private keys?

On 06/22/2018 01:04 PM, Tom Horsley wrote: On Fri, 22 Jun 2018 12:45:08 -0700 Gordon Messmer wrote: There is an open bug concerning the fact that if there is an invalid .pub file in .ssh, GNOME keyring won't automatically unlock *any* keys, so remove any old key files. Yep, some forms of keys

Re: Could LightDM be bad?? (LONG)

On Mon, 21 May 2018 05:48:24 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote: > In actuality you just need one command. > > systemctl -f enable sddm   (or whatever new dm you want) > > -f = force   which means "When used with enable, overwrite any existing > conflicting symlinks." > > and no need to use ".service"

Re: SSH private keys?

On Fri, 22 Jun 2018 12:45:08 -0700 Gordon Messmer wrote: > There is an open bug concerning the fact that if there is an invalid > .pub file in .ssh, GNOME keyring won't automatically unlock *any* keys, > so remove any old key files. Yep, some forms of keys are no longer supported because securi

Re: SSH private keys?

On 06/22/2018 04:37 AM, Jeffrey Ross wrote: Fast forward to today, the system had been reinstalled (new hardware, new disks, etc) and I no longer have that ability.  I'm currently runn Fedora 28 and the desktop is "Gnome", I'm sure it is just a matter of installing/configuring/running the corre

Re: better subject

On Fri, 2018-06-22 at 13:08 -0500, Rex Dieter wrote: > Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > > > On Fri, 2018-06-22 at 08:28 -0500, Rex Dieter wrote: > > > François Patte wrote: > > > > > > > Bonjour, > > > > > > such inflammatory subject lines are not welcome, please do better next > > > time. > > > >

Re: better subject

Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > On Fri, 2018-06-22 at 08:28 -0500, Rex Dieter wrote: >> François Patte wrote: >> >> > Bonjour, >> >> such inflammatory subject lines are not welcome, please do better next >> time. > > I know you were joking, but that was a greeting rather than a Subject > line. I

Re: F28 suspend

On Tue, 2018-05-29 at 08:56 -0700, Samuel Sieb wrote: > On 05/29/2018 01:53 AM, Berend De Schouwer wrote: > > I've got a laptop that has started misbehaving on suspend. > > > > About 1 in 10 suspends the laptop fails to fully suspend. It > > switches > > mostly off (screen off, etc.) but some of

Re: better subject

On Fri, 2018-06-22 at 17:22 +0100, John Pilkington wrote: > On 22/06/18 16:28, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > > On Fri, 2018-06-22 at 08:28 -0500, Rex Dieter wrote: > > > François Patte wrote: > > > > > > > Bonjour, > > > > > > such inflammatory subject lines are not welcome, please do better next

Re: better subject

On 22/06/18 16:28, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: On Fri, 2018-06-22 at 08:28 -0500, Rex Dieter wrote: François Patte wrote: Bonjour, such inflammatory subject lines are not welcome, please do better next time. I know you were joking, but that was a greeting rather than a Subject line. poc

Re: Createrepeo faild with error on Fedora 28

On Fri, Jun 22, 2018 at 9:36 PM, Todd Zullinger wrote: > Hi, > > Danishka Navin wrote: > > I noticed that createrepo failed on Fedora 28 under SELinux permissive as > > well. > > > > createrepo /data/dist/localrepo/h28/norach/ > > Spawning worker 0 with 1 pkgs > > Spawning worker 1 with 1 pkgs >

Re: Createrepeo faild with error on Fedora 28

Hi, Danishka Navin wrote: > I noticed that createrepo failed on Fedora 28 under SELinux permissive as > well. > > createrepo /data/dist/localrepo/h28/norach/ > Spawning worker 0 with 1 pkgs > Spawning worker 1 with 1 pkgs > Worker 0: Error: Could not open local rpm file: > /data/dist/localrepo/h

Createrepeo faild with error on Fedora 28

Hi, I noticed that createrepo failed on Fedora 28 under SELinux permissive as well. createrepo /data/dist/localrepo/h28/norach/ Spawning worker 0 with 1 pkgs Spawning worker 1 with 1 pkgs Worker 0: Error: Could not open local rpm file: /data/dist/localrepo/h28/norach//generic-logos-18.0.0-900.fc

Re: better subject

On Fri, 2018-06-22 at 08:28 -0500, Rex Dieter wrote: > François Patte wrote: > > > Bonjour, > > such inflammatory subject lines are not welcome, please do better next time. I know you were joking, but that was a greeting rather than a Subject line. poc __

Re: SSH private keys?

On Fri, 2018-06-22 at 13:54 +0200, Berend De Schouwer wrote: > On Fri, 2018-06-22 at 07:37 -0400, Jeffrey Ross wrote: > > At one point Fedora had something (keyring?) that would allow me to > > unlock my SSH private keys and it would keep the unlocked key > > available > > so I could ssh without

better subject

François Patte wrote: > Bonjour, such inflammatory subject lines are not welcome, please do better next time. -- Rex ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code

Re: SSH private keys?

On Fri, 2018-06-22 at 07:37 -0400, Jeffrey Ross wrote: > At one point Fedora had something (keyring?) that would allow me to > unlock my SSH private keys and it would keep the unlocked key > available > so I could ssh without having to unlock my key every time. I > typically > run a simple "ter

Re: >60gb of reserved memory??

On Thu, Jun 21, 2018 at 09:13:00PM +0300, Susi Lehtola wrote: On 06/21/2018 07:51 PM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: AFAIK Fedora uses the available RAM as a) buffer space, and b) the /tmp filesystem. BTW a slightly more user-friendly way to get that info is with the free(1) command. The joke is,

SSH private keys?

At one point Fedora had something (keyring?) that would allow me to unlock my SSH private keys and it would keep the unlocked key available so I could ssh without having to unlock my key every time.  I typically run a simple "terminal" window and then "ssh " since my key is not retained unlocke

Re: problem with cups-pdf and spool directory under wine

On Wed, 2018-06-20 at 08:54 +0200, Saša Janiška wrote: > Now, there are no more alerts, but where is the output? How are you using cups-pdf? Did you configure a PDF printer, or are you trying to run cups-pdf on the command line? Can you use it on the command line, but not in Wine? Or can you no