On 4/1/19 3:30 PM, Digimer wrote:
I've had so many bug reports to Fedora go ignored, only to have them
auto-close when the version I filed against goes EOL. I rarely even
bother filing bugs against it anymore.
Come to think of it, I have a few of those too. But
they were all non critical and I
On 4/1/19 3:07 PM, Tom Horsley wrote:
On Mon, 1 Apr 2019 11:40:26 -0700
ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
I have several bug reports on RHEL that
are over five years old. That does not happen with Fedora.
Sure about that?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451562
(11 years old now :-)
On 2019-04-01 6:07 p.m., Tom Horsley wrote:
> On Mon, 1 Apr 2019 11:40:26 -0700
> ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
>
>> I have several bug reports on RHEL that
>> are over five years old. That does not happen with Fedora.
>
> Sure about that?
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451562
On Mon, 1 Apr 2019 11:40:26 -0700
ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
> I have several bug reports on RHEL that
> are over five years old. That does not happen with Fedora.
Sure about that?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451562
(11 years old now :-).
On 4/1/19 11:23 AM, Digimer wrote:
On 2019-04-01 11:58 a.m., Beartooth wrote:
On Sun, 31 Mar 2019 20:51:32 -0700, ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
[]
I think that the term "stable" here should be replaced with "buggy".
RHEL is intensely buggy and their bugs seldom get fixed; Fedora has
On 4/1/19 8:58 AM, Beartooth wrote:
On Sun, 31 Mar 2019 20:51:32 -0700, ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
[]
I think that the term "stable" here should be replaced with "buggy".
RHEL is intensely buggy and their bugs seldom get fixed; Fedora has a
few bugs, but they are rapidly taken car
On 4/1/19 6:40 AM, David Dusanic wrote:
ToddAndMargo via users:
Not really. It is the next thing that is stable after the
bleeding edge. Think LibreOffice and Firefox and the kernel.
Are the repo's on the latest version? They are not.
Just the one behind it usually.
I look at Fedroa as up-t
On 4/1/19 6:34 AM, David Dusanic wrote:
ToddAndMargo via users:
But you can do that
with any OS by disabling the updates.
I would not recommend disabling updates. RHEL gives you updates, too but
they are security fixes and patches.
RHEL indeed does do minimal updates. Mostly security
On 4/1/19 4:47 AM, Roberto Ragusa wrote:
On 3/30/19 1:41 AM, ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
I believe they may mean that within a given release there may be
updates which may update
a version of a library which is incompatible with their app.
An extreme case of this would be F29 going from the
On 3/31/19 9:03 PM, ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
> On 3/31/19 4:58 PM, David Dusanic wrote:
>> Sam Varshavchik:
>>
>>> The only bug I'm aware of is the cursor pointer flickering, which is
>>> not even xfce's fault, but buggy Gnome code.
>>>
>>> xfce 4.13 has been fine for me.
>>
>> I understand th
On 2019-04-01 11:58 a.m., Beartooth wrote:
> On Sun, 31 Mar 2019 20:51:32 -0700, ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
> []
>> I think that the term "stable" here should be replaced with "buggy".
>> RHEL is intensely buggy and their bugs seldom get fixed; Fedora has a
>> few bugs, but they are r
On Mon, 2019-04-01 at 12:57 -0400, Todd Zullinger wrote:
> Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> > On Mon, 2019-04-01 at 13:32 +0200, Michal Schorm wrote:
> > > I've got simmilar problem.
> > >
> > > 1) You should use BLSCFG.
> > > that way, you will have each boot entry as a standalone file - which
> > >
Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> On Mon, 2019-04-01 at 13:32 +0200, Michal Schorm wrote:
>> I've got simmilar problem.
>>
>> 1) You should use BLSCFG.
>> that way, you will have each boot entry as a standalone file - which
>> is easily configurable - in "/boot/loader/entries".
>>
>> 2) You have to up
On Sun, 31 Mar 2019 20:51:32 -0700, ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
[]
> I think that the term "stable" here should be replaced with "buggy".
> RHEL is intensely buggy and their bugs seldom get fixed; Fedora has a
> few bugs, but they are rapidly taken care of.
I'm confused, ma
On Mon, 2019-04-01 at 13:32 +0200, Michal Schorm wrote:
> I've got simmilar problem.
>
> 1) You should use BLSCFG.
> that way, you will have each boot entry as a standalone file - which
> is easily configurable - in "/boot/loader/entries".
>
> 2) You have to update the script that creates / updat
ToddAndMargo via users:
Where did you find 30?
You can search for packages and even for the upcoming release and EPEL:
https://apps.fedoraproject.org/packages/
--
David Dusanic
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe
ToddAndMargo via users:
Not really. It is the next thing that is stable after the
bleeding edge. Think LibreOffice and Firefox and the kernel.
Are the repo's on the latest version? They are not.
Just the one behind it usually.
I look at Fedroa as up-to-date, not bleeding edge. You
can get b
ToddAndMargo via users:
But you can do that
with any OS by disabling the updates.
I would not recommend disabling updates. RHEL gives you updates, too but
they are security fixes and patches.
--
David Dusanic
___
users mailing list -- users@lists
On 3/30/19 1:41 AM, ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
I believe they may mean that within a given release there may be updates which
may update
a version of a library which is incompatible with their app.
An extreme case of this would be F29 going from the 4.X kernel to the 5.X
kernel.
Not quit
I've got simmilar problem.
1) You should use BLSCFG.
that way, you will have each boot entry as a standalone file - which
is easily configurable - in "/boot/loader/entries".
2) You have to update the script that creates / updates the boot entries.
which is "/usr/lib/kernel/install.d/20-grub.insta
I'm interested in configuring grub to allow selecting different sets of
kernel parameters at boot time. I know I can edit the boot command line
by hand, but this is tedious and error-prone. (An example might be to
choose between the Nouveau and Nvidia drivers by selecting the
appropriate menu entry
On 3/31/19 10:28 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 4/1/19 1:03 PM, ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
On 3/31/19 9:36 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 4/1/19 12:03 PM, ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
Do you know if 4.14 be in Fedora 30?
Well, if you download the latest F30 Xfce Live image you'd find out it is still
22 matches
Mail list logo
